Talk:Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Viruses Low‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Merge?

Merge virus article into disease article, as per Rift Valley fever virus? Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 11:27, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A fairer comparison would be that hantaviruses have their own articles, but the two diseases typically caused by hantaviruses (Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome and Hantavirus hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome) have their articles as well so the diseases can be discussed in greater detail. Dividing viruses from the diseases they cause is a general rule of thumb on WP because the virus article can be allowed to go in depth with respect to its structure, tropism, replication cycle, evolution, et al., while the disease article can focus more on symptoms, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and prevention. This difference can be easily observed in the HIV and HIV/AIDS articles. While SFTS and SFTS virus aren't modeled this way yet (SFTS has info on the evolution of the virus, for example), I believe they can be developed to do so since they are new. With that being said, I am removing the merge templates. ComfyKem (talk) 10:18, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome, an emerging tick-borne zoonosis - Review in Lancet Infect Dis doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70718-2 JFW | T@lk 13:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Say year, not "recently"

…an emerging infectious disease recently discovered in northeast…

Recent for you, not for me. Jidanni (talk) 14:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome

Merge?

Review

Say year, not "recently"

Navigation menu

Search