Pulmonary embolism probability scoring

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The PERC rule is used to determine if any testing is needed, in those in who the diagnosis is unlikely. The Wells score is used to determine the probability of a pulmonary embolism based on a person's history and examination. There is additionally a Wells score for deep vein thrombosis.

PERC rule

PERC rule
Age > 49 1 0 +1
HR > 99/min 1 0 +1
Oxygen sats < 95% 1 0 +1
One leg swollen 1 0 +1
Previous VTE 1 0 +1
Coughing blood 1 0 +1
Surgery or trauma in last 4 wks 1 0 +1
Estrogen use 1 0 +1
Score

If the final score is 1 or more pulmonary embolism is not ruled out.[1]

Wells score

Wells score[2][3]
Symptoms of deep vein thrombosis 1 0 +3
Other diagnosis less likely 1 0 +3
Heart rate > 100/min 1 0 +1.5
Not moving ≥ 3 days OR surgery in last month 1 0 +1.5
Previous VTE 1 0 +1.5
Coughing blood 1 0 +1
Cancer in last 6 months 1 0 +1
Score

Traditional interpretation[4][5][6]

  • Score >6.0 — High (probability 59% based on pooled data)[7]
  • Score 2.0 to 6.0 — Moderate (probability 29% based on pooled data)[7]
  • Score <2.0 — Low (probability 15% based on pooled data)[7]

Alternative interpretation[4][8]

  • Score > 4 — PE likely. Consider diagnostic imaging.
  • Score 4 or less — PE unlikely. Consider D-dimer to rule out PE.

References

  1. "PERC Rule for Pulmonary Embolism". MDCalc. Archived from the original on 9 September 2024. Retrieved 26 September 2024. Archived 9 September 2024 at the Wayback Machine
  2. Wells, PS; Anderson, DR; Rodger, M; Stiell, I; Dreyer, JF; Barnes, D; Forgie, M; Kovacs, G; Ward, J; Kovacs, MJ (17 July 2001). "Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer". Annals of internal medicine. 135 (2): 98–107. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-135-2-200107170-00010. PMID 11453709.
  3. Neff MJ (August 2003). "ACEP releases clinical policy on evaluation and management of pulmonary embolism". American Family Physician. 68 (4): 759–60. PMID 12952389. Archived from the original on 2007-09-26.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, et al. (March 2000). "Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer". Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 83 (3): 416–20. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1613830. PMID 10744147.
  5. Wells, PS; Anderson, DR; Rodger, M; Stiell, I; Dreyer, JF; Barnes, D; Forgie, M; Kovacs, G; Ward, J; Kovacs, MJ (17 July 2001). "Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer". Annals of internal medicine. 135 (2): 98–107. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-135-2-200107170-00010. PMID 11453709.
  6. Yap KS, Kalff V, Turlakow A, Kelly MJ (September 2007). "A prospective reassessment of the utility of the Wells score in identifying pulmonary embolism". The Medical Journal of Australia. 187 (6): 333–6. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01274.x. PMID 17874979.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Stein PD, Woodard PK, Weg JG, Wakefield TW, Tapson VF, Sostman HD, et al. (January 2007). "Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: recommendations of the PIOPED II Investigators". Radiology. 242 (1): 15–21. doi:10.1148/radiol.2421060971. PMID 17185658.
  8. van Belle A, Büller HR, Huisman MV, Huisman PM, Kaasjager K, Kamphuisen PW, et al. (January 2006). "Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography". JAMA. 295 (2): 172–9. doi:10.1001/jama.295.2.172. PMID 16403929.