Talk:Mesalazine

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Mesalazine.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Methaeoglobinaemia

"Methaeoglobinaemia" is listed as a side effect. Should this be "Methaemoglobinaemia" (with an "m"), which redirects to Methemoglobinemia? Songdog 15:13, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mesalamine

Content moved from mesalamine to mesalazine to reflect the International Nonproprietary Name rather than the United States Approved Name PeteThePill 22:55, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Lialda

The section describing Lialda sounds a little bit like a sales pitch for the drug. The other formulations are not really mentioned much, and it seems to be emphasizing benefits of Lialda that don't seem proven yet. I'm just a layperson when it comes to this stuff, so please take my comment with a grain of salt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.135.207.129 (talk) 16:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mode of action?

How does the drug work? If this is not known, it should be said that such information is unavailable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.238.142.12 (talk) 22:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Asacol is banned now by the FDA and in several countries due to the presence of dibutyl phthalate, I think it is worth mentioning. The ban also suspeciously comes just as the patent was expiring and the new patent for drug Delzicol came. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.242.244 (talk) 06:01, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Advert?

This page supposedly on a generic drug reads like an advert for Apriso — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.176.105.132 (talk) 17:12, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I removed some of the Apriso stuff and reorganized some of the content. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"PENTASA" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect PENTASA. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Whywhenwhohow (talk) 02:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]