User talk:194.176.105.132

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Big beat, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Big beat was changed by 194.176.105.132 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957287 on 2011-08-30T11:40:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:40, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Windchaser. I noticed that one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Buittle with this edit, appeared to be unconstructive, and I’ve reverted it. In the future, please use the sandbox for testing and be sure to provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Please feel free to ask me questions about editing Wikipedia (or anything else) on my talk page. Windchaser (talk) 03:39, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chuckle Brothers, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. January (talk) 12:27, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Culture in Glasgow. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SuperMarioMan 14:33, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:41, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Liam Bull. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 17:49, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Martin Johnson (rugby union). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. noq (talk) 13:51, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Orrell R.U.F.C. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Arnavchaudhary (talk) 21:52, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Natural nasal sprays, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SuperMarioMan 21:32, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

February 2012

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Syria, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:00, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Another one of your stupid acts of vandalism has been reverted. Because of your history of vandalism, your IP address has been reported to Wikipedia moderators. Bantam1983 (talk) 17:57, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

October 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bernd Schuster. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 14:27, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

March 2013

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Geoffrey Hayes. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 17:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Callum McManaman, you may be blocked from editing. Arctic Kangaroo 15:38, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Hello, I'm Faizan Al-Badri. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Gina G, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Faizan -Let's talk! 13:09, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Yorkshire Terrier, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 18:49, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yorkshire Terrier with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 18:53, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your edit but...

Hello there! Unfortunately we need reliable medical sources, like recent review articles, to support content such as risk factors for diseases. An edit from this IP (hopefully you!) added intravenous substance abuse to the article deep vein thrombosis. Unfortunately, because it wasn't sourced, and I can't remember seeing any sources stating this, I am going to revert your contribution. It does takes a little bit of time to learn how to make things "stick" here. But if you learn, then you'll have a lasting impact on sharing your knowledge. Try to use the explanation at H:Cheatsheet on how to cite a source. One could simply copy and paste the information on a journal reference from PubMed like this: <ref> put your source here </ref>. Then the information will be sourced. Feel free to ask questions at the WP:Teahouse. Best wishes! Biosthmors (talk) 16:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Have found a review article and a textbook as the review was a little old. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 15:31, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm Melonkelon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Stan Collymore because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Melonkelon (talk) 23:05, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Growth hormone deficiency. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 16:14, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2013

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lavabit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MrScorch6200 (talk) 13:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Liam Bull concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Liam Bull, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 05:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Liam Bull

Hello 194.176.105.132. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Liam Bull.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Liam Bull}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:29, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Sean Pertwee, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 20:06, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bradford City A.F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:23, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Giuseppe Rossi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —Darkwind (talk) 13:36, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Nahki Wells, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 12:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Oliver McBurnie, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli ^Talk 13:19, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Jackie Stewart, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GiantSnowman 14:19, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Dougweller (talk) 08:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Arabs in Pakistan because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Nigel de Jong, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 10:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of association footballers who died while playing. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. GiantSnowman 15:37, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with...this page Tope Brass. Someone deleted it.

194.176.105.132 (talk) 01:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

As I said on IRC, that article was deleted for good reason. If Tope Brass meets Wikipedia's standards of notability (see WP:NACTOR), in short, if she has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable third-party sources such as newspapers or reputable magazines, I'd suggest you write a new draft via the Article Wizard by summarizing in your own words what those sources have said about Tope Brass. See WP:Referencing for beginners on how to easily cite your sources. Huon (talk) 02:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Chac Island concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Chac Island, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chac Island

Hello 194.176.105.132. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Chac Island".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Chac Island}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Geniac (talk) 11:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to St Andrew's (stadium). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 09:49, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2015

Hello, I'm Eduardofeld. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mangala Fossa— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. E. Feld ^talk 22:29, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Luke Shaw, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2016

Hello, I'm Rrburke. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to David Burrows (artist)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 16:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2016

Hello, I'm Boomer Vial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Rossett School without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Boomer Vial^Holla 13:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 14:52, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 45 Years, you may be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 21:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Verwood has been reverted.
Your edit here to Verwood was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/grey.day.944/?fref=ts) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

References

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Cervical ectropion— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. . Lakeside Out!-LakesideMiners^{Click Here To Talk To Me!} 15:10, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

April 2018

Hello, I'm Dane. I noticed that in this edit to Pelsall Villa F.C., you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Dane ^talk 16:04, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Hello, I'm Kpgjhpjm. Your recent edit to the page List of Premier League players with 100 or more goals appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kpgjhpjm 02:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.