User talk:Urstadt

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome Urstadt!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 47,325,685 registered users!
Hello, Urstadt. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm Jax 0677, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
  Introduction to Wikipedia
  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  Editing tutorial
  How to edit a page
  Simplified Manual of Style
  The basics of Wikicode
  How to develop an article
  How to create an article
  Help pages
  What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:
  Do be bold
  Do assume good faith
  Do be civil
  Do keep cool!
  Do maintain a neutral point of view
  Don't spam
  Don't infringe copyright
  Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
  Don't vandalize
  Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
  Ask a question
or you can:
  Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
  Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
  Fight vandalism
  Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
  Help contribute to articles
           
  Perform maintenance tasks
  Become a member of a project that interests you
  Help design new templates

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your userpage.

Sincerely, Jax 0677 (talk) 07:25, 21 September 2014 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ontological hermeneutics has been accepted

Ontological hermeneutics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

APerson (talk!) 04:07, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image

We unfortunately do not allow "non-free" images except under very rare situations. Thus [1] will likely get deleted soon. We must either get release or create our own. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - @Doc James:: Then why even allow random users to upload? If it's so rare, only moderators should be able to. That's fine. I'll boot up photoshop and draw the exact same diagram for upload. Thank you for letting me know. Urstadt (talk) 08:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Reply - @Doc James: Alright, that's finished and uploaded. Urstadt (talk) 09:39, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Diagram of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Diagram of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 05:25, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - @Future Perfect at Sunrise: Another user already indicated that this would happen. My apologies for the error. I already created my own image and uploaded it to the Cognitive behavioral therapy page. Please, just expedite deleting the non-free content in question in this post. Thank you. Urstadt (talk) 05:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Urstadt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Urstadt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know how to create a new sandbox

I am trying to go into my Sandbox, but when I do, I see a link to a page that was moved from my Sandbox to the site. I am afraid that if I work in my sandbox, I will screw up the page (Ontological hermeneutics). How can I work in my Sandbox without messing up the other page? Thank you. Urstadt (talk) 09:39, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Urstadt, here is your sandbox User:Urstadt/sandbox. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 09:46, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please, permanently ban my account

Please, permanently ban my account. But, please don't block my IP. I'd like to be to keep using the cite. I just don't want an active account for editing any more. Thank you. Urstadt (talk) 23:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Even if your account is blocked you can of course still read Wikipedia. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:42, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging a randomly-chosen admin from Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to consider placing self-requested blocks: @Beeblebrox:. He'll probably just tell you about Wikipedia:Courtesy vanishing but it never hurts to try. 78.28.45.127 (talk) 09:56, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Change the password for one you will never remember. OR
  2. Lock yourself out - Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/WikiBreak Enforcer
Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:57, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ron’s advice is good if you want to just walk away forever, I’m afraid this request does not meet my criteria for self-requested blocks. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:55, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Beeblebrox: Can I elect for the clean slate option? Urstadt (talk) 18:09, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]