User talk:RightCowLeftCoast/Archive 11
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | → | Archive 15 |
Arts Datathon!
| LA County Civic Arts Datathon! | |
|---|---|
|
Please join us for the LA County Arts Commission Civic Art Wikipedia Edit-a-thon. Beginners are welcome! We'll provide training for new editors. Bob Hope Patriotic Hall, 1816 S. Figueroa St., Los Angeles, CA 90015. To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list. | |
AsAm infobox
As I'm sure you noticed, I've mostly retired from editing Asian Americans. Especially with the 30d inactivity logout, I often don't see messages like yours. While I might have weighed in, I lost my patience for those quibbles a long time ago. For example, the Religions listed in the infobox lists just about every major religion except Judaism. At least the too-long list of languages got fixed. Don't hesitate to reach out, but once we fixed the silliness of Dark Tichondrias/Dark Tea, I did lose interest in herding cats. But who knows, maybe something will catch my attention. Wiki on, my friend. Ishu (talk) 21:09, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Dude, thanks for the Barnstar! I suppose it makes me say this. Ishu (talk) 22:02, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Goat Canyon (Carrizo Gorge)
Hello! Your submission of Goat Canyon (Carrizo Gorge) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —howcheng {chat} 21:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Goat Canyon (Carrizo Gorge)
On 11 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Goat Canyon (Carrizo Gorge), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the world's largest curved all-wood trestle was built over Goat Canyon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Goat Canyon (Carrizo Gorge). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Goat Canyon (Carrizo Gorge)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 12:01, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chula Vista, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strike (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much
The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.
By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.
Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.
If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.
Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 11:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT
Asian Americans... what else?
I have been slow-walking my changes, but some feedback would be helpful. I will be notifying recent editors to weigh in. --Ishu (talk) 02:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Goat Canyon (Tijuana River Valley)
On 6 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Goat Canyon (Tijuana River Valley), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that sewage from Canon de los Laureles flows into the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Goat Canyon (Tijuana River Valley). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Goat Canyon (Tijuana River Valley)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 03:46, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Tom Hom
On 7 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tom Hom, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tom Hom. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Tom Hom), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 06:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
The Right Stuff June 2018
By Lionelt
Fellow members, I'm pleased to announce the return of the newsletter of WikiProject Conservatism. And considering the recent downsizing at The Signpost the timing could not be better. The Right Stuff will help keep you apprised of what's happening in conservatism at Wikipedia and in the world. The Right Stuff welcomes submissions including position pieces, instructional articles, or short essays addressing important conservatism-related issues. Post submissions here.
Add the Project Discussion page to your watchlist for the latest updates at WikiProject Conservatism (Discuss this story)By Lionelt
After a series of unfortunate events largely self-created, bureaucrat and admin Andrevan was the subject of an Arbitration case for conduct unbecoming. Prior to the case getting underway Andrevan resigned as bureaucrat and admin. A widely discussed incident was when he suggested that some editors he described as "pro-Trump" were paid Russian agents. This resulted in a number of editors from varied quarters denouncing the allegations and voicing support for veteran editors including Winkelvi and the notorious MONGO.
Editors who faced Enforcement action include SPECIFICO (no action), Factchecker atyourservice (three month topic ban ARBAPDS), Netoholic (no action) and Anythingyouwant (indef topic ban ARBAPDS). (Discuss this story)By Lionelt
Breitbart News, in response to Facebook's decision to use Wikipedia as a source to fight fake news, has declared war on our beloved pedia. The article in Haaretz describes the Facebook arrangement as Wikipedia's "greatest test in years" as well as a "massive threat" to the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Breitbart's targeting of Wikipedia has resulted in an "epic battle" with respect to editing at the Breitbart article. The article has also recently experienced a dramatic increase in traffic with 50,000 visitors according to Haaretz. There is no love lost between Breitbart and Wikipedia where editors at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard have criticized the news websites unreliability and have compared it to The Daily Mail. (Discuss this story)By Lionelt
- There is an RFC regarding Liberty University and its relationship to President Trump; see discussion
- Activist and commentator Avi Yemini is listed at AFD; see discussion
Delivered: 11:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
The Right Stuff: July 2018
By Lionelt
WikiProject Conservatism was a topic of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (AN/I). Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could result in swaying consensus by selective notification." Several editors participated in the relatively abbreviated six hour discussion. The assertion that the project is a "club for conservatives" was countered by editors listing examples of users who "profess no political persuasion." It was also noted that notification of WikiProjects regarding ongoing discussions is explicitly permitted by the WP:Canvassing guideline.
At one point the discussion segued to feedback about The Right Stuff. Member SPECIFICO wrote: "One thing I enjoy about the Conservatism Project is the handy newsletter that members receive on our talk pages." Atsme praised the newsletter as "first-class entertainment...BIGLY...first-class...nothing even comes close...it's amazing." Some good-natured sarcasm was offered with Objective3000 observing, "Well, they got the color right" and MrX's followup, "Wow. Yellow is the new red."
Admin Oshwah closed the thread with the result "definitely not an issue for ANI" and directing editors to the project Discussion page for any further discussion. Editor's note: originally the design and color of The Right Stuff was chosen to mimic an old, paper newspaper.
Add the Project Discussion page to your watchlist for the "latest RFCs" at WikiProject Conservatism (Discuss this story)By Lionelt
Margaret Thatcher is the first article promoted at the new WikiProject Conservatism A-Class review. Congratulations to Neveselbert. A-Class is a quality rating which is ranked higher than GA (Good article) but the criteria are not as rigorous as FA (Featued article). WikiProject Conservatism is one of only two WikiProjects offering A-Class review, the other being WikiProject Military History. Nominate your article here. (Discuss this story)By Lionelt
Reprinted in part from the April 26, 2018 issue of The Signpost; written by Zarasophos
 | Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Out of over one hundred questioned editors, only twenty-seven (27%) are happy with the way reports of conflicts between editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (AN/I), according to a recent survey . The survey also found that dissatisfaction has varied reasons including "defensive cliques" and biased administrators as well as fear of a "boomerang effect" due to a lacking rule for scope on AN/I reports. The survey also included an analysis of available quantitative data about AN/I. Some notable takeaways:
- 53% avoided making a report due to fearing it would not be handled appropriately
- "Otherwise 'popular' users often avoid heavy sanctions for issues that would get new editors banned."
- "Discussions need to be clerked to keep them from raising more problems than they solve."
In the wake of Zarasophos' article editors discussed the AN/I survey at The Signpost and also at AN/I. Ironically a portion of the AN/I thread was hatted due to "off-topic sniping." To follow-up the problems identified by the research project the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team and Support and Safety team initiated a discussion. You can express your thoughts and ideas here.
(Discuss this story)Delivered: 09:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLVII, July 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Need insight on potential vandalism on sdcc wiki page
Hi!
As you know the San Diego Comic Con wikipedidia page keeps on having an ip user post about some convention in Brazil having more attendance. The ip address is indeed coming from Sao Paulo Brazil where the con is being held. No where states it is bigger than sdcc besides what the promoter said. Also, it is believed other cons like New York Comic Con is bigger than sdcc now which makes these edits all the more pointless. I believe the edits are purely for promotional purposes and potential vandalism. I'm a new user so I am unsure what to do. I will undo the edit yet again and warn about potential vandalism. Any insight as to what steps to take would be appreciated.
Gameinfirmary (talk) 02:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Gameinfirmary: WP:LEAD and WP:NOTADVERT apply in this case. The lead is suppose to summarize the article. If it isn't stated in the body of the article, it does not belong in the lead/introduction section. Even if it is included in the body of the article, unless it is a significant part of the article, it would be WP:UNDUE to include it in the lead section.
- Additionally, Wikipedia is not for advertising, which the Brazilian IPs may be attempting to do. Whataboutism perhaps?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:56, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- @RightCowLeftCoast: Thank you for the answer. That makes sense. They definitely aren't attempting to put that into the body of the article. Even then you could potentially make the case that another con has proven to surpass SDCC. I'm not sure how you can communicate with a ip user but I hope they either move on or gather some understanding about how Wikipedia works. I appreciate the feedback. Gameinfirmary (talk) 10:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Gameinfirmary and RightCowLeftCoast: OK, I will stop. But CCXP is still the biggest Comic Con and I WASN'T promoting anything, just saying the trust. 179.98.232.100 (talk) 13:59, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited San Diego Comic-Con, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Balboa Park and Demolition Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Double-double
Thanks for the double-double! Dining on In-N-Out Burger food is one of the things that I've been missing since I left California. (I've resorted to dining on Five Guys food to fill the void.) Mind you, I only responded to dlthewave because he called me out. -JohnAlbertRigali (talk) 18:02, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Silver Strand Training Complex, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Camp Roberts and Susan Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLVIII, August 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for the apology in advance.
If you'd like an explanation why I reviewed some of your recent edits, just let me know. I make mistakes too. --Ronz (talk) 22:52, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
I appreciate your measured responses and focus on finding consensus. Not what I expected, and a huge relief. --Ronz (talk) 16:25, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Event coordinator granted
After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:
- The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
- The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the "confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
- The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
- Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.
If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux Talk 16:57, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: Thanks for the granting of the widget. This is sooner than I needed it, but better early than late.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 16:52, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
John Yoo
Imagine my surprise to see that article tagged for CSD as an attack page. That was an ill advised move. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:46, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- Reading the article, it appeared to me to meet the definition set forth in WP:ATTACK. It is a article about a living person and does not appear to be neutral, significantly focusing on the claim that the individual is a war criminal. It is fine if others disagree with my opinion of the article, but I don't see why following the policy is ill advised.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 03:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
7th Annual Los Angeles Wiknic
Sunday, September 30, 11:00-4:00 PM
Pan Pacific Park, 7600 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90036
Hang out. Consume crowd-sourced BBQ! Bask in the glory of late September in Los Angeles (and the glory
of our new user group, Wikimedians of Los Angeles).
RSVP (and volunteer) here.
We hope to see you there! JSFarman (talk) 02:50, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Join our Facebook group, or follow us on Twitter!
@JSFarman: Thanks for the invite. I will see whether I have the time off to attend this. Interesting to use WP:MMS. Is it more effective than WP:GEONOTICE in reaching out to fellow Wikimedians in a geographic area?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 03:26, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi RightCowLeftCoast! I hope you can make it. It's always a blast, and since we're doing the Wiknic in late September the weather should be great. (It was in July in the past). And yes, I think mms is more effective because it goes to people who have opted-in. I could be wrong, of course. Hope to see you soon! JSFarman (talk) 03:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Richat structure
There's a discussion at Talk:Atlantis#Added "other location" Richat Structure in Mauritania, as related in film by George S. Alexander you should see. Among other things I've mentioned Invader Moon. It's fringe, and I know that Simon and Schuster publish fringe and mention the book on their site, but the actual publisher is Permuted Press "An industry-leading independent publisher of sci-fi. Fantasy. Dystopian, prepper, post-apocalyptic, horror, military, and paranormal fiction and non-fiction." Doug Weller talk 11:30, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller: I was unaware of that discussion and don't add content to articles about Atlantis, but after finding some RSs which make the claim, I added the content. Is the claim not verified by these RSs? Not saying that Atlantis=Richat, but the sources claim it could be.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 16:31, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
- Of course you weren't aware, I didn't think you were. Some of those sources aren't RS I believe, eg Invader Moon, Forbes, etc. If it's going to be in, I think it needs to be discussed so everyone except the Atlantis fans of course are happy. Doug Weller talk 16:33, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
San Diego Wikimedians User Group October 2018 meetup invitation
Who: All members of the public
What: Filipino American History Month-themed Edit a thon in Mira Mesa, San Diego.
When: Sunday 7 October 2018, 1:00PM PST / 1300 until 3:00PM PST / 1500
Where: Mira Mesa Branch Library
Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )
Your host: RightCowLeftCoast (talk · contribs)
Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to limited space available.
(Delivered: 01:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list.)
Reliable Sources
You've been advocating for the use of a number of sources that are marginally reliable at best and plagiarized from other unreliable sources at worst [1][2][3][4]. The Perrenial sources chart is a good resource for finding prior discussions regarding the reliability of these sources. Many of them are known to publish verifiably false information and thus fail the "reputation for fact-checking" requirement, regardless of political leaning. I suggest that you follow the advice of your fellow editors and stop trying to use these notoriously unreliable sources. –dlthewave ☎ 02:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have civilly asked in the past to stop being followed. I again ask that the above editor Dlthewave (talk · contribs) stop following me, a form of WP:HARASSMENT. Collecting diffs perhaps is evidence of this. Again, please stop and leave me alone.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 02:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIX, September 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Edward Byers
I believe I was the one who put the update tag on the article a year or so ago. If memory serves me correctly, the article said something about anticipated graduation and it was then a couple a months past typical graduation time. Other editors evidently updated the graduation information but never removed that tag. Thanks for removing it! Bob305 (talk) 02:10, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Criticism of Google
Hi RightCowLeftCoast. I reverted your edit to Criticism of Google for all the same reasons as we've discussed earlier: using poor sources for content that has questionable encyclopedic value in order to promote a specific viewpoint. Sorry to bother you, but I think it best to notify editors directly in such circumstances. --Ronz (talk) 16:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Discussions about content on an article, are best done at the most relevant talk page, that of the article. Please see my rebuttal there.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:47, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- You appear to understand what are and are not reliable sources, and their appropriate use. Yet you have a habit of using them, apparently to shift or introduce new pov's, then personalizing the resulting disputes. --Ronz (talk) 23:49, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Please stop, and continue the discussion on the relevant talk page, for content about the article. Please stop showing bad faith regarding my edits.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:58, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- I started a discussion here in the hope that we could avoid any drama and keep discussion of behavior to a minimum. This is the best place to do that.
- If there's anything that even remotely demonstrates bad faith on my part, point it out and I'll refactor. --Ronz (talk) 00:17, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Please refactor this discussion then.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Please stop, and continue the discussion on the relevant talk page, for content about the article. Please stop showing bad faith regarding my edits.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:58, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- You appear to understand what are and are not reliable sources, and their appropriate use. Yet you have a habit of using them, apparently to shift or introduce new pov's, then personalizing the resulting disputes. --Ronz (talk) 23:49, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- I've noticed this trend of using unreliable sources as well. This is not a matter of AGF; continued use of poor sources is an issue that needs to be addressed, regardless of the intent, faith, etc. of the editor. –dlthewave ☎ 02:32, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have previously asked the above editor to stop hounding me. Please stop harassing me, and leave me alone Dlthewave.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 02:53, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Dlthewave: Per WP:NOBAN, "If a user asks you not to edit their user pages, it is sensible to respect their request, although a user cannot avoid administrator attention or appropriate project notices and communications by merely demanding their talk page not be posted to." Respect this user's request. And don't use someone else's concerns to coatrack your own. It makes his claim that you are harassing him that much stronger.--v/r - TP 00:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have previously asked the above editor to stop hounding me. Please stop harassing me, and leave me alone Dlthewave.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 02:53, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Pensionado Act
Hello! Your submission of Pensionado Act at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:03, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.
Disambiguation link notification for September 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Washington Free Beacon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mother Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Have your say!
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Pensionado Act
On 1 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pensionado Act, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that upon their return to the Philippines after attending college in the United States, pensionados were referred to as "American boys" and faced discrimination? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pensionado Act. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Pensionado Act), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Results from global Wikimedia survey 2018 are published
Hello! A few months ago the Wikimedia Foundation invited you to take a survey about your experiences on Wikipedia. You signed up to receive the results. The report is now published on Meta-Wiki! We asked contributors 170 questions across many different topics like diversity, harassment, paid editing, Wikimedia events and many others.
Read the report or watch the presentation, which is available only in English.
Add your thoughts and comments to the report talk page.
Feel free to share the report on Wikipedia/Wikimedia or on your favorite social media. Thanks!
--EGalvez (WMF)
19:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Discussion on Asian Americans
As someone who edited Asian Americans in the past two weeks, I invite you to participate in a discussion about some recent edits. Specifically, there is a question about whether to include South Asian ethnicities in the discussion about Asian Americans. --Ishu (talk) 04:49, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CL, October 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:01, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Landing of the first Filipinos
On 18 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Landing of the first Filipinos, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Filipinos became the first Asians to have a documented presence in the Americas when they landed in what is now California on 18 October 1587? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Landing of the first Filipinos. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Landing of the first Filipinos), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vanamonde (talk) 00:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
WikiConference presentation
Did you use a slideshow at your recent wikiconference presentation? If so, I'd be interested in seeing it. Thanks –dlthewave ☎ 07:27, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Halloween cheer!
Hello RightCowLeftCoast:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
– ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡) 23:21, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
wikicon
Hi RCLC,
Glad to meet you this weekend and thanks for the anime con tips :). I was also glad for your presentation. If there were more time (maybe next year) I'd have liked to grab a beer or something and have an all-too-rare real-life conversation about some of the points you raised. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- The presentation which followed mine, was great to observe as well. I hope continued success of your efforts to increase working with academia. Perhaps at a future conference we can continue our camaraderie.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 05:55, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of South Bay Salt Works
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article South Bay Salt Works you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cygnis insignis -- Cygnis insignis (talk) 16:21, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Invitation for a Edit a thon in Chula Vista
Who: All members of the public
What: A Edit a thon in Chula Vista.
When: Sunday 11 November 2018, 2:00PM PST / 1400 until 4:00PM PST / 1600
Where: Chula Vista Public Library Civic Center Branch
Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )
Your host: RightCowLeftCoast (talk · contribs)
Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to limited space available.
The City of Chula Vista Public Library does not advocate nor endorse the views or positions expressed by the users of its facilities.
— Chula Vista Public Library Meeting Room Policy
(Delivered: 21:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list.)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is NuVasive. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:08, 12 November 2018 (UTC)