User talk:Otisfrog

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome!

Hello, Otisfrog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:16, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Hey, Otisfrog, I'm sorry for tagging Mercedes (name) for deletion under A10; I didn't think about page splits. The reviewing admin quite rightly declined it. I removed the unnecessary notice from this page; again, I apologize! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

T. J.'s (Newport)

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of T. J.'s (Newport), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: T. J.'s. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 21:34, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

T.J.'s, T.J. Maxx and T. J.'s (Newport)

Hi Otisfrog!

It appears you tried to do the following:

I have undone these changes for a number of reasons (and left T. J.'s (Newport) as a redirect to T.J.'s:

  1. The only subject who's common name is "T.J.'s" is the nightclub in question, and therefore that should be the name of the article on the nightclub.
  2. If there is a concern that someone looking for T.J. Maxx will get the wrong article by searching "T.J.", that is why there is a disambiguation link at the top of the article for other uses of "TJ". Feel free to add a reference to T.J. Maxx at that disambiguation page (TJ).
  3. Copy/pasting within Wikipedia is not good. Rather than reciting the reasons why here, read through Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

Let me know if you have any questions. Singularity42 (talk) 21:55, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Julian C. Day

The article Julian C. Day has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Best regards, Cindy(talk to me) 22:05, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Thanks for contributing new article Julian C. Day. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Best regards, Cindy(talk to me) 22:27, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Christina Hendricks. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 21:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Nicholas with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:39, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mack Bernard

The article Mack Bernard has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:26, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you removed topically-relevant content from a Wikipedia article. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. STATic message me! 17:54, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parental Advisory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MDNA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only warning

I don't know why you tagged two perfectly acceptable pages with deletion tags, but I imagine it's in some sort of retaliation for the proposed deletion of an article you created above. Please note that Wikipedia is not a game, and tagging acceptable articles for deletion with spurious reasons is disruptive. If you continue, you will be blocked. Qwyrxian (talk) 17:52, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Poeticjusticekenlamar.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Poeticjusticekenlamar.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 16:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Haughton Elevator Company for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haughton Elevator Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haughton Elevator Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Peter James (talk) 22:47, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also your user page has two userboxes claiming you are an administrator on Wikipedia and the Meta wiki, although this account has no administrator privilege - please remove these userboxes (or if this is an administrator's alternative account, link to your main account). Peter James (talk) 22:55, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Actually, I've just gone ahead and removed the claims; while users are generally free to do with their user page as they wish, they are explicitly not allowed to claim a WP flag (administrator, checkuser, etc.) that they do not hold. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:12, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm Racerx11. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Rick Ross, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! RacerX11 Talk to meStalk me 19:12, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Walmart with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:59, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jodeen A. Kozlak

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jodeen A. Kozlak, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.diversitybestpractices.com/person/jodee-kozlak.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 23:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Jodeen A. Kozlak

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Jodeen A. Kozlak, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.diversitybestpractices.com/person/jodee-kozlak. As a copyright violation, Jodeen A. Kozlak appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Jodeen A. Kozlak has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Jodeen A. Kozlak and send an email with the message to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Jodeen A. Kozlak with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Jodeen A. Kozlak.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 23:25, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • You cannot copy text from the other website. You can write an article about Kozlak in your own words, but you can't copy the content. —C.Fred (talk) 23:37, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave the maintenance templates in place while other editors review the article

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Jodee Kozlak, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 23:47, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:50, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Jodee Kozlak. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 23:53, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On creating an article

Re this comment left on my talk page:

can i creat a new article based on Target Kozlak — Preceding unsigned comment added by Otisfrog (talk • contribs) 23:37, 30 January 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Maybe. There are a number of things you'll have to do for the article to stick around. Most critically:

  • You must write the article in your own words. You cannot copy sentences or paragraphs from other websites.
  • You must demonstrate that Kozlak is notable. That doesn't mean she's notable within Target; that means she's notable as a person in general. WP:BIO has specific criteria that make a person notable; I don't see how Kozlak satisfies any of those.

Unless you can demonstrate notability, then no, you may not create an article on her. —C.Fred (talk) 00:01, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing maintenance tags is disruptive

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Jodee Kozlak. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 00:07, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me for being blunt, but here is a final warning

What part of these two statements is unclear?

  • Do not copy text from another website to the Jodee Kozlak article (or any other article here).
  • Do not delete maintenance tags like {{db-bio}} or {{BLP unreferenced}} from an article you created.

Please respond if either of these is unclear. If do either of them again, your account will be blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 00:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gregg Steinhafel's DOB

How are you calculating a year of birth for Gregg Steinhafel? The only source cited in the article gives an age for him but says that's current as of the most recent definitive proxy; it doesn't say when that proxy was written. —C.Fred (talk) 00:45, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Argo (2012 film). Thingg⊕⊗ 01:05, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, I'm Happysailor. I noticed that you recently removed some content from User:Nickoso without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, - Happysailor (Talk) 15:47, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:VerveryoldDelllogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:VerveryoldDelllogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:15, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Isaac

Hello Otisfrog, I found you through your edits to articles such as the Palm Beach Mall (I was reading it because of the recent demolition) and noticed that you live in the West Palm Beach area like I do :). Anyway, I asked Grahambrunk this too, but he appears to be much less active than you. I am a member of WikiProject Tropical cyclones and created an article called Effects of Hurricane Isaac (2012) in Florida, which is a separate article specifically about impact from Hurricane Isaac in that sate. What I am wanting to know is if you have pictures from the storm (like standing water/flooding) and would be willing to upload them to that page and/or Commons. Thanks in advance for help regarding this matter.--12george1 (talk) 02:42, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Open Letter (Jay-Z song)

I moved your stub here. It has a lot of issues, even after I cleaned it up. Bearian (talk) 17:48, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Myron E. Ullman

The article Myron E. Ullman has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 23:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bieber

Do not redirect Bieber without community consensus. The page is a disambiguation page. Thanks, —Mikemoral♪♫ 23:05, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ghetto (rapper) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • It is predominantly a solo mixtape, and features no other producers aside Lewi White and Smasher (The pair responsible for "Back in the Day]". It includes collaborations with Smasher, Sparkey, Griminal, Brutal, Chipmunk & Devlin. Ghetto
  • {{update after|2011|12|31}}<ref>[http://www.allelements.net/article.php?cislo=2041 Allelements.net > hip hop & uk garage emag - Ghetto]</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:46, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Targetroseville.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Targetroseville.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Targetroseville.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Targetroseville.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TKK bark ! 02:03, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed all content from CVS (disambiguation), with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 21:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the notice, but please prepare the content of the disambiguation page first, and do not just blank it. If you need help with disambiguation pages, check out MOS:DAB and WP:DAB, thanks! — MusikAnimal talk 22:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Do not copy and paste one article to another, this is not good as we need to retain the history, potentially for copyright reasons. See WP:CUTPASTE — MusikAnimal talk 22:04, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at African American, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:56, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Latino (demonym), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:07, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Otis Kmart please unblocke me

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Otis Kmart


{{unblock|Vandalism please anyone block me OtisfrogOtis Kmart 02:31, 13 July 2013 (UTC)}}


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Otisfrog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

can I find a way of getting unblocked

Decline reason:

You just vandalized three articles. Why would we unblock you? You need to address the reasons for your block. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:55, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2013

Hello, I'm DoorsAjar. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Aretha Franklin, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DoorsAjar (talk) 23:15, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to CVS Pharmacy has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. DoorsAjar (talk) 23:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Pease unblock me }}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Qwyrxian (talk) 23:44, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Otisfrog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

No reason given to unblock.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Oakwood Plaza

Notice

The article Oakwood Plaza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:ROTM shopping center, not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MB 00:49, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Otisfrog"