User talk:Caesarjbsquitti

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thanks for the messages...

Dear Caesarjbsquitti,

Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator.

One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with two hyphens followed by four tildes --~~~~. The software that runs Wikipedia will automatically convert this into a signature which contains your username and the date and time you posted the message, so other users don't get confused.

I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself on your userpage, you should start by adding {{User:PEAR/welcomed}} to your userpage.

--PEAR 16:31, August User:PEAR/FriendlyDay 2006 (UTC)

Thank you...for the welcome, I hope that I may be able to lend my abilities to your source. Have some patience with my lack of understanding your system.

Thanks again.

"The new truth about truth lies in the truth that Truth can lie ! CS"

--Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 15:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

signing

Hi! Just FYI, you should sign the edits you make to discussion ("talk") pages, but not the edits you make to actual articles. Rlitwin 22:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit at Canada

For your convenience, I am pasting your addition to Canada below. It doesn't belong in the top-level Canada article, but it may belong at Health care in Canada after some polishing. Thanks. Jkelly 22:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Health Care system

Canada's Health care system has been called a public system, a socilized heath care system but in fact it is merely pulically funded, although many politicians and reports refer incorrectly to this system as a public one. ( this a good example of a half-truth - half-truth)

It was a very famous socialist politician Tommy Douglas the son of a preacher who instituted government funded health care.

Canadians receive 'free' health care paid for by a provincially funded tax supported fund. Some provinces employ a monthly insurance premium, Ontario does not. Some limited services are not covered.

Most doctors are in reality 'corporations' and clinics are privately owmed by doctor consortiums. Doctors, family doctors receive a fee per visit from the Government. A system that rewards repeat visits, referrals, and testing. Doctors in Canada, except for some hospital doctors do not receive a yearly salary.

The College of Physicians and Surgeons is a self regulating department that handles physician complaints.

Canadians are currently experiencing a doctor shortage due to the market forces at play and the fee structure, that penalizes doctors income relative to the supply of doctors.

A recent comparative report on Health Systems in the World, 'Wyatt/Watson' ranked Canada's Health system 20th in the world, better than that in the USA, ranked 24th. France and Italy were ranked in the top two.

Feedback

Feel free to send me suggestions.

Thanks

--Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 16:44, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematical definition of God? Have you seen intelligent math? — Dunc|☺ 16:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"No original research" policy

Caesar, based on edits you've been making concerning your insights about truth, lie, and half-truth, I think you should really read the Wikipedia No Original Research policy. Edits based on your own ideas are really not acceptable and will be deleted (unless you've had them published in reliable publications that you can reference). Rlitwin 13:32, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dictionary

As a matter of policy, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. As you know, the Wikimedia project already has a dictionary, Wiktionary. Gazpacho 22:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

USENET

I sympathise with your frustration at not being able to communicate your message to the world, but Wikipedia is not the place to publish original research. If you are unable to have your ideas published in academic papers, or popular magazines, you may like to consider USENET.

USENET is easily available through Google Groups. While Wikipedia is an on-line encyclopedia that anyone can edit, USENET is an on-line news and discussion system that anyone can post to. Material posted to USENET is archived by Google and, once archived, no-one can delete your words.

Be warned however, USENET is a threaded discussion format. People can post replies to your article, question your ideas and attack you personally. If you post your ideas to USENET be prepared to defend them because they will be mercilessly attacked.

It is also important to choose an appropriate newsgroup in which to post your ideas. If you choose the wrong newsgroup your ideas will either be ignored, or replies will ignore the ideas and criticise your poor choice of newsgroup. Think of it as a news stand of magazines, each with their own target audience. An article about bodybuilding techniques would not look right in a magazine about crochet and knitting. Your ideas would not be well received in rec.aquaria, but they may be better received in alt.philosophy.

I also suggest you take time to read some of the articles in your chosen newsgroup, preferably for a week or so, before posting an article of your own. This will allow you to get a feel for the style of the newsgroup, and the kind of responses you might evoke. USENET is not for everyone, but it may be the publishing media you have been looking for. --Dave 09:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info...

You might consider a page, about discoveries that no one realy wants to print...conflict of intersts...but that would benefit people...cancer cures, etc...

I have been posting these discoveries since about 1998 in the newsgroups.

Most of the 'others' do not find it politically acceptable to print these politically unacceptable truths.

Some because the material confirms the message of Jesus Christ, others because it offends their hidden political agenda that appears to be 'vindictive' rather than based on justice and compassion.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:35, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

IBS

Hi Caesarjbsquitti,

You posted the message below on Talk:Irritable bowel syndrome. However, you don't make any suggestions about the article, so I think you're violating Wikipedia is not a discussion forum. Please use talk pages to discuss the making of articles. Also, please sign your name. Feel free to add to the article itself.

grtz,

--Steven Fruitsmaak | Talk 14:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted again. Please discuss, I have no intention to get into an edit war. Also, trie to add new comments at the bottom of a talk page, or better yet use the " + "-tab to automatically add a comment.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Talk) 11:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Overlooked cause: Bacteria

While the logic of the symptoms suggest a 'infection' of some sorts, it becomes clear that IBS, and Crohns will follow the history of ulcers.

BACTERIA MAY BE THE CAUSE OF IBS

My suggestion look up herbal cures for parasites.

If a corporation who is concerned about bottom line profits is willing to sell you cigarettes that will kill you, do you not think a corporation who is concerned about bottom line profits is willing to sell you tests, and superficial treatments that help but not cure you from a disease that creates the demand for their tests, and superficial treatments ?

--Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 22:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

George Petralia

I moved your article to George Petralia. Please don't keep recreating it under the name How to create an article. Thanks, NawlinWiki 05:56, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Finally read your message....excuse the slip up, too late, too tired. Thanks !

License tagging for Image:Roy Piovesana.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Roy Piovesana.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Don Grashey

Can you please add the year of his death, not just his age? Thanks.

Image:Roy_Piovesana.JPG listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Roy_Piovesana.JPG has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. J Di ^talk 17:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on Talk:Devil

I've removed your comments from Talk:Devil. Again, Wikipedia is not a forum to promote your original research. I suggest you may want to publish your findings in reputable magazines or peer-reviewed journals, or set up a website and (when it becomes notable) later others will link it appropriately in articles. Until then, please help contribute to improving the factual information on articles here. -- Kesh 04:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears most magazines or peer-reveiwed journals are part of the stone walling these new ideas.

I have an online website to expose these discoveries, with some reference to Oxford's acceptance of some of the suggestions regarding half-truths.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:37, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello anyone else here ?

I seem to have made quite a few changes without a comment...is anyone else here ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:11, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Preview

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Geniac 20:49, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regrets on that one...sometimes I forget...as I just did...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 15:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I know...use the sandbox...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 00:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About some of your edits

Hello Caesarjbsquitti,

Since you asked for comments on the talk page of half-truths, I will do my best to give you some that, I hope, might be helpful. Note that I am not the editor who removed your recent additions to that page, calling them a "peeve", even though I probably would have done so if I had seen them first (though I would have tried to use a less harsh language).

Firstly, your example about Galilleo going through hell to prove his point is of course correct, but it does not apply to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not about proving one's point or giving opinions, however well founded and in good faith. If something has not been published by a reputable source, it should not be on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia had existed in Galilleo's days, his new research, however well founded, would not have been welcome here. Anything for which you cannot find a reliable source, anything that is an opinion, whether yours or someone else's, should be kept out of Wikipedia articles (except if you clearly state who thinks so, and, again, provide a source). Personal experiences, original research and thoughts are of course totally forbidden and will be reverted.

My book, 'The Jesus Christ Code' has not yet been published, and as of yet, many sources are unwilling to print the material, poltiical. I am certain the GAlilleo, also could not find someone to print his material, except himself, and he was taken to task by the 'authorities' of the day.

+++++++++++++

There are different types of opinion. A fact, ie Canada's political system uses two types of electing people, first is uses a first past the post system during the general election, and it uses a multiple run off system for electing party leaders. That is not merely an opinion, that is a fact that is seldom if ever detailed as such. It is my 'original research', yes but more than that.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

++++++++++++++++

About providing sources: not everything that's on the internet counts as a reliable source. The most obvious examples of sources that should not be used are blogs, user-edited sites such as Wiktionary, and promotional websites. For more information about providing reliable sources, you may want to read Wikipedia:Citing sources.

++++++++++

I have just finished changing the material for Loretta Lynn her movie and book are false, or shall we say full of half-truths, or errors of omission.

Sicilian Wood Carver

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

++++++++++

Last but not least, all edits much reflect a neutral point of view, but I trust that you were aware of that.

The examples provided in the half-thruths article therefore violated WP:NOR, as no source could be provided that said "[...] is a half-truth". The ones that you added later, about Canadian politics and such were unnecessarily divisive and controversial, as well as being original research and possible biased, and definitely unverifiable as half-truths.

++++++++++++++++++++

If you see an animal and conclude it is a dear, that is 'your opinion', your research, is it true ?

The Canadian Political system or medical system are full of half-truths, problem is that all people except myself really know what they are. So where is the publications ?

Well you see, medias' have been corrupted for many years, and they do not want to disclose this. Their ability to maintain the decpetion is based on their political ability to control the media forces. Not a conspiracy, merely politics.

Tricky part...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

++++++++++

I am sure that you have much knowledge and insight to share, however Wikipedia is not the place to do so. Only well-established, published facts belong here, whereas opinions, personal research and beliefs belong to blogs. Remember, "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth" (from WP:V).

I hope that these comments will be helpful to you, and that you will keep them in mind when editing. Regards, IronChris | (talk) 17:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

++++++++++++++

It becomes obvious to me that 'the system' can easily be corrupted by those 'that print' research with ulterior motives....ie the cigarette companies and their scientiests...

The sign on the Canadian US border, "IN ONTARIO Wife abuse is a crime" is a half-truth. Can you not understand this, is it research or is it findings that does not need scientific explanation.

I appreciate your feedback...The Jesus Christ Code....coming soon !

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spousal abuse Noted on www.wikipedia.com, January 27th, 2007 "Spousal abuse is a specific form of domestic violence where physical or sexual abuse is perpetuated by one spouse upon another. The term was coined in the late 1970s once such crimes were given wider attention in society. There are separate legalities and punishments applied to such a crime as opposed to random assault or assaults of another nature (see battered woman defence and battered person syndrome)." Here the corruption of a topic is noted by the manipulation of abuse. Abuse is NOT a specific type fo domestic violence. Here the heading has been corrupted to attack men, because the material is used to highlight statistical manipuation fo violence by men against women, which is only one type of abuse.^[1]

On half-truths andwholesale WP:OR

Although numerous people have already pointed this out, let me remind you that publishing your own refutation of a source or another Wikipedia article is the very definition of original research and does not belong in Wikipedia articles. Frankly, I'm glad that you think critically about your sources, but if you continue to put your analysis in articles, it will continue to be deleted and you and other editors will get increasingly frustrated with the situation. Please just stop doing this. The best outcome for all would be for you to continue to contribute to WP by inserting information from reliable sources into articles, but discussing your opinions on such sources in a blog or your own website. Cheers, JChap2007 23:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images.

What types of licensing are acceptable for images.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 16:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Carroll Baker Petralia Grasley.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Carroll Baker Petralia Grasley.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Durin 15:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the no source tag on the image without providing a source. Please do not remove this tag without providing a source. Thank you, --Durin 16:02, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did i not provide the source...George Petralia ? Technical problem ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 21:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:2004tbonlinegregzelinskimayor.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:2004tbonlinegregzelinskimayor.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Iamunknown 04:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rita Ubriaco

An editor has nominated Rita Ubriaco, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rita Ubriaco and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 15:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Child Abuse page

I have reverted the edits you put on the first section of the Child Abuse page as I did not feel they added anything to the text, they were unsubstantiated in regards to the Childrens Aid Society (and even if you can substantiate claims that they have been involved in abuse that information could perhaps go in the Notable Instances of Child Abuse section, not in the introductory paragraph) and did not seem to be NPOV. edchant 04:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the incidents are well referenced, if you would like to move them to an appropriate section, please do. (if I have time I will try myself) But it is not appropriate to merely isolate 'adults', ignoring all the other 'sources' of abuse.

Thanks.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 16:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted you again, unfortunately before I saw this discussion. However, I side with Edchant; even if you can argue that there is some substance, this belongs nowhere near the first sentence of the article. Please feel free to add it somewhere appropriate. Clayboy 17:10, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your point, and make the following adjustment...less is more sometimes....

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 17:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Joseph Mauro

A tag has been placed on Joseph Mauro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall ^talk 17:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Mauro was a well recognized writer, producer, etc... in Thunder Bay...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Thunder Bay Sleeping Giant.JPG

Image:Thunder Bay Sleeping Giant.JPG has a nasty watermark identifying it as property of thunderbayonline.com yet you licensed it as PD.

If you are the actual copyright owner, could you please upload a version without a watermark? If you are not, please change the license statement on the image accordingly. --Qyd 13:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is the best way of doing that ?

Depends of the actual copyright status. If you just copied the image frpm the mentioned website without permission, the image may not stay on wikipedia, and should be deleted (place a {{db}} tag on the image page). If there are permissions, explain that on the image page. Read Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for more information. --Qyd 15:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fugue (mental state of mind)

A tag has been placed on Fugue (mental state of mind), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Page is redundant. See Fugue state.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --DashaKat 00:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, but when I entered "fugue" into the search, 'fugue -state of mind' did not show up.

Option here to improve the cross reference ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 16:30, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carroll Baker (singer)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [1] --Ronz 23:25, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --Ronz 23:25, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This applies to your links to http://www.squittis.com/ and http://www.thejesuschristcode.com/ --Ronz 23:30, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The links are only on my personal information page, is that problem ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've added the second to articles and article talk pages. --Ronz 04:09, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The second in 'talk pages' only, is for the purpose of providing you the opportunity of seeing my original research, and hopefully finding something close to it, that you can use for improving the encyclopedia.

You must ask yourself how many of the 'research articles' are original research by individuals who are not at arms length from other corporate entities that serve their purpose, magazines with affiliated sources ?

Anyway, hope it helps....

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 16:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Wikipedia has a lot of problems with original research. I hope you're not bringing this up as justification for what you have done though. --Ronz 18:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 23:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

École Polytechnique massacre

I reverted your recent addition to this article, as it seemed to me to be merely your opinion. You said: The political polarization of the incident male verses female is apparent in the simple observation that while all the victims were female, (a half-truth many had fathers, brothers or boyfriends who were also victims of the tragedy, and who were totally ignored. I see no citations for this commentary and I'm not even totally sure what you were trying to say. So I removed it. Dina 16:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was a simplistic observation, every woman has a father ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 22:22, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Giardiasis

I have reverted your edits to Giardiasis because they were copied from http://www.yosemite.org/naturenotes/Giardia.htm. Wikipedia can't take material copied from other sources. Corvus cornix 22:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the original quote was referenced, however the reference did not show up, and was hoping you would correct that problem rather than remove the citing.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 22:19, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two paragraphs are not a quote, even if they're cited, they're plagiarism. Corvus cornix 23:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware of that, citing a referenced quote is plagiarism ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't indicate in the article that it was a quote, nor did you indicate in the article whom you were quoting. You merely copied paragraphs from the source and added a footnote indicating that's where they came from. Corvus cornix 16:54, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does not the second assume the first ? Anyway, I will add it in the future, thanks.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 16:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just for the record, my first posting, used some type of code for reference, perhaps it was the wrong one...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 22:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sir John Magazine Cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sir John Magazine Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sir John Magazine.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sir John Magazine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Green Flag of Canada svg.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Green Flag of Canada svg.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had second thoughts on the image, and was trying to delete it...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 18:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria for biographical articles

Please could you read our biography criteria before adding any more articles about people (apparently, most of them your relatives) to Wikipedia? -- Karada 17:09, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We are all related...? If the material is appropriate is the real qustion...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 17:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's right. Please read WP:NOTABILITY and WP:RS for more information on the necessary criteria for inclusion. -- Karada 18:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Bruno Bertucci

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bruno Bertucci, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bruno Bertucci seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bruno Bertucci, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 17:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Kanada...your not related to the individual who posted that remark on my site are you ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 18:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Squitti's

Well my advisor was right, the world does not care about you.

Why was Squitti's deleted from your encyclopedia ?

There are other jewelery stores on the site, and other businesses.

It would have been nice to acknowledge that the research funded by Squitti's, led to the discovery of anti-truths, some a mutant of the half-truth.

Let time record that this was not an event that the world believed was notable or worth investing in.

They were right, perhaps I should have minded my own business....

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 18:36, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the criteria for inclusion of companies on Wikipedia, as well as the original research policy, which appears to apply to your research on "anti-truth". -- Karada 12:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Straw puppet terrorists ?

I have noted a similar heading on another thread.

Have you any examples of such 'terrorists' in the world of information and wikipedia ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:22, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Squitti coat of arms.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Squitti coat of arms.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:03, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User page images stating (c)

I've removed the "(c)" from teh captions of 2 images on your user page. Firstly images stored in wikipedia can not be claimed to have copyright to a user as they, like all material at wikipedia, is released on GNU free license or equivalent (see GFDL and relevant image license details). Secondly the image of the prism light-split is originally from NASA according to the image file. You may of course have meant to imply that it is your works that the images attempt to illustrate that are copyrighted, but that was not clear from using the (c) within the image captions. David Ruben ^Talk 21:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the part of that about not being able to claim copyright is slightly misleading. All non-public domain writings and images in Wikipedia are copyrighted by their creators at the time of their creation; that's a basic consequence of copyright law. However, they must also necessarily be licensed under the GFDL by their copyright holder at upload time, something which is only possible because they are copyrighted in the first place, otherwise the license would be meaningless. If you are not the copyright owner of a piece of material, you must not assert that you are the copyright owner.

David is correct in referring to the policy that authors of Wikipedia content do not claim attribution or copyright within the body text of articles: their contribution of written material is, however, clearly attributed in the history logs for each article, and the copyright status of their images is clearly attributed in the image pages which are easily accessible by clicking on the images themselves. -- Karada 08:08, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of half-truths, the copyright was not in reference to the pictures, even though the copyright symbol was under the picture, the copyright referred to the name, "The Jesus Christ Code. © ", and "The LIGHT: The Rainbow of Truth © "

Thanks for the information.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 14:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Block notification

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 4 days in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for soapboxing, POV pushing, and flamebaiting. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Evidence of this editing problem is available here. Please discuss with me, or obtain a consensus at that thread before unblocking. - Jehochman ^Talk 15:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feminism comprises a number of social, cultural and political movements, theories and moral philosophies concerned with gender inequalities and equal rights for women.

I see that you have made the corrections to the definition.

As the author of many of the subclassifications of "feminmism" it was quite frustrating to see obvious errors in the encylopedia, and to have changes reversed by individuals who appear to lack the insight. So I used the 'sandbox', where changes where discussion is to be brought forward.

By the corrections to the obvious entry line to feminism, I see that my concerns were finally addressed.

You must excuse me, I do not really have the time to research who the other posters are, and what is their agenda, or training.

Feminism, or should I say the lack of understanding the good and more importantly the evil side to this movement has no doubt impacted most people in contemporary society, and we should not support such a movement by saying statements that are misleading.

Anyway, no need to unblock me.

Its always good to see who and what actions were carried out by whom and justify their actions. Were they provoking ? Were they uninformed ?

Finally glad to see the corrections to the listing.

Remember even if the allegations presented are totally true, they may be in fact half-truths, deceptive lies, because they omit important truths.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Feminism comprises a number of social, cultural and political movements, theories and moral philosophies concerned with gender inequalities and equal rights for women.

Perhaps someone with more ability should check the above statement, it can be misunderstood, should be

Feminism comprises a number of social, cultural and political movements, theories and moral philosophies concerned with gender inequalities against women, and equal rights for women.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Having researched 'feminism' for some 20 years, some individuals who are supportive of the movement seem quite defensive in exposing the truth of this matter, and will go to extreme lengths.

Example: "Stop violence against women" is based on the half-truth "Most violence is by men against women"

False black and white logic that is defended and any attempts to correct this will be met with stiff resisitence.

All I suggest is "STop the abuse of people' which some find offensive ?

Is there a term for this ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay...how do I get some of the listings about 'Squitti Nicola' back on Wikipedia. Information about him were gathered from a book "Nobility of Italy' ...

Thanks

--216.211.15.123 (talk) 01:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Odd I went into the page logged in by my computer...?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 02:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Caesarjbsquitti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, let me contest the validity of the actions of the block. I have given you close to 40 days 'free' to expose an error on the purpose of this complaint. First and foremost the 'details' were posted to a 'talk' page. It appears some people would consider my 'observations' for the purpose of improving the article, as unacceptable. I would believe that the 'blocking criteria' are concerned about wikipedia the encyclopedia, and not the 'talk' page. The 'talk' page is designed for suggestions, be they politically incorrect as they are. To suggest that any particular group can be corrupted has been a common historic retaliation to any critical comments especially those dealing with 'cult feminism'. I would hope wikipedia would be more clear on where discussions and observations can be allowed to be placed. I had always believed that the talk page was about discussing possible challenges to the 'status quo'. When I see attempts to censor 'talk' it appears an attempt is being made to restrict the truth. While it is now impossible to remove the block even it you wanted to, the world, wikipedia and time, has my input forever; a good thing, or a bad thing someone else must judge that, but none the less an intersting development showing how Truth can be manipulated by political agendas....Merry Christmas !

Decline reason:

You were blocked on 2 November 2007 for a period of 4 days. That block has long since expired. In other words, you need not request to be unblocked, as you are not blocked. Please feel free to edit. Merry Christmas! - auburnpilot talk 05:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AfD nomination of Half-truth

An editor has nominated Half-truth, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Half-truth (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:31, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

soapboxing

No soapboxing, please. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Use the talk pages to recommend specific changes or issues with the encyclopedia article in question. Please do not use it to discuss your "original research"; that's specifically prohibited by Wikipedia's "No original research" policy. Your comments on Talk:Censorship do not appear aimed at helping to write or edit an encyclopedia article on censorship. --Lquilter (talk) 17:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. It is indeed aimed at suggesting the many 'political' directives that create the many faces of 'censorship' within society. It is a suggestion, an opinion, like many others; the idea was included in the 'talk' section for that specific purpose.

On the point of my 'original research', I was bringing to your attention, the reality that no 'reliable source' that wikipedia accepts is willing to accept it, and thereby is a possible form of intellectual censorship. For example, a trade magazine on 'health care' had its entire staff resign, because they could not 'report' the truths, the negative truths about some drugs, because of 'conflicts of interest'.

This criticism of my "soapboxing" follows the inclusion of 'half-truth' in the 'truth' section of wikipedia. I am now going to follow up to see if it was removed and why. Seems 'this negative' side to truth, something confirmed by Dr. Whitehead, is not somepeople want other peole to know about; Food for thought.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 23:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC) (added later)

Speedy deletion of Foggy brain

A tag has been placed on Foggy brain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"wiki-stalking"

"wiki-stalking"

I recall that when I posted certain politcally incorrect comments on how some individuals had corrupted social programs on spousal abuse to polarize the family, and the sexes, that some individuals who were possibly a party to this would 'stalk' my postings to delete them using whatever truths they could. --Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC) So my concern is that wikipedia be aware of this, and how this gate keeping can censor certain ideas or people.

The greatness of wikipedia will be to allow 'comments' to be listed as long as they are truthful to themselves and of themselves, if it is a rumor, if it is speculation, if it is unfouonded or substantiated by some select these truths should be so noted.

Suggest a criticism section on every topic from the Catholic Church to Feminism, to beyond...and perhaps a rating, on the concern relative to the year and place....?

Remember nothing is perfect so don't be so defensive.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

POV Warning

May 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You've already been warned you about general 9/11 discussions in the talk page. VegitaU (talk) 03:14, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taliban Drug Connection Terroist link

Somehow a previous link has not shown up, but here is another.

Some truths no one wants printed ?

Seems someone is racing to ban me before i get a chance to respond.

Also noted was that a PBS report, or other claimed that Alquida was a creation of the whitehouse...

So let us find that link...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

"This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You've already been warned you about general 9/11 discussions in the talk page."

Interesting response.

I tried to place a link that verified my statement, confirming my observation that the entry lacked any referenct to drugs, and now this final 'stone walling'?

I would wikipedia takes a close look at this before I am banned forever, and not allowed to defend myself...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

"VegitaU posted: Taliban had stopped opium growth before 9/11."

Later on I found a link substantiating the connection.

However by then VegitaU had given me a final threat of banning me from wikipedia.

I did not have a chance to post my respond to the shortcomings of the article. The drug connection.

Anyway, I don't like the treatment I received in this matter, and hope Wikipedia will examine this evidence.

VeitaU then posts. " What does that have to do with anything 9/11 related? -- VegitaU (talk) 03:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC) "

Is it not obious. VegitaU makes the claim that the Taliban stopped producing Opium. Oh really ?

They still are.

"I have to say I've never heard this one before. And since the Taliban had stopped opium growth before 9/11, no, it's not possible. -- VegitaU (talk) 19:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I too am surprised not to have heard of it before now. Do you have a reliable source for this, or is it just conjecture? We can't just add any editor's opinion to an article. Wikipedia policy forbids it. SHEFFIELDSTEELTALK 19:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

This isn't a discussion forum. If you don't feel the motives given by Al-Qaeda are logical, then that's your opinion — they clearly disagree. Nonetheless, this isn't a place to discuss which motives are, or are not, logical. Please confine your comments to the article, and not the subject. --Haemo (talk) 22:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC) Taliban Drug Connection Terroist link

Somehow a previous link has not shown up, but here is another.

Some truths no one wants printed ?

(there was reference here to a PBS documentary that said "Al-Quida" was created by the Whitehouse. (PBS documentary that aired some 2 months ago) My posting of this comment did not show up on the talk page.

"What does that have to do with anything 9/11 related? -- VegitaU (talk) 03:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:September_11%2C_2001_attacks"

I think we have a problem here ! I let me post this before I, my posts, become victims of another "politically corrector"

What are talk pages all about anyway. I suggested there was a flaw with the page, and later found it.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:30, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

So I was wrong about the Taliban. Big whoop. I'm an editor on the 9/11 attacks article and you have failed to show me one bit of evidence about the Taliban's policies toward opium having anything to do with the attacks. Show me some evidence that America's war on drugs inspired the attacks or was even a motivator for bin Laden. -- VegitaU (talk) 03:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The links speak for themselves, if they are reliable. My suggestion, was that the article missed the most obvious, and a link was found. Why are you so defensive ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 04:00, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

What links? All I see is a congressional discussion after 9/11 about the Taliban's policy on opium. -- VegitaU (talk) 04:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The movie is 'Clear and Present Danger ?" Its about a 'covert' CIA operation aimed at drug lords in Columbia using the Air Force...?

To: VegitaU

No disrespect to the American Military, I had two cousins lose their lives as US Marines in the 2nd world war, and some of my cousins are in the middle east, with the US Military. Let's not polarize the issue or take it personal.

Being involved in 'organizations' I have learned that the 'actual philosophy' of the organization can change depending on who is in power and their purposes, be they obvious or hidden.

The truth is out there somewhere, and who knows if we will ever find it.

As Cain said to God, "Am I my brothers keeper"....teh question asked by God, was "where is your brother'...(God knew the answer and Cain deflected the question with a question that hid what God knew; He was his brothers killer !

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 13:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Terrorists are a half-truth: It may be an Opium war.

You wanted links, some people don't want these ones....? - - Terrorists are a half-truth: It may be an Opium war. - Since the initial 9-11 and 'the war on terrorism' certain facts come to mind. - - This may in fact be an Opium war. - - I will add more links as I find them. - - Opium War not a war on terrorists - - --Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:09, 24 May 2008 (UTC) - - BBC report - - BBC Report - - --Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC) - - B.B. Report. - BBC REPORT - - The problem of Opium seems to be the problem attached to 'the Taliban'...the word lacks definition. - - BBC Reports on Opium War Possibility - - --Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:27, 24 May 2008 (UTC) - - - As a result, in 1974 the Turks, with American and U.N. support, tried a different tactic. They began licensing poppy cultivation for the purpose of producing morphine, codeine and other legal opiates. Legal factories were built to replace the illegal ones. Farmers registered to grow poppies, and they paid taxes. You wouldn't necessarily know this from the latest White House drug strategy report-- which devotes several pages to Afghanistan but doesn't mention Turkey -- but the U.S. government still supports the Turkish program, even requiring U.S. drug companies to purchase 80 percent of what the legal documents euphemistically refer to as "narcotic raw materials" from the two traditional producers, Turkey and India. - - You wouldn't necessarily know this from the latest White House drug strategy report-- - - --Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:37, 24 May 2008 (UTC) - - I did manage to find this on an older screen, please advise if this is correct, and who and why was this removed ? - - --Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 02:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Topic ban

From all the evidence here on your talkpage, edits, Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#User:Caesarjbsquitti_and_unsourced_POV, and input from other admins, you are banned from all 9/11 articles and their talk pages. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The original 'talk' input about the total lack of an 'opium/drug' was a comment.

As soon as I posted this, I was sent a notice that I would be banned.

Within minutes, I was able to find several sources that suggested an opium/drug source, however I was being 'stone walled' about them.

In fact the 'editor' that presented me with the cease or be censored was an individual who based on his military background should have suggested or known about this.

Anway, I will post the links I have found, and perhaps you can determine why this information is not being included in this section or the conspiracy thought section of the site.

Thanks

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 14:18, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Your edit to Sexism: Apparent non-neutral point of view, (WP:NPOV) and original research WP:OR

Hello. I noticed you re-included a paragraph in the sexism article. As I explained in the edit summary of my reversion of this material, the long paragraph illustrating an instance of perceived sexism against males is inappropriate in a general "sexism against males" section. The goal of the section is to explain what sexism against males is and what forms it may take, not to list incidents. On that basis, I believe the paragraph is to be removed. The information may be relevant to other articles, perhaps Violence against women.

I'd also like to note that the paragraph contains apparently non-neutral, and non-verified statements that appear to be your personal opinion ("The response shows how generalized, selective half-truth logic has been used to rationlize sexist theory"). It also gets the year wrong at the beginning ("In 1987..."). Just a note to be more careful on that. Blackworm (talk) 21:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion, I will try it there.

You had explained that the 'date' was missing. So I added it in.

"what forms it may take, not to list incidents" Are they not the same, as in the incident reveals the 'social advertising' dealing with 'violence.'

My observation, and there are many observations of the material tries to explain the decpetion.

Anyway, food for thought...

Yes the year was 1997, (but I have been spending hours on my computer trying to get my Kapersky Anti-Virus back working, it appears the upgrades to the program corrupted the abilty for it to work, and I had to upgrade the program. I have been busy.

Anyway something for you to consider.

Again thanks for the suggestion.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 22:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Tommaso Squitti deleted speedily as recreation of deleted article

Hello, this was previously deleted as the outcome of the discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommaso Squitti. Please address the concerns about notability and verifiable sources before again creating this. Or, you can appeal the deletion at WP:DRV Cheers, Dloh cierekim 04:10, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 04:31, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks for addressing Mosmof's concern that quickly! :) ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 11:41, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also want to add my thanks, but I realized I forgot to notify you re: Image:Port Arthur Collegiate Institute.JPG. Otherwise, I think everything is set. Cheers. --Mosmof (talk) 15:04, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wondered what happened to the PACI picture.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 15:22, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi, could you upload a version of Image:Port Arthur Collegiate Institute.JPG without the Thunder Bay Online watermark? I believe that is the only image remaining that needs the URL removed. Thanks. --Mosmof (talk) 03:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sguittti revisited

Thanks for your note I'm not too sure this establishes notability, but it is enough to restore and send back to WP:AFD. BTW I made no reference to any possible family connection. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 14:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tommaso Squitti

I have nominated Tommaso Squitti, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommaso Squitti (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Dloh cierekim 14:29, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joseph Squitti

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Joseph Squitti, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Apoc2400 (talk) 19:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on talk pages

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Half-truth for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 02:02, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Can you please change your signature back to the linked version you were previously using? (Or to some other version that includes a link to either User:Caesarjbsquitti, User talk:Caesarjbsquitti, or both, as you prefer.) Thanks. Alai (talk) 16:13, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware of any changes to my signature or linked version...perhaps you can explain the problem.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:50, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Your statement suggests a different signature somewhere else...please direct me to it. Thanks

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 04:07, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

In My preferences, you have inserted some new text in the "Signature" block. Replace it with:

[[User:Caesarjbsquitti|Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti]] [[User talk:Caesarjbsquitti|(talk)]]

which renders as Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk)

Click the "Raw signature" box. Now you retain the same overly-long text, but when you sign pages it is much easier for other editors to reach your talk and user pages. WLU (t) (c) ^{(rules - simple rules)} 13:55, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September, 2008

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Crohn's disease for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked. You must have medically reliable sources to make changes to pages like Chron's disease. Your soapboxing on the evils of the drug companies and your own success or failure to deal with whatever condition you may or may not have constitutes original research, which is strictly forbidden, and a primary source which is not suitable for wikipedia's medical pages (or most pages for that matter). Please restrict your talk page posting to matters which have a chance of actually improving the page, simply venting or telling stories is appropriate for a web forum, which wikipedia is NOT. WLU (t) (c) ^{(rules - simple rules)} 13:59, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

+++++++++

Someone has cencored one of my posts....

[http://www.cbc.ca/cp/health/080911/x091102A.html Medical schools and journals fight drug industry influence Published: Thursday, September 11, 2008 | 10:05 AM ET Canadian Press: Linda A. Johnson, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS]

I feel an ambush coming.

Anyway, perhaps Wikipedia should allow for more discussion in light of the recent Sept. 11 publication.

Oh and by the way, my talk, is all about improving the article, again it is missing many half-truths.

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 14:02, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an internet forum (see WP:NOT#FORUM - it is very clear, and very well supported within the community). Frankly, if you don't post more coherent responses, you won't get blocked but you are very likely to get absolutely no interest or support for your ideas. Your post on CD was hidden using a template - I'm trying to discourage you from posting similarly nonsensical, chatty comments, and other editors from commenting or engaging. Your post is there in its entirety, but hidden. Please do not alter or unhide it - instead consider what change you would like to see made on the main page, and suggest it clearly and with sources. Do not discuss, and do not use original research - cite a source you think says something important, but missing from the current page, and let other editors discuss with you. This is not a place to advertise, play, promote yourself, your ideas, your own personal theories or anything except build an encyclopedia. WLU (t) (c) ^{(rules - simple rules)} 19:02, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should go back and reread the material, there should be enough there to add some information to the listing, including the material about the pharamaceuticals and how they have corrupted 'science' to suit their agenda...

Good Luck with article and perhaps we should be investigating the sockpuppets within Science. (There is enough information on the net to show how the lobby groups have forced entire research publications to resign because of pressure to manipulate the truths of science.

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 21:10, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TRUTH CAN LIE !!!

It becomes somewhat obvious to me after posting that there are individuals who may be called many names, but they appear reluctant to accept any truths beyond those currently accepted, even though they provide no solution to answers to problems, and in some cases are the problems themselves.

There is some progress as the world moves to accept 'politically true' as being for the most part half-truths that ignore other truths that conflict with their agenda...

Keep up the good work !!!

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 03:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are to be blocked until you finish your book...

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 03:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cancer

I have explained on Talk:Cancer why I have removed your addition about diagnostic errors. Please respond there rather than reinserting said content. I would support a few lines on diagnostic quality control, but with a source that is not purely based on a single incident. JFW | T@lk 05:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I never make mistakes. Once I thought I did, but i was wrong !

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 23:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rita Ubriaco

I have nominated Rita Ubriaco, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rita Ubriaco (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Djsasso (talk) 03:55, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sad to see a person from Thunder Bay move to remove Rita Ubriaco from Wikipedia. Perhaps one of the most notable women in the last 30 years next to Dusty Miller, and Dr. Penny Petrone.

Hopefully someone will appeal the move.

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 17:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Judy Rebick

Because adding a section which only includes an incredibly tangential piece of information (an aside in an interview) is undue weight. VoluntarySlave (talk) 18:49, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, this is not a view about Judy Rebick, but a statement made by Judy Rebick.

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 19:33, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how that counts as "disagreeing." I agree that this is a statement by Judy Rebick. I don't think, though, that it's a significant enough statement to put in the article, particularly given that we don't include any other statements by her on her political beliefs here. I haven't seen you make any argument as to why this statement in particular should be picked out to be included in the article.VoluntarySlave (talk) 22:58, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The statement is seldom mentioned, and if Judy Rebick is correct, this may help explain the 'anti-male' perspective of feminism in Canada over the last 30 years, together with many of the half-truths developed by 'social services' in Canada and North America that makes no mention of men, merely 'women and children'...

I believe her insight is important.

By the way what is her orientation ?

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 23:16, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, you want to give undue weight to this statement in order to push a point of view based on your own original research. I believe Wikipedia has some policies in these areas.VoluntarySlave (talk) 23:23, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...not really...I am quoting her statement, as one of the most important women in the 'women's movement' ...

Co-incicently, her statement, does by the way, support some of my original research, but her statement is important, she makes it, and who better to comment on this truth....?

Any way.....Merry Christmas to you and to all a good day !

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 20:56, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus

Please take it easy on the Jesus page and work with the other editors. If you want to make a point, figure out how to do it by the book. Leadwind (talk) 00:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There appears to be alot of 'hostile' editors working on Jesus Christ...

We should at least allow the full message of Jesus Christ...to be declared...

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 22:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Canada has an extensive early psychosis services

would appreciate any additions to early intervention in psychosis article, given the extensive programmes in Canada

Fraser South Early Psychosis [2] [3] [4]

Earlypsychosis (talk) 11:10, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not really aware of much in that area, although they have been formed a few years ago, which is a great idea.

In Canada there is a great doctor shortage caused in part by the great power of the doctors union, restricting supply to increase incomes, so I would expect many people falling through the cracks.

There is also a great problem with drugs, both illegal and legal, and I am certain a few incidents of "Date Drugs" or " Entertainment Drugs" that are being used on the general public creating more problems...(take a look to see if these are so noted in the appropriate spots).

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 15:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Danny Johnson

A tag has been placed on Danny Johnson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Marek.69 ^talk 23:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Italian Mutual Benefit Society of Port Arthur

A tag has been placed on Italian Mutual Benefit Society of Port Arthur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:00, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Societa Italiana di Benevolenza Principe di Piemonte

A tag has been placed on Societa Italiana di Benevolenza Principe di Piemonte requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:00, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Societa Italiana di Benevolenza Principe di Piemonte

An article that you have been involved in editing, Societa Italiana di Benevolenza Principe di Piemonte, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Societa Italiana di Benevolenza Principe di Piemonte. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 22:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Review needed of Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/September_11_conspiracy theories?

See: Proportion of 9/11 defenders restricted compared to 9/11 conspiracy theorists

Although I do not support the views of 9/11 conspiracy theorists, and will not lead a review of this arbitration, I think that a review maybe warranted, and I am floating the idea, with all parties who may have been unfairly censored. Ikip (talk) 14:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems a conpiracy theory is not really justifiable merely suggested, so any possible theory should be accepted. To censor a conspiracy theory seems to justify it ?

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 16:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:THE JESUS CHRIST CODE COVER.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:THE JESUS CHRIST CODE COVER.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:57, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:English language for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I have hidden your posts with a template. Talk pages are for discussion about how to improve articles. You have been warned several times in the past about misuse. —teb728 t c 21:13, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting ?

Interesting response to adding a discussion on the english language....?

Seems like a direct and serious attempt at censoring my attempt to use wikipedia. I would hope some other administrator would take note of this serious threat based on a minor addition to 'talk pages'....?

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 23:40, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You got your wish of administrator notice. —teb728 t c 20:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the related material...

"Thus the two men, for two decades, maintained a close relationship only through correspondence. Finally, in 1896, after Minor had sent nearly ten thousand definitions to the dictionary but had still never traveled from his home, a puzzled Murray set out to visit him. It was then that Murray finally learned the truth about Minor--that, in addition to being a masterful wordsmith, Minor was also a murderer, clinically insane -- and locked up in Broadmoor, England's harshest asylum for criminal lunatics.

THE PROFESSOR AND THE MADMAN is an extraordinary tale of madness and genius, and the incredible obsessions of two men at the heart of the Oxford English Dictionary and literary history. With riveting insight and detail, Simon Winchester crafts a fascinating glimpse into one man's tortured mind and his contribution to another man's magnificent dictionary. "

from the site... Book Material

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 00:02, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like you don't understand what Wikipedia is. This is an encyclopedia for sourced information, it is not a discussion forum for whatever we happen to have read. You can put forward any theory on the English language you want without being "censored", but when you start posting completely irrelevant posts, such as the one above which may be interesting Oxford English Dictinary but lacks any relevance to English language, then such posts may be removed in order to prevent talk pages from turning into forums.Jeppiz (talk) 00:41, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Basket of Puppies 02:48, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 18 hours for deliberately misusing talk pages. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 05:13, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In anticipation of an "AMBUSH" I have not visited wikipedia.com until today, November 1st. Procedural matters against my account show that my premonitions were correct.

A small reference to some new material, printed material, concerning the involvement of a criminal genius in creating words in the English language, ON A TALK PAGE, were met with serious 'resistence', a resistance that played itself out by individuals who are so noted.

(I have been too busy trying to promote my book, "The Jesus Christ Code" that describes the anti-male, anti-family agenda by cult feminists in the world, using deceptive half-truths)

For those who have the time to check this out, it is a shame that even 'talk pages' are being used to exert pressure, intimidate, and censor ideas, be they only on talk pages.

This is s sad incident for wikipedia, although perhaps one that might reflect on the motives of some individuals.

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 09:34, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thinking in colour

A tag has been placed on Thinking in colour requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. iBen^discuss/_contribsHow's my driving? 05:35, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I might note that just because someone gives you the idea to create an article doesn't mean that that articles doesn't have to conform to Wikipedia's Policies and Guidelines on verifiability and notability. Please avoid original research and unsourced content. Moogwrench (talk) 05:47, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will leave it up to someone else to reference the discoveries of "half-truths" and the new philosophy "Thinking in Color" ....as per a book printed. It is interesting to note that this book was based on the discovery of a second definition of 'half-truth' back in 1989, a discovery that was communicated to North America's leading media resources, so the question is why did they not tell the general public about this ?

Anyway here is the link to "The Jesus Christ Code"

So to those in the realm of 'censorship' one must appreciate that many groups don't want you to know The Truth...!

Keep Wikipedia free and free; there are two definitions of free...keeping in mind that "freedom of the media is not freedom of The Truth."

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 20:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Caesarjbsquitti! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Greg Zelinski - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:16, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have someone in the hospital...soon as I have time I will locate the references...

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 20:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Greg Zelinski

The article Greg Zelinski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, inactive WP:BLP over three years old; Google yields little more than Wiki mirrors or the odd vendor mentioning his name in passing.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nifboy (talk) 03:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of WP:ANI thread Feb 2010

Just notifying you that I have opened a thread on WP:ANI about your recent talk page edits and continuing soapboxing on site. Please feel free to respond there: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Caesarjbsquitti_soapboxing_-_community_input_requested--Cailil ^talk 05:38, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per discussion there, you have been banned from the site. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 21:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

E tu Bruti...

The originator of this complaint did state that there was nothing wrong with my suggestion, 'merely how I said it...' I would hope that my suggestion be dealt with.

Someone how I was to believe that I was being banned from the topic site, not the entire site ?

I would also request someone to suggest to me how I can appeal this decision, (i was going to file my own complaint...but perhaps forgiveness is the high road to take.)

When I have the time, I will respond...it may take a while... ?

Thanks

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 21:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Appealing a block#Appeal to the Arbitration Committee is what you want to look at. Since you are banned not blocked, appeal goes via Arbcom. Nothing personal; I carefuly avoided going in with an opinion. I just enforced what others had already decided. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 21:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blood Red Sandman...I note first of all the article which I added a comment is already under dispute for not being neutral.

Is there a time frame for this appeal ?

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 03:44, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blood Red Sandman has given the wrong link; the appeals process is given here. During the appeal, you will not be allowed to edit any other articles or pages, except this talk page, and possibly the venue where your appeal is being held. Even after the appeal, you may not be allowed to edit any other pages until the community is satisfied that your understanding of and compliance with Wikipedia policy/procedure is sufficient so that no further sanctions are required. You must also bear in mind that if you have no intention of changing your approach to match the expectations of the community, then your appeal is likely to be declined. The timeframe varies, but depends on the grounds of your appeal and the issues that led to the sanction being imposed, and the conditions (if any) that are imposed, should the ban be lifted. Would you be willing to change the way you conduct yourself on Wikipedia to match the standards and expectations set by the community? If not, it's a waste of time trying to appeal. Ncmvocalist (talk) 03:54, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry. Yes, Ncm has provided a more appropriate link. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 21:08, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I unfortunatley have put in enough time to substantiate and provide two links to resources that confirm that the entry is unbalanced. Simple logic would suggest it is. Anyway, would someone please provide me with the link to move forward with removing this ban.

Thanks

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 04:08, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Caesarjbsquitti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I note that this topic is already labelled as being non neutral. I provided links and information on the talk page to correct this problem and it appears some were not happy. A total ban of the entire site is unfair, considering all the improvements I have made.

Decline reason:

I have read over the thread at WP:PITCHFORKS, as well as the events that led up to your block and the prior block. I see no reason to override a community ban at this time. I suggest you wait six months and then consider the standard offer. Trusilver 05:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

- Due to the fact that I was given a wrong link I sent in the appeal prior to the original request for review. Opps.

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 02:04, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Greg Zelinski

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Greg Zelinski. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Zelinski. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks.

I note that certain editors have instigated deletion attempts on many of my listings.

Is there any way that I can total their efforts against my site, due to my political, and religious beliefs ?

Is there a name or site where attacks on editors have been identified and labeled, such as site ownership, etc...?

Thanks

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 04:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A whole bunch of BLP articles have been targeted due to lack of notability. The number is somewhere in the thousands. It's unlikely you're being targeted specifically. HalfShadow 04:35, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- This is what I am trying to see, especially when obvious unfair articles are protected from being corrected.

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 04:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's some advice from a completely neutral, uninvolved editor: if you want to resume editing Wikipedia, you'll first have to drop the "I'm a victim" bit. You have been attempting to push a specific, political agenda, which is against our policies. That's why you were banned. It's not a conspiracy against you or a politically motivated bias. So, if you want to edit here, you'll have to adhere to Wikipedia's standards, not the other way around. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 13:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you for your advice.

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 15:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question to Cailil:

In hopes of making Wikipedia more complete and accurate, user Cailil has stated that my posting was not inaccurate, it was a mater of presentation. So the question to Cailil is what would you suggest would be the correct posting to accomodate my concern. I will add it to the site when I get the opportunity. Thanks for your time.

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 22:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cailil ^talk

Cailil is under no obligation to answer any of your questions. You have been banned and you've also been given links on how to appeal your ban. Continuing to use this talk page to soapbox will likely result in talk page privileges being revoked. Read WP:Standard offer and consider following the advice there if you hope to edit Wikipedia in the future. AniMate 22:49, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 02:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Caesarjbsquitti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It has been over 6 months, and I promise to not post, nor discuss, anything to do with issues that I have edited in the past for another 6 months - Thanks for your consideration

Decline reason:

After almost 2 days of discussion, there is nearly no support for an unblock at this time. Many of the people who commented noted the lack of evidence that you have reformed from the prior problems you have caused. May I suggest that you take a few months to edit at other Wikimedia projects, such as Wikinews or Wikiquote or Simple English Wikipedia, or another languages Wikipedia and establish a history of good editing at one of those, and then try to request another unblock after you have established a history of positive contributions. Jayron32 04:19, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 23:39, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For any reviewing sysops please see the community discussion relating to this block which enforces a community ban as detailed in that discussion--Cailil ^talk 01:56, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the consideration. I note that the action to have me banned was taken in February, after spending a month in hospital looking after an elderly man with no family, (Pasquale Bosco) he died on January 21st, 2010. This was in part responsible for me not being able to spend time on this defense.

To highlight the point, the complaint originated by my attempt to expose a very destructive half-truth; politically unacceptable truth. Case in point. During a winter election, a local politician, had his sign vandalized across the street, with the spray painting of "is a fag" on it. (I removed the sign and turned it over so no one would read it). Yes the statement was derogatory, however we cannot assume who did it.

The polarization of a subject through the use of generalized black and white logic is unproductive and it is hoped Wikipedia exposes this.

Merry Christmas !

--174.5.48.206 (talk) 18:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 22:19, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Italian Cultural Centre

The article Italian Cultural Centre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication or evidence of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PK T(alk) 21:25, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good day.

I have not been back to Wikipedia for a while, since being 'banned' by an organized attempt to prevent true truths from being posted.

I have noticed that the Italian Cultural Center has been deleted, and I might present the argument that other community organizations, like The Hoito have similar significance to the City of Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada.

Anway...Ciao !

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 21:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vitamin D and depression

Note that the site for vitamin D and related deficiency does not show depresson as a possible symptoms.

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/vitamin-d/NS_patient-vitamind/DSECTION=evidence

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 18:51, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RITA GRADUATION.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RITA GRADUATION.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:39, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I question the decision to remove the file about Rita Ubriaco, she was a note worthy person from Thunder Bay. However given that the article has been deleted, no sense in having the picture of her graduation.

Thanks again.

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 22:26, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Squitti and Squitt information on Baldassare Squitti site.

Squitti and Squitt information on Baldassare Squitti site. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baldassarre_Squitti

I note that someone has posted some rather negative information about Baldassarre Squitti.

The reference is to a person with the name Squitt, and with the statement, 'it is widely believed"... that Squitti came from England.

I question not only the validity of the connection between Squitt and Squitti but also the statement.

Thanks for your time.--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 17:09, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a continuation of a perceived malicious attack on myself, my postings ? and now my name ?

He (Sproggs) and Squitt, author of "Murder Hall", the "Gypsy's Warning", skunk of the "London Luminary", constitute a peculiar set of men who enjoy each, as far as numbers go, more readers than Chataubriand ever had, and live in a kind of under-world of literature of their own. They have their sets and circles, and entertain each other, I dare say, and have their jelousies and interests, like other men: they keep up a kind of Beggar's Opera under the world of letters, and literary Life Below Stairs. (...) Squitt is now writing a fiction in which there is a "titled ruffian" figuring away every week, who, I fear, will be the death of me. The absurd unnatural struct of that being (for he is not human at all, whether "titled" or not) through these columns there is a weariness to the flesh. He has married a tradesman's daughter for her money, and is going to murder her in a tower in the country. He is also a high political man. (I am willing to hope that the existing Cabinet are now way delineated here.) He talks and she talks in a way that no human being ever did on our planet. The Lord has a gamekeeper who keeps people locked up, and bribes several men to hold their tongues - from which I begin to dread that he has been at these wicked games from early youth. Unfortunate Squitt! How does Squitt get hundreds of thousands of readers to listen to this mass of malignant balderdash? Let us hope that at least our titled friend will die penitent (if as far off as a hundred numbers hence - for Squitt is prolix), and part with melancholy from these reflections on the personal infamy so curiously seems to mix itself up with revolutionary politics."

Thanks for your time.

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 17:20, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections: Nicola to Balldassare Squitti --Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 00:30, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Balldassare Squitti.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Balldassare Squitti.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:32, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Black+White Propaganda.

This type of propaganda includes white propaganda, and black propaganda.

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 21:44, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Baldassare Squitti article vandalism.

I have tried on previous attempts to bring someone's attention to the article on Baldasarre Squitti.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baldassarre_Squitti

Revision as of 22:27, 27 October 2012 (edit) (undo) 151.74.102.248 (talk)

A very creative piece of information that is not verifiable by a one time poster who has creatively attacked the name.

"The Lord has a gamekeeper who keeps people locked up, and bribes several men to hold their tongues - from which I begin to dread that he has been at these wicked games from early youth. Unfortunate Squitt! How does Squitt get hundreds of thousands of readers to listen to this mass of malignant balderdash? Let us hope that at least our titled friend will die penitent (if as far off as a hundred numbers hence - for Squitt is prolix), "

Please advise.

--Caesar J.B. Squitti: Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti (talk) 08:09, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Caesarsquitti3.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Caesarsquitti3.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:51, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zero Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zero Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 18:36, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alfred Petrone.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alfred Petrone.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 03:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Carroll Baker Petralia Grasley.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Carroll Baker Petralia Grasley.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 18:24, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Carroll Baker Petralia Grasley.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Carroll Baker Petralia Grasley.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 16:06, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Potestio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Potestio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Potestio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Broc (talk) 00:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^ What is spousal abuse.

[1] What is spousal abuse.

[1]