Talk:Cancer

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Former good articleCancer was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 22, 2005Good article nomineeListed
February 1, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
April 28, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 21, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
December 18, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Delisted good article

Semi-protected edit request on 15 August 2022

79.76.109.78 (talk) 13:24, 15 August 2022 (UTC) change 'prostate cancer in men' to 'prostate cancer in men who have a prostate' if you're going to say 'women who have a cervix' then its only fair[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"change 'prostate cancer in men' to 'prostate cancer in men who have a prostate' if you're going to say 'women who have a cervix' then its only fair" is the dumbest thing I've read on Wikipedia today. Congrats. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.232.131 (talk) 19:23, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 August 2022 (2)

In section 4.2, under the header "epigenetics", please consider the following edits: Please replace the following "Later epigenetic alterations' role was identified.[92]", with "Later a role for epigenetic alterations giving rise to chromatin variants[1] was identified.[92]" Thank you for considering. Obelista (talk) 20:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, although differently. Zefr (talk) 00:41, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keto diet as recommended for cancer treatment

Please remove this from the article. It is a commercial promotion and unnecessary. 2605:8D80:62D:D4B7:99D4:F1B:E41B:1866 (talk) 18:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and  Done. Zefr (talk) 15:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revise cancer risk language

The current risk language around obesity is not medically valid, as it could track a correlation rather than a causation. Mokshafarmsanctuary (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements needed

Along with a generic tag at the top, I included four citation needed tags. I advise medical regulars to combine the numerous brief paragraphs, add inline citations, and improve the "other animals" section. Since this medical article is of paramount importance, Wikipedia needs to have a well-presented entry. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 20:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]