User talk:Bearian/ArchivesAprToJune2012

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

Linda Biggs AFD

The Linda Biggs article has been nominated a second time for deletion. As you were a participant in the first AFD discussion, you may wish to particpate in the second discussion. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 13:10, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Internecine (2014)

I am a teenage director. This film will be coming out on June 13, 2014. Not to be rude, but personally I do not think that I should have my page deleted just because the movie is coming out in 2014. And does it really matter that my actors are not notable, since this is their first film too. HorrorDirector (talk) 18:26, 3 April 2012 (UTC)HorrorDirector

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Count von Count, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cobweb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:32, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bearian. You have new messages at Whenaxis's talk page.
Message added 22:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Whenaxis (contribs) DR goes to Wikimania! 22:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bearian. You have new messages at Whenaxis's talk page.
Message added 22:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Whenaxis (contribs) DR goes to Wikimania! 22:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

I remember wanting to talk to you about something with talk pages... I came across the Torres page, so my tiny brain remembered.

FYI... WikiProject Biography no longer uses "importance" or "priority" parameters. They have been replaced by work-group priority... politician-priority=, sports-priority=, a&e-priority, etc. Also, you listed Torres with the a&e-work-group, when he should have had musician-work-group. I'm not sure if you are aware of this group. Bgwhite (talk) 07:58, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite


Hello Bearian. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.


You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 01:38, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your support at my RfA. I will do my best to live up to people's confidence in me. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Note to self: AfD? Bearian (talk) 20:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

Dark Metal

Hey! Thanks for your support on Dark Metal (genre). Could I trouble you to look at Dark Rock as well? You seem pretty unbiased... thanks in advance.  The Steve  06:30, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

New England Wikimedia General Meeting

The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future!
Potential topics:
Sunday, April 22
1:30 PM – 4:30 PM
Conference Room C06, Johnson Building,
Boston Public Library—Central Library
700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

Message delivered by Dominic at 09:08, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Eduardo Torres (organist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Gramophone and Organ
Bandrefam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bantu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at [[Talk:Tirumala Venkateswara Temple]]. Pavan 23:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Please participate in the RFC discussion of whether Thondaiman has built the Tirumala Temple. Pavan 23:45, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

You're invited to Wiki-Gangs of New York @ NYPL on April 21!

Wiki-Gangs of New York: April 21 at the New York Public Library
Join us for an an civic edit-a-thon, Wikipedia meet-up and instructional workshop that will be held this weekend on Saturday, April 21, at the New York Public Library Main Branch.
  • Venue: Stephen A. Schwarzman Building (NYPL Main Branch), Margaret Liebman Berger Forum (Room 227).
  • Directions: Fifth Avenue at 42nd Street.
  • Time: 11 a.m. - 5 p.m. (drop-ins welcome at any time)

The event's goal will be to improve Wikipedia articles and content related to the neighborhoods and history of New York City - No special wiki knowledge is required!

Also, please RSVP!--Pharos (talk) 17:11, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

Seamus (dog)

I noticed that your contributed to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seamus (dog). Please note that there is a new AfD for the same article. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seamus (dog) (2nd nomination) HHIAdm (talk) 21:55, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

As a contributor to this article, you may be interested to know I have nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillary Clinton presidential campaign office hostage crisis. Robofish (talk) 20:43, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Pedro's recall criteria

You may care to reconsider your position.[1]

Why? I probably won't push to recall him. Bearian (talk) 16:17, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

AfDs

Size Even if an edition of Wikipedia is comparatively large, it needs sources. How large a wiki is is entirely independent of its notability--it's all about sources. —Justin (koavf)TCM 17:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Obama Eats Dogs

Thank you for the Barnstar of Diplomacy. Debbie W. 22:17, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Kittens

Thank you! Prioryman (talk) 00:20, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Seamus article

Bearian, I need advice about the Seamus article. Yesterday, an admin put the article under full protection until May 7th because of edit disputes. I think that there was a belief by the admin that some degree of consensus could be reached. However, based on what I've been seeing on the talk page, the number of disputes just keeps increasing. I've stopped commenting on the Talk page for now because new threads keep popping up. I count at least 7 different issues (see list below) that are in question, and I'm concerned that the edit warring will resume on May 7th. What can be done to help resolve some of these issues? Issues

(1) Quote by PETA -- there is a proposal to combine two quotes from different sources by the President of PETA
(2) Sentence about super PACs -- two super PACs have been founded regarding the Seamus incident; discussion about if info should be removed.
(3) Sentence about animal cruelty databases -- Romney is listed in two privately-run databases; discussion about if info should be restored.
(4) Sentence about Gail Collins, who wrote 50 article about Seamus; discussion about if info should be removed.
(5) Comments about Obama's jokes at the White House Correspondents Dinner
(6) The Obama Eats Dogs meme -- there is a proposal to add this to the article.
(7) NPOV tags -- there is a discussion that the entire article is not neutral because it doesn't include info about Obama eating dogs.

Thank you. Debbie W. 17:42, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Philippine WikiCon

You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

Admin review comment

Hi Bearian, I know it's almost been a year but thanks for this. ;) Best. Acalamari 09:49, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

You are welcome. Bearian (talk) 18:34, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

Talkback

I left a question for you at WP:Articles for deletion/Amy Sanders. —Bagumba (talk) 19:07, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

New York

Thanks, I hadn't checked to see if anything was in userspaces. I was filing most of our old system for deletion since we are trying to make it easier for people to use, salvaging only the parts with information and getting rid of as many transclusion-only pages as possible. Rob SchnautZ (WMF) (talkcontribs) 21:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

FYI

Hi Bearian, hope things are going well for you. I just wanted to let you know that I removed some of your comments on Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ (see history). That section probably should have been in an archive box (I'll have to go and update the procedures page to make sure the trainee clerks know that in the future), but those statements normally are not for threaded discussion regardless. Feel free to adapt your points into a statement for the talk page or evidence for the evidence page though. Best, NW (Talk) 22:05, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

I have no problem, since it is archived, except for my seconding of one user's opinion, which I would like to change back. Bearian (talk) 00:25, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Well, that's so minor that I wouldn't want to say no. Maybe open a new section to make that point and any other points you might have? NW (Talk) 10:46, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
OK, later. Bearian (talk) 19:16, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Help with Bloomberg Law

Hi-there. I have been working on a new draft of the Bloomberg Law article that currently lacks any real content or citation. I am reaching out to you directly because I have sought guidance elsewhere, but nobody has shown enough interest in the subject to help review or implement the edits to the existing article. I prefer not to make edits myself because I do some work with Bloomberg and realize this creates a conflict of interest, which I have acknowledged here. With your expertise in law I was wondering if you would be willing to review my draft and, if deemed appropriate, help implement them into the existing article. My draft can be found here. Thank you for your time! --RivBitz (talk) 20:24, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

It's good work so far! Bearian (talk) 20:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, I feel that draft is ready to be edited into the existing article. I'd rather not do it myself due to COI. Would you make the edit on my behalf? --RivBitz (talk) 21:12, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
OK, if there's no rush, I will do it next week. Bearian (talk) 21:14, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Much appreciated! I'm eager to see them added. --RivBitz (talk) 21:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi-there, just wanted to see if you will still be able to implement the Bloomberg Law edits this week. Thanks! --RivBitz (talk) 13:49, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
I just noticed the "Bearian is busy" sign at the top of your talk page and I entirely understand. Just wanted to check to see if you would have a moment to either review and implement the changes or point me in the direction of someone who can. Thanks again for your time, I really appreciate it! --RivBitz (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Yes, try to contact User talk:DGG and User talk:Newyorkbrad. Bearian (talk) 19:32, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Since the decision to keep this article, every single reference source was deleted, as was some of the info about the hospital. Yesterday, I pretty much rewrote the article and in the talk page under ==Deleted material== I provided much information about some of the sources that were deleted and the new sources I added. Since you commented in the deletion discussion, I thought you may be interested to revisit this article and see what you think of my updates and comments. Bill Pollard (talk) 12:52, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

Notification

WikiThanks
WikiThanks
I have mentioned you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ/Evidence#Reply to questions by Fæ. If you wish to comment please take note of the guidelines at the top of the page and either the same page or Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ/Workshop may be suitable. Thanks -- (talk) 09:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC) (talk) 09:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

Onion the dog

Uhh, not sure how to put a title on this, but...per your request, non-local cites have been added to Onion the dog, currently an Afd. MadZarkoff (talk) 21:24, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Cheers for cite memory jog

Aaaahh it's coming back to me now, thanks for the reminder! Power Society (talk) 14:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

LOL

  • Thanks! Glad to make you laugh! Bearian (talk) 22:50, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

Barnstar

Why thank you. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 20:27, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bearian. You have new messages at Elektrik Shoos's talk page.
Message added 00:50, 21 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

elektrikSHOOS (talk) 00:50, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Articles for creation urgently needs your help!

Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. There are currently 2441 submissions waiting to be reviewed.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Are you autoconfirmed?
  5. Can you review submitted artcles based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.


Click here to review a random submission Article selected by erwin85's random article script on toolserver.

We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just a few reviews, would be extremely beneficial.

On behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation,

Callanecc (talk) 03:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Its Okay

No worries friend. We even got a user account for [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Michael.ocansey Michael Ocansey] which is serving basically the exact same purpose of what I created earlier. If necessary, I will request for the Undeletion later on. thanks

--Nkansahrexford (talk) 04:26, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Dowd on Sandusky

Hi Bearian, the day after Dowd's column on the Sandusky case you added this quote: "Like the Roman Catholic Church hierarchy, the Penn State hierarchy appears to have covered up pedophile crimes to protect its brand." Without giving any editorial notice, the Times site has removed the sentence. I've never run into this, but since you've been around WP for quite a while, I bring it to you: How do we deal with a quote that's no longer in the given citation? (I hope the Times isn't doing this as a matter of practice.) Best, – dave :: ccnut – 16:49, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Nevermind: after I tagged it, another editor removed the quote altogether, then another editor verified it in the print edition, added the quote again, and removed the link since the on-line version has changed. – dave :: ccnut – 21:01, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

Hello, please help

Hello!

I wonder if I might interest you in this: Wikipedia:BLP_noticeboard#NXIVM. We need help. Chrisrus (talk) 07:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited United We Stand America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Way (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC)