User talk:Robofish

Notes:

• This talk page is not a forum; it is meant for messages to me only. Please take off-topic discussion elsewhere.
• If you leave a message here, I will reply here and tag your username to notify you, unless you request otherwise.
• If I leave a message on your talk page, I prefer for you to either reply here, or notify me of your reply by tagging my username.

Hello Robofish, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! Budgiekiller 10:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikipedians Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Request to re-assess article quality

Dear Robofish, please check out the more detailed message I left for you here: Talk:Yearbook on International Communist Affairs. I would like to request your re-assessment of the article's quality. Thank you. (talk) user:Al83tito 7:15, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

"Paris in the Belle Époque" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Paris in the ''Belle Époque'' and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 2#Paris in the ''Belle Époque'' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 03:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

10 years ago

In this diff at a [Signpost-related RFC] I quoted your commenting at a Signpost arbcom report 10 years ago. Thank you for that, back then. Feel free to comment in the current discussion, which is about whether Signpost should try to be NPOV or allow itself to take one-sided positions with respect to open Arbcom actions. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 23:43, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

Thanks for the notification! Wow, you reached into the past to find that one. :)

I'm not active here any more, haven't read the Signpost in years, so I don't think I'll involve myself in the current discussion. But thanks anyway. Robofish (talk) 23:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

"Mary Bale" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Mary Bale has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 24 § Mary Bale until a consensus is reached. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 16:23, 24 September 2023 (UTC)