User:Bellerophon/Dashboard

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search


RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 00:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

Immediate requests Entries
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 62
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 25

Possible vandalism

Editing alerts:

Vandalism reports

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

Usernames for administrator attention / Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Floriano Peixoto

Reason: 3 accounts of the IP sock master warned multiple times. Page has been protected, and 2 of his accounts have been blocked. They still insist on coming back with a new IP address. IP tries to add content without sources, deletes material without explanation, and ignores multiple user warnings. Auzandil (talk) 05:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

I looked at the most recent IP edits (the only IP edits since protection expired) and they seem defensible. I am reluctant to semi-protect the article given that the IP had removed "and for his remarkable deeds he is widely considered a national hero to the brazilians" which you restored in diff. Are you sure that is how an encyclopedic article should be written? Is there a reference? Also, there is nothing relevant on article talk. Can you identify some recent vandalism? Johnuniq (talk) 06:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
I forgot to ping Auzandil. Johnuniq (talk) 06:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
I understand what you mean. I believe that's more than just an edit dispute. That sentence is problematic, for sure, and I'm okay with deleting it. The issue is, the user deleted more than just that and said nothing. He deleted half of the page before protection. In his previous edits, they reverted changes, insisted on his version, and refused to communicate with other users. Is this how an article should be edited? He vandalized pages, and did block evasion. Should we allow sockedits and let other IP users do the same? There is no end to this.
Please see what he did. I can't think of any "good faith" at this point. @Johnuniq
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=On_the_Cult_of_Personality_and_Its_Consequences&action=history
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_Stalin%27s_rise_to_power&action=history Auzandil (talk) 06:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
I have to go elsewhere for a while and am hoping others will have a look. Johnuniq (talk) 07:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Dangerous World Tour

Reason: Addition of unsourced content that has been reverted repeatedly. HorrorLover555 (talk) 12:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

The One That Got Away (Philippine TV series)

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 12:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Baig

Reason: Repeatedly being changed from a redirect to a duplicate article, contrary to the merge consensus at Talk:Bey#Merge_proposal - Arjayay (talk) 12:48, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Brenda Biya

Reason: Biya has recently received international media coverage (see below) over her coming out. She already has an article on the French Wikipedia, which I have translated at Draft:Brenda Biya. Coverage:

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Kalki 2898 AD

change box office from 700 crore to 732 crore Smtsayantan (talk) 14:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:25, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
In India we use Film's box office as per Bollywood Hungama and Box Office India. Firstpost is not usable per all previous Indian film statistics. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:37, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

WP:CSD / Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
All candidates 5
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 0
Vandalism 0
Hoaxes 0
Spam/advertising/promotion 2
No significance or importance 0
Nonsense pages 0
No context 0
Duplicate articles 0
Previously deleted at XfD 0
Blocked or banned user creation 0
Test pages 0
Broken redirects 0
Empty articles 0
Dependent on non-existent page 0
Request from author 3
Technical speedy deletion 0
Unspecified reason 0
Files with unacceptable licenses 0
Redundant files 0
Orphaned non-free revisions 1
Expired PRODS

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Old AFDs

Old discussions (open)


Backlogs

Wikipedia backlog

WP:RFPERM


Rollback

User:2RDD

I hereby tender my application for the distinguished role of Rollbacker, having accomplished a notable volume of contributions exceeding 500 edits and consistently demonstrated a steadfast commitment to maintaining the highest standards of content quality through the diligent reversion of vandalized pages. I am confident that my expertise and unwavering dedication render me an exemplary candidate for this position, and I eagerly anticipate the opportunity to further serve the community in this capacity. 2RDD (talk) 10:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

In your own words, would you please explain what vandalism is? Using that explanation, please evaluate whether the following edits are vandalism, and provide an explanation as to why or why not:
Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:49, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 Not done This request is pure, possibly AI-generated, puffery that shows no understanding of what rollbacker even is. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Ben Azura

I requested Rollback several months ago and my request was was turned down because I didn't have enough anti-vandalism in my recent editing history. I haven't been very consistently active for personal and family reasons so I don't remember the exact course of events after that. After I was turned down I tried filtering the recent changes feed based on suggestions I saw here. This is the latest example of why that hasn't been working for me:

[1]

The vandalism was done in multiple edits and part of it survived my revert [2].

I had figured out a way to warn users after my previous request was turned down but after a few months away I don't remember how I was doing it. I wasn't able to find a way to easily warn the user whose username is not clickable the way it usually is when edits are reverted.

I am not planning to use rollback for anything other than reverting vandalism. Is this process really necessary to get the Rollback privilege? Ben Azura (talk) 13:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. You've only made a small handful of reverts since I declined your previous request. That's not enough activity for me to assess whether you'll be able to use this tool properly. That being said, youdon't need rollback to undo inappropriate edits. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 09:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Hey Fastily, it's your call man. I will use the recent changes feed as you have asked me to. What I wanted was to undo "consecutive previous edits" (from WP:ROLLBACK) like the situation I encountered that led to this request.
I am only interested in the tool because I think it is the right tool to help with the situation I encountered while patrolling RecentChanges.
Can you direct me to all the policies I need to familiarize myself with? What if I only get the most recent edit but miss the "consecutive previous edits"? I don't want to be blamed for that. By requesting Rollback have I fulfilled my end of responsibility in terms of what I can control? And, is warning editors a must? I don't want too many demands on my time (limited these days). But I still want to revert vandalism that I see. Let me know how you think it is best to proceed, please ping me with advice. Ben Azura (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
We already have Wikipedia:Twinkle which does exactly what you're asking for. You don't need rollback to use Twinkle. There isn't a specific policy I can point you to, and frankly, that's not the right question to ask anyways. There are no shortcuts here; if you want rollback, you need to put in the work, get experience patrolling recent changes, and prove to us that you're ready for it. -Fastily 09:24, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

User:GoldRomean

I believe that I meet the requirements for the rollback user right; I've read WP:RBK and WP:REVERT, have enough edits, try my best to consistently warn users, and I've been reviewing recent changes fairly consistently since around May. I think I have a good grasp of Wikipedia's main policies. I'm also currently enrolled in the CVU Academy. I use Twinkle and Ultraviolet but I would love to be able have full access to Huggle and have another tool to be able to stop vandals so I am requesting rollback rights. Thanks :D. GoldRomean (talk) 19:15, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done, although @GoldRomean, please ensure that you are consistently notifying editors when you revert their edits. I did see a few instances where you neglected to do so (e.g. 1, 2, 3). -Fastily 09:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Ok, thakn you. I will try my best to always warn editors :D. GoldRomean (talk) 14:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

User:S-Aura

I've been editing on Wikipedia for more than three years and i have developed the expertise to identify vandalism and familiarize myself with Wikipedia's content policies and copyright laws. I'm requesting the rights and responsibilities that come with this experience. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 13:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I noticed you started actively editing about a week ago. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month gaining experience editing Wikipedia before assigning you advanced permissions. Thanks, Fastily 20:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Ok, Thankyou for your guidance! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 06:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for reviewer rights.

File mover

Autopatrolled

User:Xegma

Hello there, I have created 30 articles as of now and i am requesting for Autopatrolled right. Xegma(talk) 07:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Could anyone look into my request ? It is now been couple of days of the request ? Xegma(talk) 06:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

User:C1K98V

Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Extraordinary Writ, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, you declined this previously. Do you want to have another look? Schwede66 06:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry I don't have time to look at this properly right now. I'm happy for another admin to process it as they see fit. – Joe (talk) 09:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Joe Roe, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Dclemens1971

As a new page reviewer for the past couple months, I've seen the value of keeping high-quality page creations out of the review backlog. Since 2022, I've created 154 articles (one of which was PROD'ed, uncontested, early on, but I learned from it and that's the only one ever proposed for deletion in any venue). I think my track record of page creation is strong and I'd like to receive autopatrolled rights to reduce the NPP backlog for my future article creations. I'm also autopatrolled for redirects if that's helpful context. Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done – Joe (talk) 12:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

User:SuperMightyBoy

Please give me Autopatrolled rights, i need it because i planned to create more articles on Wikipedia. I recently create the Guwahati–North Guwahati Bridge article and create more in future, i mainly focuses in the infrastructure articles. SuperMightyBoy (talk) 12:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has created roughly 1 article. MusikBot talk 12:40, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
But i planned to create more articles on Wikipedia, To give me Autopatrolled rights SuperMightyBoy (talk) 12:41, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 Not done, please read the message at the top of this page. – Joe (talk) 12:53, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Green tickY Ok SuperMightyBoy (talk) 12:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Sir MemeGod

I have created over 85 (or something like that) articles in the last few months, and am requesting the autopatrolled right. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 06:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC) Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 06:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

User:GMB205

Hello, I have created over 105 articles in total and I am requesting the autopatrolled right. GMB205 (talk) 15:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)


Confirmed

Account creator

Links