Talk:Otitis externa

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Otitis externa.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Solutions

re: alcohol + vinegar solution...

would white wine vinegar be ok to use? i tried it and it worked great, but i don't know about using it long term without having a second opinion!

Tim.mac 13:07, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

whoever it was who edited the page got this tip from the hospital website mentioned at the bottom of the page, so it seems to be correct. --Ajcee7 13:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i have a narrow ear canal so water gets clogged in there almost every time i go swimming. i have a white wine/alcohol solution i use. however, it's only useful for drying out the ear BEFORE the infection starts.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.108.233.164 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 28 June 2007

mild, moderate or severe.

Is it possible to quantify the disease as mild, moderate or severe. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.211.255.70 (talk) 14:20, 1 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Pictures?

This page contain a LOT of dry information. Could someone add a picture or something? Make it easier to read the whole page. Yongke 18:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These pictures are gross and I'd like to be able to read about this without having to stare at that crap. Wikipedia's formatting prioritizes pictures so I can't even avoid it by reducing the size of the window. Can we cut it down to one picture and not have it at the very top of the page?2001:420:28C:1250:69ED:B2D7:DA5:D9AE (talk) 18:18, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

This article is getting clumpsy, would anyone clean it up a bit? --Esthaleida (talk) 09:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article seems to be taken straight out the textbook. For the most part it doesn't cite any sources, it's extremely redundant, and it uses a language that is almost scolding the reader for picking his or her ears. It's like talking to a doctor, and that's not encyclopedic at all. Do you notice how many times it mentions not poking the ear canal?

The article needs straight to the point sections: causes, symptoms, medication, complications, or something like that.189.175.213.233 (talk) 16:13, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is well written enough and has sufficient references so I removed the expert-subject and refimprove tags (they just clutter the page for any minor things). Sultec (talk) 09:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pain

Damn right about the pain, this thing is killing me!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.226.1.229 (talk) 18:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Earphones?

I think I got this because I bought a pair of rubber in-ear earphones, which fit very closely to the opening of the ear-canal. Would any one agree these are a risk factor? Should something about them be added? Malick78 (talk) 10:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got it from wearing earbuds as well. 24.255.33.88 (talk) 18:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bacterial VS fungal

can some one tell how to differentiate between ( fungal and Bacterial ) infection ?? (with pictures if applicable). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.52.173.30 (talk) 03:08, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Really?!

Can I not look up a single medical condition on Wikipedia without being treated to a horrendous, atypical, worst-case-scenario picture at the top of the page? --Buddy13 (talk) 02:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

totally agree with buddy13 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.64.37.148 (talk) 15:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Otitis externa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090717170308/http://www.ent.uci.edu:80/surfer's%20ear.htm to http://www.ent.uci.edu/surfer%27s%20ear.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:16, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]