Talk:Extramammary Paget's disease

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Extramammary Paget's disease. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060925043450/http://www.cancer.org/docroot/cri/content/cri_2_4_1x_what_is_vulvar_cancer_45.asp to http://www.cancer.org/docroot/cri/content/cri_2_4_1x_what_is_vulvar_cancer_45.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:52, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Technical tag

I placed a technical tag on this article several months ago. The article has changed since then and someone removed the tag, but I think that removal was not appropriate. The first two paragraphs of the article use the words "epithelium," "lactiferous," "erythematous," and "eczematous." I have a (non-medical) graduate-level education and do not know what any of those words mean. The second sentence defines it with reference to "Mammary Paget’s disease," which, again, is extremely unhelpful to a lay reader. Going deeper into the article, it only gets worse. It starts talking about "adenocarcinoma" (again, couldn't define that if you asked me) without explanation.

This article needs serious cleanup to make it understandable to people outside the medical field. I understand that this is a complicated topic, but there are lots of complicated topics on Wikipedia. This article should not be impenetrable. agtx 17:55, 14 June 2018 (UTC)