This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Oppose: Traditional Chinese medicine is already 140k and unwieldy; Ophthalmology is sufficiently distinct branch of medicine that it seems reasonable for Chinese Ophthalmology to have a distinct page. The further reading section alone suggests that there are more than enough references supporting this as a distinct topic. Klbrain (talk) 21:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(Talk) 02:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC)