Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in Belarus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the COVID-19 pandemic in Belarus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Belarus

	Belarus portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Central Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal COVID-19 pandemic in Belarus is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

COVID-19 Mid‑importance

	COVID-19 portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Pulmonology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Pulmonology task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Viruses Low‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[COVID-19 testing#PCR based|PCR-based COVID-19 test]] The anchor (#PCR based) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

WikiProject COVID-19

I've created WikiProject COVID-19 as a temporary or permanent WikiProject and invite editors to use this space for discussing ways to improve coverage of the ongoing 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Please bring your ideas to the project/talk page. Stay safe, --Another Believer _(Talk) 17:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Case fatality rates

"The case fatality ratio for COVID-19 has been much lower than SARS of 2003,[4][5] but the transmission has been significantly greater, with a significant death toll.[6][4]"

This is currently in the main article. I do not doubt this, because other countries show a similar pattern (if they have a comparable counting system + health care system and comparable aging distribution in the population) - but I would recommend to also add numbers right here, such as "transmission rate of R xyz" or whatever the value is. It is a bit cumbersome to click through all these external articles before reaching that number on your own. 2A02:8388:1641:8380:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 23:47, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unusually un-noisy daily case counts

@Nicholas Velasquez: Much of the Belarus daily infection counts are less noisy than they should be: see the preprint arXiv:2007.11779 (other forms of archiving: Zenodo: 3951152 ; swh:fcc9d6b...). For COI reasons, it would be best be someone other than me who adds material about this to the article. Boud (talk) 14:17, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is quite obvious. However, such is the official statistics, and there's not much we, as editors, can do about it, since anything apart from potential leaks, or specific Belarus-related publications would be considered an original research. -- Nicholas Velasquez (talk) 17:14, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nicholas Velasquez: It's research in a preprint - external to Wikipedia, submitted for peer review to a regular academic journal. I'm not neutral here, but you are. Using the abstract of an academic research article is generally considered the most reasonable way to use the information from it - Belarus is listed in the abstract; that's independent of my role as a Wikipedian. Boud (talk) 11:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for mentioning this, because somehow I forgot to search for "Belarus" in the paper. Going to add it. -- Nicholas Velasquez (talk) 12:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Belarus is now spelt in full (instead of just "BY") in the abstract of the final peer-reviewed version. I updated the ref to include the peer-reviewed bibliometry parameters. The peer reviewers' comments are themselves available at the journal website (right-hand column). Boud (talk) 19:23, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

reference list

The reference list is missing. Could you correct this? I need it for my research. Thanks a lot! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.229.229.168 (talk) 17:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

inside information

i know a guy that have a wife that is from belarus. she travelled there because her father died of corona. what she says is that they are building new graveyards which quickly fills up.84.212.107.130 (talk) 09:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PEIS warning

The following warning appears on the page when you preview it:

Warning: Post-expand include size is too large. Some templates will not be included.

To reduce the amount of content that contributes to the issue, I suggest switching the six daily graphs found in the "Additional statistics" section to something more practical like weekly or monthly numbers. In its daily format, the x-axis labels as well as the data points aren't readable. If this doesn't resolve the warning, then I also suggest doing the same to the daily Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Belarus medical cases chart. Jroberson108 (talk) 12:42, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, haven't noticed it. Previously, a similar problem was resolved with the "Timeline" section being too big (it's content was just moved to separate articles), but I am not sure how to fix this one neither from the technical standpoint, nor from the standpoint of preserving the information, since switching to weekly/monthly values removes valuable data from the template's source code, if I understand what you're suggesting correctly. Perhaps, we should try moving the statistics to a separate page, maybe it fixes it. -- Nicholas Velasquez (talk) 00:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]