Talk:Animal bite

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Vandalisim:

i have discovered this text at the bottom of the page: MITCH GOT RAPED BY DONKEY COCKS it was probably a new user. if anymore vandalisim is seen, please place a tag thanks YaddaYaddaBlahBlahBlah 05:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

kk, i saw some more vandalisim in the edit history and theres about 3 instances! YaddaYaddaBlahBlahBlah 05:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If any more vandalism is seen, just delete it. --vgmddg (look | talk | do) 20:17, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

picture?

Is such an eh, *cough* gay *cough* picture required? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.70.123.180 (talk) 22:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I agree. I'm going to delete it right now.
Apparently someone put the picture back. I know wikipedia should not be censored from disturbing pictures in general, but in this case it's absolutely unnecessary and doesn't help the reader understand what a bite is. It appears as if a bite means "sadism by many naked men in hell". For those reasons, I'm removing it again. SuperMidget (talk) 12:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scorpions?

Why are scorpions mentioned in an article dedicated to biting? A scorpion injects toxins via its stinger rather than through its bite. Wouldn't that merit relocation to an article on stings?

Inappropriate Example

The statement, "This could happen if a female bites too hard during oral sex," is inappropriate for a number of reasons: The other bullets in that section do not give examples (good, bad, or indifferent). Doing so in this case lacks parallelism and is poor style. The statement is missing a period at the end. The statement blithely introduces a "female" without explanation or preface although many forms of oral sex do not involve a woman. Finally, the sexual nature of the comment is unwarranted and unrelated to the scope of the article. 74.140.112.243 02:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)RedFez[reply]

what's innapropriate is that picture

Yeah thats true

Sexual nature of biting

I'd like to see Wikipedia cover the sexual nature of biting a bit better. The current page seems scoped to biting as an animal defensive behavior, and as a part of early childhood. But there is much more to biting. I'm dumping this on the talk page to give controversy a bit of time to settle before putting it on the article page.

Here are some tables from Gebhard, Paul H. (1979). The Kinsey Data: Marginal Tabulations of the 1938-1963 Interviews. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) They sort of go along with the data at Kinsey Reports#Biting but really it seems to make more sense that they go in the Biting page rather than the Kinsey page, since the latter should not be an attempt to reproduce all data from those reports.


Table 216 Frequency of Respondent Biting in Sexual Activity
Male Female
White Black White Black
Frequency College Non-college College College Non-College College
Never 65.5 73.1 71.9 67.1 74.9
Rarely 16.1 10.1 13.6 9.4 9.7 5.5
Occasionally 9.7 7.5 14.2 9.3 11.8 7.8
Often 8.2 8.2 4.5 8.7 10.4 11.0
Never now, formerly did 0.4 1.1 0 0.7 0.9 0.9
Rarely now, formerly more 0 0.6 0 0 0
Occasionally now formerly often 0 0 0 0 0 0

Standard Question: "Do you gently bite or nibble your partner during petting or intercourse?" If affirmative reply: "often, occasionally, or rarely?"

JTMresearch 16:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Table 217 Frequency of and Response to Being Bitten in Sexual Activity
Male Female
White Black White Black
Frequency College Non-college College College Non-College College
Never 55.8 62.6 33.1 59.2 56.0 51.8
Rarely 19.6 12.8 22.8 15.9 15.1 19.4
Occsaionally 13.7 10.3 34.3 14.8 18.7 16.7
Often 10.9 14.4 9.7 10.0 10.1 12.2
Of those bitten rarely, % aroused by it 35.0 37.0 20.0 38.8 40.1 20.1
Of those bitten occsaionally, % aroused by it 62.3 63.8 40.0 57.9 64.9 59.4
Of those bitten often, %aroused by it 58.8 54.2 35.0 68.5 69.6 55.5

Standard Question: "Does your partner bite you?" If affirmative reply: "often, occasionally or rarely?" and "Does it arouse you sexually?"

JTMresearch (talk) 23:44, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bite (Car Mechanics)

im looking for car terms for my concepts of technology class.. I searched for bite and it gave me a wound.. can you help me out by sending me a car term please.. email address is hardcoreemu23@aol.com

I've heard of people getting run down by cars, but I've never heard of anyone getting bitten by one. What part of a car is its bite? Smerdis of Tlön 17:33, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

References needed

"In Eastern European folklore, ..." This quote seems a little NPOV to me. Please provide references.

Biting mechanic?

Strangely the article does not contain anything about mechanic of a bite and how is it performed. Needed more info about the act of biting rather than wound. I mean, it's also a verb, not just the noun. 213.7.110.237 (talk) 20:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)zondartul[reply]

Let me also say something

I must say something! Here is the thing: I hate the fact that people bite each other as part of sexual petting. Doing such a thing to each other to show affection is wrong.--User:Fangusu(User_talk:Fangusu) 13:13,6 June 2008 (UTC)

This is your personal opinion. You have every right to have this opinion, but you cannot keep removing the information about it because you don't like it. Wikipedia is for accurate, verifiable information. Regardless of your personal opinion, this information is both accurate and verifiable, and changing something true to something untrue is vandalism. Do not remove this or any other accurate, verifiable, notable information in the future, from this or any other article, unless there is a consensus among the other editors who have discussed it. --Icarus (Hi!) 08:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Legal liability for pet bites

Is there an article (or section) anywhere on the legal liability aspects of bites by pets anywhere in Wikipedia? H Padleckas (talk) 09:29, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I found Dog attack. H Padleckas (talk) 09:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Change Picture

Can we change the current picture to one that accents the dog's teeth more than their extremely huge eyes? Thanks. --vgmddg (look | talk | do) 20:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Il second that! That picture is more distracting than informative.... I'm Flightx52 and I approve this message 01:38, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Megalodon has the highest bite force of all animals[1]

This is not a sign or a symptom or a cause of a bite. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:20, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Animal bite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:19, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Animal Behaviour: Biting

Animal Behaviour: Biting is a content fork of this article that focuses on some specific aspects of animal bites. signed, Rosguill talk 19:56, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support merge. It was the second thing that came into my mind after seeing that article (the first was, that's gonna have to be moved to a less unwieldy title...) This is a well-meaning but overly WP:SYNTH WikiEd production that duplicates a lot of existing content and drags in some stuff that is largely unrelated (e.g. the mosquito sectiob - it's not even a "bite" in the technical sense of the word). Prune and merge the rest here. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:53, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support merge. Common sense. The two are duplicative... Veryproicelandic (talk) 22:21, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Merged to Biting by Guettarda. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]