User talk:Tounsimentounes

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome

Hello, Tounsimentounes, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 11:28, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Tunisian Arabic

Dear User,

As you are one of the contributors to Tunisian Arabic. You are kindly asked to review the part about Domains of Use and adjust it directly or through comments in the talk page of Tunisian Arabic.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 14:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 30 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Berber language

Dear Mr.,

Berber language was still spoken in Western Tunisia even after Punic era. So, punic language was not the unique language spoken in Tunisia before the spread of Arabic there.

Try to adjust this.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 10:51, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your important edits. I consider publishing the paper in a scholarly journal when it achieves the GA Status according to the regulations of Wikipedia. So, please provide to me your full name and institutional affiliation so that I can add your name as an author of this important work. --Csisc (talk) 13:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About publishing Tunisian Arabic

Thank you for your important edits. I consider publishing the paper in a scholarly journal when it achieves the GA Status according to the regulations of Wikipedia. So, please provide to me your full name and institutional affiliation so that I can add your name as an author of this important work. --Csisc (talk) 13:47, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About your institutional affiliation

I contacted the editor and she said to me that you should also provide your institutional affiliation. This means the Faculty in which you study for example. --Csisc (talk) 16:29, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for providing your institutional affiliation and contributing more to Tunisian Arabic work. --Csisc (talk) 13:36, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ar to aeb

Please stop changing ar template to aeb in articles related to Tunisia. If you want to make such a major change please add a topic in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tunisia. --Helmoony (talk) 00:12, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tunisia#Arabic vs. Tunisian Arabic. Huon (talk) 01:10, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Moreover, please stop moving pages to spellings that you prefer. This is not uncontroversial and must be discussed. Thanks Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 13:40, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisia

Don't just cn a bunch of stuff with cites. I could just remove that, but instead, prove your point _with_ cites. I daresay it is implausible that the population is 99% Muslim; show me the sources, and we can agree on a more reasonable version of the article. Pinkbeast (talk) 23:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wut, i was actually removing the 99% numbers because they are obviously impossible PinkbeastTounsimentounes (talk) 13:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I intend to seek dispute resolution if you continue to revert this page without discussion. Either produce sources justifying your edits or stick to what the sources - even the ones produced _by you_ - say. Pinkbeast (talk) 19:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead, I already proved my point on the talk page, plus you seem confused, on the message before you were completely approving the reasoning.Tounsimentounes (talk) 19:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I approved the reasoning because I had not then checked that the sources say what you claimed they did. They don't. They, in fact, support the 99% figure. Pinkbeast (talk) 19:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
99% is impossible anyway, because of lack of pertinent census we cannot support it. Also that's not what is stated in all of the sources I gave you. The global index of Religiosity and atheism estimates that 22% of Tunisians are not religious. Sigma conseil gives 62.5% of practicing muslims, among them 0.2% are chiites and 69.4 sunites. While the PewReseachCenter http://www.pewforum.org/2012/08/09/the-worlds-muslims-unity-and-diversity-1-religious-affiliation/#identity consider that 40% of Tunisia's muslims are not sunnis but non-denominational
So produce a cite to say it's not 99%. (I've already dealt with the "global index" one on the talk page.) Pinkbeast (talk) 01:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I won't, diabolic proof, take it to adminTounsimentounes (talk) 06:34, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I did so. Now we've got that out of our systems, surely it is not impossible to produce a cite saying Tunisia has no census, or no reliable data? Pinkbeast (talk) 09:46, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot have such a thing Pinkbeast, we cannot prove that something "is not", that's what we call a diabolical proof, I could prove you that the numbers are something else but it is impossible to prove they are not (nb: they don't exist/there is no census)Tounsimentounes (talk) 17:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That does not preclude a scholarly source casting doubt on the numbers, for example. Or even a reputable source _saying_ there is no census. Pinkbeast (talk) 17:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly that would be surprising that there is anything scholarly that aims to cast doubt on this type of data anywhere, yet about Tunisia.Tounsimentounes (talk) 17:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Pinkbeast (talk) 06:47, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Boga (soft drink)

Hello, Tounsimentounes. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Boga (soft drink), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arbustum (talk) 17:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Demographics of Tunisia

Please see the closure of your report here. You may personally be certain that your numbers are correct, but you have the duty of persuading the other editors here. If either party continues to revert, blocks are likely. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:56, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 3 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

You're currently adding Tunisia related categories to a lot of articles with no consensus to do do. This looks disruptive and not helpful, please stop immediately. Jeppiz (talk) 19:16, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see in what it is distributive, linguistically, Tunisian Arabic influenced and was influenced by those languages that nowadays represent a considerable part of it, its normal that we list Tunisia too.Tounsimentounes (talk) 21:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Apart from the utter lack of linguistic evidence French or Italian or others were influenced by Tunisian Arabic, the category is for languages actively spoken in a country. Sardinian, for instance, is not spoken in Tunisia. Your edits to soft drinks per country were also unhelpful. Coca-Cola is American, not Tunisian, Fanta is German not Tunisian, and so on. I sincerely encourage you to read up on Wikipedia's policies before continuing to edit, especially WP:NPOV, WP:RS, WP:BRD and WP:OR.Jeppiz (talk) 21:41, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but you're acting very stupidly, i'm thinking about calling an admin nowTounsimentounes (talk) 21:42, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated mass-insertions of erroneous material despite several warnings

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information. Jeppiz (talk) 21:44, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

African Romance

It's twice already that I have to revert more or less the same unsourced information... why? Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 23:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 11 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your transcription

I advise you to understand what the IPA really is and read this rule WP:OR. What you are doing is simply unscientific and breaks the rules, you invent a non-existing transcription and put it in many articles, you may not do this.--11:28, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

If you speak about the transcription of the sounds in tunisian arabic, you are mistaken, they are not IPA but Tunisian Arabic in Latin alphabet. Sorry, I said that you didn't know the language, but apparently it wasn't the case. We are using a standard used for research on tunisian arabic. I advice we add the phonological transcript near to it.Tounsimentounes (talk) 13:15, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read WP:OR? Read it again. You invent an alphabet. You put your invention into some articles (I do not know into how many). Moreover, you create a page pretending that your invention is widely accepted by everyone.

I never claimed I know Tunisian, it does not matter at all. And I do not much care about this my "ignorance", Tunisia is out of scope of my interests. What I do care is reliability of information. What does matter is everybody must follow sources. Wikipedia is not a playground for everybody, it is a not place for propagating new ideas. You are simply breaking the rules. Where is your alphabet used? By whom? Is it accepted by the Tunisian government? By any Tunisian institution? What is it at all?

And do not roughly revert other edits, which you simply dislike. I tried to improve the page according to the Wikipedia standards. If it is about the IPA, then one should use the IPA. I made the page better, you, with the reverting, made it worse. If I made small mistakes (and I must have), just correct them, do not revert everything and do not put your original research back. You break another rule WP:DIS, read it as well.--Lüboslóv Yęzýkin (talk) 11:04, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tunisia

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tunisia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SSTflyer -- SSTflyer (talk) 07:40, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tunis

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tunis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SSTflyer -- SSTflyer (talk) 07:40, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tunisia

The article Tunisia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Tunisia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SSTflyer -- SSTflyer (talk) 22:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tunis

The article Tunis you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Tunis for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SSTflyer -- SSTflyer (talk) 22:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tounsimentounes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not a sock puppet Tounsimentounes (talk) 15:22, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Seems to be a clear case of sockpuppetry between both the technical evidence according to the checkusers and based on edit histories. only (talk) 21:26, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tounsimentounes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is the main account, not Exacrion. I understand why using multiple accounts in this fashion proved to be disruptive for the working of wikipedia. Also I apologize, i was still new to wikipedia and its rulings back then and I won't have the same behaviour, I only want to help the growth of wikipedia articles both in quality and quantityTounsimentounes (talk) 17:45, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You weren't new in October. You were, however, heavily POV-pushing. Huon (talk) 02:05, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I recommend you take the WP:Standard offer. Vanjagenije (talk) 02:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanjagenije: He's still active. At least I suppose. --Helmoony (talk) 22:19, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'll be monitoring this IP range. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanjagenije: This one too even if this time he's right for University of Ez-Zitouna about the spelling, I've made an error. But the revert is not correct for Al-Zaytuna Mosque. --Helmoony (talk) 01:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure this second IP is him. Vanjagenije (talk) 03:23, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tunisian Arabic

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tunisian Arabic you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 13:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tunisian Arabic

The article Tunisian Arabic you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tunisian Arabic for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 23:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tunisian Arabic

The article Tunisian Arabic you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Tunisian Arabic for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 13:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contests

User:Dr. Blofeld has created Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tounsimentounes. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Tounsimentounes"