User talk:MPJ-DK

(NDPWS)	Talk to me • Lucha Libre • Book Sources • Magazine Sources • Work in progress • Triplemanía & Anniversary

The "No Drama" Professional Wrestling Society (NDPWS) - aka. Just me

	By royal decree of the Alexander the Great Triple Crown Regent of the order of the "Timeless Triple Crown" and the most charismatic Grand High Togneme Vicarus I do declare that this page be a "No Drama" zone and that the royal regent of nobility (in other words me) shall "let it go" and practice the lost art of "No Drama". Fully recognizing my right to ignore my own decrees as well as your right to call me out on it when I an not being a "No Drama Lama". I am nothing if not inconsistent. I am a grumpy old man IRL (no I won't tell you how old) but I am trying to not be one on Wikipedia.
"Be kind to each other (even to the annoying ones)"

This is MPJ-DK's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2

Archives

Archive 1 February – Early May 2007
Archive 2 Early May 2007 - October 2008
Archive 3 November - January, 2010
Archive 4 January, 2010 - March 2013
Archive 5 August 2013 - March 2015
Archive 6 April 2015 - August 2016
Archive 7 August 2016 - December 2016
Archive 8 December 2016 - July 2018
Archive 9 August 2018 - December 2018

Your GA nomination of Pierroth Jr.

The article Pierroth Jr. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pierroth Jr. for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:40, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiCup

Congratulations! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Héctor Garza

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Héctor Garza you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Héctor Garza

The article Héctor Garza you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Héctor Garza for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:40, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Pierroth Jr.

The article Pierroth Jr. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pierroth Jr. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:22, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Héctor Garza

The article Héctor Garza you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Héctor Garza for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 21:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Yoshihiro Tajiri

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yoshihiro Tajiri you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 20:40, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Yoshihiro Tajiri

The article Yoshihiro Tajiri you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yoshihiro Tajiri for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 13:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiCup

Last year you helped me when I was setting up the new WikiCup pages and could not work out what I was doing wrong. This year I am having similar difficulties. Basically, editors who sign up have their details put onto a Participant page which increments numerically each year. See Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant10 for the 2019 cup, and now Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant11 which I have just created for 2020.

The main 2020 WikiCup page links to this and you can see where I am currently. The third entry is linked to the "Participant10" page and that is what it is meant to look like, but that is just for demonstration purposes. The first two entries are linked to the "Participant11" page but the system does not like it. Last year the problem turned out to be with the formatting of the participant page but I cannot see what has happened this time. Your help would be welcome. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 15:41, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If I remember in a year's time, I will set up a very short version of the Participant12 page so that errors are more easily locatable. Thank you for your help, and a happy new year to you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:27, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NWA Hard Times.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NWA Hard Times.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of WWF/AJPW/NJPW Wrestling Summit

Hello! Your submission of WWF/AJPW/NJPW Wrestling Summit at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kosack (talk) 20:49, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mexican National Atómicos Championship

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mexican National Atómicos Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 03:41, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for La Parka II

On 12 January 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article La Parka II, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. --valereee (talk) 19:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mexican National Atómicos Championship

The article Mexican National Atómicos Championship you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mexican National Atómicos Championship for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 22:21, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Kazuo Sakurada

On 16 January 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kazuo Sakurada, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of CMLL World Micro-Estrellas Championship

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article CMLL World Micro-Estrellas Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ducktech89 -- Ducktech89 (talk) 17:02, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UWA World Junior Heavyweight Championship.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UWA World Junior Heavyweight Championship.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of CMLL World Micro-Estrellas Championship

The article CMLL World Micro-Estrellas Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:CMLL World Micro-Estrellas Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ducktech89 -- Ducktech89 (talk) 01:21, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Scarlett

Hi, MPJ. Can you help me with Scarlett Bordeaux article? I created the persona section, where she explained her gimmick and her POV about sexyness in pro wrestling, but was deleted. Maybe it's because I'm not a English native-speaker, so isn't well written. Can you take a look? I like how do you write the wrestling persona section, is very informative. Here is the section. Thanks :) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:58, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for WWF/AJPW/NJPW Wrestling Summit

On 28 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article WWF/AJPW/NJPW Wrestling Summit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1990 Wrestling Summit was the only time the World Wrestling Federation, New Japan Pro-Wrestling, and All Japan Pro Wrestling presented a show together? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/WWF/AJPW/NJPW Wrestling Summit. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, WWF/AJPW/NJPW Wrestling Summit), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Rock on Kelly Clarkson

DUDE Hi Much Love as a friend Can I show you something? [[Telley~~]] (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Titán (wrestler)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Titán (wrestler) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 21:01, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Titán (wrestler)

The article Titán (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Titán (wrestler) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:41, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Titán (wrestler)

The article Titán (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Titán (wrestler) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 10:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hirai Kawato

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hirai Kawato you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:21, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hirai Kawato

The article Hirai Kawato you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hirai Kawato for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 14:42, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hirai Kawato

The article Hirai Kawato you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hirai Kawato for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:43, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Irma González (wrestler)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Irma González (wrestler) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2020 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 57 contestants qualifying. We have abolished the groups this year, so to qualify for Round 3 you will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

Epicgenius, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with a featured article, five good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 895 points.
Gog the Mild came next with 464 points, from a featured article, two good articles and a number of reviews, the main theme being naval warfare.
Raymie was in third place with 419 points, garnered from one good article and an impressive 34 DYKs on radio and TV stations in the United States.
Harrias came next at 414, with a featured article and three good articles, an English civil war battle specialist.
CaptainEek was in fifth place with 405 points, mostly garnered from bringing Cactus wren to featured article status.
The top ten contestants at the end of Round 1 all scored over 200 points; they also included L293D, Kingsif, Enwebb, Lee Vilenski and CAPTAIN MEDUSA. Seven of the top ten contestants in Round 1 are new to the WikiCup.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. In Round 1 there were four featured articles, one featured list and two featured pictures, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. Between them, contestants completed 127 good article reviews, nearly a hundred more than the 43 good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Contestants also claimed for 40 featured article / featured list reviews, and most even remembered to mention their WikiCup participation in their reviews (a requirement).

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup newsletter correction

There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter; L293D should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead, Dunkleosteus77 should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican National Women's Tag Team Championship

Hello, MPJ-DK. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Mexican National Women's Tag Team Championship at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 08:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MrNiebla Mask.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MrNiebla Mask.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Antonio Peña Memorial Show (2007) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Brazo de Oro

CMLL 80th Anniversary Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Brazo de Oro

Infierno en el Ring (2015) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Brazo de Oro

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:47, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

reFill

Hi, I notice you use reFill. Although it is a very useful tool, it does have some shortcomings as illustrated in this edit of yours:

reFill has not been updated since the parameter deadurl= was dropped in favour of url-status=
where there is a url from archive.today, it fails to add the required archive-date= parameter

Regards --John B123 (talk) 12:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Irma González (wrestler)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Irma González (wrestler) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:22, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Irma González (wrestler)

The article Irma González (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Irma González (wrestler) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:01, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Irma González (wrestler)

The article Irma González (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Irma González (wrestler) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 14:22, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mexican National Women's Tag Team Championship

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mexican National Women's Tag Team Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mexican National Women's Tag Team Championship

The article Mexican National Women's Tag Team Championship you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mexican National Women's Tag Team Championship for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mexican National Women's Tag Team Championship

The article Mexican National Women's Tag Team Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mexican National Women's Tag Team Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 06:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Felino

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article El Felino you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:21, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Matt Taven

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Matt Taven you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:21, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Felino

The article El Felino you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:El Felino for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 15:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Matt Taven

The article Matt Taven you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Matt Taven for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 15:21, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Matt Taven

The article Matt Taven you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Matt Taven for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 10:41, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Felino

The article El Felino you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:El Felino for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for La Dama Enmascarada

On 6 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article La Dama Enmascarada, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that La Dama Enmascarada became the first female professional wrestler in Mexico to be forced to unmask when she lost a Lucha de Apuestas match to Irma González in 1958? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, La Dama Enmascarada), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Irma González (wrestler)

On 6 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Irma González (wrestler), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that La Dama Enmascarada became the first female professional wrestler in Mexico to be forced to unmask when she lost a Lucha de Apuestas match to Irma González in 1958? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Irma González (wrestler)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Hijo del Fantasma

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article El Hijo del Fantasma you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 07:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Hijo del Fantasma

The article El Hijo del Fantasma you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:El Hijo del Fantasma for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 09:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Hijo del Fantasma

The article El Hijo del Fantasma you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:El Hijo del Fantasma for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

music on my talk, listen ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Templario

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Templario you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Templario

The article Templario you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Templario for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 16:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Templario

The article Templario you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Templario for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

La Metálica

Hello, MPJ. One question. I have seen your article about La Metálica. In the C&A section, I have seen Producciones Sanchez and Wrestling Martin Calderon. In Spanith, it's written Sánchez and Martín Calderón. I think the promotions should be written as the names. Usually, English sources and Cagematch don't include Spanish accent mark. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:43, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

True, they list her as La Metalic as well, I fixed the names, thanks. MPJ-DK (talk) 16:11, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

El Cuatrero

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article El Cuatrero has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN moving forward.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help with some articles

Hello. Congratulations for your GA. You're like the Good Article Machine XD. I Maybe you can help me with some articles. I would like to include a persona and style section for Undertaker and a Legacy section for CM Punk. As you know, my English it's usualy a wall bewteen me and good writing (Punk it's a FA). I like how do you write the articles and the style and persona section, I think you can help me. Thanks --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 13:43, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HHH Pedrigree Yeah I can definitly do that. Would it make sense to use a draft space to collaborate on it? That way we can work on it together and then add it to the articles once it's been worked through? MPJ-DK (talk) 13:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah. I started the Legacy section in my sandbox. I can include Taker's style and persona too. Thanks for your help. :)
  - Do you think we can make The Undertaker a GA? It's a pain, I don't like articles about current wrestler, a lot of vandalism and good faith editions, but it's strange that one of the most famous wrestlers isn't GA. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - HHH Pedrigree Active WWE/AEW/Impact wrestlers can be dicey to get to GA, especially if they are unstable with edit warring - I personally try to stay away from those myself and keep to the Lucha world. Since he's not that active, the Undertake one may be a good candidate though. I'd be happy to work with you on getting in GA ready, I haven't looked at the article itself so I am not sure what works needs to be done, but I'd be happy to help. MPJ-DK (talk) 17:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - My main issue with this (and every article) it's the excesive in-universe. It's the main complain for the pro wrestling articles (and the reason Taker lost the GA status in 2007). Also, the huge weekly coverage of WWF, sometimes it's amazing how every challenge, promo or brawl is detailed. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of La Metálica

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article La Metálica you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of La Metálica

The article La Metálica you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:La Metálica for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of La Metálica

The article La Metálica you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:La Metálica for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 10:21, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of La Dama Enmascarada

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article La Dama Enmascarada you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 10:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of La Dama Enmascarada

The article La Dama Enmascarada you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:La Dama Enmascarada for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 11:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Emilio Charles Jr.

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Emilio Charles Jr. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 08:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Emilio Charles Jr.

The article Emilio Charles Jr. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Emilio Charles Jr. for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of La Dama Enmascarada

The article La Dama Enmascarada you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:La Dama Enmascarada for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 08:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Emilio Charles Jr.

The article Emilio Charles Jr. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Emilio Charles Jr. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 08:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2020 May newsletter

The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

Epicgenius, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points
Gog the Mild, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
The Rambling Man, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews
Harrias, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews
Lee Vilenski with 869 points, Hog Farm with 801, Kingsif with 719, SounderBruce with 710, Dunkleosteus77 with 608 and MX with 515.

The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FTC

Hey it's great to always see featured topics grow in additions. But can you review some of the other nominations so the backlog can go down? It would be much appreciated. GamerPro64 21:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NWA World Welterweight Championship

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article NWA World Welterweight Championship has been completed.

Please let me know of you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the FLC nomination moving forward.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:03, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiCup

Are you happy with the points the bot has awarded you for your good topic? I find the scoring page a bit confusing on this subject, but think you deserve 5 points for each good article included in the topic on which you have done substantial work at some stage. I think you deserve 85 points. Is this how you read it? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bestia Salvaje

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bestia Salvaje you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bestia Salvaje

The article Bestia Salvaje you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bestia Salvaje for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 09:00, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bestia Salvaje

The article Bestia Salvaje you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bestia Salvaje for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 08:21, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Style and persona

Hi, MPJ. Congrats for your recent GA. As you remember, I started some section in my sandbox to incorporate to the articles. If you can help me, I will be very happy. :) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HHH Pedrigree sorry I did forget, I'll totally own up to that. Looking at the sections you have, which one is your top priority? THat way I can help with that part first. MPJ-DK (talk) 13:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I would like Punk and Taker :) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:23, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - HHH Pedrigree take a look at the CM Punk section, I've worked through the content, sourcing etc. does that look okay to you? MPJ-DK (talk) 19:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - it looks great, thanks :) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Former Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre Championships

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Former Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre Championships you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:41, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Former Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre Championships

The article Former Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre Championships you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Former Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre Championships for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 16:41, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Former Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre Championships

The article Former Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre Championships you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Former Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre Championships for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 11:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NGD

Hello, MPJ.Recently, I saw something. In the CMLL, there is written Nueva Generación Dinamitas. However, reading some sources, I found Nueva Generación Dinamita, without S. Maybe you want to made a research about it.

BTW, thank you for your words. As I have said, editing it's not so funny because other users complains, insults and eternal discussions. Others, just don't follow basic rules like OR. Thanks for your cheers. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mexican National Cruiserweight Championship

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mexican National Cruiserweight Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 14:21, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mexican National Cruiserweight Championship

The article Mexican National Cruiserweight Championship you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mexican National Cruiserweight Championship for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 15:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mexican National Cruiserweight Championship

The article Mexican National Cruiserweight Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mexican National Cruiserweight Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 08:02, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mexican National Atómicos Championship

The article Mexican National Atómicos Championship you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mexican National Atómicos Championship for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 07:40, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:JWB and duplicate arguments

Hi! I've never used WP:JWB, so I'm not sure exactly how it works, but I just thought I'd let you know that it's causing quite a lot of articles to end up in Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls. Specifically, some of the time that it gets you to change publisher = Súper Luchas into work = Súper Luchas, the work is already there, so it ends up with two "work" parameters (e.g. [1]). (Normally the software presents a warning on the "Preview" screen if you try and do that, but that presumably isn't something JWB shows you.) YorkshireLad ✿ ^(talk) 17:47, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mexican National Atómicos Championship

The article Mexican National Atómicos Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mexican National Atómicos Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated Mexican National Cruiserweight Championship for DYK

You can view it here: Template:Did you know nominations/Mexican National Cruiserweight Championship.

I encourage you to nominate future articles you create, expand 5x in size, or improve to GA, as most of the content in DYK is from North America and Europe. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:13, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Cuatrero

The article El Cuatrero you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:El Cuatrero for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Raymie -- Raymie (talk) 19:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Chabela Romero

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chabela Romero you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Chabela Romero

The article Chabela Romero you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chabela Romero for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Microman (wrestler)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Microman (wrestler) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Chabela Romero

The article Chabela Romero you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chabela Romero for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 07:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Microman (wrestler)

The article Microman (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Microman (wrestler) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 09:41, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Microman (wrestler)

The article Microman (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Microman (wrestler) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:21, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mexican National Cruiserweight Championship

On 15 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mexican National Cruiserweight Championship, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that La Parka Jr. (pictured) won the Mexican National Cruiserweight Championship, relinquished the title when he changed his ring name, then won it again under his new name? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mexican National Cruiserweight Championship. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mexican National Cruiserweight Championship), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chabela Romero

On 23 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chabela Romero, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mexican professional wrestler Chabela Romero had a feud with Irma González that played out across eight years and in three countries? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chabela Romero. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Chabela Romero), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Wug·a·po·des 23:10, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 12:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican National Middleweight Championship

Hello, MPJ-DK. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Mexican National Middleweight Championship at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 00:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:The Crash Heayweight Championship

A tag has been placed on Template:The Crash Heayweight Championship requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheImaCow (talk) 08:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2020 July newsletter

The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

Epicgenius, with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points
The Rambling Man , with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs
Gog the Mild, a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.

Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally, MPJ-DK added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

Hello, I've seen your comments about my edit on List of CMLL World Heavyweight Champions. I'll learned better for the next time. I just wish you didn't leave that comment to anyone to see. Good day. SeosiWrestling (talk) 06:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Gallito

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article El Gallito you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 07:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Guapito

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Guapito you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 07:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Chamuel (wrestler)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chamuel (wrestler) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 07:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Chamuel (wrestler)

The article Chamuel (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Chamuel (wrestler) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 09:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Gallito

The article El Gallito you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:El Gallito for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Guapito

The article Guapito you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Guapito for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Gallito

The article El Gallito you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:El Gallito for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Chamuel (wrestler)

The article Chamuel (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chamuel (wrestler) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Guapito

The article Guapito you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Guapito for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 07:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lady Apache

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lady Apache you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 08:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I got sidetracked from this. I'm going away on holiday in a couple of days, so for the moment I have deleted the GAN page and reverted so that it goes back into the queue. If it is still unclaimed when I get back from holiday, I will take it back on, but I thought it fairer to give you more opportunity to have it done, rather than have it sitting definitely not getting done for a further week. Harrias ^talk 15:59, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Zacarias el Perico

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Zacarias el Perico you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 09:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Forastero

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Forastero you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 09:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mije (wrestler)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mije (wrestler) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 09:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mije (wrestler)

The article Mije (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mije (wrestler) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 12:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Zacarias el Perico

The article Zacarias el Perico you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Zacarias el Perico for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:41, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Forastero

The article Forastero you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Forastero for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 15:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mije (wrestler)

The article Mije (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mije (wrestler) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 09:21, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Zacarias el Perico

The article Zacarias el Perico you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Zacarias el Perico for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 09:41, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Forastero

The article Forastero you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Forastero for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 16:21, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good articles

Hello. I left you messages on the Mije and Zacarías articles. Zacarias it's important, since a name change would be necesary. If you want, I can read other articles you have and correct them before the GA nomination. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:09, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Marcela (wrestler)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marcela (wrestler) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 17:21, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Marcela (wrestler)

The article Marcela (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Marcela (wrestler) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 20:00, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2020 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.

Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AAA Mega Championship.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AAA Mega Championship.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Marcela (wrestler)

The article Marcela (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marcela (wrestler) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Larry Hockett -- Larry Hockett (talk) 00:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mascara Dorada

Hello, MPJ. Again, congratulations for your GA. It's good to see hard work getting a reward. I was thinking... yesterday I saw that Gran Metalik's article stills named as Máscara Dorada. I was thinking to open a discussion to change the name to Gran Metalik. I know, he was a big star in México, but he has worked as Metalik for 4 years. Since you have edited the article a lot, I want to hear your opinion. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:19, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cinta de Oro Reliable Source

I am the brother of Cinta de Oro (formerly Sin Cara). I think I have a reliable source. Thank you!

File:Proof for MPJ-DK.jpg

Advice on AFC submission?

Hi MPJ-DK,

Would you mind checking out Draft:World Heavyweight Championship (Montreal version)? I actually used your title pages as a model and would really appreciate any feedback you could give me. Thanks. 173.162.220.17 (talk) 16:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Satánico

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article El Satánico you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 14:41, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Satánico

The article El Satánico you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:El Satánico for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 16:41, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lady Apache

The article Lady Apache you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lady Apache for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 20:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sansón (wrestler)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sansón (wrestler) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sansón (wrestler)

The article Sansón (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sansón (wrestler) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 11:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Satánico

The article El Satánico you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:El Satánico for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 12:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Dandy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article El Dandy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 09:20, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Dandy

The article El Dandy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:El Dandy for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 14:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lady Apache

The article Lady Apache you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lady Apache for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 08:22, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bandido (wrestler)

Hello, MPJ-DK. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Bandido (wrestler) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:55, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MPJ-DK, I noticed the subsection "Bandido (2016–present) --> New Japan Pro Wrestling (2019)" is unreferenced so I've marked it with {{Unreferenced-section}}. It will probably need a citation before you nominate for GAN. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:55, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sansón (wrestler)

The article Sansón (wrestler) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sansón (wrestler) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 16:22, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2020 November newsletter

The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is Lee Vilenski (submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by Gog the Mild (submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. The Rambling Man (submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with Epicgenius (submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.

The other finalists were Hog Farm (submissions), HaEr48 (submissions), Harrias (submissions) and Bloom6132 (submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
Bloom6132 (submissions) win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4.
Rhododendrites (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall.
Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.
Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
MPJ-DK (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.
The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.
Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup award

Congratulations! (You won this award last year as well.) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:07, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican National Middleweight Championship

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Mexican National Middleweight Championship has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the FL nomination.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:32, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Missing cite in NWA World Historic Welterweight Championship

The article cites "Hornbaker 2006" but no such source is listed in the bibliography. It comes from this edit in 2017. Can you please add? Or is it a typo in the year? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 03:46, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of El Dandy

The article El Dandy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:El Dandy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 09:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article drive notice

This message has been sent to users signed up for the Good articles newsletter. Add or remove your name from the list to subscribe or unsubscribe from future updates. Alternatively, to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. -- For the drive co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2021 March newsletter

Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:59, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:AAA Latin American Championship.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AAA Latin American Championship.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2021 May newsletter

The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in Round 2 were:

The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.

Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations \| July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2021 July newsletter

The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:

The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.

In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NWA Georgia Tag Team Championship.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NWA Georgia Tag Team Championship.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:All Elite Wrestling Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:All Elite Wrestling Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GWF North American Heavyweight Championship.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GWF North American Heavyweight Championship.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, The Rambling Man and Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are Gog the Mild, Lee Vilenski, BennyOnTheLoose, Amakuru and Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:AdorableRubi.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:AdorableRubi.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 15:56, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2021 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is The Rambling Man (submissions), who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:

The Rambling Man (submissions) with 5072 points
Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 3276 points
Amakuru (submissions) with 3197 points
Epicgenius (submissions) with 1611 points
Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1571 points
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 1420 points
Hog Farm (submissions) with 1043 points
Bloom6132 (submissions) with 528 points

All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for 8 FAs in round 5.
Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 5.
Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured topic prize, for 13 articles in a featured topic in round 5.
Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 63 GAs in round 4.
The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good topic prize, for 86 articles in good topics in round 5.
The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5.
Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall.
Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wolf Ruvinskis.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wolf Ruvinskis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

Good article nominations \| January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WCCW Championships

Template:WCCW Championships has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 17:04, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page mover revoked due to inactivity

Hello MPJ-DK. This message is to notify you that I have removed your page mover user right because you have been inactive for a year or more. This removal is merely procedural in nature and serves to mitigate the potential risks of having inactive accounts retain sensitive permissions. Should you require access again, please make a request at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Page mover. Thank you for your past contributions to the project and best wishes, --Blablubbs (talk) 14:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello MPJ-DK! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:18, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2022 May newsletter

The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:

Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| June 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BlueDemonPose.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BlueDemonPose.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 13:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Huracán Ramírez Championships.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Huracán Ramírez Championships.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:43, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2022 July newsletter

The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.
Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.

Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2022 September newsletter

The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:RDRBrackets

Template:RDRBrackets has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 04:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CMLL World Heavyweight Championship scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the CMLL World Heavyweight Championship article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 22, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 22, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

~~For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.~~

~~We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks!~~ Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:53, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, had to change Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:06, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2022 November newsletter

The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is

Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by
Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was
BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by
Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were
Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations,
Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.

During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.

Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round.
Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition.
Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4.
Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1.
SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1.
Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5.
Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall.
Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall.
Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been removed from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send due to inactivity

Hi MPJ-DK! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 2 years.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article review for CMLL World Heavyweight Championship

I have nominated CMLL World Heavyweight Championship for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 20:07, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NWA World Television Championship.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NWA World Television Championship.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WCW World Six-Man Tag Team Championship.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WCW World Six-Man Tag Team Championship.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of World Heavyweight Championship (Los Angeles) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Heavyweight Championship (Los Angeles), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Heavyweight Championship (Los Angeles) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]