Do you like my editing? Do you want to say hi? If so, please check out my guestbook here. Note: This message is also on my user page.
If I send you a message on your talk page, please reply there. I will be waiting. If you'd like, ping me. If you send a message on my talk page, I will reply here, and please expect to be pinged.
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.
To leave a new message: Click "New section" above. If that's too much, click here.
Archives
2020: JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2024: JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecWikiLove archive: Click here
This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.
My I Ask Why You Started With Any Only Warning
I'm talking about this IP talk page. They only had 2 edits (both vandalism), and were reverted. You were the first warning. Just wondering why did you start with an only warning? Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 00:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Me Da Wikipedian Happy to explain. The user was vandalizing by changing potentially controversial info in quick succession, which is why I did that. Feel free to let me know if that didn't clear it up for you. Thanks --- thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/$ 00:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Me Da Wikipedian Uh oh, looks like I got them confused with another IP. I have apologized and removed them from AIV. Sorry --- thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/$ 00:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine. A quick look at my talk page will tell you I've made a lot of mistakes too Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 01:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mind if I change the warning to level 1 or 2? Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 01:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Me Da Wikipedian Go ahead. Seriously. And about mistakes, it's funny, because I've never made this mistake before. Oh well. Yes, you may do that. Signed --- thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/$ 01:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oddly enough, this is like the 2nd time in 3 days I've notified a experienced editor about giving only warnings first (although the other one doesn't seem to have just made a mistake) Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 01:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can i please ask why you undid a change I made to Mr Cains page when I clearly spelt out the reaosns for my undoing of CanonNis undoing of my first edit? Are you guys supporting this LocalCbrHero guy? 121.45.168.167 (talk) 01:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You deleted lots of information. Sorry, but Wikipedia is written in a neutral point of view, so if you're against them, well, sorry.
that may be the case but the information delted was malicious. I will restrict my deletion of the last paragraph that relates to an "unconfirmed" accusation of an adult moive. Surely this can be deleted as it has no citations and is led with "unconfirmed". The accusation is completely false 121.45.168.167 (talk) 02:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We are not "supporting" anyone. Information cannot be removed because you need to pay to view it. See WP:PAYWALL. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 02:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK guys, you do what you need to do. You are actually supporting a number of major changes and edits made by the Localcbrhero user and I have seen nothing done in relation to the unconfirmed adult movie section. I ask that this be at least removed as it does not meet the verification and has no citations. I will leave the rest as its clear you wont allow me to remove it 121.45.168.167 (talk) 02:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
TheTechie, did you look into the claims of this editor? You kept quoting policy abbreviations and didn't address their concerns. IPs are editors too. This shouldn't have been brought to AN of all places. This can be resolved through discussion on the article talk page. LizRead!Talk! 04:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at the article, you can see that other editors removed some of the same improper content the IP editor removed and you mistakenly restored. Please look at edits instead of doing a knee-jerk revert. LizRead!Talk! 04:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry! The edits came on my radar while doing RC patrol and were marked as "section blanking", and was marked as "may be bad faith" which is which I reverted it. Apologies to the IP. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/$ 14:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]