User talk:Tamar Chkhartishvili

This is Tamar Chkhartishvili's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: EUt+ (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EUt+ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tamar Chkhartishvili! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EUt+ (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OnlyNano was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EUt+ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OnlyNano^talk 01:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I should also mention you have not fixed any of the sourcing errors, so that is still going to apply. I would suggest you add more sources before you resubmit. OnlyNano^talk 01:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I have a question, I tried to fix everything, also sources, they are official EU sources and University website, I do not understand how can I correct it. can you help? Tamar Chkhartishvili (talk) 08:43, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! I declined your submission because it's not written in the correct tone that you would see in an encyclopedia. In your case, it is written in a promotional way. There is word choice such as "cutting-edge" and "innovative." While they might have an innovative program, this comes off as promotional, and unencyclopedic (as your goal is, in terms of tone, to write in a formal tone). You can check out this page on encyclopedic tone to get more information about what we're looking for in terms of tone.

Additionally, in terms of sources, we actually want to steer around primary sources (such as a universities page, if they are involved in the program). Instead, a great source would be a newspaper which wrote an article about EUt+. They are independent of the topic. You can find a great sourcing guide here. A great example of a source you picked very well was the Le Monde article.

A small suggestion would be renaming the "Contact" section to "External links," as that can appear promotional. Though there is no issue with simply providing a link to their website.

If you need more help, or have completed those changes, I'd be happy to re-review the article, if you'd like! OnlyNano^talk 14:08, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Tamar Chkhartishvili

Your submission at Articles for creation: EUt+ (July 8)

Your submission at Articles for creation: EUt+ (July 11)

Navigation menu

Search