User talk:SafariScribe
 Archives (Index) |
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
- A request for adminship is open for discussion.
- How to describe past events on the main page
- Enforcing ECR for article creators
| Resources for maintenance and collaboration |
|---|
| Cleanup |
| Categories |
| Create an article |
| Referencing |
| Stubs |
| Deletion |
| Polishing |
| Translation into English |
| Images |
| Controversy |
| To-do lists |
| Disambiguation |
| More |
|
|
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard. |
The world was created for all.
No one is perfect even AI's do mis fault. Stay cool, just alert me and I will see it off!
— SafariScribe
Question from Badfighter+29 (12:43, 26 April 2024)
Hello! I hope you're well.
I'm not sure how this works, please confirm: are you a real person or a chatbot? I have a question: how do I add notes to a Wikipedia article? There are a few articles I want to add the note of 'the neutrality of this article is disputed.' What is the procedure for that?
Thank you and best wishes, Badfighter-29 --Badfighter-29 (talk) 13:43, 26 April 2024 (CCC+)
- Badfighter-29, Hi and welcome to Wikipedia. Firstly, editors are humans (volunteers) who read and edit this online Encyclopedia. If you see a page not written with neutrality, you should probably edit them and remove contents that seems to promote them.
You can list them here for me to review. Thanks! — Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 12:11, 26 April 2024 (CCC+)</>
Could you please clarify your closure? You said the consensus makes way for Aziz ul Haq to remain independent and not a dab to Azizul Haque
, but then moved that page anyway, which doesn't make sense. I don't think anyone, myself included, wanted a WP:MISPLACED situation. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Pppery, you should ignore the closure message at this time because I thought @DeloarAkram, and the other editor supported not to dab to Azizul Haque. There is no problem there, I saw you reverted the dab you made earlier; it's also good you came first to clarify. I will place that to dab since a line cited in the article said,
"Aziz ul Haq (24 January 1939 – 28 May 1972), also called Dr. Azizul Haque or Aziz-ul Haque, was a Marxist–Leninist communist activist from Pakistan and one of the notable literary icons of Pak Tea House"
. Thanks and I appreciate! — Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)- So, the consensus of that discussion is that Aziz ul Haq should redirect to the dab instead right? If that's the case you should clarify it at the discussion itself and implement it. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Pppery, I am about doing that. Just chill! — Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:33, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- So, the consensus of that discussion is that Aziz ul Haq should redirect to the dab instead right? If that's the case you should clarify it at the discussion itself and implement it. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Gerald F. Seib moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Gerald F. Seib. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and the bulk of this article is a copyright violation or close paraphrasing of the sources. Considerable issues with grammar make several of the passages inscrutable. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. gobonobo + c 14:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Gobonobo, this is a little issue you can fix and request revdel instead of userfying the article which meets WP:JOURNALIST and WP:GNG. You needs to see that through if it is simple as this. — Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- It is a good practice to check all AfC drafts for copyright violations before approving them. This article was almost entirely composed of word-for-word copies of passages from the sources. While the subject is notable, we shouldn't be accepting drafts that need to be completely rewritten. Also, there are serious problems with the grammar here, making many of the statements impenetrable. I also have concerns that the "arrests"/reactions section give undue weight, given this was all from one incident in 1987. gobonobo + c 15:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Gobonobo, I disagree with you. There are much to journalism than the arrest. Also, it might interest you to know according to the sources, the arrest was because of the articles journalistic works and possible not giving undue weight to the arrest and reactions. They are however, parts of being notable. This time, I believe it exceeds that WP:BIO1E. — Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Gobonobo, also I am not logged with my gadget because I'm on the bus and couldn't access earwig via this phone. However, WP:COMMONSENSE there was that the lines were correctly cited to sources that says exactly. So I'm not to be blamed here. I'll clean up and request revdel once I get home but also "calm down"—being that fast can get others annoyed especially when one reverts a good faith clean up. That's all I have for now. Bye! — Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if I annoyed you. Per WP:AFCR, copyright violations are one of the quick-fail criteria, so this draft shouldn't have been accepted. I draftified the article at the same time that you made some changes, so my sincerest apologies if any of your changes were not saved. I am also having difficulty parsing your responses here as your fluency in English is not very strong and I worry that it could affect your ability to competently evaluate AfC submissions. gobonobo + c 16:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Gobonobo, I know you don't have the time in the world, but at least you could have helped cleaned it and save reviewing further. There is no problem, Regards! — Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 16:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if I annoyed you. Per WP:AFCR, copyright violations are one of the quick-fail criteria, so this draft shouldn't have been accepted. I draftified the article at the same time that you made some changes, so my sincerest apologies if any of your changes were not saved. I am also having difficulty parsing your responses here as your fluency in English is not very strong and I worry that it could affect your ability to competently evaluate AfC submissions. gobonobo + c 16:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- It is a good practice to check all AfC drafts for copyright violations before approving them. This article was almost entirely composed of word-for-word copies of passages from the sources. While the subject is notable, we shouldn't be accepting drafts that need to be completely rewritten. Also, there are serious problems with the grammar here, making many of the statements impenetrable. I also have concerns that the "arrests"/reactions section give undue weight, given this was all from one incident in 1987. gobonobo + c 15:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm concerned you accepted this AfC draft given the complete lack of secondary sources. The AfC process is designed to prevent this type of article being published. WP:AFC says "Articles should reflect only what reliable sources have said about the topic, and all articles need references to reliable sources." AusLondonder (talk) 15:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- AusLondonder, thanks for getting me by. Based on the fact the article likewise it's kinds will take place next month, it could have been good leaving it unreviewed till then. However, it got nominated and I will advise it goes back to draft and marked as promise. That's what I should have done instead. What was I thinking though? — Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 18, 2024)
 A crewed submersible used for underwater exploration
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Pool (cue sports) • Antarctic Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|