User talk:Ruikipedia

Category:Dokdo has been nominated for deletion

Category:Dokdo has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:50, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heungdeoksa Temple Site

Not impressed! This was a draft article that was going through a major re-write. Simply copying it before that re-write was completed - even when it had a maintenance tag clearly displayed - and moving it to the mainspace without any acknowledgement to either myself or the article's creator is not appreciated. Trying to attribute other people's work as your own efforts is really low. Dan arndt (talk) 05:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Draft:Choi Jong-deok. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dan arndt (talk) 05:52, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Angelworld7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ruikipedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I erased something in editing page by accident and it was not a intention. However, I think that was wrong action regardless intention or by mistake, so I accept blocking for 1 week. But, I am not sock puppetry of 'Angelworld7'. The reason I edited or created wikipedia was I want to let people know proper or correct information. I don't know who 'Angelworld7' is. Also I have not seen the user Angelworld7 since I first edited. I really want to edit your wikipedia. And I promise I will not disrupt editing. please unlock my ID for edit wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, this request has been insufficient to convince any patrolling admin to unblock. This is a procedural decline only, and you are welcome to appeal again, using a substantially reworded argument. SQL ^{Query me!} 02:36, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you are unblocked, I suggest you read WP:COMMONNAME and WP:PLACE carefully before you start editing again, and that you stop trying to add Liancourt Rocks dispute stuff into articles about innocent plants and animals. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:08, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and I will edit carefully --Ruikipedia (talk) 01:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kim Sin-yeol

Hello, Ruikipedia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kim Sin-yeol".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Choi Jong-deok

Hello, Ruikipedia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Choi Jong-deok".