User talk:Prisencolin/Archive 10

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 5 ← Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 → Archive 14

Orphaned non-free image File:Taipei Assassins logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Taipei Assassins logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:105 in China

A tag has been placed on Category:105 in China requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:27, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Team Vitality

Notice

The article Team Vitality has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

If you eliminate the info referenced to twitter, there is no indication of notability. And since Twitter cannot speak to notability, there isn't any notability. Fails all notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 02:30, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Team Vitality for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Team Vitality is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Vitality until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 15:53, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ramapo College logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ramapo College logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 18:42, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Unicorn Ridge moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Unicorn Ridge, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:37, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huang Sian Teh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fukien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Workplace by Facebook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chevron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:48, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nie Shicheng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manchurian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

"Hoklo chauvanism" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hoklo chauvanism. Since you had some involvement with the Hoklo chauvanism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:37, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bali Ha'i (Better Call Saul), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Pacific (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

TNS

Can you provide any references for your recent addition about members of the Triple Nine Society? I'm considering reverting it, since there's no basis for the claims. I would like the article to have more content than it does, but Wikipedia does require references for included info. (Even the Robert Forster reference you provided isn't obvious when you click the link; do you get more confirmation if you log in as a member?). Finney1234 (talk) 20:17, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Mexico Holocaust & Intolerance Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:38, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly Adam Cuerden (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 91 featured pictures, including 32 in the final round. Our finalists this year were:

  1. Better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly Adam Cuerden (submissions) with 964 points
  2. England Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 899 points
  3. Norfolk Island Casliber (submissions) with 817 points
  4. Wales Kosack (submissions) with 691 points
  5. Washington (state) SounderBruce (submissions) with 388 points
  6. Antarctica Enwebb (submissions) with 146 points
  7. United States Usernameunique (submissions) with 145 points
  8. Indonesia HaEr48 (submissions) with 74 points

All those who reached the final will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

We have opened a scoring discussion on whether the rules and scoring need adjustment. Please have your say. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2020 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth 14:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

New source

Thanks for this addition. Please see WP:LINKROT. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Más (Breaking Bad), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Call of Duty Championships has been nominated for discussion

Category:Call of Duty Championships, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pbrks (talk) 22:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

List of Firefly (TV series) characters

Per WP:BRD, please discuss at the article's Talk page why you believe it is appropriate and helpful to include a link to a historical copy of another article's page within this article. In my experience that is unorthodox to the point that I have never seen it done. Thank you! DonIago (talk) 03:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ranch-style house (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Walter White
William O. Douglas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Odd job

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Girardi & Keese

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Girardi & Keese requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 05:47, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Goodbye, Mr. Chips, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scarface (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Freedomland (play)

Hello, Prisencolin,

Thank you for creating Freedomland (play).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for creating the page, much appreciated!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 01:48, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chow Chih, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Revolutionary Army (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2XL Fleet Defense.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2XL Fleet Defense.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kaifeng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 東京 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

"Diana Fuck" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Diana Fuck. Since you had some involvement with the Diana Fuck redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 02:33, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Más (Breaking Bad), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flashback (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:29, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Category:People who were expelled from school has been nominated for discussion

Category:People who were expelled from school, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Vaporgaze (talk) 07:58, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup!

Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

"Angel Munos" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Angel Munos. Since you had some involvement with the Angel Munos redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:31, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited F. Murray Abraham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syriac (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Kinesma moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kinesma, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 19:49, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kinesma (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Prisencolin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Fistful for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fistful is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fistful until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. buidhe 06:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of The BrandLaureate Awards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The BrandLaureate Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The BrandLaureate Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:11, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Tiger Global Management versus Tiger Management

Hi! In May of last year you created this redirect of Tiger Global Management (TGM) to Tiger Management (TM). A COI editor for Chase Coleman III has indicated that these are two separate companies, Coleman's being TGM and TM being a company founded by Julian Robertson. I was hoping you might have more information on the matter, as the redirect was being used as a WikiLink in the Chase Coleman article to what the COI editor says is not Coleman's company. I wanted to omit it if these were two different companies, but wanted to check with you first. Let me know if you could, thank you so much! Warm regards,  Spintendo  16:33, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Concerning an informal study

Hi there. I was conducting an "informal" study on the usage of Portals on Wikipedia, and for that reason, I've come to ask you a few question:

  • How often do you use Portals?
  • Which Portals do you visit (if any)?
  • How useful do you find them?

Apologies for wasting your precious time on Wikipedia. P.S. It's all fine with me if you don't want to answer these questions. Ambuj Shukla (talk) 18:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wushan County, Chongqing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patient zero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Drafts

Please consider incubating new articles in the Draft namespace before publishing them. You may already be following this process, but in the past (specifically between 2016 and 2018) you left several pages unfinished, and they remain incomplete to this day. CentreLeftRight ✉ 02:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

"Restoring as a comment"?

Hi. Please provide some rationale for this edit you just made. You may not have realised it, but by undoing my edit, you have restored unsourced and —at least partially incorrect— content that may be considered edit-warring. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 20:08, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi it's easier to just restore it with a comment, instead of having to dig back into the edit history to restore the content.--Prisencolin (talk) 20:29, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your response. However, I still don't get why you restored unsourced content that is, at least partially, incorrect. Likewise, what does "restore it with a comment" actually mean? Unless you have any major objection, I will procede to remove that content over the next couple of days. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 08:47, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Liang Jun

Stop adding unnecessary disambiguation to the top of the Liang Jun (tractor driver) page. The other guy is nowhere near notable enough that if an article with a very different title is accessed, people will need to be sent to his. There's also the Liang Jun disambiguation page, which I added him to for you. Any more will be seen as disruptive editing. Kingsif (talk) 05:17, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

The "other guy" is the founder of "one of the largest civilian-run enterprise in China." tell me how that's not notable enough.--Prisencolin (talk) 00:26, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Google doesn't show him up. The names are not alike enough to be conflated on English Wikipedia, and hatnotes are advised against unless they're necessary. The way you keep adding it back without giving a good reason (i.e. why it's needed, not why you want it) is persistent disruptive editing. Template below will have links to explore for your convenience, but you have to stop just adding it back.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Kingsif (talk) 01:54, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 4 Days Out, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Generator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Gun Club (secret society)

Hello, Prisencolin,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Psiĥedelisto and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, The Gun Club (secret society) for deletion, because it seems to be an article that has been already decided by a [decision] to be unsuitable for inclusion.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Psiĥedelisto}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Psiĥedelisto (talk) 03:36, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Carradine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christmas party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

"Tiger Global Management" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tiger Global Management. Since you had some involvement with the Tiger Global Management redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. NinaSpezz (talk) 15:51, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

List of fictional universities and colleges moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of fictional universities and colleges, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 00:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional Cambridge University people

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional Cambridge University people requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:53, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of fictional universities and colleges (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at List of fictional schools. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:52, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Unicorn Ridge concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Unicorn Ridge, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Inaccurate updates to JLL article

Hi Prisencolin, I left you a message on the JLL talk page on February 6, but it may have gotten lost in notifications. You recently made an edit to the article's infobox, stating that Roger Staubach is the executive chairman. He retired from his position in 2018. In my original note on the JLL talk page, I left a reference that supports his resignation. Do you mind reversing your edits in the infobox? As an employee with a financial conflict of interest, I will only post to talk pages and avoid making direct edits to the article. Thanks! JKatJLL (talk) 15:43, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unicorn Ridge (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NGEO, requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 01:43, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Scottish esports players has been nominated for discussion

Category:Scottish esports players, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 10:35, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Welsh esports players has been nominated for discussion

Category:Welsh esports players, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 10:36, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:English esports players has been nominated for discussion

Category:English esports players, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 10:37, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huizhou, Anhui, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages She County and Wuyuan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:52, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 57 contestants qualifying. We have abolished the groups this year, so to qualify for Round 3 you will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • New York (state) Epicgenius, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with a featured article, five good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 895 points.
  • England Gog the Mild came next with 464 points, from a featured article, two good articles and a number of reviews, the main theme being naval warfare.
  • United States Raymie was in third place with 419 points, garnered from one good article and an impressive 34 DYKs on radio and TV stations in the United States.
  • Somerset Harrias came next at 414, with a featured article and three good articles, an English civil war battle specialist.
  • Pirate flag CaptainEek was in fifth place with 405 points, mostly garnered from bringing Cactus wren to featured article status.
  • The top ten contestants at the end of Round 1 all scored over 200 points; they also included United States L293D, Venezuela Kingsif, Antarctica Enwebb, England Lee Vilenski and Nepal CAPTAIN MEDUSA. Seven of the top ten contestants in Round 1 are new to the WikiCup.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. In Round 1 there were four featured articles, one featured list and two featured pictures, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. Between them, contestants completed 127 good article reviews, nearly a hundred more than the 43 good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Contestants also claimed for 40 featured article / featured list reviews, and most even remembered to mention their WikiCup participation in their reviews (a requirement).

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup newsletter correction

There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter; United States L293D should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead, United States Dunkleosteus77 should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited High school dropouts in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lester B. Pearson High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Gab4gab. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lester B. Pearson High School (Burlington), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 12:31, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Armada vs Leffen Paragon 2015.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Armada vs Leffen Paragon 2015.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:54, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chu (Chinese surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter Breitmayer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Breitmayer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Breitmayer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:56, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cong (surname) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cong
Private Internet Access (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Andrew Lee

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

"Ethnic marker" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ethnic marker. Since you had some involvement with the Ethnic marker redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:33, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crown prince, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lee Jae-yong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Category:Television shows shot in Cambodia has been nominated for discussion

Category:Television shows shot in Cambodia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Direct, reliable sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct reliable sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without references are now being reverted on-sight.

Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Prisencolin/Archive_10"