User talk:Moreau1

Welcome!

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! If you need help or just want to say hello, click here and leave a message! [1] -- Phgao 05:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

McMillan Reservoir on NRHP list?

Hi ... I've updating the NRHP lists and see that you added McMillan Reservoir to the District of Columbia list. However, I can't find anything that says this site is on the list. I looked for it using the search features on the [www.nr.nps.gov National Park Service website] and also ran a Google search. Can you give a citation for this? Thanks. --Sanfranman59 (talk) 19:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that McMillan was designated as a historic landmark by the DC government, but has not been added to the NRHP.

OK. Then I'm going to remove it from the DC NRHP list here. Thanks --Sanfranman59 (talk) 05:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BMP

I suspect you are part of a student project. Please come clean and declare yourselves at Wikipedia:School and university projects. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 07:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a student & not part of any project. Moreau1 (talk) 15:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Federal Water Quality Association

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Federal Water Quality Association, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bongomatic (talk) 01:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am suggesting that I be allowed to create a page on the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF). It saw that another user tried to create this article but it has been rerouted. Its sister program the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) has its own page. The Drinking Water State Revolving Fund has received $2 billion under ARRA 2009 and much attention has been placed on this program. I find it important to create a page that is informational for those wanting to know more about the construction or repair of drinking water infrastructure here in the United States and Puerto Rico. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueRoyal1974 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for WEPS

On 17 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article WEPS, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 11:03, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental monitoring

Totally agree with your comments - I have ended up writing just about all the article but my background is rivers and lakes. If you can add air, ground, sea etc. please do so. You are also right that soon it may have to spawn off daughter articles leaving short summaries on the main page. Before we do that however, it would be good to get at least all the heading and short paragraphs present. Velela ^{Velela Talk} 08:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Culverts

Hello. It seems to me, to you is what to tell about Culverts. Help us to develop the correct point of view.--Andrey! 16:11, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stream Update

Thanks for the updates and references on Stream. SBaker43 (talk) 20:43, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Silt fence

Thank you for adding the copypaste tag (and providing the source too!) on that article. I have confirmed that some of the content added by Fireandwater33 was a copyright violation. So I have removed the content from the source mentioned and also, the template appropriately. Minima c (talk) 13:15, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Regulation of ship pollution in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Research Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deadlink?

Re this edit: the google books link you tagged as deadlink links fine for me. Is there anything I should know? Staszek Lem (talk) 16:55, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Water pollution

I guess it's that time of night ! Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sedimentation

I invite your comments in a discussion of organization of Wikipedia coverage of water treatment sedimentation at Talk:Sedimentation (water treatment).Thewellman (talk) 16:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bacteriological water analysis may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

in which serial dilutions of the sample are vacuum filtered through purpose made ppmembrane filter]]s and these filters are themselves laid on nutrient medium within sealed plates.<ref>EPA (2002). [

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drinking water quality in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Public water system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sewer overflow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Drug pollution

Dear Moreau1, Actually, it is on topic. Your reaction, that Milorganite is fertilizer is correct. However, the pharmaceutical and personal care waste stream has a very real impact on the down stream products, and is interrelated to it. I don't want to get into an edit war over relevancy, as I tend to view that as being in the eyes of the beholder. However, the readers of wikipedia could better make that decision on their own, and may not know of that facet of the problem, if it isn't in this article. The reference to the problem are in the Milorganite article (perhaps you missed that). So I am asking you to reconsider. 10:47, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

You erased a link to Alexandra Dunn.

Bearian (talk) 13:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aqueducts on the C&O Canal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mosby's Raiders. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Industrial wastewater treatment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercury. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clean Air Act. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Moreau1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Environmental impact of aviation. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:37, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Stormwater into Industrial stormwater. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. Moreau1 (talk) 00:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Early Amatuer Radio Teletype History

The addition of the partial sentence, "...Surplus equipment distributed by US government and military agencies provided other models available to radio amateurs, including Teletype Models 14, 15, and 28..." in the 1940's part of this paragraph is incorrect. Teletype Model 28 equipment was not distributed to Amateur Radio operators until the late 1960s. As such, while correct as a partial stand-alone sentence, the placement is factually incorrect from a timeline perspective. Wa3frp (talk) 13:31, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It sure looks to me

that your renaming the Department of Labor building the William Jefferson Clinton Federal Building is way wrong. Please take a look at it and fix it. Carptrash (talk) 03:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What a mess. Well it seems to me that you are being as conscientious as is possible trying to sort it out. With the recent cutbacks in the US Federal government I doubt that updating web sites is much of a priority. Carptrash (talk) 16:40, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Moreau1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clarksburg, Maryland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tenmile Creek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clean-in-place, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caustic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Industrial wastewater treatment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BOD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Long Island Sound, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Heavy metal and Hypoxia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Moreau1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Chalk Point Generating Station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mercury

Dickerson Generating Station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mercury

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge article?

Expanded Coal ash basin before spotting Ash pond. Would you like to merge these? Oliveleaf4 (talk) 20:58, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DesTech

DesTech is a vanity press. See [2], [3], or [4] if you don't want to take Beall at his word. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The charge that Destech is a "vanity press" is not based on any evidence. The three websites that you refer to all say the same thing: Destech sponsored some questionable conferences. There is nothing in the accusations regarding the integrity of Destech's engineering publications; only complaints about some conferences. The authors that Destech publishes in the engineering field are well known and highly respected. Regarding the authors in the cited publication:

Dr. W. Wesley Eckenfelder, Jr. (d. 2010) was Professor Emeritus at Vanderbilt University and one of the most distinguished experts in the world in the field of industrial wastewater treatment. These articles describe some of his accomplishments.

Throughout his career, Dr. Eckenfelder's works were produced by a variety of technical/scientific publishing companies, including Marcel Dekker, Pergamon Press and McGraw-Hill. I do not know how he chose his publisher for any particular work product. He may have selected a publisher based on his working relationships with particular editors, or else fees, copyright or other business-related issues.

Joseph Cleary is a Principal Environmental Engineer at Geosyntec, an international consulting firm. Mr. Cleary has over 44 years of experience in industrial wastewater treatment and related fields. https://geosyntec.com/people/joseph-cleary

I am not familiar with Destech's business practices regarding conferences, but that issue is irrelevant when citing individual publications by reputable authors. The company's technical publications are written by recognized experts, and are valid sources for citation. Moreau1 (talk) 02:39, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not when they have non-existent peer review and are vanity/predatory outlets. If you still disagree, take it to WP:RSN. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:42, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Coal gas-fired power stations in the United States has been nominated for deletion

Category:Coal gas-fired power stations in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 11:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former coal gas-fired power stations in the United States has been nominated for deletion

Category:Former coal gas-fired power stations in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 11:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2005 in the environment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clean Air Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1962 in the environment moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1962 in the environment, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 22:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Water pollution in South Korea

A tag has been placed on Category:Water pollution in South Korea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:32, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Photo Added of Mary Dolores Nichols?

Hello Moreau1! I liked noticing that you added a nice photo of Mary Dolores Nichols today, December 5, 2020. I thank you publicly at Wikipedia editing history. And I thank you here at your 'user talk' for doing so. Peace, 'Roy'...Robert Jan van de Hoek (talk) 18:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Fly ash into Kingston Fossil Plant coal fly ash slurry spill. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 20:31, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:1962 in the environment

Hello, Moreau1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1962 in the environment".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Tipple

I have responded to your reversion of my change to Tipple on the talk page for that article. Douglas W. Jones (talk) 17:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2005 energy policy act

The fracking provision was inconsequential because fracking is regulated at the state level and Texas requires fracking companies to disclose what is in fracking liquid. The major impact of the act is the ethanol industry blew up after the act was passed and one can easily see that by looking at US ethanol production by year. Clam chowdah (talk) 22:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon - April 22nd - 2PM EST

You're invited! NYC Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon! April 22nd!

Sure We Can and the Environment of New York City Task Force invite you to join us for:

2022 Earth Day Edit-a-thon 2pm - 4pm EST (April 22nd) online via Zoom and in person

This Edit-a-Thon is part of a larger Earth Day celebration, hosted by Brooklyn based recycling and community center Sure We Can, that runs from 1PM-7PM and is open to the public! See this flyer for more information: https://www.instagram.com/p/CcGr4FyuqEa/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

-- Environment of New York City Task Force

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Streetcars in Washington, D.C., and Maryland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glen Echo Park.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talbot County, Maryland#Environment

Since you created the Talbot County, Maryland#Environment section, I was wondering if you have any thoughts you'd care to share at Talk:Talbot County, Maryland#Environment -- Pemilligan (talk) 15:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Water supply and sanitation in the United States

Water supply and sanitation in the United States has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 02:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (third request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Hackensack River into New Jersey Meadowlands. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]