User talk:Mo79

Nomination of Immunity Resource Foundation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Immunity Resource Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immunity Resource Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Disclosure

Hi, thanks for your disclosure on your userpage. However I think you need to clarify it, as I'm not sure it complies with WP:COIDISCLOSEPAY or Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure at the moment. In particular, while you mention you're an affliate of Joan Shenton and Immunity Resource Foundation and have been paid to edit these articles, it's not clearly stated who is paying you to edit these articles. I guess it's either the Immunity Resource Foundation or perhaps Joan Shenton directly or both, but this isn't clearly stated. Nil Einne (talk) 07:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Immunity Resource Foundation (IRF) logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Immunity Resource Foundation (IRF) logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Joan Shenton 2002.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Joan Shenton 2002.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 16:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)