User talk:Megan.roberson
| This user is a student editor in UCSF/Foundations_II_(Summer) . |
Welcome!
Hello, Megan.roberson, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:57, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
References
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.
- While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
- Then click on "templates",
- Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
- If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".
We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Steven's Peer Review
1) Since the article is already a category "B", I felt like @megan.roberson did a great job with adding more information and organizing the information that was previously there.
2)The group has definitely followed the overall goals for improvement of the article. @megan.roberson had 5 goals improve the article and was able to achieve almost all of them.
3)No there were no evidence of copyright and plagiarism. She effectively cited her sources on the page as well. I liked her choice of source that she used to include in her article.
Stevenvpham (talk) 20:46, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Foundations II 2019, Brian's Review
(1) The edits made to the article followed the guiding framework. The content is neutral, follows good structure, and maintains the flow of the article.
(2) The sources were verified to reliable sources - primary references were not used, which keeps in line with the policy of Wikipedia. The sources were free and accessible to users online.
Great work!