User talk:Mcbrarian

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mcbrarian! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:56, Thursday, February 16, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together
Get Help
About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Medicine Wikiproject!

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia from Wikiproject Medicine (also known as WPMED).

We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of medical articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Wikipedia articles are:

  • Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
  • Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Wikipedia is guided by our medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically requires recent secondary sources to support information; its application is further explained here. Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
  • The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, edit, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss it on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.

Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any problems. I wish you all the best on your wiki voyages!

Welcome to Wikipedia. Based on what you posted to your profile page I thought you might be interested to see these community forums -

If I can help with anything then message me. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for your post on my talk page.

About Open Access Week - this is one of the more significant holiday seasons on the Wikipedia calendar, and we have a tradition of organizing events for the occasion. You said you wanted support - I can set up a Wikipedia event page so that you can register participants and get an automated report of outcomes. I can also talk anyone through slides and training, and might be able to appear remotely. I am less sure about whether I can refer an in-person trainer, but we can ask around.

It is great that you can join Wikimania for the medicine day! Many people enjoy the experience of meeting the writers behind the content. I think if you came you would enjoy talking with others, and also, you might get to have the odd experience yourself of someone approaching you and asking you to teach them Wikipedia and share your experiences.

You said you wanted documentation to propose the event to your library - I am not sure that I have your email, or perhaps I am overlooking it. I have a pamphlet about presenting Wikipedia in academic conferences, and this might work for that. I can also set up an event page and link to some open access resources. Overall, an in-person event would be much like we had remotely, but happen in ~2 hours (or longer as a drop-in event) as a self-contained event. There are various groups which provide support for this, including the Canadian chapter, my NYC chapter, the medicine group, the Wikipedia Library, and there is also an open access team. From your perspective you would just host the event, but internationally lots of libraries do this.

Please email me and let's continue to talk more. Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great work at your editathon! A Barn Star for you!

The Real-Life Barnstar
Congratulations on organizing a successful event! I look forward to editing with you in the future! JenOttawa (talk) 02:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi JenOttawa, Thank you for the kind note and the Barn Star! Your assistance was invaluable during the planning stages! Mcbrarian (talk) 16:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the kind words! Hope to see you back on WikiProject Med soon! JenOttawa (talk) 13:00, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Event coordinator granted

After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

  • The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
  • The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the "confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
  • The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
  • Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux Talk 15:44, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • This will automatically expire in a week. — xaosflux Talk 15:44, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the note, hope you had a good event! — xaosflux Talk 13:03, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New mailing list for Wikimedia Canada

Good day, this message is to inform you that Wikimedia Canada has created a new mailing list operated by Mailman. This mailing list is for all discussions related to the Wikimedia movement in Canada, in both English and French. Announcements from Wikimedia Canada will always be bilingual, but you are welcomed to discuss in any language of your choice. The old google group will be abandoned. To join this mailing list, please go to [1]. To send messages to the list, write to general(at)discussions.wikimedia.ca. Also, please forward this message to anybody who may be interested. Thank you and do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. JP Béland (WMCA) (talk) 14:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Wondering if you would be willing to send me a preprint of your review? Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:07, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doc James Done! Mcbrarian (talk) 14:31, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Event coordinator granted

After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

  • The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
  • The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the "confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
  • The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
  • Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux Talk 19:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battlefield medicine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morbidity and mortality. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brockville. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:17, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This editing is an act of reconciliation with Canada's indigenous communities who's existence on Canadian land has not been recorded in these Wikipedia articles. If you want better sources, I can find them. But calling this editing "disruptive" is accusatory and inappropriate. Each gathering on Canadian soil begins with an acknowledgement of the traditional indigenous territory that the gathering is taking place upon. Therefore, it is fitting that the beginning of an entry about a Canadian city shall begin with an acknowledgement of the indigenous territory is sits on. This is not disruptive editing and there is no agenda or bias in stating the territory exists and was unceded by the indigenous groups it belonged to before being settled by Europeans.
I will confer with WIkiProject Canada to obtain consensus on adding indigenous place names to Wikipedia but the work will absolutely continue, if not today, soon. Mcbrarian (talk) 15:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
From your editing statistics I'm a bit unsure about how well you know Wikipedia. You've made 183 mainspace edits over 4 years which doesn't indicate a lot of editing experience, but you've coordinated two events which ought to mean you have some understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Perhaps you have some familiarity with policy but not much experience in how it is implemented in practice as an editor.
One of the best things to to is always assume good faith and keep in mind that it is up to you to justify anything you add to an article. Try not to take offence at being reverted. A revert is simply an invitation to discussion, and the bold-revert-discuss cycle is the cornerstone of collaborative editing. Reverting the revert is disruptive, even if your edit improved the article. Once you start on that disruptive path the other editor may not have as much patience with you as they would had you taken the step to open a discussion and explained why you thought your edit was an improvement to the article. Likewise when you unilaterally make edits to a series of articles. You may find it useful to refer to policy on resolving content disputes.
Wikipedia is not a place to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. If you feel strongly about a topic ("the work will absolutely continue" sounds to me a bit like fanaticism), that may be a topic you should avoid editing on Wikipedia. As you are meeting community opposition to your edits, this means that by definition your edits are controversial. Try to pay heed and to measure your responses. I feel that I should note that accusing someone of racism is a form of disruptive editing and can lead to editing sanctions (see Wikipedia:No personal attacks).
I hope that this is helpful. Happy editing! – Reidgreg (talk) 13:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Reidgreg: Thanks for your input. Based on what you have written above I assume (perhaps wrongly) that you followed the discussion at WP:CA. I appreciate that you are assuming good faith, as this is indeed the motive.
You're right to point out I don't edit frequently and you're right to point out that this does not necessarily mean I am unfamiliar with WP editing guidelines and policies.
Improving Indigenous content on Wikipedia's articles about cities in Canada may have started off misguided and rocky and I agree that the initial edits I made, where I named specific Indigenous territory acknowledgements to the lead, were perhaps not the best place to start. The community consensus is now such that improving the presence of Indigenous history in these articles is valued. We agree that the information belongs in the History section of the city's article as long as it is well sourced. We also agreed that one sentence in the lead of an article is appropriate if the history section provides elaboration. I have continued to make contributions to articles about Canadian cities and I am putting forth my best effort to follow WP:RS and the consensus reached at WP:CA.
Indigenous history in Canada is a highly sensitive topic and, admittedly, I allowed emotions to override civility for a brief moment. As a result of that, I removed myself from the discussion on WP:CA entirely, but I have not stopped following it. I will engage with other editors here or on the talk pages of articles I contribute to.
Sometimes we mess up, and I am no exception. I teach my students to jump on talk pages before making edits, I should have done the same. Mistakes are opportunities for reflection and learning. I'm optimistic moving forward and I appreciate your supportive guidance here. Mcbrarian (talk) 13:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
PS. Open to being whacked with trout. Mcbrarian (talk) 14:02, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm relieved to hear that and I agree that there's plenty of room to improve the presence of indigenous history. There's always more to be done on Wikipedia; if I find a dispute becomes too heated I may leave it for a couple weeks and work on other things. You may have to wait a month for formal consensus on a request for comment if it gets to that point anyways. If you need some perspective, there's a lot of good advice at Wikipedia:Essay directory, including some humorous reflections on editing. Cheers! – Reidgreg (talk) 16:46, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider documenting your contributions in this area, and to Canadian topics in general, at Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge. Your efforts deserve to be highlighted. Cheers, Cobblet (talk) 00:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! The work has stalled a bit as I get pulled in several directions but I plan to return to it over the next day or two. I'll check out the challenge. Mcbrarian (talk) 16:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Denise. Just making a note here that Magnolia677's use of the Template:Uw-disruptive2 message above is clearly inappropriate. Really sorry to see you've had to go through this. Take care, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 14:54, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ClayoquotThanks so much and my apologies for the severe delay. I took a pretty significant break from this work. Hope to get back into with refreshed energy. Hope to see you again the next time wiki folks can meet in person! Mcbrarian (talk) 17:15, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It would be lovely to see you. Welcome back! Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 03:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for writing the article on Jeannie Callum! Women in Red is a fantastic initiative - Glad that you're contributing :)

ThadeusOfNazerethTalk to Me! 21:46, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ThadeusOfNazerethThanks! This is a collaboration with Wiki blood guy and TChanMD who have been participating in a workshop series I am facilitating. Mcbrarian (talk) 17:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to take part in a survey about medical topics on Wikipedia

Dear fellow editor,

I am Piotr Konieczny, a sociologist of new media at Hanyang University (and User:Piotrus on Wikipedia). I would like to better understand Wikipedia's volunteers who edit medical topics, many associated with the WikiProject Medicine, and known to create some of the highest quality content on Wikipedia. I hope that the lessons I can learn from you that I will present to the academic audience will benefit both the WikiProject Medicine (improving your understanding of yourself and helping to promote it and attract new volunteers) and the wider world of medical volunteering and academia. Open access copy of the resulting research will be made available at WikiProject's Medicine upon the completion of the project.

All questions are optional. The survey is divided into 4 parts: 1 - Brief description of yourself; 2 - Questions about your volunteering; 3 - Questions about WikiProject Medicine and 4 - Questions about Wikipedia's coverage of medical topics.

Please note that by filling out this questionnaire, you consent to participate in this research. The survey is anonymous and all personal details relevant to your experience will be kept private and will not be transferred to any third party.

I appreciate your support of this research and thank you in advance for taking the time to participate and share your experiences! If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia user page or through my email listed on the survey page (or by Wikipedia email this user function).

The survey is accessible through the LINK HERE.

Piotr Konieczny
Associate Professor
Hanyang University
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Mcbrarian"