User talk:Magnolia677/Archive 6

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Oxford, Alabama 1870 Population

I should have explained my reason for removing the figure: It is not the population of Oxford Town for 1870. The 1,147 figure is for the entire Calhoun County 13th (Oxford) Beat/Precinct. http://www2.census.gov/prod2/decennial/documents/1870a-05.pdf There is no figure listed in 1870 for the town itself on the U.S. Census returns, which would be much lower than the 1,147. The earliest figure listed for the town itself on the U.S. Census was 1880 when it showed 780 persons. It is for this reason that the 1,147 figure should not be on the list of historical population. DJ Jones74 (talk) 10:48, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've just moved Leota Plantation to mainspace. Perhaps you could find out more. I believe that Worthington Island (see this) should have its own page, as should Thomas Worthington. I have not worked out the entire family tree yet (there's a connection to Lycurgus Johnson by marriage for example, and to the Belmont Plantation), but it looked like they owned a lot of acreage and slaves. Let me know if you would like to help. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 11:21, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I've just realized you created Leota, Mississippi. Would you like to merge them?Zigzig20s (talk) 12:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure about merging, but some links are in order. Have a look in here, where there's some history on the Worthington brothers. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:37, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Green Party deletions

I am nominating them for deletion because they are in very poor shape. They're so bad you would never see them in a proper encyclopedia. They need major work that is not being done. Some of these articles go tagged for years. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:36, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree they are in poor shape, but they are all registered US political parties. They simply do not meet the criteria for a speedy delete. It took me 5 minutes to fix the Green Party of Delaware article (and I'm a Republican). Please take a moment to read alternatives to deletion. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm taking a step back before I get hot headed. I do thank you for your help in improving the articles. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:37, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've since improved the Green Party of Hawaii, Green Party of Delaware, and Green Party of Mississippi. Took just a few minutes and I learned something new. If you prefer deleting articles over improving them, Wikipedia may not be the best hobby for you. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on "White Puerto Ricans" page

Hello Hold up first of all, you got it ALL mixed up. This Jesse Rafe guy is the one replacing sourced facts with his racist bias opinions and beliefs to this article. Im simply reverting it back to it's original content. You should block him for vandalism.

Thank you for adding his picture!Zigzig20s (talk) 05:06, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes I create articles and wonder if anyone reads them...Zigzig20s (talk) 05:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think you could upload this picture to John M. Shelton please?Zigzig20s (talk) 05:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Zigzig20s, I often read over the new articles and spot your interesting biographies and plantation homes. Thanks for your hard work, and I'll see if I can upload the picture. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:06, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The photo has no date on it, and because Shelton died in 1923, the photo may still be under copyright so I can't upload it. I'll look around for another. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:17, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please upload this for Thomas H. Malone's infobox? If you could crop this one as well, that would be great. Thank you. But the first one might be safer for copyright, not sure.Zigzig20s (talk) 04:03, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Are you able to find a picture of N. S. B. Gras please? I have not found one yet.Zigzig20s (talk) 15:07, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
They need to digitalize their special collections. Btw, I requested an article about his life, not sure if you can send it to me...Zigzig20s (talk) 05:02, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I got the article (it was on Jstor but wouldn't show up in the search results for reasons unknown). Are you able to upload Charles Badger Clark's picture please? Btw, I think he may have been best known as Badger Clark (without Charles), but I foolishly already created a redirect, and I feel like the redirect should be in the opposite (toward Badger without Charles). Not sure how to fix this. Any idea?Zigzig20s (talk) 15:39, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis Funeral Home

Hello, I have improved the quality rating of this article but think "importance=low" is correct.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 11:03, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring on articles about districts of Los Angeles

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Sherman Oaks, Los Angeles shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Note that in addition to Sherman Oaks, Los Angeles, this edit-warring also extends to Encino, Los Angeles and Toluca Lake, Los Angeles. If you are unable to reach agreement with the other editors involved, I suggest that you open a WP:RFC to find a consensus solution, and that in the meantime you all stop adding and/or reverting contested material. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:39, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Attendance figures

If you have an issue with my sourcing, please discuss it with me (e.g. Orange Bowl) before going through my history and undoing every edit you can find. Fightingweasel (talk) 05:31, 19 January 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fightingweasel (talkcontribs) 05:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay, we're all human

I'm not the mayor of Jug Fork, by the way. ha ha 2601:482:4401:C180:55BF:FBBC:E6D9:CEAF (talk) 03:54, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the GNIS entry a few days ago and it didn't list the other county. You may have an in with the Dept of Interior, so again, my apologies! Magnolia677 (talk) 04:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Newburyport, Massachusetts Points of Interest Removal

Hi,

Why did you remove the link to Newburyport Brewing Co. that I had added? It is indeed a point of interest, being the first brewery in Newburyport in hundreds of years, and is a destination for beer lovers all over eastern New England. You have it under (Removing unsourced content)".

Brian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Briancallahan2014 (talkcontribs) 00:28, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may have me confused with another editor. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:46, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't. The "revised" link comes straight to your page. You did it again, removing the external link. What is the problem? -Brian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Briancallahan2014 (talkcontribs) 13:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Canada

The Order of Canada is the country's second highest civilian honour, the highest honour being the Order of Merit, which only one living Canadian has currently. It is our Presidential Medal of Freedom or Congressional Gold Medal. -- Zanimum (talk) 17:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you're telling me this? Magnolia677 (talk) 21:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You deleted people from lists, despite the fact that they were listed as Order of Canada winners, and clearly notable. -- Zanimum (talk) 14:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mississippi mansions

Thank you. I don't know how to upload pictures from Flickr though--but I could ask you to do it. Btw, do you know how to review DYKs? I am stuck in a nightmare situation. I have suggested Randy W. Berry for DYK and it was accepted on the caveat that I review one. I don't know how to do it and I am discouraged by the lengthy guidelines. Is it possible for you to do it for me please, or am I stuck with my own mess?Zigzig20s (talk) 05:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First, whatever pics you need uploaded just ask. I frequently look at your new articles and search for photos to add to them, as we edit in the same circles. Also, I saw the DYK nomination on your talk page, but have never looked at a DYK. The only editors I know of who do DYK's are User:Alansohn and maybe User:John from Idegon. Drop them a message. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 05:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Since you mentioned the Cocke-Martin-Jackson House, I started a stub. Feel free to expand it with more references. It's not clear if it was first designed as Colonial or Greek Revival, but perhaps you can find out more. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 05:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not this guy..... John from Idegon (talk) 06:26, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User:John from Idegon: I'm sorry?Zigzig20s (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No clue how DYK works. Try WP:DYK. John from Idegon (talk) 15:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you able to find a picture of John Trotwood Moore please?Zigzig20s (talk) 06:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

St. Cloud, MN picture

Dear Sir or Madame, I was wondering what was wrong with my St. Cloud picture.Reedlander (talk) 01:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file you added here didn't seem to exist anywhere. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adams, Massachusetts may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * Mount Greylock State Reservation]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fairview Alpha, Louisiana again

Where are we putting the Sox in that dresser? John from Idegon (talk) 07:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John. I've been keeping track of all the suspected socks of User:Dragonrap2, including User:WXA53, user:Futurewiki, user:104.243.169.127, user:104.243.167.109, User:Futuristic21, User:Futurewiki2, User:Mega256, User:Futurewiki The Third, User:Mega257, User:Mega258, User:Futurew, User:104.243.166.108, and User:104.243.170.125.
Each time I spot one I post an urgent message to ANI and they are quickly blocked. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another: User:2600:100C:B20D:EAFF:1779:B2D3:50EF:5C34 Seems there should be a better way than going to the drama board every time. John from Idegon (talk) 18:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've blocked 2600:100C:B20D:EAFF:1779:B2D3:50EF:5C34 for a couple of weeks, as you can see here. Feel welcome to let me know of any more. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your removal of text in Sir Adam Beck Hydroelectric Generating Stations

Please clarify the reason for your edit on this page -
(1) It was my understanding that lead paras weren't supposed to be bogged down with references. see WP:WHENNOTCITE
(2) are the station names a problem? abbreviated versions are already in the box to the right, and are available on OPG's website, which is listed as a reference later
(3) the quote on being the largest station in the world at the time is drawn from the text of the next section (and is sourced, with a link to an archive URL for good measure, by me).
(4) the only thing not explicitly referenced is the comment about earlier power stations. If that is a problem, then why not try and reference it yourself, or ask me about it? Thanks Walkabout14 (talk) 23:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I'll have time to find a source for your edit. Could you be a good chap and find one? Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 00:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's it? Thanks for all of your effort removing the text, and not explaining why. I can see why new editors get frustrated here. Walkabout14 (talk) 01:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted my edit. Please take a moment to either add [citation needed] to the unsourced content you added, or delete it until you find a source. All the best. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:16, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reverting the edit. I added the reference. Walkabout14 (talk) 05:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Are you interested in helping me expand Joseph P. Sneed please? He is a direct ancestor of Carly Fiorina on her paternal side, according to Find a Grave.Zigzig20s (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look at it. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why would anyone devote significant time to an article on Carly Fiorina? She has no chance of winning the nomination. She is not notable at all.John Paul Parks (talk) 04:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sneed is notable in his own right, as he spread the Methodist faith in Texas and converted many slaves prior to and during the Civil War.Zigzig20s (talk) 11:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I also created Port Sullivan, Texas, a ghost town.Zigzig20s (talk) 13:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can you find a reference for the Carly connection? I think he may be her great-great-grandfather.Zigzig20s (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edit on the Franklin Pierce Article

Franklin Pierce was, in fact, the first President born in the nineteenth century. Whether it is "notable" I do not know, but it is factual. Also, the article on John F. Kennedy states that he was the first President born in the twentieth century, and the article on Dwight D. Eisenhower states that he was the last President born in the nineteenth century. Therefore, I thought it was appropriate to note that Franklin Pierce was the first President born in the nineteenth century.John Paul Parks (talk) 05:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drive-in theater, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union, New Jersey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of professional Ultimate team from sports section of Austin, TX

I am curious why you continue to remove any mention of a professional Ultimate team under the Austin,TX#Sports section of the Austin, TX wiki.

You cite that this is not news, but the sport of Ultimate has not only gained Olympic status[1] (unlike Women's football, which is cited) but is one of the fastest growing sports in the United States with a 24.7% increase in participation for children between 2007 and 2014 [2] and had 5.1 million participants in 2012. [3]

Given the fact that Austin lacks any top level professional sports teams, (only minor league and college level), it is worth mentioning that Austin actually does have a top level sports team. It should also be noted that the professional Ultimate team in Austin, the Austin Sol, is part of the American Ultimate Disc League, which has a multi-year broadcast agreement with ESPN[4]

Vsmmd (talk) 03:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)vsmmd[reply]


(talk page stalker)Do you have any reliable sourcing for the team you are trying to add? John from Idegon (talk) 04:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Is the American Ultimate Disc League actual website not a reliable source?[5] The AUDL has been featured in the Bleacher Report[6], The New York Times[7], and SB Nation[8].

Locally, Fox News 7 has done a story reporting about the Austin Sol.[9]

Furthermore, other major cities such as Cincinnatti, Ohio; Madison, Wisconsin; and Charlotte, North Carolina all display their professional Ultimate teams under the sports section of their respective cities Wikipedia pages.

Vsmmd (talk) 15:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Vsmmd[reply]

No, the league's own website is not a reliable source nor is the team's website. OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid arguement. NOTNEWS definitely applies as this organization has not even played a game yet. When the NYT writes about the team (not a competition they were in, not the league) in detail, then you can write an article about the team. You could then briefly mention then in the city's article with a wikilink.
I must ask....do you have some connection to the team or the league? John from Idegon (talk) 16:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I don't see how the league's own website is not reliable. If the official NFL website said that the Oakland Raiders were moving to Austin and have the "Austin Raiders" listed in their "NFC-Whatever official" division would that not be THE definitive source?

I can point to articles in Ultiworld, which is the largest Ultimate-related magazine, but then I would wonder if you would not consider that a reliable source. In fact, if the NYTimes is the standard for reliable references, I would love to see sources for any of the other Austin sports teams mentioned in the NYTimes. I certainly don't see any references cited for the Austin Outlaws other than their own wikipedia page, which only has their own website cited as a reference.

My logic is as follows:

1. The AUDL is established a professional sports league. (Evidenced by previous cited references.)

2. If the AUDL is established as a professional sports league, then all teams that operate within the AUDL are professional sports teams.

3. The Austin Sol operates within the AUDL, therefore, the Austin Sol is a professional sports team.

4. The sports section in the Austin wiki is meant to list the professional sports teams in Austin.

5. The Austin Sol should be listed as a professional sports team in Austin.


However, I do fully recognize your point that the Sol hasn't played a game yet. That is valid and I can wait until their season has started.

To answer your question, I am very actively involved in the Ultimate community, and this has been news to the national Ultimate community (again over 5.1 million participants) for over the past year. I wanted to update the city's wiki accordingly.

I have not included the Ultimate club teams that operate within Austin, despite their notoriety, including the men's team winning the USA Ultimate National Championship in 2012[10], and members being selected for Team USA for the World Games, as they are not professional/paid and do not have a schedule that operates within the city.

Vsmmd (talk) 18:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Vsmmd[reply]

I will ask again. What is your connection to this? I've left some links on your page as to how Wikipedia works. You obviously do not get it. It is not for publicity. John from Idegon (talk) 18:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

My connection is that I play Ultimate and I live in Austin. Sorry for being excited? But you're right, I don't get it. Other major cities have teams in this league listed. I don't understand why Austin does not. I've read the "Other stuff exists" and it seems like it can go both ways being valid or invalid. But isn't that the point of using the talk feature? There's no editing war going on. I was looking for your logic and I will check out the links you left on my page.
I'm not trying to promote anything. I don't even believe I linked the website in my original revision. In the realm of a fairly large subculture (Ultimate), this is absolutely noteworthy news. In the context of another large subculture (the city of Austin), I was simply listing that the team exists among other existing teams.
And on that note-- if I add the Round Rock Express as an Austin area sports team, is that going to be deleted? (Full disclosure: I like baseball too.)

Vsmmd (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Vsmmd[reply]

Yes it would, as Round Rock is not Austin. And to answer your previous hypothetical about a pro football team moving here, no, we would not include it based on what the team's website says. Encyclopedias are tertiary sources. That means our content is based almost entirely on what secondary sources say. Obviously, the team's website is primary. You are welcome to start a discussion on the talk page of the article as to whether to include this, and consensus, built through arguments based on policy and reliable sources will rule the day. Keep in mind that at this point you have two editors opposing your position, so be prepared to make much sounder arguments than you have here. Pretty much all your points have been some variation of ILIKEIT, which will not win anyone to a consensus. John from Idegon (talk) 21:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Are you able to find a portrait of Mark R. Cockrill please? It would be good to find out where his Mississippi plantation was located as well.Zigzig20s (talk) 19:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's one here, but I can't confirm the copyright status. If it were a photo it would be ok because of the year Cockrill died, but the portrait could have been done any time using a photo. I'll keep looking. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Do you think the forts on the Cibolo Creek Ranch are on the National Register of Historic Places listings in Presidio County, Texas? Perhaps number 2?Zigzig20s (talk) 21:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article mentions El Fortin de Cibolo, which is on the NRHP list. How would we insert it in the article with the NRHP infobox please?Zigzig20s (talk) 04:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest article

Only one question: Are the eponymous feature of the hot springs included in the price of lodging? John from Idegon (talk) 04:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Too funny! Magnolia677 (talk) 10:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Waldrep

While I appreciate your hard work on the Phil Waldrep, you seem to have missed the mark on how to leave references. Please drop a line here or on my talk page and I can give you a hand. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


Oh dear. I thought I sourced them correctly. Can you please walk me through this? I have tried referencing walk throughs of how to do this and do not understand them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipedia824 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Please send me a notification when you respond to this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipedia824 (talkcontribs) 19:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cibolo Creek Ranch has been nominated for Did You Know

Sorry for no resources

Magnolia667, I must submit my apologies for not finding any internet pages that back up my sight. I submitted my "Gambling" section of Cheyenne after I seen the place, thinking that people should know about is effects on the Cheyenne area. Unfortunately, because I am using a safe search, I didn't find any articles on it. After seeing your reply, I will promise to keep it removed. Thank You. 174.45.128.124 (talk) 16:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably worth adding to the article, it just needs a source. I'll help you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I have always enjoyed contributing, and I'm glad you would help me with my source! 174.45.128.124 (talk) 18:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please do not throw baseless accusations my way and/or ascribe bad intentions to me as you did on my talk page in regards to Drake Hotel (Toronto). If you have issues with my edits try to state the specifics of what it is you're objecting to on the article's talk page rather than blanketly removing content and verifiable info.99.225.150.245 (talk) 05:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Minnie J. Grinstead

Hi! As you're aware, Minnie J. Grinstead was tagged as a possible copyvio both by CorenSearchBot and by a real human editor; the nature of the problem with the page was clearly explained on the talk page by Moonriddengirl. Since little seems to have been done to resolve the matter (see this comparison), I've now blanked the page and listed it at WP:CP for processing. I'm sorry, but I saw no alternative. If you'd like to work on a rewrite, you can do so at this temporary page. This clumsily handwritten note is instead of the customary large and invasive template. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Do you think it would be possible for you to upload this picture please? Possibly in fair use?Zigzig20s (talk) 10:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's almost certainly copyright protected, as it was published after 1923. Magnolia677 (talk) 02:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with picture in infobox

Hello. Do you know how to add this picture to the infobox for Miączyn, Lublin Voivodeship please?Zigzig20s (talk) 20:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Magnolia677 made the necessary edit. Thanks to you both for getting the pic added to the article. MarnetteD|Talk 01:35, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

Jeepers Magnolia I thought I was editing the help desk not your talk page so D'oh and a trout for me. Please remove this if you wish. Thanks for everything you do. MarnetteD|Talk 01:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's all Oscars tonight. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Salinas, California

Added a link to ReferenceUSA website. I am unsure how else to improve the reference. --Shortride (talk) 01:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Jersey maps

Hey there. I am sorry, but that wasn't me who made those edits. It must have been someone in the house when I left everything logged in, they must've edited without me knowing. Anyway, I took a look at those pages that were changed, and I wondered what would be the standard practice. Because some pages use 1 map and others, like the ones you created, use 2 maps. Should 2 maps be added to each page? I have a feeling this was discussed a while back. Tinton5 (talk) 05:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. When I created Pinkneyville, New Jersey and other New Jersey articles I added a pushpin map similar to those found on several city and town articles across the US. Another editor subsequently added a second map to the infobox. I haven't seen any policy forbidding this though it makes the infobox really long on these stub article. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Are you able to upload a picture of June Brewster please?Zigzig20s (talk) 23:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

None of the photos are public domain yet. They need to be pre-1923. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Not sure if you are interested in this, but I think we should add a list of all state senators and representatives per district. We could start with this one. But do you know where we could find a reliable list please? I tried to look on the website of the California State Senate and I couldn't find much.Zigzig20s (talk) 03:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Magnolia, I noticed several redlinks to communities in Chickasaw County, Mississippi, and thought of you, as you have created so many articles on Mississippi towns. Jacona (talk) 14:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to hear from you. I wanted to look the locations of the redlink communities but GNIS is down for maintenance. According to Dunbar Rowland, Buena Vista "has two churches, a number of good stores, and an academy. Population in 1900, 225". Definitely needs an article. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:38, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Cibolo Creek Ranch

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An apology message

Hold on user, I writing a message so I am here to offer you an apology. Before I will apologize to you, I will stop this behavior this going to be expected. So I will have to do better than that. And second, I will never attack a user. Now I will make a apology to you, User, I am "extremely sorry" for what I have done. If you can accept my apology. I will stop this behavior and I will have to do better than that next time and I will avoid a possible block. So again I am "extremely sorry" and I will not do this behavior and I will never make mistakes for what I have done and I will do better than that next time. So thanks anyways. 2001:569:70DD:7500:39EA:19D8:DF90:EF4D (talk) 06:55, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sparta, Tennessee

Hello! I am just updating the population from 16 years ago. The 2014 estimate can be found in the demographics section of the page. There is also a source there. --ACase0000 (talk) 01:04, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It looked like spam because the date of access was 2011 for 2014 demographic info. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with picture in infobox

Hello. Do you know how to add this picture to the infobox for Ryki please?Zigzig20s (talk) 22:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:11, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!Zigzig20s (talk) 00:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Austin, Minnesota

Thanks for your edits to Austin, Minnesota. As you have seen, I've been working very hard on this page lately and it's very helpful to have a good editor review my work. I think the vast majority of your changes are very positive and I agree with them. Some of the photos were redundant and duly removed. I also appreciated the reorganization of some sections. I did restore a one photo that I feel is a very good representation of the city's nature preserve. Thanks for keeping an eye on the page and for justifying/explaining your edits with comments. Darb02 (talk) 21:40, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your addition of Gervan Fearon to this article as a notable alumni again. He may well be notable, but you cannot justify his inclusion simply by saying that he is. If you are not willing to write an article for him then per WP:SIGCOV you need to show that he has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Your single Share News source is not sufficient, and I'm not sure that it even qualifies as a reliable source. It appears to be more than just a blog, but I don't know that it meets the requirements of WP:NEWSORG. For example, I don't know who wrote the piece (just the admin of the website), and I don't know if Share News does fact-checking and has a reputation for accuracy. Meters (talk) 00:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my response at Talk:West Hill Collegiate Institute#Disputed addition of notable alumni. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've been in a fair amount of trouble before, because of your continuing conflicts with Alansohn, which went to ArbCom, and one of your problems is that you don't listen and you don't have a very good sense of visual layout, You follow guidelines as if they were absolutely mandatory rules, which they are not. My advice to you is to move on to other articles, and to deal with content issues,. not layout issues, which you really have no talent for. Also, ease up on thinking that MOS is mandatory -- it is not, and never has been, it is a guideline, which means it is advisory. In this way, you're much more likely to stay out of trouble. BMK (talk) 21:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Herald Square was sloppy and you evidently have little regard for guidelines. If your edit was purely vexatious, shame on you. Moving forward, this may assist you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War

As previously discussed in the comments of the reverts, you are seem to be having an edit war for the article Golden, Colorado. This directly violates the policy at WP:EW and also appears to violate WP:GF. At Talk:Golden, Colorado, I encouraged you to edit to improve wikipedia. It's fair enough that I meet you half way. So you don't have to go through the references for Brianne Nelson, albeit there are only 5 so it wouldn't be that hard anyways, here is a refernece showing she is from Golden - [1]. I think it is fair to warn you that continued edit wars only hurt wikipedia and the editors. RonSigPi (talk) 00:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank your for sharing WP:EW. If you read that policy you will see "reverting to enforce certain overriding policies is not considered edit warring". Please take a moment to read WP:V (an overriding policy), which states:
  • "Verifiability, no original research and neutral point of view are Wikipedia's core content policies".
  • "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source".
You added Brianne Nelson as a notable person to Golden, Colorado without a source. Ok, so I checked the target article (which you wrote), and that article makes no mention of her being from Golden Colorado. I even told you that in the edit summary when I deleted her. So instead of adding a source to both articles, you add a link to the source on my talk page (and on the Golden talk page you told me to go find a source for myself), and accuse me of edit waring for deleting your unsourced edits. Am I missing something? Magnolia677 (talk) 02:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Richmond, British Columbia

Hi,

I consulted a professional photographer and he suggested the image that I put up there is better than the 2,440*843 image used to be there. Even with window markings, a 20M image is still better than a 2M image. My image is not offensive according to MOS:Images and satisfies the guidelines of WP:LEADIMAGE. Thank you.

Ueutyi (talk) 04:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for writing. I left a detailed edit summary on the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I do see if I open the image up there are window reflections visible, but how can you see them by viewing the thumbnail? Anyways, I have uploaded two alternative ones,
Skyline of Richmond, BC 3, Skyline of Richmond, BC 2
If you see these are any better. Thank you.
Ueutyi (talk) 04:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you add them to the talk page at Richmond? Let other editors decide. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'd like to add a picture to Jean de Bonnefon. Do you think this one could be uploaded, or are you able to find another one please? Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 04:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The photo may have been published after 1923, so it may not be in the public domain. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clemens Field

Thanks for your edits on Clemens Field, any advice to improve is welcomed and appreciated! User talk:Skilgis1900

Do you actually know what a Speed Trial is?

Speed Week is a speed trial. A speed trial describes the type of event. --Falcadore (talk) 09:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion spamming

Hey, stop reporting all my articles, most of them matter, have you done your research? Your spamming the deletion nomination on these articles which are real celebrities man, come on? --Xboxmanwar (talk) 22:18, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rates section in Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Thanks for noticing that Magnolia677 (talk). I wanted to get rid of that section to. It is outdated and unsightly with everything in bold font. I tried unsuccessfully to at least change that. I could move it to the talk page where it could be discussed. If anyone really wants the rate section there maybe they could summarize it instead of leaving all the data.Oceanflynn (talk) 21:12, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BACK in the saddle

Hey There, I am back after taking care of a few million real world things,. I can walk again, ANDF not be in pain, woo hoo....Had my knee scoped and a few other physical things, but I am able to contribute again. Many Thanks for the message on my talkCoal town guy (talk) 01:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you're feeling better. I was starting to feel I was the only one on Wikipedia who knows where Hoohoo is! Magnolia677 (talk) 02:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Utopia, Georgia in Berrien County.

Can I please get assistance in getting Utopia on the list of unincorporated communities in Berrien County, Georgia? The Utopia information can be verified on the county's historical site. I established the community at age 15 in 1972. I am now 59. My name is Phil Jones. Ptrain8@yahoo.com I will try and send a picture. I am very challenged when it comes to tech. Thank you. Ptrain8 (talk) 00:03, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The only Utopia that gets a gnis hit in Georgia is a church in Douglass County. No hits on Google news. Neoglism? John from Idegon (talk) 06:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is a road named Utopia Circle about 3 clicks north of the county seat, off of appropriately named Enigma Road. I find nothing anywhere that would meet WP:RS to even make the low WP:V standard for WP:N for a settlement. Can't see how anything could be written that wasn't WP:OR. Hopefully, YMMV. John from Idegon (talk) 06:51, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hey John. I also poked around on GNIS and Google could not find the settlement. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:07, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks plus an idea

Hello. Thanks for updating Death of Jonathan Sanders. I would add that it's a good idea to keep wp:redlinks if an article can be created, which seems to be fairly obvious to me for the Mississippi Bureau of Investigation. But then again, maybe you think it's not a notable topic. Best wishes. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 13:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit is great. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:24, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use cover of 41: A Portrait of My Father

Hello. Do you think you could add a fair use cover of 41: A Portrait of My Father please? I am reading it now and will try to expand it with book reviews later. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 01:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give it a try on the weekend. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 02:25, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lonsdale, Knoxville

I have a link here to an article saying that Lonsdale was in fact its own municipality at one point. Please revert your edit. Thanks - Chickensire (talk)

Perhaps you can find more references to expand this.Zigzig20s (talk) 05:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Port Hope, Ontario may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * Port Hope Farmers' Market] (May to October)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Blackwater, Missouri edit

You removed my edit in Blackwater Missouri because I could not cite the additions that I added. How am I suppose to do that when there is nothing to cite? No website or online resource would have the information that I provided as I used to attend the school. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DucTheGuardian (talkcontribs) 08:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kodak Black -- stub status

Hello Magnolia677, I have initiated a discussion section on Talk:Kodak_Black regarding the stub status of the article.

I look forward to your reply there. Thank you. Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 01:33, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to an old question

You had asked me some time back about an RfC for the inclusion or not of various magazine polls in settlement articles. It wasn't an RfC just a discussion and it is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities#Boosterism. I would like to see an RfC on the subject. John from Idegon (talk) 05:00, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Williams County, North Dakota

Must every single thing be sourced? These population numbers are already in the article. Backspace (talk) 00:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't noticed a sourced entry elsewhere in the article for the edit you made. Perhaps I missed it. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I was referring to the fact that the population numbers of 2010 and 2015 had been "accepted" in the article, and that the corresponding numbers had also been "accepted" for McKenzie County. A mathematical check into the numbers for McKenzie County would suggest an obvious discrepancy between the original statement in the Williams County article and the numbers in McKenzie County. Backspace (talk) 01:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker)For an article about a settlement in the USA, all population and demographic information should be cited to the US Census Bureau. John from Idegon (talk) 03:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and...

I saw your edit at the Marine Academy article, thanks for that! Would you take a look at The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina for the same problem? There is an editor who believes that the titles should stay, but I disagree per Wikipedia guidelines. Thoughts? Thanks, 🎓 Corkythehornetfan 🎓 02:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your revision of the Corrections i made to the Apalachicola Climate Table

Hello

If you open the Nowdata Source for the Climate Table, and then click on the Daily/Monthly Normals for Apalachicola Ap, the site will show this. http://i.imgur.com/5yrqIca.png For some reason it will not open the Climate Table. What you need to do to see the normals is:

Open the map "View Map"

Then Click on "Show more Stations" below the map first http://i.imgur.com/nSXMIRM.png

Then Click on the Apalachicola Ap on the map http://i.imgur.com/5juSBBW.png

Now click on "Daily/Monthly Normals" and then Go http://i.imgur.com/9YEgLEP.png

Then it works (atleast for me) http://i.imgur.com/uontlK0.png http://i.imgur.com/1GiGXah.png

I corrected the Normals in the Wiki Box to these. The Wikipedia Table for Apalachicola as it is now is simply wrong.

There's also an other way to get the same climate normals without using the buggy Nowdata site

National Climate Data Center http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datatools/normals

Choose Florida and Apalachicola Airport http://i.imgur.com/QwPK9Hi.png http://i.imgur.com/VzVIBAM.png

I hope you see now, that i changed the Normals to the correct ones. Then you changed them back to the wrong ones. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guajara3718 (talkcontribs) 09:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Without adding or updating the source you used--which you failed to do--it just looks like spam. I'm surprised you don't get reverted more often. Thanks for your hard work though. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:45, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Source is already there (Nowdata). Just the data for the table is wrong. So updating the source doesn't make sense to me. What now? --Guajara3718 (talk) 23:09, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update your access date. You've had numerous warnings on your talk page from other editors. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is it ok now?

--Guajara3718 (talk) 11:35, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AWB skip text

Resolved

In the Skip Text Contains/Doesn't contain boxes, do you know of a way to code the following: Category:National Register of Historic Places in ? County, Arkansas, for example, where ? needs to be a wildcard denoting any string of characters at this location? Thanks Hmains (talk) 19:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think you meant to write User:Magioladitis. I've added several historic places to Arkansas though. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:52, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, sorry. Thanks Hmains (talk) 22:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on my talk page. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Empty list

Thanks for restoring. (I guess that was the smarter reaction to finding an empty list :-) I actually looked up the Winnipeg article for a list of notable people. My edit summary wasn't intended to be nonsensical, sorry about that. Have a Happy Friday soon! (It's Friday here). ---Sluzzelin talk 00:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The list needs work for sure. Thanks for writing and have a great weekend soon. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:34, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced Census Data for 2015

Hi, I noticed your comment about the unsourced data I added about populations. I will revert your edits (the edit that took my edits out) and add sources. Thanks for letting me know! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superbug2399 (talkcontribs) 14:43, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alhambra, California may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''Alhambra''' ({{IPAc-en|æ|l|ˈ|h|æ|m|b|r|ə}} or {{IPAc-en|ɑː|l|ˈ|h|ɑː|m|b|r|ə}} is a [[city]] located in the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see that you are doing a very big mistake in the page Victoria, British Columbia and with me. What's that that "I may be blocked if I put unsourced content" ? Have you ever seen my contributions and edits on Wikipedia ¿? I make unsourced changes?? Now please check it by yourself. You're insulting me.

I will explain you something about the climate. First of all, here it is the source.<ref>http://koeppen-geiger.vu-wien.ac.at/pics/kottek_et_al_2006.gif</ref> And now I will explain about the classification of the climates, as I only changed the name of the climate according to the official parameters of the Köppen Climate Classification, as as you can check by yourself (prior to my edition) the climate is CSb, which means Warm-summer Mediterrean climate, because the average temperature in the hottest month doesn't exceed 22ºC/71.6F. I strongly recommend you to check the climate classification before you revert my changes and also "warn" me about making "unsourced changes". I mean... what? Why do I need a source when the page was saying "CSb" and it was indicating "mediterranean climate" when it's referencing to Köppen's climate classification, and according to that classification, CSb is not a hot summer mediterranean climate/normal mediterranean climate. It's a warm summer mediterreanean climate.
You can check it on the page from above. I don't need any advises, I'm from here from long time ago and I only do sourced and valuable edits. In this case it isn't needed any source as it's clear.
In fact, I've also added a source now to the page of Victoria's climate. Here you have the image of Worldwide's climate (Southern Canada can be easily distinguished).<ref>http://koeppen-geiger.vu-wien.ac.at/pics/kottek_et_al_2006.gif</ref> Also I put it here. You can check it in the page of Köppen climate classification, there is a map on the page of mediterranean climate, but also I will put it on the page. Please, the next time, better check what you revert and prove if it's true or not. I never make false changes or unsourced changes unless in a few cases like this one, where they aren't needed. Yes, I have a couple of warnings for edit warring, that's all. And finally the administrators gave me the reason. That was a year ago. Thanks

Also I would like to say that I don't say it in a bad mood. But I didn't like at all how you treated me at first, like if I was a new editor here and I was doing what I wanted. No, I'm not that kind of person. I work here to improve the Wikipedia. I've just seen an error and I've corrected it. Next time, please check it before you revert any changes. Anyways, thanks for the advice. Regards! --TechnicianGB (talk) 15:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New article. Somehow the Elkman tool didn't work, so no infobox. The JSTOR article is interesting and it looks like the original planter may have been related to Thomas Whitmore (MP) of Apley Hall.Zigzig20s (talk) 20:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I hope 173.29.101.109 isn't a 10-year-old, because otherwise their many edits to articles about executed and murdered people would be even more disturbing. Trivialist (talk) 12:16, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Has been sent to the time out room anyway. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:24, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
New user Alex Piela appears to have identical editing interests as 173.29.101.109. Trivialist (talk) 18:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kristina Pimenova

Hello, you have now voted twice to delete Kristina Pimenova, but you still didn't explain why you think that more than 4 million fans is not enough. Also, it is not a vote. Lyrda (talk) 20:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If it's not a vote, then actually, I haven't voted at all! Magnolia677 (talk) 20:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Map Room

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Map_Room_(White_House)&oldid=prev&diff=725823228

It is 3 words - just let it go. Wizzy 07:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New article you may enjoy (and possibly be able to add a map to the infobox?). I really must ask my boss for a raise because this could be mine!Zigzig20s (talk) 12:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Data USA maps?

I noticed your reversion here. I have similar concerns but am not sure I understand the issue all that well, and have begun a discussion here if you have any insights - thanks! JohnInDC (talk) 03:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kodak Black for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kodak Black is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kodak Black until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LK (talk) 06:34, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey.

I know that it has been a while since we have last communicated. I would like to say that I'm still sorry for the "vandalism" that I had done when I was first starting out on Wikipedia. I tried to edit them in good faith, but you were right, non-cited stuff might as well be hogwash. Thank you. ExecutiveWashington (talk) 08:32, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]