User talk:LJstats

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

That a paper is hosted on CyberLeninka is nothing special, that's like a paper being hosted on ResearchGate or Zenodo. Those are general unfiltered repositories where you can upload pretty much anything.


The actual publisher of this journal is the "Eurasian Union of Scientists", which is a predatory publisher. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:55, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Record runs with the same time are worth mentioning no less than the time of the first run. They also count as records.Montell 74 (talk) 14:05, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I get your argument but we should follow World Athletics standards.LJstats (talk) 14:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To your information, Bracy ran 9.85 on three different occasions.LJstats (talk) 14:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
At an event like high jump or pole vault you would get littered by secondary marks. Many athletes have equaled their personal best a dozen times.LJstats (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not a fan of ignore equal marks and ancillary jumps and throws. Just think of Crowsers big ancillary shot put throws (23.01 m, 23.11 m) in his last series in Eugene. This kind of stats f.e. also don't do justice to Duplantis' dominance in the pole vault.Montell 74 (talk) 15:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is LJstats. Thank you.dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 20:17, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Average human height by country) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Salvio 20:32, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As soon as the page was unprotected, you immediately started back edit warring, that's why I have just blocked you. Salvio 20:35, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's now indefinite because you're a sock puppet of User:Prim96. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:06, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]