User talk:Homeostasis07
| “ | There is so much that I haven't yet. And don't I know it. | ” |
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
Barnstar/Roxette rosette
|
The Audio Barnstar | |
| Great work with this and many like it. GregKaye 20:56, 9 July 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks so much for the barnstar, @GregKaye: Roxette might be a cheesy 80s band, but they're a part of my childhood. It was a real labor of love fixing up all their articles. And thanks for the ping to that other user's comment. I've unfortunately had enough of that particular user for one lifetime, so I won't even dignify them with a response at this point. If you want to know more about that user and why they started editing these sorts of articles, you should read their opening comment at this thread they started called "Pop culture articles related to domestic abuse and gender bias". It's the most blatant self-admission to WP:POINTY editing and WP:NOTHERE that I've ever read, at least on-site. That would end up being a whole big thing, so I won't prolong your thread by starting all that up. Anyway, I'm glad things are working out for you, and hope you keep well. Keep your chin up. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 20:48, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello
Hello again. Apologies for the random message, but I just wanted to reach out and see how you were doing. I hope everything is well and have a great weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 01:28, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hey Aoba47! So sorry for the delay responding to you. Issues with work/life balance making it practically impossible to go online at all in the evenings now. Aside from that, everything's cool my end. Everyone happy and healthy. How about you? Any projects in the pipeline? Hope you're keeping well. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 21:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- Now it is my turn to apologize for a delayed response and mine is far worse lol. I am glad that you are doing well. I am trying my best, but otherwise, I am solid. I do not have any projects at the moment. I completed a FAC recently so I think I will sit back and wait a bit before trying to do something new. I have had a few false starts so I will take that as a sign that now is not the right time lol. Aoba47 (talk) 23:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- No worries about any delayed response on your part. I'm pretty sure I have you beat in that department anyways. ;) The simultaneously good/bad news is that I'm absolutely sick of being taken for granted in my current job, so am actively applying for new roles elsewhere. I'm completely burnt out from working 9am–2am 6 days a week (no, I'm not exaggerating). I was absolutely correct when I said that "promotion" I got all that time ago didn't feel like a "promotion" at all. So... enough is enough. Hopefully, I'll soon be working a nice cushy 9–5 job, and will be able to reintegrate into Wikipedia society in the evenings once again. Let me know if you have any projects in the pipeline in a month or so. I should be good by then. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 02:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Now it is my turn to apologize for a delayed response and mine is far worse lol. I am glad that you are doing well. I am trying my best, but otherwise, I am solid. I do not have any projects at the moment. I completed a FAC recently so I think I will sit back and wait a bit before trying to do something new. I have had a few false starts so I will take that as a sign that now is not the right time lol. Aoba47 (talk) 23:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
September drive bling
|
The Modest Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to Homeostasis07 for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2022 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 19:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC) |
Standard ArbCom discretionary sanctions notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Newimpartial (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert!
Hello! Thanks for reverting me here—that was an unintentional edit; I think I was having trouble with my browser's cache—just a couple edits later, I added a Template:who tag, then, in the very next edit, somehow managed to revert myself. Sorry about that!--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 21:23, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- No worries @Jerome Frank Disciple: I figured it was a mistake. Sort of thing that tends to happen when two users are simultaneously expanding the same section of an article. I'll leave you to it for a while, and come back tomorrow. Happy editing! ;) Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 21:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oh no! It appears we left the article at the same time; either way, all yours!--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 12:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=We_Are_Chaos&diff=prev&oldid=1174674676 Hi why is Gritdaily unreliable? it seems like a perfectly fine source. -FMSky (talk) 12:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @FMSky: It's a long shot in hell right now, with all of this unresolved, but I do plan on making We Are Chaos at least a GA someday. I started work on the article several months before the allegations surfaced, so felt I might as well finish what I started. I doubt Grit Daily would survive a GA review, to be honest, but if you want to re-add it as a source for the album being rock, please feel free to. There are probably higher-profile sources (i.e., used in more articles; the named source having its own Wiki article, etc.) that could be used to support the same content.
- I don't think the Ultimate Guitar source can be used though. There's a policy somewhere saying the AllMusic sidebar can't be used to source genres, so I doubt that UG default page could be used. Happy to be proven wrong though. Hope you're keeping well, and happy editing. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 22:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
After the trial
Your deletion of the commercial consequences section in Depp-Heard. It seems to make sense to add a comment to say that their film careers appear to be unaffected as a result of the trial. The data included in the section you deleted covered their film production careers during the filing of the complaints to the present date once year after verdict. Why delete it? HenryRoan (talk) 23:47, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- One, because a substantial portion of the section was unsourced and irrelevant to the article; it read like WP:Promotion for the forthcoming Aquaman film. That article is about the trial, not Aquaman. Two, because of what I said in the edit-summary. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 00:48, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| I’m always a little shocked when someone actually stands up for me at ANI. I really can’t thank you enough. Dronebogus (talk) 02:10, 1 November 2023 (UTC) |
- No problem @Dronebogus: I don't believe we've ever interacted before, but I randomly browse ANI every once in a while and couldn't help but notice that comment I responded to. I don't know how that whole thing is going to end, but keep your chin up. And don't let anyone goad you in to saying something you'll end up regretting. Otherwise, you'll be fine. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 02:17, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Long time no see! Would you be willing to look at the article for Terror Train when I finish it?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 00:27, 10 January 2024 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
- Hey MagicatthemovieS, long time no see indeed! Hope you've been keeping well. Sorry about the delay in responding, but January/February is always a stinker for me, editing-wise. Quite busy at work dealing with paperwork from the pre-Christmas rush. But if you schedule this for a Friday or Saturday evening (the only time I can edit most weeks) then I'd be happy to have a look relatively quickly. Otherwise, you'd probably be left waiting until the next weekend. Have quite a few of my own potential GAs waiting in the wings, until a time when I have enough energy to deal with the reviews. Kind regards, Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 22:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Also, couldn't help but notice you tried to nominate Get Your Gunn for FA earlier this week, but didn't finish the set-up procedure. Is that something you're really interested in doing? I think it's definitely FA-quality work, but feel I should warn you now that it's a lot of work. And WP:FAC is arguably the most politicised Wikipedia page these days. Although recent reporting has nothing to do with a song he released in 1994, I'd be very much expecting to see all that brought up during the FA review from at least one of the "regulars". I think We Are Chaos is probably the best work I've ever done on Wikipedia (except the lead, which I never finished), but I've not had the stomach for even a GA MM-related review, let alone an FA one. I'm envisioning quite a mess if you proceed, to be honest. We could probably talk more candidly about this elsewhere. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 22:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- I hear you on the MM stuff. I'm not proceeding with that one. I'll let you know when I finish Terror Train and you can look at it at your convenience. Thanks so much! :)MagicatthemovieS (talk) 23:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
- I think Terror Train is looking good right about now so I nominated it.MagicatthemovieS (talk) 02:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
- I hear you on the MM stuff. I'm not proceeding with that one. I'll let you know when I finish Terror Train and you can look at it at your convenience. Thanks so much! :)MagicatthemovieS (talk) 23:59, 12 January 2024 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Seven years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Re your oppose vote at Sdkb's RFA
Your rationale and followup message, particularly your parting words "compiling now," were enough to convince me that until you returned, I wouldn't have all the information I'd need to cast a vote. It's now been more than two three four days and 109 129 156 support votes (including mine) have been filed since your last edit here. Do you have an idea when you'll be back with an update? City of Silver 23:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Your comment at Sdkb's RfA
At Sdkb's RfA you state that you have off-wiki evidence pointing to their participation in meatpuppetry. The Arbitration Committee has not yet received any such evidence from you. Please supply the evidence by email to arbcom-en@wikimedia.org or withdraw your aspersion. firefly ( t · c ) 18:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- I just stopped by to notify you that despite ArbCom's asking you to remove it, I think (as a crat) there has been plenty of time for you to compile your concerns and send them to ArbCom or substantiate them publicly inside community norms. Therefore I both redacted the comments and struck your vote until such time you reestablish it within community norms or substantiate your claim at an appropriate venue. -- Amanda (she/her) 02:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of MarilynManson.com for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MarilynManson.com, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MarilynManson.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)