User talk:GustavoCza/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Proposed deletion of File:Cowboy Carter.jpeg

The file File:Cowboy Carter.jpeg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cowboy Carter.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cowboy Carter.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cowboy Carter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cowboy Carter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Oasis have reached the threshold of 75 millon record sales wordwide.

Hello there how are you doing ?. I am sure Oasis have now reached the 75million sales mark. Can you add them to the biggest selling artists page please ?. Kind Regards 92.251.150.169 (talk) 10:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Can you please add Oasis to the 75 million mark please ?.

Can you have a look at this for me please ?.they have sold 75 million records ok ?.

Thanks 92.251.158.32 (talk) 05:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Promotion of List of cover versions of Coldplay songs

Congratulations, GustavoCza! The list you nominated, List of cover versions of Coldplay songs, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Phil Harvey (band manager)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Phil Harvey (band manager) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 19:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Phil Harvey (band manager)

The article Phil Harvey (band manager) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Phil Harvey (band manager) and Talk:Phil Harvey (band manager)/GA4 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 23:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi! Any update? (CC) Tbhotch^™ 17:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

I'm going to need a lot more time than just a week, specially now that my college is back. This nomination was from months ago. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 17:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

No problem. I'll extend it to one month at most. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 18:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Please find more substantive contributions to make

Please find more substantive contributions to make than fiddly nonsense like this. If you're not contributing content or hell, introducing consistency to a page, avoid making edits that don't have any reflection in the visual output. I know you're a fan of Coldplay but you don't need to fiddle with the code of their articles in such a meaningless way. The spacing I put there is consistent with the release history section, which funnily enough you haven't bothered with. It makes no sense to have a space before the pipe (|) but not one after. There is also no need at present to make the caption unnecessarily wordier and longer by putting "weekly" in there. Historically, most main national charts around the world are issued weekly. All the chart positions listed on Coldplay's discography are weekly, and there's been no need to point that out in the captions on discographies, so until there is a different type of chart listed (monthly, year-end), there's no need for the additional specification. Ss112 11:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

no wp:self published source

Per the discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_46#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews there's a very clear consensus here that Scaruffi is not to be used as a source in music/album articles in any capacity. So please, do not add his opinions anymore. It is a wp:self published source. Since this is a long running dispute, any contributor warned by the situation and who doesn't respect it, would encounter sanctions and could be blocked from editing. Thanks. You've been informed because you used this source here. Woovee (talk) 15:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

I was not aware of this. Just removed Scaruffi from "Viva la Vida" as well. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 16:02, 6 July 2024 (UTC)