User talk:Gazamp/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

1845 East Cornwall by-election

Would it make more sense to redirect this article to List of United Kingdom by-elections (1832–1847)? Given that it was an uncontested and uncontroversial by-election, it doesn't seem like it will ever include more information than is on a line of the table there, and maintaining it as a separate article just seems like unnecessary overhead. Choess (talk) 15:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

@Choess:- I would err on the side of keeping it; when people search for these things, often they want a simple and immediate answer. Redirecting the page to a list will put the Wikipedia article dealing with it (which people look to as a quick source) far, far down the search and mean people either have to go an find the info for themselves from the original source or be left without the info altogether.

I think also if it were to be redirected, there would need to be a concerted effort on the part of someone to do this to other similar articles. Just scrolling down the list a bit there are loads of other articles in the same boat (1833 Morpeth by-election, 1838 West Suffolk by-election, 1842 Liverpool by-election, 1845 East Cornwall by-election, 1845 West Suffolk by-election, 1846 East Suffolk by-election are just the ones I found in a few minutes). I think if what you proposed were to work, we'd need to deal with all of these (and all the other similar ones that are no doubt out there) and have some sort of a guideline on it, so that there was a clear line on this of what should have a page and what shouldn't. Gazamp (talk) 16:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

I assign very little weight to the SEO argument—the by-election has essentially zero intrinsic interest (it's only of interest as an aspect of the constituency as a whole or the careers of the two MPs), and I think readers are only likely to access it via one of those pages rather than directly from the Internet. (A Google search with terms "east cornwall", 1845, by-election turned up the East Cornwall constituency as the 2nd result, incidentally.)

That said, I had the impression that there were some guidelines for redirecting by-elections like this, and from what you say, that isn't the case at present. I might pursue developing some at some point in the future, but it's not a very high priority, and I don't intend to start redirecting articles like that without a thorough airing of the matter among the community. Thanks for your response, and happy article-writing. Choess (talk) 19:27, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

@Choess: I see your point on search engine matter - I think either way there should be a guideline on it. I haven't come across any and by the looks of it, neither have other editors who have made similar pages. If you find there's an existing rule, do pass it on - it'll save me making pages that'll just get redirected later. Thanks for bringing it up Gazamp (talk) 22:04, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

ShropshirePilgrim Sandbox

You made changes to my sandbox at 07.00 today, altering the categories I had attached to a draft article I am working on. Basically you reinstated categories for St Petroc's Church, Bodmin, and indeed I used that page in my sandbox as a basis for my total re-write on a different topic (related to a different religious building in Bodmin). The extant article for St Petroc's church, Bodmin retains its categories and has not been changed (yet) in any way, by me or by you. So I am undoing your changes to my sandbox draft. Trust you don't mind! ShropshirePilgrim (talk) 16:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

@ShropshirePilgrim: - I didn't change any of the actual categories on your sandbox; I only added a colon at the beginning of each to stop your sandbox showing in the category space. I thought this was standard procedure (that user-space pages shouldn't be in 'main-space' categories)? Gazamp (talk) 16:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation - it did seem a bit odd, but I'm always glad to learn just hope I have! ShropshirePilgrim (talk) 00:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

19th c gubernatorial elections

There are many sources for these results, some are contradictory, some require untangling. Can this be borne in mind before adding pages? Thanks. Marplesmustgo (talk) 20:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

@Marplesmustgo: Of course - I'll take more care in future. Thanks for bringing it up, Gazamp (talk) 08:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Collaborating to improve company articles

Hello Gazamp, I noticed your interest on WP:Companies to improve company articles. I have COI with a few companies. There are some errors and inaccuracies that need to be updated on those articles. Since I am familiar with the subject and have COI, If I present content and verifiable secondary sources, would you be open to collaborating? What are your thoughts on this?--Chefmikesf (talk) 19:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
29		Politics of Cornwall (talk)	Add sources
44		Clifford Shull (talk)	Add sources
68		Porthleven (talk)	Add sources
79		Pavel Cherenkov (talk)	Add sources
54		Rudolf Mössbauer (talk)	Add sources
86		Kai Siegbahn (talk)	Add sources
1,715		Sexual harassment (talk)	Cleanup
27		Legal aspects of workplace bullying (talk)	Cleanup
33		Rio Hondo College (talk)	Cleanup
198		Cornish nationalism (talk)	Expand
80		Igor Tamm (talk)	Expand
103		Vitaly Ginzburg (talk)	Expand
584		Marsy's Law (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
27		The King's University (Texas) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
27		Unionism in Wales (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
192		National University (California) (talk)	Merge
44		Austrian nationalism (talk)	Merge
266		House of Commons (talk)	Merge
315		Murray Gell-Mann (talk)	Wikify
477		Street harassment (talk)	Wikify
25		United States Congress Office of Compliance (talk)	Wikify
6		RCMP harassment policy (talk)	Orphan
3		Gender and labor in Vermont (talk)	Orphan
2		David Levene (talk)	Orphan
196		Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
5		Richard Gendall (talk)	Stub
6		River Seaton (talk)	Stub
438		Abolish the Welsh Assembly Party (talk)	Stub
3		Juan José Rodríguez Pérez (talk)	Stub
2		East Grinstead South & Ashurst Wood (electoral division) (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:28, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		2 years of good content work... Adolphus79 (talk) 23:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

I remember back when you were a new(ish) user, and I have kinda been watching you... you are always working on improving content and creating good articles... 200+ articles and almost 20,000 edits in the last two and a half years deserves something... Ha-Zaa! A barnstar! Do people still do this? idk... gratz... :) - Adolphus79 (talk) 23:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Aw thanks - a nice surprise to log on to! Here's to more good stuff Gazamp (talk) 18:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)