User talk:Gazamp

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

1845 East Cornwall by-election

Would it make more sense to redirect this article to List of United Kingdom by-elections (1832–1847)? Given that it was an uncontested and uncontroversial by-election, it doesn't seem like it will ever include more information than is on a line of the table there, and maintaining it as a separate article just seems like unnecessary overhead. Choess (talk) 15:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Choess:- I would err on the side of keeping it; when people search for these things, often they want a simple and immediate answer. Redirecting the page to a list will put the Wikipedia article dealing with it (which people look to as a quick source) far, far down the search and mean people either have to go an find the info for themselves from the original source or be left without the info altogether.
I think also if it were to be redirected, there would need to be a concerted effort on the part of someone to do this to other similar articles. Just scrolling down the list a bit there are loads of other articles in the same boat (1833 Morpeth by-election, 1838 West Suffolk by-election, 1842 Liverpool by-election, 1845 East Cornwall by-election, 1845 West Suffolk by-election, 1846 East Suffolk by-election are just the ones I found in a few minutes). I think if what you proposed were to work, we'd need to deal with all of these (and all the other similar ones that are no doubt out there) and have some sort of a guideline on it, so that there was a clear line on this of what should have a page and what shouldn't. Gazamp (talk) 16:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I assign very little weight to the SEO argument—the by-election has essentially zero intrinsic interest (it's only of interest as an aspect of the constituency as a whole or the careers of the two MPs), and I think readers are only likely to access it via one of those pages rather than directly from the Internet. (A Google search with terms "east cornwall", 1845, by-election turned up the East Cornwall constituency as the 2nd result, incidentally.)
That said, I had the impression that there were some guidelines for redirecting by-elections like this, and from what you say, that isn't the case at present. I might pursue developing some at some point in the future, but it's not a very high priority, and I don't intend to start redirecting articles like that without a thorough airing of the matter among the community. Thanks for your response, and happy article-writing. Choess (talk) 19:27, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Choess: I see your point on search engine matter - I think either way there should be a guideline on it. I haven't come across any and by the looks of it, neither have other editors who have made similar pages. If you find there's an existing rule, do pass it on - it'll save me making pages that'll just get redirected later. Thanks for bringing it up Gazamp (talk) 22:04, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ShropshirePilgrim Sandbox

You made changes to my sandbox at 07.00 today, altering the categories I had attached to a draft article I am working on. Basically you reinstated categories for St Petroc's Church, Bodmin, and indeed I used that page in my sandbox as a basis for my total re-write on a different topic (related to a different religious building in Bodmin). The extant article for St Petroc's church, Bodmin retains its categories and has not been changed (yet) in any way, by me or by you. So I am undoing your changes to my sandbox draft. Trust you don't mind! ShropshirePilgrim (talk) 16:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ShropshirePilgrim: - I didn't change any of the actual categories on your sandbox; I only added a colon at the beginning of each to stop your sandbox showing in the category space. I thought this was standard procedure (that user-space pages shouldn't be in 'main-space' categories)? Gazamp (talk) 16:39, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation - it did seem a bit odd, but I'm always glad to learn just hope I have! ShropshirePilgrim (talk) 00:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19th c gubernatorial elections

There are many sources for these results, some are contradictory, some require untangling. Can this be borne in mind before adding pages? Thanks. Marplesmustgo (talk) 20:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Marplesmustgo: Of course - I'll take more care in future. Thanks for bringing it up, Gazamp (talk) 08:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Collaborating to improve company articles

Hello Gazamp, I noticed your interest on WP:Companies to improve company articles. I have COI with a few companies. There are some errors and inaccuracies that need to be updated on those articles. Since I am familiar with the subject and have COI, If I present content and verifiable secondary sources, would you be open to collaborating? What are your thoughts on this?--Chefmikesf (talk) 19:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:13, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
29 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Politics of Cornwall (talk) Add sources
44 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Clifford Shull (talk) Add sources
68 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Porthleven (talk) Add sources
79 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Pavel Cherenkov (talk) Add sources
54 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Rudolf Mössbauer (talk) Add sources
86 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Kai Siegbahn (talk) Add sources
1,715 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Sexual harassment (talk) Cleanup
27 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Legal aspects of workplace bullying (talk) Cleanup
33 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Rio Hondo College (talk) Cleanup
198 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Cornish nationalism (talk) Expand
80 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Igor Tamm (talk) Expand
103 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Vitaly Ginzburg (talk) Expand
584 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Marsy's Law (talk) Unencyclopaedic
27 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start The King's University (Texas) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
27 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Unionism in Wales (talk) Unencyclopaedic
192 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C National University (California) (talk) Merge
44 Quality: High, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: GA Austrian nationalism (talk) Merge
266 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C House of Commons (talk) Merge
315 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Murray Gell-Mann (talk) Wikify
477 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Street harassment (talk) Wikify
25 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C United States Congress Office of Compliance (talk) Wikify
6 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C RCMP harassment policy (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Gender and labor in Vermont (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub David Levene (talk) Orphan
196 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Semantic Scholar (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Richard Gendall (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start River Seaton (talk) Stub
438 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Abolish the Welsh Assembly Party (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Juan José Rodríguez Pérez (talk) Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start East Grinstead South & Ashurst Wood (electoral division) (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:28, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
2 years of good content work... Adolphus79 (talk) 23:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I remember back when you were a new(ish) user, and I have kinda been watching you... you are always working on improving content and creating good articles... 200+ articles and almost 20,000 edits in the last two and a half years deserves something... Ha-Zaa! A barnstar! Do people still do this? idk... gratz... :) - Adolphus79 (talk) 23:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Aw thanks - a nice surprise to log on to! Here's to more good stuff Gazamp (talk) 18:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you a lot for helping me and giving me some advice, I'm still confused a little bit. How is it possible to find out turnout? Thanks again. Neverbuffed (talk) 17:47, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For all these elections you need to work out turnout yourself. From info on the Cornwall Council website, you can do this by calculating Total votes / electorate, both of which can be found under the 'voting summary' heading. Also, rejected or unmarked ballots aren't generally used in turnout (and anyhow, the difference is often negligible). Happy editing, Gazamp (talk) 17:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Turns out rejected and unmarked ballots are included...[TO 1] Whoops! I'll go back and start fixing the pages as I get time Gazamp (talk) 11:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Sandra Breux; Jérôme Couture. "Invalid Voting in an Apolitical and Low Turnout Context: A Case Study of One Canadian Municipal Election" (PDF). Political Studies Association. Retrieved 16 January 2021.

A Barnstar for you

The WikiProject Cornwall Barnstar
For all the work on the Cornwall electoral wards, tedious work I would imagine! JW 1961 Talk 21:04, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Joseywales1961: Thank you! It's not too bad and, after all, someone has to do it... Gazamp (talk) 21:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessments

Can you possibly not using the redirect, such as "WP Ireland" but use the full "WikiProject Ireland", for your assessments and likewise for other projects? The full WikiProject thus avoids the redirect. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 00:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will do from here on out - thanks for letting me know! Gazamp (talk) 12:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Gazamp

Thank you for creating Roseland (electoral division).

User:Joseywales1961, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Neat article (as usual!)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 Talk 20:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cornwall Council wards

Hi, just a quick message in regards to your creation of article for wards of Cornwall County Council. Generally the articles are titled as Newlyn and Goonhavern (ward) instead of Newlyn and Goonhavern (electoral division), and furthermore, the Template:Infobox England and Wales ward is used instead of the one you have been using. Thanks – SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 (Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 15:01, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SmartyPants22: Hi there! Thanks for your message. Regarding the use of 'electoral division' rather than 'ward', this is because that's what Cornwall Council uses, and what the pages in Category:Electoral Divisions of West Sussex (which I used as a template for the earlier articles) went by. Regarding the use of the ward infobox, I found the UK-place infobox to be easier to use quickly and better looking for the information I can find.
On both of these counts, I'm open to a wider discussion after I finish the rest; I'm currently working against the clock a little to complete the current divisions in case the sources start to disappear after re-districting at this May's elections. Personally, I don't feel that either of these factors have a great impact on users (though Category:Electoral divisions of England and Category:Wards of England might be better merged), so I'm really not fussed of going back through all of the articles I've made already and changing them. If there's anything else, do let me know! Thanks, Gazamp (talk) 19:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SmartyPants22 and Gazamp I just saw this. Please note that we have the page Wards and electoral divisions of the United Kingdom, which explains the difference. I wouldn’t support using one of the two words, “wards” or “divisions”, to mean both. In particular, there is the problem of two-tier areas which have both wards and divisions, where the separation is useful and needs to be understood. Moonraker (talk) 12:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Moonraker: I didn't realise there was a clear difference, but it's useful to know for future reference - thank you! Gazamp (talk) 22:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for the feedback on my edits, I'd love to keep helping out and I really appreciate the advice on how to use the boxes Zach Griffiths (talk) 12:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Zach Griffiths: Thanks! It's great to have you around helping - it really does make a difference to readers and editors alike. Come and ask questions if you need. Happy editing, Gazamp (talk) 12:16, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brexit in popular culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European Court.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:56, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinators and help needed

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

Autopatrolled

Hi Gazamp thanks for creating articles such as Opaluma rupaul, I was surprised to see you hadn't already had your account set as WP:Autopatrolled, so I've fixed hat. ϢereSpielChequers 22:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! Gazamp (talk) 17:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Keep up the good work! Happy Editing! Wikianonymous09 (talk) 04:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth anniversary on Wikipedia

Hey, Gazamp. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 11:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Gazamp, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see that you now intend to spend some of your editing time on creating articles about women. On the basis of your two recent women's biographies, you seem to be familiar with the requirements. You might nevertheless find it useful to look through our Primer for creating women's biographies. Please let me know is you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:52, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant, thank you! Gazamp (talk) 14:23, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2022

Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of Badminton at the 2022 Maccabiah Games for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Badminton at the 2022 Maccabiah Games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badminton at the 2022 Maccabiah Games until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in September 2022

Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241


Online events:


Request for help:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red October 2022

Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red November 2022

Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red in December 2022

WiR Women who died in 2022
WiR Women who died in 2022
Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Remember to search slight spelling variations of your subject's name,
    like Katherine/Katharine or Elizabeth/Elisabeth, especially for historical subjects.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:54, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2023

Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • De-orphan and incorporate an article into Wikipedia using the Find Link tool

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Malta 2023 GSSE logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Malta 2023 GSSE logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Kempczinski

Hi Gazamp. I am a COI editor working to improve the article about Chris Kempczinski, the CEO of McDonald's. I have two open edit requests which have been discussed without a clear conclusion. I found you are part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies, so I am hoping you might like to take a look at the conversations at Talk:Chris Kempczinski. I believe the information in the second request provides a better understanding of the role Kempczinski has played leading the company since he became CEO. If you agree, I would appreciate if you could update the main article accordingly. Looking forward to your input, MattMcDonalds (talk) 18:32, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in February 2023

Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259


Online events:

Tip of the month:

  • Explore Wikipedia for all variations of the woman's name (birth name,
    married name, re-married name, pen name, nickname)

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red March 2023

Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Mobile phone readers may only see the article "lead" – take some time to make it shine!
    Include something to keep people reading.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of Jessica Hand for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Hand, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Hand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2023

Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red May 2023

Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Use the Google translate app and camera on your phone to translate text from an article or book

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red - June 2023

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Looking for new red links? Keep an eye out for interesting and notable friends, family, or associates of your last article subject, and re-examine group photos for other women who may still need an article.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red July 2023

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red 8th Anniversary

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap!

--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red August 2023

Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280


Online events:

See also:

  • Wikimania 2023 will be held in Singapore, 16–19 August, and will be facilitated by the
    affiliates in the ESEAP (East/South East/Asia/Pacific) region.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

September 2023 at Women in Red

Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283


Online events:

Tip of the month:

  • The books she wrote might be notable, too; learn 5 quick tips about about book articles.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red October 2023

Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of Chris Campbell (diplomat) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Campbell (diplomat), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Campbell (diplomat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - November 2023

Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephen Randolph (disambiguation)

Notice

The article Stephen Randolph (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2023

Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2024

Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296


Online events:

Announcement

  • In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
    of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red February 2024

Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red March 2024

Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301


Online events:

Announcements

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
    and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red April 2024

Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304


Online events:

Announcements

  • The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Gazamp"