User talk:EuroCarGT/Archives/2013/September

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

You reverted an edit to Outlaw motorcycle club " Many find a fulfilling identity in their fantasy persona in the biker culture"

You recently reverted an edit without including a reason. I hope your reason is not because the statement does not portray the subject matter the way you would like it to. The statement may not be flattering to fans of the culture but it is correct. It is a basic statement regarding human behavior. I can bring in the social and psychological editors into the discussion if you find it to be a non-objective statement to reach a consensus. Many people assume other identities for psychological reasons and a psychological book could be written about the Outlaw culture. The phenomenon is not peculiar to this group. Dungeons and Dragons and other fantasy personas are similar. Many internet gamers will also find the fantasy persona as psychologically fulfilling. The reasons are many among them are the sense of power given to people who otherwise feel powerless in their jobs and life. It can also apply to many wiki editors who believe they exert power and control over others as fulfilling themselves psychologically .

Hello! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! It seems like you have an issue with a recent revert I did. Please don't feel offended. However before my revert ClueBot NG reverted the same edit you made as possible vandalism or edit issues. ClueBotNG makes little to few mistakes on detecting issues on edits here. I was using a anti-vandal tool and detected your edit as a minor issue, therefore I reverted it. If you think it was a mistake discuss it here which you did and just revert my revert to let other users review your edit. However you got to remember that you must cite your sources. Please read: WP:FORUM for more information on primary research.
Also note; editing with no reason is accepted here. Edit summaries are optional but is encouraged. I do assume good faith, however that to is optional. What I did was a regular revert and not a type of revert which would send a warning template to your talk page. Again sorry for this issue, however you do need to cite your sources on most edits and state your edit in a neutral point of view. ///EuroCarGT 01:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No issue with your right to revert however it does seem you are rather quick to revert after reading your talk page and looking at how fast you reverted previous articles. That is something you should consider. The reason for adding to the article was to supplement the previous sentence and there is even a notice that the article needs improvement which I did. The real reason for others deletion is because of the accuracy of the statement and the denial of the psychological reasoning for joining groups by some involved in groups. I am not claiming that as your viewpoint because you did not take the time to exam the edit before reverting. It does make the "meatheads" out there who want to deny that their reason for joining that group can be accurately summarized in what they consider an unflattering reason. This is why wiki will always fail in its mission because people can change without reason or logic simply for their own unfounded reasons. I will get of my soap box now. Have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.40.234 (talk) 03:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty!! I do view edits, if a user reverts a edit without looking at it, your most likely going to get blocked for "disruptive editing". Everybody has different reading capabilities, some people read quickly, some slowly, I read every edit keenly and make sure it doesn't contain vandalism, content issues and etc. Wiki will not fail, let me tell you that, Wikipedia is one of the Top 10 most visited sites in the world, no even close to failing. You should go to Special:RecentChanges and see how many edits don't have reasons and summary. Remember there optional. ///EuroCarGT 03:32, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the only one who has noticed. Time stamps tell the truth. You also failed to comprehend what I said. "fail in its mission" is not the same as Wiki failing as a web site. I was very specific and you read it broadly. This is more evidence against your hasty edits. Slow down and read two or three times and make sure you comprehend before you change or I will smack your hands with a ruler. Just kidding about the last part but it is better to take your time and be accurate. You did correctly identify disruptive editing as a resolution. I am only here anonymously due to the meatheads in the very unscholarly article I added to. We can go back and forth but it serves no further purpose. So once again Good Day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.40.234 (talk) 04:35, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand now, take it slow and be clear. I understand your frustration, and I'm sorry about that. ///EuroCarGT 04:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Subway surfers

Good idea. I added pending changes to the article. Garion96 (talk) 14:41, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ///EuroCarGT 14:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats... You have joined a team of awesome helpers!

Teahouse Host Badge Teahouse Host Badge
Awarded to hosts at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Experienced editors with this badge have committed to welcoming guests, helping new editors, and upholding the standards of the Teahouse by giving friendly and patient guidance—at least for a time.

Hosts illuminate the path for new Wikipedians, like Tōrō in a Teahouse garden.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Hey EuroCarGT-- thanks for signing up to host at the Teahouse. Just wanted to alert you to some automatic scripts that you can put on your Special:MyPage/common.js page, which you can find here. They make some routine things easier, like welcoming new users and alerting them when you've answered a question of theirs at the Questions page. Thanks again for your help,
I, JethroBT drop me a line 01:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks! Even if this was automated, thanks again! ///EuroCarGT 01:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it wasn't automated-- I wrote all that stuff at the bottom myself. These don't automatically get delivered to new hosts either-- I keep an eye on who volunteers and try to welcome them when I can.  :) I, JethroBT drop me a line 03:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well you keep up that work! ///EuroCarGT 03:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, EuroCarGT. You have new messages at Numbermaniac's talk page.
Message added 07:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-- t numbermaniac c 07:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you!
Thank you for taking the time to appreciate a fellow Wikipedian! Cheers! — Keithbob • Talk • 14:15, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/New York City/1

Hi,

You nominated this article for Good article reassessment with this edit. As you have given no reasons for your request, i have closed the GAR. Jezhotwells (talk) 08:45, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Barnstar

Thanks, I appreciate it! Mattythewhite (talk) 21:16, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, just showing appreciation! ///EuroCarGT 21:22, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Colm Cooper

Its a joke nearly, thanks for your help, two accounts now, so I have filed a SPI, also requested page protection. Some people! Thanks again. Murry1975 (talk) 21:23, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty! Thanks for notifying me. Huggle detected it as high-risk level of vandalism so I reverted those edits, now with your help, I understand now! ///EuroCarGT 21:26, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Coopers nickname is "The Gooch", Kerry's nickname is "The Kingdom", someone out there thinks its a good idea to use these in extensively in an article in an encyclopedia. And also the "primates" comment (and other commentry and peacock phrases). Thanks once more. Murry1975 (talk) 21:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. ///EuroCarGT 21:33, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Software Defined Storage

Could you please explain what was wrong with the latest update in Software Defined Storage page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Capriciousmaze (talk • contribs) 00:00, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It might have been a accident (mis-clicked) or I might have thought it was spam content. Sorry about that. Just reviewed the edit, all cleared! ///EuroCarGT 00:04, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that

I have just started using the feed, and this is only my second. Im a fairly experienced ed, and I see the main points for concern, improvement or deletion in articles for review.. I hope you agree with my decsion on this one. Any feedback welcome. That new tool is awesome btw, especially the sidebar. Cheers! Irondome (talk) 00:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I shall recommend you read New Page Patrol for reviewing articles! This is important because if you mark a page as review without physically reviewing it, 1 bad article just came into Wikipedia. Just a little heads up! Thanks for being a New Page Patroller! ///EuroCarGT 01:14, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Its ok. I just got the sequence backwards. Its recommendations for improvement or deletion, with comments for creator, then classification of article status, then confirm reviewed. I think thats right? Irondome (talk) 01:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's some what correct, first off look at the page first, look for issues and problems such as not cites (references), stub, violates BLP, has a neutral point-of-view and etc., then you could discuss these issues by placing tags or talking to the author, then confirm review. ///EuroCarGT 01:25, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ive got a second one right. Yep, its as you say. The reviewed tag does hold. I think I may have gone out, thinking it was reviewed, on my first one, without checking if the reviewed tag held in feed. Cheers and thanks for encouragement. I may be of use here, and we got one hell of a backlog. I have reviewed the guidelines, but the feed wouldnt let me in for 2 days. Please wait...for hours. LOL. Regards Irondome (talk) 01:34, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's alright, you did nothing wrong :D I just wanted to welcome you and give some advice. It's very important to be a contributor here, helping improve this site as it is one of the top 10 most visited sites in the world! If you need help anytime ask me or any admins! Also it's quite weird that the feed didn't let you in. Strange :/ ///EuroCarGT 01:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah it was strange. But my WP functionality sometimes goes crazy, but it always comes back. Seems to be linked to my disc clean up, but dont know what clean seems to help. but it seems to fix itself. Admin kudpung recommended I come over and help, and I respect the editor greatly. First person to actually give me a job on WP :). Cheers and appreciate the encouragement! Irondome (talk) 01:49, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well your Autoconfirmed user rights, so you basically could do anything here on Wikipedia. Still so strange :0. Admin Kudpung is a good admin here, so if you need help or any questions ask him or her. ///EuroCarGT 01:59, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's just my beloved old Dell 3000. She is old and cranky. Still XP too. I love her. I will keep in touch, any issues It would be a pleasure to run them by you. Hope I can help out on this important WP task. Cheers mate Irondome (talk) 02:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My school has the Dell Optiplex 960 with XP and 2 GB RAM works well with Wikipedia! It's probably when you disk clean up it removed your browser's cache and cookies. Purge! ///EuroCarGT 02:09, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. Need to do it one more time before they finally stop supporting XP. That will be a sad day. I love XP :) Irondome (talk) 02:15, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
April 2014, pop up a new copy of Windows 7 not 8 or 8.1 and say hi! to the new world of computing! ///EuroCarGT 02:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah she can deal with basic vista functions. I did the MS checklist years ago. Unless I win lottery, no new computing hardware for me in next year or so, so she gonna have to soldier on for a bit yet. :/ Cheers! Irondome (talk) 02:39, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GFOA

Hi:

I am the Communications Manager for GFOA and the current information posted is wrong and incomplete. I was asked by my employer to update the information. Will you please allow me to continue to make my updates and not revert it to the past postings? I am still in the process of posting. I have been working on these changes all day. Please allow me a few days to update the information. If you have a concern, please let me know at that time.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.201.239.163 (talk) 20:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GFOA

Hi:

I will remove the external links to our association's website as well as any material that has a "promotional" tone. I greatly appreciate your patience as I am new to the Wikipedia community. Will you please implement my recent changes to appear and I will make any necessary changes as soon as possible?

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.201.239.163 (talk) 20:55, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: ceiling fans

Yeah, I was watching that one and it just got protected by an admin. It appears to be a prolific sockpuppeter User:David Beals who has made a ton of accounts. If you see it, I recommend reporting the account as a sockpuppet. Thanks for pointing that out to me! EvergreenFir (talk) 23:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well I always report to Sockpuppet Investigations if I see any users that seem to have a connection with each other, just gets more annoying when they make new accounts and put up those ceiling fan videos. Though the recent user was imposing as a Anti-Vandal bot and puts in his edit summary "Bot Reverting Vandalism" , when he is the one adding vandalism. ///EuroCarGT 23:26, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Such a nuisance, right? EvergreenFir (talk) 23:29, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes! For now we'll just deal with it and wait till they stop. ///EuroCarGT 23:33, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Where were the ceiling fan edits? EvergreenFir (talk) 02:29, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
User was blocked indef. (abusing multiple accounts) - The edit was at: [1] however it was removed due to the block of the user. ///EuroCarGT 02:33, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay thanks! EvergreenFir (talk) 02:35, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
He put admin in his username and said on the edit summary; "Don't revert admin edit". He also was very offensive using bad slurs. ///EuroCarGT 02:37, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Professional sports teams in the United States and Canada

Hello EuroCaGt, I appreciate your contribution to Wikipedia. However, On the article entitled "professional sports teams in the united states and Canada," the removal of the section "National premier soccer league" is merited. The NPSL is an amateur, albeit competitive, soccer league. Please do not revert my merited edit again. 24.175.173.153 (talk) 05:36, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Camila Cabello (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Epic, Cuban, The X-Factor and Pop

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transferwise

See Transferwise talk. 2.100.93.151 (talk) 16:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lolita dresses

Hi, You removed my item on the website LolitaDresses.com. I disagree completely and believe that you had no right in removing this item, that it is a valid item for inclusion in Wikipedia. The website mirrors the term "lolita dress" and as such is the main online reference point for people wanting to acquire Lolita dresses. The website displays and reflects the variety of garments available in the marketplace under the breath of Lolita style dresses and shows historic reference to recycled garments from the 50s and 60s that are categorised under this style. As such it is more of a reference point for Lolita dresses than Wikipedia. Please reinstate this item. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.168.208.242 (talk) 02:07, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EuroCaGt, can you please stop reverting joshuaforests sandbox i am joshuaforest i just was not signed in — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.244.103.204 (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Government Finance Officers Association". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 14:03, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GFOA

Hi EuroCarGT:

I wanted to let you know that I started the process for dispute resolution this morning. I appreciate you working with me to resolve any issues as quickly as possible.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.201.239.163 (talk) 14:05, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My Links

Hello, The reason why I've been posting the link on the page (The Looney Tunes Show) is because I'm trying to get people to save the show because I heard that it got cancelled. If you don't mind me by asking how come I can't leave it on the page.

Thank You, Please reply back — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.77.88 (talk) 23:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia! You can't put links promoting any website in Wikipedia. Especially the ones you put on the page. It promotes a online petition per WP:EL and WP:ELNO states 4. Links mainly intended to promote a website, including online petitions. See external link spamming. Also read: Wikipedia:REFSPAM for more information. I understand you don't want the show to be cancel so do I cause I watched that show when I was a kid, however spam and promotional content is not to be placed here. Thank you. ///EuroCarGT 23:11, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for telling me, I had no idea about that but did you want to sign it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.77.88 (talk) 23:24, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll pass on that. Good luck though. ///EuroCarGT 23:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank u — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.77.88 (talk) 23:28, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Need practice using the talk page

Hi - I was the one who accidentally deleted material from the article on Electrostatics. My original intent was to copy and edit material to be distributed for my students, but then the "bug" to improve Wikipedia bit me and I decided to edit the article on Electrostatics. Please let me know if there is anything wrong Guy vandegrift (talk) 02:51, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

STiki emergency

re User talk:Mark Arsten#STiki Help. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:38, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

help with USP pages

hi there,

I am the webmaster at USP and i was making some updates which you have removed. Can you guide me on what i did wrong? thanks in advance.
Hello! I reverted your edits because you added unsource content and content that is not stated in a neutral point-of-view. ///EuroCarGT 21:23, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. I was trying to figure out how to reference that SP by linking it but when i got there, the section was gone. But what about the regional campus links. they were correct and relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by USPWebmaster (talk • contribs) 21:29, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you removed the information about Annette Dubas being a candidate for Governor

Please explain before removing again. This is important information that should be in the tagline of her profile. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NEImport (talk • contribs) 23:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and Welcome! The information needs to be cited using appropriate sources, you just placed a link to another Wikipedia page. You could learn how to cite your sources at WP:CITESHORT or Citing Sources tutorial. Or you could use internal links to the page that is appropriate and related to the article. I'll be glad to help you in the article! ///EuroCarGT 23:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed it up adding an internal link. You could view the edit [2] ///EuroCarGT 23:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you very much for your help! I spent some time (well, just 5-10 min, to be honest with you) to figure out how to delete the page. And I did not figure out. So, I just went ahead to remove the article. I wanted to make it more complete and consistent with Dansk version which I'm working with another person. But I suppose it is OK to resume the post in English for the time being. Thanks again for your input. Ak1998 (talk) 02:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I reverted your edit cause you can't blank pages without a proper reasoning. You could learn more at Page Blanking. ///EuroCarGT 02:24, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Glitch Art

Hello I believe you may have made a mistake in removing the external link. The link went to a blog post with pictures of glitch art rendered from the new Google maps api. This gives users a perfect example of 3-D glitch art that can happen with mapping software. The post is original, transparent, and shows users a new perspective on glitch art, I would really appreciate it if you put it back up. Here is the link again, for your approval. http://miklinseo.com/glitch-art/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.229.194.191 (talk) 05:44, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This is an encyclopedia, not a site where you could promote a site. Another user also reverted your edit as Spam. ///EuroCarGT 14:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mékinac

I'm not sure why you reverted my edits to Mékinac. It was an extremely poor disambiguation page, violating numerous guidelines from WP:MOSDAB. older ≠ wiser 15:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. Feel free to revert it. I didn't see that the page was poorly written, however you removed content, that's what made me worried. ///EuroCarGT 15:05, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Category talk:Wikipedians

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:Wikipedians. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:34, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Antopandeth (talk) 03:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please Try to Understand

EuroCarGT,


I am not frustrated in any manner because the fact is fact. The block on me from adding content was lifted and I have reverted Deepa’s(my wife) marital status in the Article. The fact is that from the beginning, when I created the article, the marital status was there for three years. Now you started to edit the article even after giving you enough links to prove marital status. Still you revert the article by hiding the fact that Deepa is married to me, I think you have some personal interest in this matter. This will affect the credibility of encyclopedia. Most of the people depending on the information provided by Wikipedia and trust it. By the action your kind of editors, without knowing the fact directly, will lead to misunderstandings. So, kindly try to be self controlled while editing the Wikipedia encyclopedia. Please do not allow to reflect your emotional jousters on hard core information. If you can’t understand the language in the YouTube links which are given for citation, you can ask for a marriage certificate which is in English. I can provide it through a personal email. My mail Id is anto.pandeth@gmail.com, or you can contact me on my phone. Please feel free to send your email address to me if you want to see the marriage certificate. I hope this statement will help me.

Deepa & Anto

Deepa about anto

AntoPandeth & Deepa Miriam

Thank you. Antopandeth.

that is NOT NPOV was the explanation

The removal of the prejudicial section headers was explained, please retract your statement and remove the section headers, thank you!

Sportfan5000 (talk) 21:55, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! NPOV is only for Wikipedia articles, not talk pages. Unfortunately your removal of headers in a talk page was nonconstructive as it was part of a discussion. Headers also keeps the page organized. NPOV has nothing to do with headers. ///EuroCarGT 22:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let it go

I have every right to delete content that is not sourced, as any and all that is on that page is pure speculation. Until, you provide ACTUAL proof that what is there is indeed legit, let it go. Sorry you are such a blind fan you can't realize truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theahamay (talk • contribs) 00:16, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of information sourced from places outside of wikipedia itself. It does not claim knowledge onto any specific event or thing, it simply states and collects the knowledge we already have. You dont call Gabe Newell anything else but "Gabe Newell", because that is his given name, not the one 'wikipedia' decided he would have. So please, stop editing my changes. I am simply stating the name that the creators of DotA gave to DotA. You wouldn't vandalize someones birth name, or IP name such as "DotA," so why would you vandalize other names associated with the IP? Its non-sensible and dishonest as an editor. I have provided my relevant sources, one by third party, and one by the first party that created the IP. I have followed all guidelines as presented by wikipedia, however, I am still being vandalized because people who do not understand DotA, are editing DotA. The fact is, the genre is ARTS, the whole community of DotA2 uses ARTS, other gaming forums use ARTS (see: http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/tag/dota-2/), the owner of the IP uses ARTS, because it is not a 'moba. Other games may be, but DotA2 is an ARTS, as by nomenclature, by assignment of the IP holders, and by transivity as I have stated above. Thank you for your time, I hope I have convinced you to stop the edit war. Correctingsomestuff —Preceding undated comment added 01:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

American Military University

Hi there,

I am an alumni of AMU and am heading up a project wherein I am creating pages for both AMU and APU. I have created an entire article...minus the sources (have not gone back through to add yet) and am trying to figure out how we can merge these pages since you control the redirect. APUS will serve as a splash page of sorts but I will be unable to post my finished AMU article (when I am done) because it says the name is already in use. How can we do this? When I get done can we simply copy and past all that I have put together and then slap it on your AMU page and if so will it then be the first wiki page to pop up when someone searches "American Military University"?

Thanks, JBullins (talk) 01:57, 17 September 2013 (UTC)JBullins[reply]

Hello and Welcome! Once you create the other page(s), and your article has been accepted and reviewed, then you could feel free to remove the re-direct, for now leave it there, until your project is finished. ///EuroCarGT 02:01, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Right but will it let me submit the page with the title American Military University despite the name being held via the redirect? Or will I just have to name it something like "AMU" to get it approved? Confused as to that part.

Thanks, JBullins (talk) 02:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)JBullins[reply]

I'll take a look at it and come back with a response. ///EuroCarGT 02:28, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, it's currently in Articles for creation so it's pending review. ///EuroCarGT 02:36, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SFB

Hello, I understand about removing an unnecessary link - thank you for the information. However, the update itself does not appear, even without the links - why is that?

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nrshlosser (talk • contribs) 23:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and Welcome! I removed your edit as it appeared to be spam and it violates the external links policy. ///EuroCarGT 23:10, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Assume good faith and please do not bite the newcomers. The edits don't look like vandalism or editing tests, more likely a user who doesn't know of the policies here. Peter James (talk) 23:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for that, using Huggle and there's no option where you could revert for adding bad disambiguation page content. I also Assume good faith, be nice and welcome the new! ///EuroCarGT 23:56, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There should be an option to view the user talk page and edit from there. A template exists, so you could suggest adding it to the options in Huggle. Peter James (talk) 00:22, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I mostly use Twinkle to post up advanced warnings! ///EuroCarGT 00:24, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:12, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Glitch Art

Hello I believe you may have made a mistake in removing the external link. The link went to a blog post with pictures of glitch art rendered from the new Google Maps api. This gives users a perfect example of 3-D glitch art that can happen with mapping software. The post is original, transparent, and shows users a new perspective on glitch art. I would really appreciate it if you put it back up. Here is the link again, for your approval. http://miklinseo.com/glitch-art/

stop

stop changing tobuscus stop stop — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zapster310 (talk • contribs) 22:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

EuroCarGT

I notice you are from Canada, which is a long way from Ireland let alone the east coast of Ireland where Baltinglass is located.

You also appear not to understand the nature of the GAA which is not only the largest sporting organisation within Ireland but also an amateur organisation.

The fact that you have chosen to block the update of one not only one of the clubs members but also one of the clubs underage coaches shows a total disregard for not only the Baltinglass GAA Club but also the Coiste Na Nog, that Children’s section to you, and a total disregard for the GAA Coiste Na Nog whose own motto is "Give Respect, Get Respect".

Regardless of your feeling that my update were "neutral" or not, the fact remains that BELIEF, ATTITUDE, LOYALTY, TRUST, & OPTIMISM is the Motto of Baltinglass GAA club.

Should you persist in blocking my updates I will have no option to report you and your IP Address to Wikipedia for vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.167.135.56 (talk) 21:17, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and Welcome to Wikipedia! I reverted your edit because I felt that it was not stated in a neutral point-of-view and also stating/explaining the slogan or motto, isn't encyclopedic content. ///EuroCarGT 21:21, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

soory

oh sooorry I didn't mean to make you maaaad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zapster310 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your involvement with DRN

Hi there, I noticed that you haven't been as active at DRN as you was before. DRN has been a bit backlogged lately and we could use some extra hands. We have updated our volunteer list to a new format, Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteers (your name is still there under the old format if you haven't updated it) and are looking into ways to make DRN more effective and more rewarding for volunteers (your input is appreciated!). If you don't have much time to volunteer at the moment, that's fine too, just move your name to the inactive list (you're free to add yourself back to active at any time). Hope to see you again soon :) Steven Zhang (talk) 13:17, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Fazenda 6 talk page

Hello, EuroCarGT.

Well, I just blanked the page because I've managed to solve the little issue that I had with the user 201.8.197.35.

So, it would be unnecessary to my complaint on that page. But you're free to restore it or do what do you think is the best.

Best wishes! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.15.97.226 (talk) 17:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty then! Thanks for notifying me! ///EuroCarGT 20:16, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how my editing is disruptive when it is a) true and b) backed with a source, as I was advised to do by another user. I am within my rights to add information about Kevin Clifton and editing out anything negative is not portraying him realistically. you can't change history and you certainly won't stop the truth revealing itself whether it is through Wikipedia or any other form of media. I wonder if you have ever read 1984. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dirtylittlesecret99 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for catching the vandalism on my userpage! Sophus Bie (talk) 23:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome & no problem!! ///EuroCarGT 00:00, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir, i wanted to divide lahnda langauges into 3 broad groups but some people not happy with that.


15:10, 28 September 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.156.194.199 (talk)

Notice

Information icon Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Propose to ban User:Hasteur. Thank you. Hasteur (talk) 23:24, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I'll read the discussion and come back to update you on this "incident". ///EuroCarGT 23:27, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

dear friend, i know thatu have more knowledge about latin greek or lydianlangauges but i feel that some greek scripts have lydian basis which came from the antolian branch withinthe indo-euoropean languge family.


15:04, 28 September 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.156.194.199 (talk) Hello 109.156.194.199! I would add a source for that, don't add speculative and unsourced content. ///EuroCarGT 15:09, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Your interest in American Indian articles is appreciated, but please do not project your own Canadian views and biases, both good and potentially not so good, onto articles on other countries. Indians south of the Border in the USA view ourselves differently and call ourselves as a group differently than our brothers and sisters in CA because our histories are different. Sadly, our relationship with the greater society and government has also been very different. Regardless, we call ourselves American Indians here. There are likely as many sociological and psychological reasons as there are our Nations that could (and likely do) keep academics in business for life. The reasons or the 'why' really dont matter though, only the what. Please do not refer to American Indians are Indigenous. We are not indigenous, we are what we call ourselves. Please respect that, as we respect the right of our brothers and sisters in CA to embrace another term today, and maybe other terms in the future. Our paths have diverged, and so to what we call ourselves.

Peace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.61.192.67 (talk) 19:46, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and Welcome! Please use the page's talk page if you see a problem with the page and want to express it, removing vital content from a page describing history is not the best thing to do here. Thanks. ///EuroCarGT 19:49, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've done so, albeit perhaps not artfully, but none the less to the best of my wikability (at the bottom of the page). And removing history was not actually done. Reverting the name to a correct one per the artcle itself (i.e., the very 1st paragraph no less clearly indicated Indians in America/the USA refer to ourselves as American Indians). I assume you read the article before removing other people's corrections eliminating conflicts within the article itself (disrespecting other ethnicities in the process, while spreading non-Indian whims and lies)... If you haven't, then maybe that would be the best thing to do here. -Peace

Nigel Clough

Why did you remove my edit on the Nigel Clough page. He has recently been sacked and I am just updating his page to reflect this!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.55.41.194 (talk) 19:56, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for that, I thought you meant "sacked" as a inappropriate term. Sorry bout that! ///EuroCarGT 19:58, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bed Bug Page Edit:Sexual Dimorphism

Hello! I do not understand why the section on Sexual Dimorphism in Bed Bugs was removed. I do not consider it to be vandalism. kaijones5245 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:54, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! It was unsourced, therefore I reverted your edit. ///EuroCarGT 21:57, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will add the source. Thanks! kaijones5245 —Preceding undated comment added 22:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chomsky is not a liberal, he's an anarchist

Chomsky is not a liberal, he's an anarchist. He should not be on the "liberal thinkers" page, and if he must be, it should be noted that he is an anarchist (a philosophy deeply at odds with liberalism). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.173.120.8 (talk) 22:19, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting blocked users

As far as I can tell, these reverts[3][4][5] were of constructive edits by IPs. The fact that they were subsequently blocked isn't a reason to revert - the blocks appear to have been for personal attacks, and from their contributions they don't look like vandals. Peter James (talk) 01:13, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Peter! The edits were constrcutive and legit however I thought when the term "dating" came by, I though the user was adding a un-related edit towards the page. Also I did not warn or report them as they did nothing wrong according to the user's talk page and My Wikipedia namespace contributions. However one user was block evading meaning the user is currently blocked and the user is trying to by-pass the block which is a violation of the Wikipedia guidelines and block policy, the other user was disruptive editing an un-related page. Apologies for the mishap. ///EuroCarGT 01:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

chino moreno

Hi no problem if you've undid my recent contribution about chino moreno it's written on the french page and on the french wikipédia what I wrote disturbs nobody thank you and have a nice day :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolita1985 (talk • contribs) 08:35, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This edit seemed legitimate. The information is also at http://www.deftonesworld.com/chino-marries/ No need to reply. 109.150.47.24 (talk) 00:47, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert Kennedy Andrews

In reality, my edit to this page did contain entirely factual information which I thought was necessary to add to the page. What was the problem with it?

86.185.118.180 (talk) 10:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out the error of my ways.

Apologies. Just seen your messages. I'm new to Wiki but realise that if everyone linked to external websites then it would become a free for all. Where do I see the rules in relation to linking? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SkilledJedi (talk • contribs) 17:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) The rules for external links are at WP:EL. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:53, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rosarae999

Hi there, regarding User talk:Rosarae999. Do you really think this was the work of a vandal, or just a newcomer trying to be helpful? Thanks. Richard Apple (talk) 18:16, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Richard! It was a vandal according to the page revision, if it wasn't a vandal/nonconstructive edit, then I would have reverted in good faith. Thanks. ///EuroCarGT 18:20, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EuroCarGT

Just a question for you- There are many websites who are using YOUR wikipedia to advertise and nobody is removing them like - http://www.survivalgrounds.com/index.php, http://www.one-stop-survival-guide.com/survival-products.html and many others who actually selling products. But if i have a tiny link,whats wrong with that ? are you taking money from those sites ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samiurrahman55 (talk • contribs) 21:13, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your links are consider as spam and is a violation of the external links policy. The links that are allowed on the page are links that are used for references and that provide information and resources, that is mostly not the intent to sell. ///EuroCarGT 21:18, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Template editor user right

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Template editor user right. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tofana

Was it 'Cortina' or 'Tofana A' that you needed to revert so quickly ? 109.150.47.24 (talk) 00:06, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! It was Tofana I reverted, your edit "Tofana A, a red-haired Ukranian girl, much photographed." was non constructive so I reverted it. ///EuroCarGT 00:10, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Google Search:- Tofana Mountain 160,000 / Tofana Guilia 37,500 / Tofana Aqua 71,300 / "Tofana A" 121,000

so she should be in the list, at 2nd position. 109.150.47.24 (talk) 02:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mvfc tac seatbelt.png

yes have it deleted, I incorrectly uploaded it, meant to be a soccer kit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crelache (talk • contribs) 03:29, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty then! Thanks for notifying me! ///EuroCarGT 03:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to the "assuming good faith", and ALL of the other rules of this discussion. As such, I've read the bullet points you have located under your greeting, and the 'Terms of Use' outlined in the link.

In my edit on the page for the ACDC song Night Prowler, the lyrics I added were "as you lie there naked, like a body in a tomb", which I added AFTER the lyrics "You don't feel the steel / Till it's hanging out your back". The lyrics "as you lie there naked, like a body in a tomb" are, in fact, lyrics to the song in question. I also listened to the song earlier today, well earlier this Sunday, it's almost Monday morning, and these were some of the lyrics I heard to Night Prowler. I believe you may think the lyrics I added are unnecessary. Is this correct, and if so, why did you choose to not delete the lyrics I added immediately after you deemed the lyrics unwanted?

I will be talking to you Monday afternoon, as I will be going to bed now, so good night to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.131.186.38 (talk) 07:00, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:EuroCarGT/Archives/2013/September"