User talk:Ernstblumberg

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

No problem

Let me know if you run into situations you don't understand by posting on my talk page. I may not get around to it right away, but I don't mind helping with minor biographies. --KP Botany (talk) 06:30, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Post links to the articles, though, it's easier for me. --KP Botany (talk) 05:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Germany

Welcome, Ernstblumberg, to the WikiProject Germany! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on Germany-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template {{WikiProject Germany}}. A few features that you might find helpful:

  • The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
  • Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to watchlist it.
  • We've developed a number of guidelines for names, titles, and other things to standardize our articles and make interlinking easier that you may find useful.

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks you can do. Please remove completed tasks from the list.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project!

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:Beeblebrox, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Why did you do that? gordonrox24 (talk) 18:51, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is in reference to this edit [1] with which you removed recent content from my talk page and restored old content so you could add to a thread you started some time ago. That thread was archived and my original reply can be seen at User talk:Beeblebrox/Archive 9#Heads Up!. What you did was completely inappropriate and could be considered vandalism. In the future, just start a new section by hitting the "new section" tab at the top of the window. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:54, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ernstblumberg. You have new messages at Beeblebrox's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Live and learn, live and learn. We all make mistakes, and I hope you know what to in the future! Thanks!--gordonrox24 (talk) 22:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Just so we're clear, I never thought this was done as deliberate vandalism, but I wanted to impress upon you how out of line it was nonetheless. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page is being categorized WP:How to

Look at the list of included templates (when editing your page); a How-to template is there and is likely the source of the problem. tooold (talk) 21:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beware of Barnstars and Editors/Admins that show them off.

Barnstars. Need I say more? Many editors and administrators demonstrate exemplary talent (s) across Wikipedia...but some things in life ring warning bells. Surely accolades, be they Oscars, Nobels or otherwise are unbecoming of informational integrity? Are we to descend into the depths of 'toadying' for credibility on the basis of cartoon symbols and retain integrity? Why do some administrators/editors persistently monitor and champion subjects that they would otherwise have no connection with? Rhetoric, albeit melodramatic, can still serve to illustrate the absurd nature of the 'information industry'. Ernstblumberg (talk) 08:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

I see you have decided to look through articles I have started and tag them. You might like to do the same with articles you have started, all of which contain unreferenced material, namely Jacob Moritz Blumberg, Hugo Perls and Arthur Pan. As you have expressed a special concern for notability, the last article certainly merits closer attention to establish it. Ty 14:47, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article on Fiona Banner had a small amount of questionable text and was easily fixed,[2] so there's no need to tag the whole article. That should be done when there are major problems. I'm quite happy for that text to be removed, as I didn't add it and it would only be justified if it was attributed to a referenced source. Tags look ugly, so they should be avoided for minor issues, which can be dealt with either through WP:BRD, or, if you prefer caution - which is not a bad thing - then raising them on the talk page.
Regarding Arthur Pan, I recommend finding the sources that justify notability in the first instance, before writing an article, in order to see whether it is justifiable to write it at all. His notability is certainly not axiomatic in wikipedia terms, unless he is covered in sufficient sources. Certain other painters of famous people have not been accorded articles for that reason.
Ty 15:33, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree from the perspective of an inclusionist - especially when so many articles seem to have been written with a spurious notability in the first instance. These include some of your own (in my opinion) but I am happy to see them here as an encyclopedia with endless articles on minor league football players (not that Wikipedia descends into this category of merely cataloguing) will hardly survive the test of time. Why do you not improve the Arthur Pan article? I would welcome your insight and obvious experience regarding Art in general. Ernstblumberg (talk) 15:53, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have searched online archives, including newspapers, and nothing further comes up about Pan. I suggest you contact the Federation of British Artists, in particular the Royal Society of Portrait Painters, to see if they can help. Otherwise, print sources, particularly contemporary, are the best avenue. Ty 11:10, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help neeed

Hi, I saw your name at the Bio project. If you have any time could you please take a look at the article Tim Blixseth. I have made a few edits and so have two people from BLPN but there is more to do. It needs cleaning up for NPOV. There a few comments on the talk page. There is already some tension between myself and one of the main contributors to the Tim Blixseth article becase of my NPOV clean up efforts at Jeffrey M. Smith so I am reluctant to spend too much time at Tim Blisxeth. so I don't want to work much on Tim Blixseth. Please take a look at it and contribute to it if you have time.. Many thanks for all of your contributions to this project! Cheers! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:50, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are very kind to think of me but the article is of little interest.Ernstblumberg (talk) 16:20, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Genesis

ne ondraede ge eow. cwepe ge magon we Godes willan onscunian.Ernstblumberg (talk) 12:27, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ernstblumberg. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ernstblumberg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ernstblumberg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of the article "2019 in Germany" in English Wikipedia

Hello, Ernstblumberg. Happy New Year to you! 2019 is coming soon. Can you creat the article "2019 in Germamy" in English Wikipedia? Thanks a lot!
123.150.182.179
15:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Not right now.Ernstblumberg (talk) 15:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Weirsky

I started a draft about Michael Weirsky. Can you please make it a full article that is a good article or featured article, please? I would prefer it to be featured article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Michael_Weirsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek (talk • contribs) 00:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No access at minute...Ernstblumberg (talk) 14:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Ernstblumberg"