User talk:Dodger67/Archives/2011/June
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Enjoyed your comment
Hi Dodger, I enjoyed your editorial comment re the Northern Cape article: "Removed meaningless nonsense about "last true San". Lifestyle does not define ethnicity." The tendency has been to let lifestyle equal ethnicity. By the way, there is a category Wikipedians in the Northern Cape - I gather you might be residing within this province? All the best, Blarcrean (talk) 05:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- LMAO!! "Lifestyle does not define ethnicity." Thank you btw, for fixing that embarrassing mistake that I made on the Square Kilometer Array. Respect
:) --User:DiscipleOfKnowledge (talk) 15:51, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Just so you understand the background of what has been happening there, a banned user has been repeatedly trying to get the article edited to reflect their personal views. They have been extremely persistent, in fact they are the only reason the article has been semi-protected for so long. In the interest of denying recognition to this user and their disruptive fixation on this article, comments and requests from their never-ending stream of sockpuppets may removed without comment in accordance with the banning policy. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Ok thanks, but surely there should be at least something in the edit summary? Roger (talk) 20:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Number format
I've replied to your message on my page, but I'll repose it here, in case you don't see it. I don't understand. In the article you cite, Decimal mark, it says clearly that South Africa uses the comma as its thousands separator. Besides, no matter what system South Africa uses I don't see any reason why the English Wikipedia should adopt that system for South Africa-related articles. I mean, we don't use 1.000 in French or German articles, why should we use 1 000 for South African articles? I believe the English Wikipedia needs to have a standard system, and since 99% of the numbers already use 1,000 I think that should be used everywhere. Has there been any previous discussion on this before? What is the official policy? --Hibernian (talk) 18:35, 15 June 2011 (UTC)