User talk:Debeaux

Image:Doris.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Doris.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. feydey 15:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Humany

I have moved the contents of that deleted article to User:Debeaux/Humany so that it can be improved by interested parties. After it contains an assertion of notability, and its language is cleaned up so it doesn't sound like an advertisment, it can be moved back to article space. I say this because if you put it back into article space now, it is likely to be deleted again (and not just by me). Thank you, Fang Aili ^talk 14:38, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it's still pretty bad but I'm going to stay away from it for now. --Fang Aili ^talk 15:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Humany ?

Where goes the fine line between spam and fact/information? When i was explained the software SiteAssistant & SearchAssistant from the Company Humany you erased the information.

For example: the information about Azyxxi, is that advertising/spam or just information? And whats the different to inform about this technology and Humanys technology, SiteAssistant & SearchAssistant?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Debeaux (talk • contribs) 12:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Well the line is somewhat ambiguous. My reasoning was thus: The article is about the company Humany, not SiteAssistant or SearchAssistant. Since neither of those programs appeared notable, and the article is about the company, I determined that describing them was not encyclopedic.

The Azyxxi article is pretty good. Its notability assertion is in the first paragraph (used in a bunch of notable hospitals), and then explains how the product works. In this case the article is about the product, not that product's company, so I think this is appropriate. It also has a few good sources. I hope this answers your question. --Fang Aili ^talk 14:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Humany.jpg

Hello, Debeaux. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Humany.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Debeaux/Humany. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Humany.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Humany.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Humany

The article Humany has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]