User talk:Christinemyers17

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

January 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jacob Zuma, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 11:02, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Jacob Zuma. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 11:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. Wizzy 11:35, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto ditto. Wizzy 12:54, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 11:04, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Jacob Zuma, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Roger (talk) 12:44, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

June 2013

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lavasa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Removal of content, blanking + addition of promotional material, meaning that you "earned" two different warnings for your edits. Thomas.W (talk) 07:02, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a week for continued disruption after a final warning. Enigmamsg 16:28, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Blocked for a longer period for resuming the behaviour that led to your being blocked in the first place. Enigmamsg 07:16, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm Anupmehra. An edit that you recently made to Venod Sharma seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 14:04, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rameshkohli123, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Anupmehra -Let's talk! 07:13, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arowana Consulting Limited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Banner talk 21:06, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]