User talk:Bosley John Bosley

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Bosley John Bosley. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Chamith (talk) 19:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars linking, December 18

Hello! You've recently been editing the Star Wars page and adding links to "Episode IV: A New Hope". I reverted these edits, as they link to the same page that the previous few words linked to. Have a nice day! SirLagsalott (talk) 18:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2016 / Exposed listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2016 / Exposed. Since you had some involvement with the 2016 / Exposed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neelix redirects listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Neelix redirects. Since you had some involvement with the Neelix redirects redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 18:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Hello, Bosley John Bosley,
I noticed that you are creating a lot of redirect pages, some of them very implausible, terms that readers are unlikely to search for. For example, readers are unlikely to use Brooklyn (2015) to search for Brooklyn (film) because it is very likely they will not know the year that it was released. They will know the name of the movie and that it is a film so Brooklyn (film) is the likely search term or they will search for Brooklyn and then will go to Brooklyn (disambiguation). Please do not make redirects for the sake of making redirects. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 15:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Smiley seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Si Trew (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Wikipedia:Edit warring shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 18:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Bosley, you made a case on the talk page, but it's not a very convincing case and it doesn't seem to convince your colleagues. It's time to let the matter drop. BTW, as an admin I have looked at that page many times, but I also can't figure out how you are improving it. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 22:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Decapitation of John the Baptist listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Decapitation of John the Baptist. Since you had some involvement with the The Decapitation of John the Baptist redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  ‑ Iridescent 22:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Magnet quench incident

Hi, superconducting magnet quenches happen frequently, the LHC incident 2008 was just one of them (LHC alone had dozens of quenches afterwards, but with less severe consequences). I don't think this redirect to a specific quench is good. I could start a formal deletion process for the redirect, but if we find consensus here we can speed that process up. --mfb (talk) 19:23, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do whatever you think right, chances are I wont object. Bosley John Bosley (talk) 11:21, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

We do not link like this [1]. Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:35, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have adjusted it to link to the list if that is what you are trying to do. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:54, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cig. smoke constituents

This is courtesy note that some of your edits are being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry‎. --Smokefoot (talk) 13:26, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. My recent removal of the category and the ref to various chemicals being found in tobacco smoke was pursuant to the consensus achieved at Talk:Chemistry. You can leave a comment here when you get the time, because I was going to resume the removal activity. Thanks, --Smokefoot (talk) 12:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2-ethyl-6-methyl-1,4-benzenediol listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2-ethyl-6-methyl-1,4-benzenediol. Since you had some involvement with the 2-ethyl-6-methyl-1,4-benzenediol redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ChemNerd (talk) 13:52, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Darren Simpson

I saw your ANI post, I think I fixed the box, let me know if you need anything else. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:22, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well I messed up. Wrong person. Nothing to see here, please move on everyone. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:25, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Constituents of tobacco smoke has been nominated for discussion

Category:Constituents of tobacco smoke, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Smokefoot (talk) 13:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Climate forcing agents listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Climate forcing agents. Since you had some involvement with the Climate forcing agents redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:37, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hazardous air pollutants listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hazardous air pollutants. Since you had some involvement with the Hazardous air pollutants redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:38, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fetotomy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Fetotomy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 11:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UK Schoolboys football

You asked in your edit summary how to turn red links blue... wikilinks are red when there is no article associated with the title. In order to turn the link blue you would have to write an article under that name. ... discospinster talk 14:54, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bosley John Bosley. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The General Election 1906 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The General Election 1906. Since you had some involvement with the The General Election 1906 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 23:34, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The 1906 General Election listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The 1906 General Election. Since you had some involvement with the The 1906 General Election redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 23:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Budin Eyalet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Fehérvár
White Castle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Fehérvár

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish language redirects

Please do not create irrelevant language redirects (per WP:FORRED). Spanish has nothing to do with medieval Hungary. Surtsicna (talk) 18:58, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos I Roberto de Hungría listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Carlos I Roberto de Hungría. Since you had some involvement with the Carlos I Roberto de Hungría redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Surtsicna (talk) 19:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Bosley John Bosley. NeilN talk to me 20:35, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 20:47, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slovene: listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Slovene:. Since you had some involvement with the Slovene: redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:01, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Russian: listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Russian:. Since you had some involvement with the Russian: redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:01, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian: listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Serbian:. Since you had some involvement with the Serbian: redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:02, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Latin: listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Latin:. Since you had some involvement with the Latin: redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:02, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

German: listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect German:. Since you had some involvement with the German: redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:02, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slovak: listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Slovak:. Since you had some involvement with the Slovak: redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:02, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish: listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Turkish:. Since you had some involvement with the Turkish: redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:03, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Polish: listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Polish:. Since you had some involvement with the Polish: redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:03, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Czech: listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Czech:. Since you had some involvement with the Czech: redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:03, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bosley John Bosley. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Serum concentrations" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Serum concentrations. Since you had some involvement with the Serum concentrations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 19:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"DONALD THOMPSON MP" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect DONALD THOMPSON MP. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 10#DONALD THOMPSON MP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:10, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matty Cash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love Island. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Good Friday
added a link pointing to William Devlin
Ursula O'Leary
added a link pointing to WSM

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Air kiss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Character block.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Good Friday: A Play in Verse for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Good Friday: A Play in Verse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Friday: A Play in Verse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 TT me 22:36, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Good Friday: A Play in Verse, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nan and Dauber.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Screenshot of my wikipedia watchlist.jpg

Notice

The file File:Screenshot of my wikipedia watchlist.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused Wikipedia screenshot. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Henry VIII (1491–1547)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Henry VIII (1491–1547) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 17 § Henry VIII (1491–1547) until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) ★ 02:31, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Bosley_John_Bosley"