User talk:Bluerasberry/Archive 3

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 → Archive 10

re Welcome!

Hi Blueraspberry

Thanks indeed for your welcome, your helpful pointers to WP guidance and glad to help you with HIV prevention.

I am truly a newby - I only just cut my teeth here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stafford&action=history. At the weekend I tripped over the very recently published archaeological reports elsewhere just surfing around, about excavations in the mid - late 1970s at Stafford (not far south of Manchester) when I worked there. There were also excavations at Stafford castle at the time. I was fascinated when the excavations were underway and always wanted to know what they found. I felt compelled to check WP to see what it had to say about these (which was nothing), discovered loads of errors and omissions, signed up, jumped in and got editing.

However my 25+ years of passion and campaigning around HIV, especially at a regional and national level in England over the last 15 years (including writing and sourcing much of the material on http://www.ght.org.uk), help explain why I seem to know what's up! I've earned a lot of respect from my peers in the UK for my creativity in response to the challenges we face and being at the cutting edge.

Campaigning on criminal transmission is one of my areas of expertise. I was a key player responding to the first prosecution in England by helping Matthew Weait organise the seminar series at Keele University (not far south of here) - 'A number of presentations from the Economic and Social Research Council funded seminar series HIV/AIDS and Law: Theory, Practice and Policy (Keele University) deal with the question of criminalization.' Unfortunately the university seems to have removed the presentations - the only reference I have found now is to the award of the grant in 2005 http://www.keele.ac.uk/news/week/archive/2005/1209/1209-06.htm. Matthew is now at Birkbeck College, University of London, http://www.bbk.ac.uk/ce/about_staff/academic_staff/weait/index_html/

I'll shortly add an external link to Edwin Bernard's criminalisation blog, which is a brilliant international resource I occasionally contribute to http://criminalhivtransmission.blogspot.com/

and to these useful resources

Bernard, E., Geretti, A-M, van Damme, A., Azad, Y. and Weait, M. (2007) The use of phylogenetic analysis as evidence in criminal investigation of HIV transmission London: National AIDS Trust / National AIDS Manual (February 2007) Full text available

Bernard, E., Geretti, A-M, van Damme, A., Azad, Y. and Weait, M. (2007) HIV forensics: pitfalls and acceptable standards in the use of phylogenetic analysis as evidence in criminal investigations of HIV transmission HIV Medicine, 8, 382–387.

Weait, M. (2005) 'Knowledge, Autonomy and Consent: R v Konzani' Criminal Law Review, October: 763-772.

Weait, M. (2001) 'Taking the Blame: Criminal Law, Social Responsibility and the Sexual Transmission of HIV' Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 23(1): 441-457

Glad to be able to provide some support Skinscribe (talk) 23:56, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

New page incubation

Thanks for signing up for the new pages incubation trial! The instructions are on the page itself - any questions or quibbles before you get started? Ironholds (talk) 19:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 15:53, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
I did not even know that there was such a permission. Thanks for your vote of confidence in giving this to me after I had created so many pages recently, and thanks also for giving me a reason to read about what this is and why it is important. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:09, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Tree Shaping again

Hi! I know you are no longer watching the Tree shaping dispute, and I totally understand why. I just thought you might want to know that your name was brought up in an Arbitration case that is just getting started (diff). I hope this case gets picked up and there is finally some resolution over there. I am also still totally jealous of that hamster, all I have are lab mice... Colincbn (talk) 07:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Alberger process

Put a note there that might be of interest. 00:44, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

changes to sofia winters page

your changes were full of events that probably will not happen. you need to cite where on any young and the restless sites does it say sofia and her baby will die. thank you 71.226.147.79 (talk) 02:20, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

It is my mistake. I was trying to remove that content, and it is removed now. Blue Rasberry (talk) 02:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bluerasberry. You have new messages at Category talk:Politicians arrested and charges with corruption.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Another message!-- . Shlok talk . 17:42, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

more - -- . Shlok talk . 18:55, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
some more for today as I am going offline, its very let night in India-- . Shlok talk . 20:32, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Look as soon as Indian news media knows about this Category They make web page for showing the list of politician arrested on corruption charges.have a look Times of India-- . Shlok talk . 21:10, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Bluerasberry. You have new messages at Deblopper's talk page.
Message added 08:26, 15 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

List of politicians in India charged with corruption

I would like to appreciate your loyalty towards yours own thoughts !!

Regarding your list article, I will defiantly work on it but the dual approach by some Wiki’s (not you) towards two democracies on this earth is very disturbing and sad. After all, it is some way or other related to how 1,210,193,422 humans living (or dying) on this planate in a dilemma that they are in a democracy. Do not take this as I am preaching you, I just expressed my thoughts. Let’s make the list in a same spirit........-- . Shlok talk . 18:18, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Your message

Thanks so much for your message. I am new at this and would love some help about COI and username policies. I do work for GuideStar, but I'm happy to change my username to LNichols1 if that's best. If I do that, can I continue down the path of updating GuideStar's Wikipedia page with information that supports the company's history, or do I need to get someone outside of GuideStar to do this? If the latter is true, I will not make any more updated to the article and will have someone else do it - I just want to do the right thing.

Thanks so much for your help.

Best, Lindsay Nichols GuideStar 202-637-7614 lnichols@guidestar.org

PS I like your hamster. Guidestar1 (talk) 16:56, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

You have a conflict of interest, but this website does not have the same standards as granting services from being a doctor or lawyer, so please continue editing. I am not suggesting that you change your behavior because you have been doing good edits, but just be conscious that this is a community space. For example, if negative publicity exists about your organization and someone puts it into the article, and your employer wants it removed despite it being from legitimate media sources, then the conflict of interest policy comes into play.
Editing the page to include Guidestar's history sounds like a great idea. The only caveat I have is to do as much as you can to incorporate third-party reviews and external press as sources for information, as Wikipedia and scholars consider external sources to be less biased than self-published ones.
Based on what your company is you seem like you would be a fantastic resource for improving Wikipedia. Wikipedia requires that information added be verifiable, and since your company is in the business of verifying the work of non-profit organizations, it seems to me that perhaps you could connect me (and the Wikipedia community) to a large amount of verified data which could be used to improve the articles for a lot of non-profit organizations. I am actually dealing with this problem, and that is why I was watching the Guidestar article.
I do recommend that you change your name because you will be a target for scrutiny until you do. Besides that, put a note on your userpage saying that you work for Guidestar, but that you plan to keep your Wikipedia account even if you cease employment with Guidestar. If you chose to use your real name, the "bureaucrat" (Wikipedia's name for a trusted class of users) will ask whether you have read WP:REALNAME. When you make a name change request [[1]], add a note after the form that you understand what you are doing.
If you have any questions about using Wikipedia, please ask me. I also will contact you by email soon to ask you about the extent to which you can direct me to any database of publicly available information about non-profits. I believe in what you are doing and I would like to give you extra attention or help on Wikipedia if you need it. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:34, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Ghulam Nabi Azad

Can you recheck the reversion of my edit to the page ?
Here is what the cited source says on the topic:

India has an estimated 2.5 million male homosexuals, according to the National AIDS Control Organization (NACO), however, advocacy groups claim the figure is much higher and impossible to accurately ascertain given that homosexuality is illegal in India. Some reports suggest that there are roughly 100 million gay, lesbian and transgender people in the country

— South India, Sarina Singh, p. 48

50.129.104.161 (talk) 21:53, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

The source is as you say above. The original version on Wikipedia said 

There are approximately 100 million gay, bisexual and transgender Indians.

Your change was to 

The National AIDS Control Organisation (NACO) estimates the number of male homosexuals in India 
to be 2.5 million, while advocacy groups say the number is much higher.

I thought some information was being lost, but now that I look again, I think your way is best and I should have checked the source better. My apologies. I reverted it. Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:58, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for looking into this and self-reverting. Unfortunately the previous version has been re-introduced by another editor; however at this stage I'll step aside and regular wikipedians handle the issue. Thanks. 50.129.104.161 (talk) 19:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Standard of living in the People's Republic of China

Please see my response to your comment at this deletion discussion. I have improved the sourcing so that it is easier to pinpoint the exact paragraphs used in the article.--Danaman5 (talk) 00:21, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Inquiry on AfDs

Hi Bluerasberry, I'm interestd in the AfDs process in Wikipedia and notice that you once involved in AfDs. I'm not sure whether you find that some discussers are admins while some are not. I'm just wondering whether you care about the adminships of the participants in deletion discussions. Does the referee's adminship affect your attitude towards the result of AfDs? Thanks. Bluesum (talk) 03:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Feel free to write me anytime with questions. I have been editing Wikipedia for a while and if I do not know the answer to something then I am sure I can help you find a good answer.
I do not care whether a person participating in an AfD is an admin, and I think most editors feel the same way. Admins have some small permissions which other users do not, and notably, most AfD discussions are ended by admins and only admins can delete articles. However, it is against the rules for any admin who has participated in a discussion to end it, so the admin ending the discussion just checks for consensus and acts accordingly.
There is not necessarily a "referee" in an AfD discussion, but sometimes the person who proposed deletion or someone who has worked on the article will take this role. I would not care if anyone refereeing an article was an admin or not, although typically, admins are people who have made more than 15,000 edits and have years of almost daily editing experience on Wikipedia, so they often are correct just because they have had a lot of experience and received a lot of feedback.
I have often disagreed with admins - sometimes I have been correct and sometimes they have been correct, or sometimes it is difficult to determine whose ideas are best. But with admins as well as most regular Wikipedia editors, generally you can expect a thoughtful response to any question to ask.
Does that answer your question? Blue Rasberry (talk) 04:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your detailed reply and explanation. I really appreciate your answer. :) Bluesum (talk) 01:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Main Page features

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Main Page features. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)


RFC/N discussion of the username "I Jethrobot"

A request for comment has been filed concerning the username of I Jethrobot (talk · contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion here. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 22:30, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Unrelated note, I like the "Howdy" message here while making this request as well as your hamster. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 22:30, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you kindly

Thank you for your support
Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. I shall endeavor to meet your and the community's expectations as an admin. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:59, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Still interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador in Seattle?

Greetings! You left a note on my talk page in response to a geonotice you surely saw on your watch page. I left a response there inviting you to respond via email, and left my email address (somewhat obfuscated). There's been no response, which is just fine, BUT...

I want you to know that we're planning a training for Wikipedia Campus Ambassadors, to take place in Seattle, quite possibly Aug. 21-22 or 28-29. All participants must have applied and been accepted by this coming Friday August 5.

So, if you're still interested, the time to act is now. Return to my talk page, retrieve that email address, and...(you can take it from here!). I do hope to hear from you. A person of your experience would be a considerable asset to the project.

Sorry, your hamster cannot apply.

Tom Cloyd (talk) 23:31, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

They dont care about us

Well who made you the man in charge here? If u only try to keep the webpage userfriendly and correctly coded, I appreciate it, though I think the lyrics should be shown in the ingress as this is the main basis of the subject.

thanks Andrè — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.210.121.78 (talk) 16:38, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for writing. Please see WP:LYRICS and read that it is a copyright violation to post the entirety of a song's lyrics in an article. Please then read WP:NOFULLTEXT to check the policy on including primary sources in Wikipedia. If you need me to explain further then write more. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Struggling

Hi, I'm sorry what I did to MSNBC, just sick and tired of attacks on Islam, and wanted to get MSNBC back. I just wanted to complain at the Islamism articles as it includes mostly Western view, and is biased as it doesn't show Islam view. 217.164.14.193 (talk) 00:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC) PS. Taliban and Al Qaeda are not islamist group

Hey, no problem. But I am glad that you recognize that what you wrote cannot stay because it is against Wikipedia guidelines. I have no opinion about whether what you wrote is true or not. Wikipedia is huge and there must be at least 100,000 other things you care about on here and which would be great articles into which you can add content to promote your philosophy. Why not contribute to articles which say good things about Islam? Let me know if I can help you in any way. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Advice needed regarding Improper content on some pages

Hello, Bluerasberry. You have new messages at Tinpisa's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Libraries

Nice suggestion, why don't you create a starter page with your library at Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle8? Also, you can share this with other Seattleite wikimeet folks at the Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Seattle7 discussion page.--Pharos (talk) 18:36, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

I am working on this right now. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:38, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Use of rollback at Mayawati

Hi Bluerasberry. FYI, your reversion here of Diannaa using rollback contravenes the terms of rollback use. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 20:26, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

You are totally correct. I should have used the "undo" function. The end result is the same, though, so I am taking no further action. I intended to revert the edit and added the reference which that user wanted. Blue Rasberry (talk) 07:16, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
No problem. We all make mistakes. I have accidentally used rollback a few times myself and it was rather embarrassing. Not a big deal though; nothing an apology couldn't fix. I'm not suggesting anything of course. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 07:28, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Well done

That was a nice touch. Well phrased too and in the spirit of Rob's cleanup. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 04:09, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Reply from Varnent

Hello, Bluerasberry. You have new messages at Varnent's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Bluerasberry. You have new messages at Varnent's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- take two

Note to self - this guy is making a worldwide LGBT resource directory and needs contact info for India. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:08, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

List of politicians in India charged with corruption

Haven't seen you adding anything on this section recently, and I hope you do. I am way too occupied unfortunately, to do anything. When I added something it was removed by Qwyrxian and I do not have any time to devote on this. So I hope you can do some good with this article if you find time. Take care.--Kijacob (talk) 16:19, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

If you think it would be efficacious then email me for a phone appointment and we can talk this through. I care about the article, but I am more interested in attracting new writers than writing myself. I cannot spend time on an article which is exclusive to anyone who wants to jump in and start adding content, and there is no consensus about the criteria for inclusion on that page. I need a lowest common denominator, and that article may not be right for me at this time. If you want to talk more, I think outside of Wikipedia is best. Let me know what you think. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

your reverts in article Mayawati‎

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mayawati#reverts_by_User:Bluerasberry please join the discussion.. further reverting will be reported. Maysara (talk) 19:38, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

I replied in that section. Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:47, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
I have reverted back to your version which represents the consensus reached at WP:BLPN. Thank you for defending consensus at the article. I also explained my actions on the Mayawati talk. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 20:25, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Online ambassador

Leaving this here as it has been a few days. You can reply here, on my talk page or via email. I would be happy to be an online ambassador for your course. Before I sign up can you give me some info on where you guys are now, what kind of support you are looking for and about how many articles you expect to see? Thanks. Protonk (talk) 19:40, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

I replied on your page. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:11, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

FYI

I've had to tag 2G spectrum scam for copyvio clean up. Most of it has been introduced much after you created the article, but it needs a thorough clean up. It's also a part of multiple CCI checks. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 16:00, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I replied on the talk page. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:11, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Videos

I responded on the talk page where you asked about video size.--ragesoss (talk) 02:25, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Oak

Re PN Oak, the fact that it is sourced is not in dispute. What matters is that it is poisoning the well, a well known concept. If we have reason to think that the author's affiliation is relevant to his/her judgement we may include that information. There are many judgement calls, for sure, but in this case I think we have a professional and respected historian commenting on a writer whose views are way beyond any mainstrwm position. Paul B (talk) 15:19, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

I understand now. Earlier in the article there is a statement that Oak campaigns against a certain kind of historian, and then at this point there is a note that one of his rival theorists is a historian of that type, and no other context is given. You are right - that should not belong. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 07:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you

Thankyou for participating in my request for adminship. Now I've got lots of extra buttons to try and avoid pressing by mistake... Redrose64 (talk) 15:53, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Bluerasberry/Archive 3! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

Hi Mr Raspberry,

The Michael Savage you refer to is unknown outside the US, and wikipedia is an international resource. Elevating one Michael Savage above others in this way is not appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hurunui99 (talk • contribs) 00:09, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

I've moved your nomination from the AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Savage (radio host) to Redirects for Discussion. Your original statement is included verbatim, but you might wish to comment further as the discussion progresses. The nomination may be found here. Best, UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 12:33, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

A short thanks

Very rusty here; its been awhile. Thank you for helping out with Kingwa Kamencu's page. - D_Katana 15.22 GMT

Thanks for creating a new page which incorporated a reference from a reliable source. If you are not rusty on that, you are off to a good start. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons

Responding to RFCs

Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 08:17, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

I responded. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:03, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Reply in regards to Chancellor Linda P. B. Katehi

Reply in regards to Chancellor Linda P. B. Katehi and a public access photo. I have supplied a link in the discussion page for her wiki article. Here is a repeat of that link as per your request. http://chancellor.ucdavis.edu/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.222.56.230 (talk • contribs) 15:00, November 21, 2011‎

Thanks for your attempt. I replied on the talk page for that article here. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:21, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Test article

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Blue Rasberry (talk) 07:18, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 03:37, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


Genome-wide association studies

Thank you for helping me with the Genome-wide association study article. I really want to make the article really good, so I was hoping to create a little more attention for it. I therefore nominated it for collaboration of the month in the genetics WikiProject. Perhaps I could convince you to help with a vote for that? --LasseFolkersen (talk) 11:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

WT:INB poll

Thanks for sorting out that fiasco. I felt that it was inappropriate for me to word a proposal because of my extensive involvement in the discussion above it. - Sitush (talk) 00:16, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Benares

You are really in Benares some of the time?
That sounds rather cool.
Varlaam (talk) 16:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Even when I am not there our research office is. If you are in the neighborhood then come visit. We are in Bhadaini (near Assi Ghat) and work with many of the local NGOs. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Inja is on the To Do list. But I'd like to go skiing in Iran first. Varlaam (talk) 19:59, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Varanasi makes a claim to be the oldest city in the world. Even if it is not the oldest, it is very old, and it will still be there when you are done skiing. Contact me after a few years when you are around. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
I thought that was Damascus.
Some years back when I was having an on-again, off-again thing with a Muslim North Indian gal, the places I most wanted to see were further to the west, Jaipur, and so on.
Your NGO work runs forward indefinitely?
Varlaam (talk) 00:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
In Hindu religion the holy books make claims that Varanasi is older than the rest of the world accepts, and many people in India will say that Varanasi is the oldest city because their religious books mention it as being around in the time of Rama 20,000 years ago. They make the claim.
I and my team have worked in Varanasi for five years and we are doing well enough to expect to be working indefinitely. Jaipur is lovely, and more tourists and travelers enjoy themselves there than in Varanasi. If you are looking for a place which is friendly to tourists, visit Jaipur. If you want to see a wilder side of India, Varanasi has that. There are more Wikipedia programs in the West because education is higher there, and also South India has Wikipedia programs which are not present yet in Varanasi. Blue Rasberry (talk) 01:56, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Expect to be consulted for expert advice in future! (Not an immediate future.)
I have a barely equivalent relationship with Mexico where I am most familiar with the tourist-free, culture-rich central area.
Thanks, Varlaam (talk) 19:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to the translation project

Drop me a note if you wish any clarification.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject OA

Hi Lane, thanks for your message. I replied on my talk page. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 11:47, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

About clinical research article

Thanks for the cup of drink.Abhijeet Safai 07:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhijeet Safai (talk • contribs) will you please expand the article further?Abhijeet Safai 12:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhijeet Safai (talk • contribs)

Now that I am aware of the existence of the article if I find sources then I will incorporate them into the article. I am doing a general expansion of articles related to clinical trials, so I am doing a literature review in this field. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

HPTN 052

Hi Lane -

Last night I edited the entry that you made for HPTN 052. I noticied that you had written that in the study, ART was given to individuals who were HIV-negative to prevent the spread of HIV. However, the study used ART to treat the HIV-positive person - and demonstrated a 96% reduction in sexual transmission. There are several studies that used antiviral medication to treat the HIV-negative person - with positive results - would you like me to point you in the direction of those studies? 2 such studies were reported on at IAS (Rome, 2011) - in the same session as HPTN 052 - so I can see how the results can be confused.

I've never written anything for Wikipedia before - do you think people would be interested in more details about HPTN 052?

I'm curious, are you a teacher? I looked at your Wikipedia profile - but I couldn't tell. I'm a scientific researcher at FHI 360 - and am a part of the HPTN 052 team.

I love the picture of your hamster - my partner and I own several cats - I haven't been able to talk her into getting chickens yet, but I'm working on it.

Take care,

Theresa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgamble (talk • contribs) 09:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much. I replied on your talk page and sent you an email. Blue Rasberry (talk) 03:55, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Right to withdraw

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Right to withdraw, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10958&page=146.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:43, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

I commented on the talk page. I am sure the bot made a mistake. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:12, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Bluerasberry/Archive_3"