User talk:Bearian/ArchivesMidOctToDec2011

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search


I do have prove of what i said yes :)

Visit thewakeupproject www.wup-forum.com and you will find all the proof you need. Additionally, Bohemian Grove is widely known to be a place for rituals where the statue of an owl is praised.If you don't believe me research - Alex Jones, the guy who blow it wide open by sneaking in and taking a video of what is going on. The footage is very weird and most importantly its TRUE!It is a secret society that uses these Kabbalah books that have been passed on for generations. That's why only the richest people in the world can have access to it and once they have been chosen and 'illumined' hence the name The Illuminati. Kabbalah is the connection to the devil. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seekingshadow (talk • contribs) 12:50, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what this is about. Bearian (talk) 18:00, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar I recently received from you. Northamerica1000 (talk) 20:59, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 October 2011


Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:01, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Placement of 'non-notability' flag on Ed Henry article

I consider your placement of a 'non-notability' flag on the Ed Henry article to be an act of vandalism. I despise Fox News. I have no respect for its correspondents. But whether I like it or not, Ed Henry is the Senior White House Correspondent for a widely watched news organization. I have to suspect your placement of the flag is not related to your appraisal his notability, but rather a reflection of your hostility towards him. I'm flabbergasted that an academic would do such a thing.Dwight Burdette (talk) 22:06, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you

Thankyou for participating in my request for adminship. Now I've got lots of extra buttons to try and avoid pressing by mistake... Redrose64 (talk) 15:48, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cuckoo clock

That's a Twinkle glitch. All you have to do is purge or do a dummy edit. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:37, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:The Musical in NYC Oct 22

Wikipedia:The Musical in NYC

You are invited to Wikipedia:The Musical in NYC, an editathon, Wikipedia meet-up and lectures that will be held on Saturday, October 22, 2011, at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts (at Lincoln Center), as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events being held across the USA.

All are welcome, sign up on the wiki and here!--Pharos (talk) 03:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 October 2011


Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: barnstars

Thanks! I really thought no one would ever agree with me except Drmies and Crusio. :P HurricaneFan25 21:57, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Though really, I don't deserve it. It was just my view, not really an idea. HurricaneFan25 21:59, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Bearian/ArchivesMidOctToDec2011! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:34, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dana Gaier

Thanks for removing the G12 from this article. As you may have noticed form my edit summary I had intended to but obviously somehow missed actually removing the tag. Dpmuk (talk) 00:58, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. Bearian (talk)
I had other concerns as well, hence the comment in the edit log about taking to Prod or AfD. I think the role in a notable film is probably enough to avoid A7 although I suspect some would disagree with me. I had left the page open in my browser as a reminder to follow up on it and I shortly will be with the speedy tagger - it looks like you've already dealt with the page creator side of things. Dpmuk (talk) 01:03, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I created my own template using WordPad for that (gentle) warning. You can use it, too. Bearian (talk) 01:09, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Message regarding the Skin (Rihanna song) deletion debate

Hello. This is a generic message that I am sending to all of the Wikipedia contributors who have aired their views on this deletion debate. Since you last contributed your perspective, the article has been significantly expanded. You may wish to change, alter or expand your argument in light of these developments at the discussion page. Thanks. SplashScreen (talk) 21:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Commons2 ‎

Like a Template:Catmore1, Template:Catmore2, Template:Commons2 is T3: Unused, redundant template: G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup. So delete Template:Commons2. Thanks in advance.--777sms (talk) 01:35, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:50, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete/userfication request: Cindy Jacobs

I notice the page for Cindy Jacobs was A7'ed. I'm trying to find out more about her, since she's considered (per New Apostolic Reformation#Criticism and Rightwingwatch.org) a leader in the "Dominionist" movement. Could I possibly have the deleted draft userfied to User:edgarde/Cindy Jacobs so I can work on a more Wikipedia-worthy version?

Since my last re-created article turned into a horrible, bloody mess, the Jacobs draft will probably reside in userspace for quite a while. / edg ☺ ☭ 12:11, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Request approved. Bearian (talk) 14:42, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 November2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:55, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Legal analysis; Copyvio? -- Reflecting National Poll Results

Inasmuch as I've linked to and characterized your comments here, as to whether there is a copyvio issue with our reflection of national poll results, I thought I should bring it to your attention. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:59, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynasty Electric

Which is why I didn't CSD it :P. I'm free to any pre-emptive closures of any AFD I make really. Alexandria (talk) 21:40, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Sophia Taylor

Hi Bearian I may be going crazy but I can't find a net presence for this person even at http://thepeerage.com/p10558.htm#i105577 which I suspect should know of her existence. Cheers Porturology (talk) 03:01, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

College Health

Hi Bearian I believe the reason I gave for deletion was importance. The article is very poorly written and I don't think it should be a stand alone article. It should probably be merged with another article. Haven't really looked into it yet, busy with real life. Don't know why that edit was from an IP; Wikipedia must have logged me out for that. Please go to my talk page to reply! Mar2194 (talk) 04:51, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:87v7t...

Hi, I saw on User talk:87v7t76fc4iguwevf7657436253yd4fug754ws67dtfugiy67t8576 that you blocked the user due to their user name. However, in light of Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple/Archive101, which is apparently approval of that user name, I believe the block may not be warranted. OCNative (talk) 11:46, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are right; see the talk page. I have already un-blocked the user. Bearian (talk) 22:15, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar. I'd never received one before! --Jtalledo (talk) 01:17, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification (for Bearian)

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Debbie Stabenow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
was linked to Libertarian

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:37, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 November 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bearian. You have new messages at Calvin999's talk page.
Message added 21:06, 15 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Calvin • TalkThatTalk 21:06, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:25, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar
For being an outstandingly good all round editor and admin. FeydHuxtable (talk) 18:12, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

YGM!

Hello, Bearian. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

ScottyBerg (talk) 03:39, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thank you

Thank you for your comment and support at my recent successful RFA. I wonder how many newbs may have been chased away though their having a lack of understanding. HAs there ever been a study? Newcomers are the renewable resource that Wikipedia needs. Anways... being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. Best, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:52, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Signpost had a study earlier this year about biting newbies and how that has affected the Project. Bearian (talk) 18:21, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Lee (musician)

Just so your aware, I nominated the article for discussion after you declined the prod. Please feel free to comment at the AfD if you want to. Hasteur (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semiotics of the Salem witch trials

Hi. A few months ago you PRODed this article. I've now taken in to AfD, so you may wish to add your thoughts to the discussion. Best, Jenks24 (talk) 07:06, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Buddy

Your user page grammar needs checking: "Wherever I personally know, or are (am) related to, a person, I try to disclose that fact". I did not think I should do it for you. --Greenmaven (talk) 05:31, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

In recognition of all your good work. Greenmaven (talk) 20:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alder Rock

hi, i see you undid the wrongful prod at Alder Rock. however, consider the google search [1]; many fewer sources than Aldorough, or Alcrossagh. this may be a candidate to delete, as opposed to those. Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 17:57, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, arguing that something else is more notable does not lessen the notability of another place. Incorporated townships are almost always notable, and I am of the opinion that even underpopulated places can be notable. Bearian (talk) 16:05, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
that's just it, when you go to the source, [2] it's not on the list of townships; apparantly, it's on the ancestryireland.com website [3]; it's on history from headstones[4]; it's not on the county template Template:County Antrim; it's not on the Images from the Geograph British Isles project photos that the others are on. Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 16:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Aha! That's a different logical argument -- you mean verifiability is at issue. Bearian (talk) 22:54, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
yes, i'm with you about the geo stubs, but given the paucity of hits, from my (cursory) search, i do doubt the existence. there's a lot of work to build those stubs out, and some of them will need to get merged; deleted as housekeeping. maybe there's a printed source. Slowking4⇔ †@1₭ 03:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

BPD thx, Law

Cheers for the Barnstar - I did a bunch of stuff on that article back in 2008 and I suspect that sentence I just reworded was partly in reaction to a point made then - about how Borderline PD has traditionally been associated with therapeutic pessimism including in the DSM, yet the research seems to counteract that to some extent as partly based on stereotypes and system issues. I was interested to see that you teach law, I was just covering the concept of sanism as developed by Michael Perlin but I don't really know what the reception of his work might have been in law circles. EverSince (talk) 13:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Belated Thank You

For the barnstar! Sorry for my late response, but I haven't been here for some time, only drifting in and out every now and then. I plan on continuing work on Bouazizi's article, hopefully toward a GA. Look forward to seeing you around the wiki! Cheers, --Al Ameer son (talk) 02:44, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

Request for your perspective on SOPA

Hi Bearian, there's currently an ongoing discussion about splitting the Stop Online Piracy Act page at Talk:Stop_Online_Piracy_Act#ONGOING_DISCUSSION_-_Splitting_the_Article. You've familiarized yourself with the entry before, and your insight and perspective on the matter would be appreciated. Hope to see you there, Sloggerbum (talk) 00:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Donald K. Ross (author)

Hi Bearian!

I created a stub on the Albany lawyer Donald K. Ross (author), with exactly one secondary source. You could do far better, I'm sure.

Cheers,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 00:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

National Archives ExtravaSCANza

You are invited to the National Archives ExtravaSCANza, taking place every day next week from January 4–7, Wednesday to Saturday, in College Park, Maryland (Washington, DC metro area). Come help me cap off my stint as Wikipedian in Residence at the National Archives with one last success!

This will be a casual working event in which Wikipedians are getting together to scan interesting documents at the National Archives related to a different theme each day—currently: spaceflight, women's suffrage, Chile, and battleships—for use on Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons. The event is being held on multiple days, and in the evenings and weekend, so that as many locals and out-of-towners from nearby regions1 as possible can come. Please join us! Dominic·t 01:09, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1 Wikipedians from DC, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Newark, New York City, and Pittsburgh have been invited.

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Bearian/ArchivesMidOctToDec2011"