User talk:All cats are british
May 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Van Province, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shadow4dark (talk) 23:25, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
It contains propaganda. Isn't it against the rules? All cats are british (talk) 23:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- It is backed by several sources.Shadow4dark (talk) 23:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
October 2021
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Anthony Fauci. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:42, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
It's a fact. He's an awful "scientist", people should know that he's a literal criminal. All cats are british (talk) 16:44, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- If you're going to make contentious claims about living people, even on talk pages, you need to include reliable sources. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:47, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Claims? That's a fact. Even the NIH admitted. But the Americans don't want to see this, people like you are trying to hide this. All cats are british (talk) 16:48, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 16:50, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notices
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:46, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
April 2022
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
she/her Ok All cats are british (talk) 00:21, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Yeah, blocking me is even odder All cats are british (talk) 00:26, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
No reason for the block tbh, but I think it's not OK to defend neutrality. I honestly don't understand westerners. All cats are british (talk) 00:28, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- You mean other than the multiple accounts and TERFy behaviour? ~TNT (talk • she/her) 00:30, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
All cats are british (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am an artist and I had provided my own creations as examples sometimes. This is just cruel and weird, because I don't think I have hurt anybody. All cats are british (talk) 00:31, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 00:39, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I defend diversity of opinions. TERFy behaviour? Are we on Twitter? Yes I have multiple accounts because I did not like the name. That's it. I'm not trying to make a secret operation or attack on anything. All cats are british (talk) 00:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Dude, I don't understand why would you block me just for not agreeing with you. That's weird and this is not Twitter. You're abusing your privileges. All cats are british (talk) 00:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bro, your edits alone were grounds for a block, the multiple account and WP:LOUTSOCKing just adds to it. Dude ~TNT (talk • she/her) 00:38, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
I see that you're obsessed with blocking random people, abuse of power.
How am I a TERF? I only have read Harry Potter's first volume. Is this it? All cats are british (talk) 00:37, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
My edits were in good faith.
And it's not a sock account, I just wanted a new username so I opened this account. Dude, you're abusing your privileges. I didn't hurt you, this was never about you. All cats are british (talk) 00:40, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- What was the weird "
she/her Ok
" comment then..? ~TNT (talk • she/her) 00:45, 20 April 2022 (UTC)- In case anyone is inclined to believe this, an example: [1] -- asilvering (talk) 06:59, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Why can't I have multiple accounts because I don't like previous one's name? That's not a valid reason. If I don't like the username, I can make a new account. All cats are british (talk) 00:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
All cats are british (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not like the username that's why I have just 2 accounts. I didn't know about the ruleAll cats are british (talk) 00:44, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you don't like your username there is a process to change it. Creating a new account without disclosing that you're doing so makes us suspicious so we block. You may not have meant anything wrong, I'll grant, but we prefer transparency in those matters. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Because I'm not used to see "she/her" in usernames. I usually see it in people's account descriptions, not names. English is not my first language, I don't understand. And how is that related? All cats are british (talk) 00:46, 20 April 2022 (UTC)