User talk:Afghan1235

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Speedy deletion nomination of Operation of Parwan (1984)

Hello Afghan1235,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Operation of Parwan (1984) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

C F A 💬 18:39, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Control copyright icon Hello Afghan1235! Your additions to Operation of Parwan (1984) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. C F A 💬 18:40, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Parwan Operation (1984)

Hello Afghan1235,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Parwan Operation (1984) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

C F A 💬 03:38, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Parwan Operation (1984) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Parwan Operation (1984). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and there doesn't seem to have been any operation of this name (though it's been used to describe Mujahideen attacks on the Soviet army). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there I put 2 source which talks about the battle and I think the name should be fine because Soviets and dra made an operation against the mujahideen but if you got other name feel free to say it Afghan1235 (talk) 10:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I put one more source feel free to check it and if you have any better names for the article tell me 2001:8003:3F8E:1F00:F875:97BD:CFC5:46C7 (talk) 10:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation of Parwan (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hey man im josh (talk) 15:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Afghan1235! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mir Ahmad Shah Rizwani into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. C F A 💬 15:41, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I didn’t copy this, This page was already made in wiki Fandom I just made this on Wikipedia Afghan1235 (talk) 00:43, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you did. The Fandom page copied the content from Wikipedia, as noted in the article: "All or a portion of this article consists of text from Wikipedia, and is therefore Creative Commons Licensed under GFDL." Whether (maybe especially if) you're taking the content from Fandom or directly from Wikipedia, you still have to correctly attribute where the content is from. You should not be copying content from random sources online without: 1) verifying the license and 2) correctly attributing the text. C F A 💬 02:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation of Parwan (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Twinkle1990 (talk) 05:45, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Ponyobons mots 20:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]