User talk:65.94.171.126

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (65.94.171.126) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Optakeover(Talk) 05:10, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Animals other than greeks

That was a nice mistake in RfD "Animals other than Greeks". I know what you meant: which is why I didn't comment there cos one or both of us will be accused of racism. I just was picturing you as a hate-filled racist calling all Greeks past and present animals and low-life. It gave be a big laugh out loud – thank you for it. Si Trew (talk) 12:33, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Humans are animals (Animalia, Cordata, Mammalia, Homo, Sapiens), it was not intended as an insult. I'll add a clarifying note. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 03:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDEX ?

In the CFD for Crosslink pages you refer to WP:INDEX. Could you clarify what you mean ? DexDor (talk) 04:53, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, sorry about that. Portal:Contents/Indexes -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:01, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kenny Casey has been accepted

Kenny Casey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

(t) Josve05a (c) 12:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC curd (disambiguation) was accepted

curd (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e deckertalk 13:01, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC curds and whey was accepted

curds and whey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e deckertalk 13:05, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Kingsman (disambiguation) was accepted

Kingsman (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Armbrust The Homunculus 23:59, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Moon Palace (disambiguation) was accepted

Moon Palace (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:56, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On Syngman Rhee

Hello! I think that it is cultural imperialism to denote South Koreans' name by U.S. style which writes family name back. Please add your comment to my comment in Talk:Syngman Rhee.NiceDay (talk) 08:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Barison was accepted

Barison, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e deckertalk 05:31, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Barrison was accepted

Barrison, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e deckertalk 05:31, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fix on Beef Jerky (song)

I'm telling you on your talk page because unfortunately, IPs cannot be thanked directly. So, thanks! Steel1943 (talk) 16:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 03:57, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RCrB (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! 65.94.171.126, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mangshan has been accepted

Mangshan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Euro league has been accepted

Euro league, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European league (disambiguation) has been accepted

European league (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:07, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Special Investigations Unit (disambiguation) has been accepted

Special Investigations Unit (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:21, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Special Investigations Division has been accepted

Special Investigations Division, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

The redirect barnstar
Thank you for your participation at RfD discussions. I greatly appreciate your contributions. Keep up the good work! TheChampionMan1234 08:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 12:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Special Investigations has been accepted

Special Investigations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LukeSurl t c 10:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Special Investigations Bureau has been accepted

Special Investigations Bureau, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LukeSurl t c 12:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your efforts to make constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (65.94.171.126) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! LukeSurl t c 12:40, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creating an account would allow you (once auto-confirmed) to create pages without having to go via Articles for Creation. --LukeSurl t c 12:42, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beef Jerky listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Beef Jerky. Since you had some involvement with the Beef Jerky redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Made the changes you wanted, would you please reconsider your Oppose? It is now as you suggested. Hafspajen (talk) 11:05, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Er, which discussion are you referring to? -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 04:12, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thanks for your work on disambiguation In ictu oculi (talk) 06:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 06:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Proper Television has been accepted

Template:Proper Television, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: House guest has been accepted

House guest, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Together

Talk:Together_(French_band)#Requested_move_04_July_2014 implemented. If you get any more straightforward ones like that and feel that RM or tech move isn't needed, by all means drop on my Talk page. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, thanks. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 06:40, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Template:Come Dine With Me was accepted

Template:Come Dine With Me, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 08:11, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Star-world has been accepted

Star-world, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:17, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

Thank you for your comment here. As you are certainly more skilled than me bout templates, could you test this one (created by the same editor) and check if it works? It appears a blatant nonsense to me, but maybe it makes sense to you. Thanks in advance. --Cavarrone 07:39, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've no idea what that one is for, it doesn't really make any sense, since I lack the context for which it was created. I know exactly what it does, by reading the template coding, but I don't see why anyone would write it. It has some required structuring that makes it less useful in the general case (especially that Mod-Pol construct) and the names of the variables don't make it any clearer as to what this is meant for. I left the usage on the talk page, Template talk:VisualArgument -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 11:57, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, we probably lack the context to understand its sense. Many thanks for the check. --Cavarrone 12:53, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problemo, and you're welcome. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 13:44, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monkey Planet (disambiguation) has been accepted

Monkey Planet (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:42, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the conversation

Thanks for providing input @ Talk:Bio-printing. So few people add to discussions on article talk pages like this one that it is worth recognizing your participation. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 11:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Da nada, you're welcome -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 12:01, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sony Alpha 77 II

I don't edit war so you can crap on the article with your silly templates if you like. Please go learn what a "primary source" is. The source you'd prefer is a "third-party" or "independent" source, which is not the same thing as primary/secondary/tertiary sourcing. Yes, such sources are great for contentious issues. I can assure you no facts here are contentious and are all easily confirmed by third party sources. Let's leave that hassle for facts that are contended. Please also don't stick a "notability" template on an article without making any effort to see if it is notable. Of course there are third party sources on this camera. A quick Google confirms this. There is absolutely zero chance of it being deleted on those grounds. So what's your point? You've spent more effort edit warring to restore your silly templates than actually checking to see if you are right or not. The article is currently one paragraph. One source for a paragraph seems quite all right to me. It is a stub. If someone wants to expand it, then more sources will be needed. If someone wants to make a contentious claim, higher quality sources will be needed. But until someone wants to make that effort, your templates are just you crapping on someone else's work. I suppose restoring your templates makes you feel all big and righteous. If you think your templates are going to make me jump through your hoops, you're mistaken. -- Colin°Talk 22:16, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PRIMARYSOURCE Primary sources are original materials that are close to an event, and are often accounts written by people who are directly involved -- the company website is most definitely a primary source. {{notability}} is for articles that do not state their notability. Since you didn't actually say why the camera is notable, the article is lacking sources to establish notability. Your article would have failed the verification process at WP:AFC (insufficient number of sources, everything being primary sources, failure to cite notability) so I don't see why you're all hot and bothered about it. Did you want me to nominate it for deletion or something? They are cleanup tags, not deletion tags. If you have such an easy time finding additional stuff, why didn't you add that material? Afterall, that's what you're supposed to do when addressing the concerns cited in the cleanup tags. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 08:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'll respond on the article talk page. You seem to be under some misunderstanding about primary sources vs independent or third-party sources, and about the purpose of sourcing or tagging. This is a wiki. The primary aim of any editor should be to improve articles. Only where they are unable to improve the article themselves, should they drop a template on it asking for help from someone else to improve it. For example, one is unable to get hold of a book or science journal. Since it is trivial to fix the claimed sourcing issues in this article, your purpose in tagging this article is simply to make work for someone else. Which is rude. -- Colin°Talk 11:07, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1 California has been accepted

1 California, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

  ArcAngel   (talk) ) 10:22, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for the article. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RCrB concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RCrB, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RCrB

Hello 65.94.171.126. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "RCrB".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RCrB}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 19:34, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:65.94.171.126"