User talk:48JCL

From WikiProjectMed
(Redirected from User talk:48JCL public)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Gaborone task force articles

A tag has been placed on Category:Gaborone task force articles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 16:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gaborone task force has been nominated for deletion

Category:Gaborone task force has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Queen of Hearts (🏳️‍⚧️ • 🏳️‍🌈) 22:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Slowpoke Good Article Review

Thank you for taking the time out of your day to review Slowpoke (PokĂŠmon), both of us nominators appreciate it. However, are a bit confused about the lack of overall comments on the article. While we're glad our prose is apparently up to par, in my case I find it a bit odd that there were apparently no comments to be made about anything in the body bar the citations checked for the spotcheck, as well as an additional lack of comments about how we passed things such as the manual of style and overall. Additionally, your source check seems to only be checking about verifying the lead, whereas most reviews focus on verifying not only the lead, but also the rest of the body of the article. If it's not too much effort, would you be willing to leave additional comments or overall summaries of these areas in order to explain your rationale? While it may or may not affect your overall review, we do just want to ensure the review was conducted while complying with the usual Good Article review standards. We hope it isn't too much trouble. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yeah sure ill do it on the talk page 48JCL TALK 22:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, thank you :) Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 23:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:CaseOh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:CaseOh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 03:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TheTechie, it is literally a draft. Why is this tag being added? 48JCL 📲 22:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At the time of tagging, all it said was "CaseOh's grocery store". But, as an admin has declined it, I'll leave it alone. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 20:22, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously? It’s a DRAFT 48JCL 19:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CaseOh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)) Are you aware this is a draft of something the community looked into recently (especially as to sourcing) and decided to delete? The article was deleted, plus the moved draft got deleted, and a user sandbox got deleted as well as content forks. You've offered no BLP-worthy sources and only a copyvio image. Yes, this matters even in a draft. It's not an alternative space to edit with free rein. Cheers. JFHJr (㊟) 01:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
...and Deb salted this article name space with the comment "Repeatedly created A7 article". See CaseOh red templates for more deletions and moves. JFHJr (㊟) 02:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Warnings

Not sure why you replied to a notice I gave over a month ago, but I am not required to follow the exact order of the warning templates (that's why we have level 4im warnings) and users generally should warn based on the severity and amounts of vandalism. Cheers, Lynch44 (talk) 15:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh terribly sorry then. Have a nice day! 48JCL • (📲/📝) 01:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Piccadilly Page

Hi 48JCL, thanks for nominating Template:Piccadilly Page for deletion. I was thinking, instead of another 7-day discussion, it would be better to just tag the template for G8 once the MfD closes. Maybe withdraw the TfD? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 01:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flora Peel

You sent me a message saying you intended to speedily delete the page Flora Peel that I just created. I went to the page to contest this and the notice has been removed. What are you playing at? There's nothing wrong with the page or its sources and I wasn't even on Wikipedia when the previous page was deleted. Shrug02 (talk) 23:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shrug02 A. see WP:AGF, and B. it was an accident. That’s why i removed it, I kinda fucked up. Anyways bye 48JCL 23:02, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drive by fail of Mark Zuckerberg

I was surprised to see here your statement about the minimum % of contributions and position in the contributions list. Can you tell me where you got those numbers? I didn't think the GAN instructions gave any definite numbers for determining if an article was a drive by. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Christie: Pretty sure here, at first I thought it was either 10% or above 6th in authorship but I was proven wrong by BlueMoonset at World War I which then led me to QF the GA (Nom complained so I was very hesitant and g7’d the review). I got the stats here. To be fair, they didn’t really add much prose, and in fact removed more than add, which really screws up the rankings. In fact, most of the text added them. Looking in the history, their main contributions were actually just trimming stuff down and archiving sources. Cheers, 48JCL 12:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks -- I'd forgotten about that footnote. I think there are cases where it wouldn't apply so I'll probably start a conversation at WT:GAN about it. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems unfair and overly hasty to fail solely based on who nominated this for GAN. For whatever it might be worth, the nominator did consult me (a frequent contributor) beforehand. You didn't even comment on the prose, referencing, breadth of coverage, neutrality, stability, or media usage. If there are glaring issues with any of those aspects, then it definitely would've helped to elaborate on that within the review. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 13:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You might be a frequent contributor but are not a major contributor. 48JCL 13:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SNUGGUMS, you are 1.8% contributor. I am assuming MSinccc deleted much of your text. 48JCL 13:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is quite possible that user did so. Either way, your review should've assessed the article quality based on the criteria I mentioned above, which at least would give people an idea of what needs to be improved. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 13:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
48JCL, looking again at that footnote, it says "if there's no post on the article talk page" you can uncontroversially fail it. In fact Msinccc did post a note saying they'd nominated it for GAN and hoped nobody would object. Nobody did object. I think that means you should not have quickfailed it. Did you not see that note? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:47, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mike Christie, could you remove this from my reviews? I have g7d it and put the nom back up. Sorry for all the inconvenience.
Ping 48JCL 21:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That should happen automatically when someone else picks it up for review -- it'll mark your review as superseded at that point and subtract it from the count. Thanks -- I think this was probably the right move on your part; if you missed the note on the page it was an easy mistake to make, but since the nominator did ask on the talk page I think a quick fail wasn't the right choice. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Larrabee County, Iowa

On 23 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Larrabee County, Iowa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that because Larrabee County was not established, Iowa remains a state with 99 counties? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Larrabee County, Iowa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Larrabee County, Iowa), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one! Feel free to put up your articles on Wikipedia:The 50,000 Challenge.♦ Dr. Blofeld 05:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

done 48JCL 11:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk page blanking

I've reverted your restoration of content at User talk:Lionel Cristiano. Per WP:BLANKING, save for a few exceptions, editors are allowed to blank their talk page content.-- Ponyobons mots 22:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Unreferenced Botswana articles

A tag has been placed on Category:Unreferenced Botswana articles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 16:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Botswana

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Botswana you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 750h+ -- 750h+ (talk) 12:02, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red July 2024

Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • A foreign language biography does not guarantee notability for English Wikipedia.
    Check the guidelines before you start.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 14:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Welcome to the DCWC!

See a    "developing" or    "least developed" country? Write about it to earn points!

Welcome to the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest, 48JCL! The contest is now open for submissions. List your work at your submissions page to earn points. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

  • Got open nominations? List them at review requests.
  • Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
  • Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
  • New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.
  • Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open until 15 July, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Dikgosis on the 3 dikgosi monument.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dikgosis on the 3 dikgosi monument.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 01:41:45, 4 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Defaultmode42


I am requesting help to better understand which type of sources would be best suited when creating a new article. Dear 48JCL, thank you so much for reviewing this one – and I am admittedly new here. I am a researcher in the DBS field and can say with confidence that Dr. Lozano is among the top five most famous people in this field, most cited neurosurgeon world-wide, etc. In your assessment, please also see Wikipedia:Notability (academics) – in which he would check many of the boxes. To name one example, the Olivecrona award is the highest honor given to neurosurgeons, world-wide. I also did include many references that cover his work prominently (e.g. the article in the independent). But as an academic, the weight on news-stories is not as high as e.g. awards, achievements, contributions to the field, etc. To help me better understand things: Would you be able to give some examples of sources that would convince you more that Dr. Lozano is a highly notable neuroscientist? Would news-stories about him be better or citation records? Would scientific articles help? For his case, everything is available (he even inspired a Dr. House episode). Since I'm new, I just don't know what you would find most convincing. Thank you so much for further help on this!

Defaultmode42 (talk) 01:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Defaultmode42, he may be notable, but the article does not show so. It has a lot of WP:PEACOCK words in a promotional tone. Do you have a conflict of interest? Are you being paid to edit? Also, try not to use so many primary sources. You source stuff he wrote, which is not appropriate and should be in a seperate "Works" section. 48JCL 01:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, this is very helpful! I will try my best to revise as requested. I can confirm I am neither paid to edit (I am an associate professor with little time myself...) nor do I have a conflict of interest. Andres is an esteemed colleague and I was surprised to see he doesnt have a wikipedia page. Again, he is ~#1 of the entire DBS field. He was first to do in human DBS for depression and first to do DBS for Alzheimer's Disease. I very much believe this alone should qualify him to be of public interest. So I thought to take up the task and learn how I can contribute. Thanks again for your help, will try my best! Andy Defaultmode42 (talk) 14:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @48JCL – I have now resubmitted the article and tried my best to find the remaining sections you referred to w/ WP:PEACOCK wording. I hope I could catch them all. I also made sure that I dont cite "stuff he wrote" (only in the section about his most recent papers). I do refer to his google scholar and research.com pages, which are typical ways we assess scientific impact in the field. I hope that is okay, but of course happy to remove. I added a CNN link about his work in depression and an NPR story covering his work in Alzheimer's. Hopefully that helps? Thank you so much for your thought on this. Andy Defaultmode42 (talk) 14:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Defaultmode42 by calling him a colleague, it is clear you do have a conflict of interest. These sources seem to help, however the tone of the article is just a bit un-encyclopedic. I'm sure he could be accepted, you just need to take another person's biography as an example. 48JCL 14:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @48JCL! You raise an interesting point. I would call any scientist in my field a colleague. To be clear: we are not at the same university or so (I am in Boston, he is in Toronto). If working in a similar field already gives me a conflict, who would you argue should write the articles about scientists (if not people from their field)? I.e., who would have the expertise to be able to judge their work?
Again, super new here, but as a scientist, I find it pretty surprising that the impact / notability of academics seems to be measured by e.g. news articles about them. It is opposed to what the WP: Notability (Academics) says and it is opposed to how scientific impact is typically measured in the field (which would rather be based on publications or other metrics such as h-index/citations etc – these have been criticized, too, but news coverage is typically not better).
I will further work on making the article more encyclopedia like – but would say that articles seem to differ a lot. For instance, the article about Michael Fox is very brief, while the one about Ali Rezai bursts of details. I tried to make the present one a bit middle-ground between the two of them. Would you happen to be able to point me to an article you like (optimally about a scientist)? That would be of tremendous help. Thank you! Defaultmode42 (talk) 15:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Defaultmode42, Alright, seems like you don't have a conflict of interest. By the way, make sure to read WP:BIO so you understand the sourcing requirements. Cheers -- 48JCL 17:07, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@48JCL, thanks a lot! Yes, I did and as I understood it differs a bit for academics – that's why there is a different notability page (see above). Quote: "Academics
Main page: Wikipedia:Notability (academics)
Many scientists, researchers, philosophers and other scholars (collectively referred to as "academics" for convenience) are notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being the subject of secondary sources."
If you'd have a good example bio that you like I'd be happy to try and adjust the draft to that one? Or shall I resubmit once more as is? Thank you! Defaultmode42 (talk) 17:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts about the Botswana article

I saw your nomination for the Botswana article, and I figured I'd share my thoughts on it. Right now, I'm hoping to get all of its most important sub-articles to GA. Right now we're at:

My plan is to get each of these to GA one at a time, and then to rework each section of the main country's article based on what I find working on these sub-articles. I've already finished the Politics article, and I rewrote most of the politics section in Botswana's article to reflect it a while back. I'm pretty much good to go on the history article. Once it's in a state I'm happy with, I want to rewrite the main article's history section using those same sources, because right now it's really unbalanced and needs some work. Since you're also interested in this article, I wondered if you had any thoughts on this. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 04:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to get work done on Flag of Botswana in my sandbox currently, I may work on these later. I'm editing the lower tier pages because I don't have access to the Wikipedia Library. Once I get it, I'll try to work on these higher tier articles. 48JCL 14:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're also editing the highest tier one of them all, Botswana itself. I was just wondering if you wanted to keep working on that as it is, or if you wanted to get the Wikipedia Library, work on some of the higher tier articles, and then tackle the main country article using our work on those higher tier articles and make it GA or even FA quality. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also going to ping 750h+ for any thoughts on this or if there are any sections of the article that stand out while reading the article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:42, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The prehistory section firstly. I've only started reading and I've noticed significant underlinking, and the books need page numbers. 750h+ 02:43, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thebiguglyalien, I might as well work on Economy of Botswana. — 48JCL 13:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Burkina Faso at the 2016 Summer Paralympics

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Burkina Faso at the 2016 Summer Paralympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 12:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Three Dikgosi Monument

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Three Dikgosi Monument you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AlphaBetaGamma -- AlphaBetaGamma (talk) 23:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Three Dikgosi Monument

The article Three Dikgosi Monument you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Three Dikgosi Monument and Talk:Three Dikgosi Monument/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AlphaBetaGamma -- AlphaBetaGamma (talk) 04:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Three Dikgosi Monument

The article Three Dikgosi Monument you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Three Dikgosi Monument for comments about the article, and Talk:Three Dikgosi Monument/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AlphaBetaGamma -- AlphaBetaGamma (talk) 16:04, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

* Pppery * it has begun... 00:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC) * Pppery * it has begun... 00:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Haliey_Welch

Hey, I noticed you accepted this AfC Haliey Welch 7 hours ago, but my draft on the subject already existed, and was declined 17 hours ago. Further, the edit history shows and proves that my article Draft:Hailey Welch, was created first, before the draft that you accepted. Please help, as the draft you accepted was not supposed to be a candidate for AfC as my draft already existed and had been submitted. Comintell (talk) 03:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Comintell: What's your point? 48JCL 14:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know. I've come to the conclusion that what happened was permissible, and that I was wrong. The draft you accepted was written an hour after mine, and contained significant overlap, but I guess no wrong was done. I thought two competing drafts weren't allowed, and perhaps I was wrong. Comintell (talk) 20:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Technical news

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Burkina Faso at the 2016 Summer Paralympics

The article Burkina Faso at the 2016 Summer Paralympics you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Burkina Faso at the 2016 Summer Paralympics for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 17:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Three Dikgosi Monument

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Three Dikgosi Monument you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AlphaBetaGamma -- AlphaBetaGamma (talk) 03:22, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:28:48, 9 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Battybri


Hello, thanks for your help on the Dereck Joubert Wiki page. I have removed quite a bit of content that was originally taken from their website https://www.wildlifefilms.co/ and could not be cited as per the Wikipedia guidelines. I have then added citations to good-quality external sources for the other elements, with every sentence cited properly.

I have saved the update as a draft, but not resubmitted - as I thought it best to message you first and check it's up to scratch. Warm regards.

Battybri (talk) 07:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Battybri After a quick readthrough -- I checked the sources, and he has enough news sources and WP:RS sources therefore establishing his notability, however, the problem is that there are some bits of unsourced text. I would also recommend removing IMDb, as it is not reliable per WP:IMDB. He is notable, when you are done with this I will gladly copyedit it and accept. 48JCL 11:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thank you once again. I have just stripped out the IMDB citations and replaced. I also added a citation to a National Geographic page where most of the unsourced information was from. Please let me know if you need any additional edits. Battybri (talk) 13:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alright once I have access to a computer I’ll copy edit and accept it. Template:48JCLsignature 15:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dereck Joubert has been accepted

Dereck Joubert, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Template:48JCLsignature 14:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

A Barnstar!
Thanks for participating in the June 2024 backlog drive!
You scored 8 points while adding citations to articles during WikiProject Reliability's first {{citation needed}} backlog drive, earning you this cookie. Thanks for helping out!

Pichpich (talk) 21:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Three Dikgosi Monument

The article Three Dikgosi Monument you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Three Dikgosi Monument for comments about the article, and Talk:Three Dikgosi Monument/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AlphaBetaGamma -- AlphaBetaGamma (talk) 21:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Botswana

The article Botswana you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Botswana for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 750h+ -- 750h+ (talk) 07:42, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Sportsmanship Barnstar
This one was made just for you! 9t5 (talk) 20:09, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of List of World Heritage Sites in Botswana

Congratulations, 48JCL! The list you nominated, List of World Heritage Sites in Botswana, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Flag of Botswana

The article Flag of Botswana you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Flag of Botswana for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cambalachero -- Cambalachero (talk) 15:23, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for your positive attitude and constructive comments about FLCs! – Editør (talk) 14:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:48JCL"