User talk:108.178.113.114
 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.
 Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
Welcome!
|
 This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
|
|---|
| The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it. |
|
June 2017
 Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. General Ization Talk 21:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
|
December 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Radioactive contamination from the Rocky Flats Plant. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 00:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- I see you have a history of edit warring yourself. That makes sense to me, as it's usually the 'pointing finger' that is the guilty party. As you are well aware, I adjusted the original line of text at this article to account for the fact -- which you ignore and reverted, despite the accompanying citations -- that the sediment of some water supplies remains contaminated with Plutonium. So your accusation is wrong based on the clear facts. You're being hypocritical...and making false claims. --108.178.113.114 (talk) 20:28, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
References
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:56, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
If you are going to make alterations to USS Scorpion (SSN-589), please make your edits in one action. A mass of changes all within a few minutes of each other are confusing and bad practice. It appears that you have done this before on other articles. Surely you can keep and make your changes in one action? Perhaps it is also time for you to register an account, rather than hiding behind a IP. David J Johnson (talk) 23:03, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Is that your 'rule'...or wikipedia's? Please try assuming good faith -- it's clear the concept troubles you. --108.178.113.114 (talk) 16:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Epiousios. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 14:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Thank you for sharing your opinion. --108.178.113.114 (talk) 14:28, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Please review the Manual of style before adding that information again. Your addition brings the article out of compliance with the MOS. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:34, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
"highly practical"
I would indeed like sources, per WP:V. If you find reviews saying that, you can attribute that certain reviewers have said that. I don't believe non-opinion sources when describing the book use that phrase, and even if they do, whether this sort of advice is "practical" is inherently opinion that needs to be attributed. Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:24, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
As you wish. It would have been just as easy for you to Google for the same results. This is trivial, and a waste of both of our times, but so it is on Wikipedia these days.
July 2018
Your recent editing history at 12 Rules for Life shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 20:50, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
And you have time for this...how? I don't. It was a very straightforward change, and one supported by the author's very career profession. I was asked for a citation (despite the silliness of the request)...and provided one. So *this*...is nonsense. All yours. Over...and out. Good luck with that. 108.178.113.114 (talk) 21:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.