User:Colin/Introduction to Psychology, 2013

See User:Colin/A large scale student assignment – what could possibly go wrong? and User:Colin/Introduction to Psychology, Part I for the 2011 class

Since Joordens won't release the class list or article list (unlike in 2011), in order to analyse the student work, we have to spot the students. Fortunately they are remarkably easy to spot. Their assignment (if like 2011) is to add two facts to two articles, with citations.

I have identified 410 students who edited 252 articles as part of this class. The process of detection isn't perfect. There will be some students here who aren't part of this class but are almost certainly part of someone's class (because, in general, newbies don't turn up on psychology articles to add a fact citing a student textbook). But I think that nearly all of them are part of Joordens' class. There will also be others I haven't found or chose not to list because I wasn't sure. In 2011, when we had an incomplete list of students, a third of the students only edited one article and three-quarters of the articles were edited by only one student. So there's likely to be a large number of students undetected by this spider-crawl technique. Although the class has 1700 students, far fewer than that actually edited in 2011. In 2013, the proportion editing seems to be a lot higher. My guess is between 200 and 400 more students unlisted and perhaps 300 articles unlisted.

Plagiarism test

I'm going through the edits of the above alphabetical student list looking for ones where the source is the web or a freely available online journal. I'll list the edit here and comment on plagiarism (either direct copy/paste or close paraphrasing).

Update: I don't see much point in continuing this. Nearly all of the edits where I can examine the source are plagiarised. Sometimes blatant copy/paste, sometimes the punctuation and conjunctions are changed, sometimes a little more rework. But still close paraphrasing without in-text attribution. On the rare exception when the student really does attempt to write in their own words, they nearly always screw up. Which is hardly surprising since they don't really understand their subject yet. These are 1st-year undergrads doing an "Introduction to" class in a subject most of them aren't planning to qualify in. Colin°^Talk 16:03, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

• Physical attractiveness edited by 3rd-bonus (talk · contribs).

Article text

In a study that reflected the views of 700 individuals, through a series of 5 studies, 3 of which involved animated representations of people walking. The physical attractiveness perceived increased by about 50 percent when women walked with a hip sway.

Source text

The findings reflect the views of over 700 individuals who participated in a series of five studies, three of which involved animated representations of people walking. The attractiveness ratings for perceived women increased by about 50 percent when they walked with hip sway

Unattributed close paraphrasing.

• Short-term memory edited by 3rd-bonus (talk · contribs).

Article text

Many language-impaired patients make several complaints about short-term memory deficits. Several family members confirming that patients have trouble recalling previously known names and events. The opinion is supported by many studies showing that many aphasics also have trouble with visual-memory required tasks.

Source text

many language-impaired patients (like those with aphasia) complain of memory difficulties, and their families often confirm that the patients have troubles recalling previously known names and events, and learning new information. It seems that the complaints of poor memory in such patients are more significant than simply a manifestation of an underlying speech breakdown (Ween et al.,1996). The above opinion is supported by a large number of studies showing that aphasics also have problems in visual memory tasks not requiring a verbal answer.

Unattributed close paraphrasing.

• Tinnitus retraining therapy edited by AakritiKapoor (talk · contribs).

Article text

Numerous other methods have been suggested for the treatment of tinnitus, two key components directly follow from the neurophysiological model of tinnitus. One of these principles include counselling aimed at reclassification of tinnitus to a category of neutral signals, while the other includes sound therapy which is aimed at weakening tinnitus related neuronal activity.

Source text

Several other methods have been suggested for habituation of tinnitus, but in TRT two components that strictly follow the principles of the neurophysiological model of tinnitus are implemented and necessary: (1) counseling, aimed at reclassification of tinnitus to a category of a neutral signals and (2) sound therapy, aimed at weakening tinnitus-related neuronal activity

Unattributed very close paraphrasing.

• Insight-oriented psychotherapy edited by AakritiKapoor (talk · contribs).

Article text

However, the popular treatment methods used can also generate placebo insights within clients. Because patients face a lot of epistemic pressure in the therapeutic encounter, they may experience insights such as illusions, deception, or adaptive self-misunderstandings-- and it can also generate therapeutic artefacts that seem to confirm these insights.

Source text

I argue that because clients face significant epistemic pressures in the therapeutic encounter, the insight-oriented psychotherapies are highly susceptible to generating placebo insights, that is, illusions, deceptions, and adaptive self-misunderstandings that convincingly mimic veridical insight but have no genuine explanatory power. The insight-oriented psychotherapies also are highly susceptible to generating therapeutic artefacts that appear to confirm the insights acquired by clients.

Unattributed close paraphrasing

• Nathan Ackerman edited by Adamskh1 (talk · contribs).

Article text

Ackerman attended a public school in New York City. In 1929 he was awarded a B.A. from Columbia University, and in 1933 earned his M.D. from the same university. After a short spell (1933–34) as an intern at the Montefiore Hospital in New York, he interned at the Menninger Clinic and Sanitorium in Topeka, Kansas. He joined their psychiatric staff in 1935.

Source text

Ackerman attended a public school in New York City. In 1929 he was awarded a B.A. from Columbia University, and in 1933 earned his M.D. from the same university. After a short spell (1933–34) as an intern at the Montefiore Hospital in New York, he interned at the Menninger Clinic and Sanitorium in Topeka, Kansas. He joined their psychiatric staff in 1935.

Copy/paste

• Bernard Weiner edited by Adamskh1 (talk · contribs).

Article text

Education: A product of Chicago's public schools, he received his undergraduate degree in Liberal Arts from the University of Chicago in 1955 and an MBA, majoring in Industrial Relations, from the same university in 1957. Following two years of service in the U.S. Army, Weiner enrolled in a PhD program in personality at the University of Michigan,where he was mentored by John Atkinson, one of the leading personality and motivational psychologists of that era. Weiner completed his PhD from Michigan in 1963, spent two years as an assistant professor at the University of Minnesota before joining the psychology faculty at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) in 1965, where he remained active into the early 2000s.

Source text

A product of Chicago's public schools, he received his undergraduate degree in Liberal Arts from the University of Chicago in 1955 and an MBA, majoring in Industrial Relations, from the same university in 1957. Following two years of service in the U.S. Army, Weiner enrolled in a PhD program in personality at the University of Michigan, where he was mentored by John Atkinson, one of the leading personality and motivational psychologists of that era. Weiner completed his PhD from Michigan in 1963, spent two years as an assistant professor at the University of Minnesota before joining the psychology faculty at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) in 1965, where he remained active into the early 2000s.

Copy/paste

• Facial symmetry edited by Adsza (talk · contribs)

Article text

There is dispute of whether increased facial attractiveness is solely due to changes in symmetry or averageness. Experiments show that symmetry and averageness make independent contributions to overall attractiveness. Averageness remains a significant predictor of attractiveness when the effect of symmetry was excluded. The results of these experiments rejected that the attractiveness of facial configurations could be solely due to associated changes in symmetry, and strengthened the evidence that facial averageness is attractive.

Source text

Several commentators have suggested that the attractiveness of average facial configurations could be due solely to associated changes in symmetry. If this symmetry hypothesis is correct, then averageness should not account for significant variance in attractiveness ratings when the effect of symmetry is partialed out. Furthermore, changes in attractiveness produced by manipulating the averageness of individual faces should disappear when all the images are made perfectly symmetric. The experiments reported support neither prediction. Symmetry and averageness (or distinctiveness, the converse of averageness) made independent contributions to attractiveness (Experiments 1 and 2), and changes in attractiveness resulting from changes in averageness remained when the images were made perfectly symmetric (Experiment 2). These results allow us to reject the symmetry hypothesis, and strengthen the evidence that facial averageness is attractive.

Unattributed close paraphrasing

• Self-image edited by Ahmednawabi (talk · contribs)

Article text

Self images tends to change over time as an individual matures and develops, though everyone goes through a certain time where they feel unhappy or insecure about their abilities and appearance.

Source text (may not be identical to source but similar article by same author)

Self-image is not static; it changes over time as a person matures and develops according to situations in life. Everyone goes through times when they feel insecure about their appearance, abilities, or accomplishments.

Unattributed close paraphrasing

Note: Previous edit by Hira.abbasi (talk · contribs) uses same source and has same copy/paste problems.

• Cerebral hemisphere edited by Ahmednawabi (talk · contribs)

Article text

During the twentieth century a theory developed about the right and left hemisphere. It was stated that the right hemisphere and the left hemisphere had different functions. The left hemisphere dealt with verbal, rational and analytic functions. While the right hemisphere dealt with emotional, and holistic. Although recent research has revealed that each hemisphere contributes to skills, reason, emotions and more.

Source text

In the later 19th, and particularly in the 20th, century following the first callosotomy procedures of Sperry and Bogen, there arose a plethora of theories about the different functions the two hemispheres might perform, which broadly distinguished a verbal, rational, analytic left hemisphere from a visuospatially orientated, emotional, and holistic right hemisphere, though the evolutionary origin and basis of their anatomical and functional separation remained obscure. [3] Subsequent research has in any case revealed that each hemisphere contributes to language, visuospatial skills, reason, and emotion, indeed to virtually every cerebral function, suggesting that the bihemispheric structure of the brain is an anomaly.

Some attempt at rephrasing but gets one fact wrong in the process: not "a theory" but "a plethora of theories". The summary of the "recent research" is not as helpful as it might be.

Note: Once again the previous edit by Hira.abbasi (talk · contribs) uses same source and is pretty much copy/paste.

• Abnormal psychology edited by AliceYangSun (talk · contribs)

Article text

Although many behaviours could be considered as abnormal, this branch of psychology generally deals in a clinical context.

Source text

Although there is obviously a great deal of behaviour that could be considered abnormal, this branch of psychology deals mostly with that which is addressed in a clinical context.

Unattributed close paraphrasing and reworked text has poor grammar.

• Alvin Liberman edited by AliceYangSun (talk · contribs)

Article text

His idea set the agenda for fifty years of psychological research in speech perception.

Source text

Alvin Meyer Liberman (May 10, 1917 - Jan. 13, 2000) was an American psychologist whose ideas set the agenda for fifty years of research in the psychology of speech perception.

Unattributed close paraphrasing verging on copy/paste.

• Pharmaceutical drug edtted by Amalmehad (talk · contribs)

Article text

The "gray market" for cancer and other drugs has been started due to a short supply of pharmaceutical drugs. The data from a statistical graph observed shows that the wholesale acquisition price of 7 prescription drugs are better sources. The drug primarily used to treat breast cancer, called Paclitaxel costs $695 on the gray market where as the wholesaler costs about $52.78.

Source text

Due to short supply of pharmaceuticals, the “gray market” for cancer and other drugs has emerged. This data reflects the wholesale acquisition price of 7 prescription drugs compared to an alternative source. Paclitaxel, primarily used to treat breast cancer, costs $695 on the gray market compared to $52.78 through the wholesaler.

Unattributed close paraphrasing. In addition, make little sense without the chart.

• Learning edited by Amyna123 (talk · contribs)

Article text

Active learning helps develop 85% of a child's brain during the first five years of their life.

Source text

Active Learning - The AKELC nursery programme for children aged two to four years is based on the principle that the early years are the most critical in a child’s development. Scientific research has highlighted that 85 percent of brain development occurs during the first five years after birth.

Rephrased but not what the source says (which is a brochure for a school in Dubai)!

• The Personality Test edited by Chaoichen (talk · contribs)

Article text

The personality Test help individuals to define their personality in a systematic and scientific way. Psychologists use this technique to accurately and consistently measure individual personality. It can be use for assessing theories, look at the changes in personality, evaluate the effectiveness of therapy, diagnosing psychological problems and screening job candidates. There are two types of basic personality tests: self-report and projective tests. However, there are potential problems with its reliability and validity.

Source text

What Is Personality Testing? ...they assess personality, but on a much more systematic and scientific level. Personality testing refers to techniques that are used to accurately and consistently measure personality. How are personality tests used? For assessing theories. To look at changes in personality. To evaluate the effectiveness of therapy. Diagnosing psychological problems. Screening job candidates. Types of Personality Assessment: There are two basic types of personality tests: self-report inventories and projective tests. [[self-report inventories are] relatively easy to administer and have a much higher reliability and validity than projective tests.

Unattributed close paraphrasing

• Emotion edited by Cheriechoi (talk · contribs)

Article text

Another component of emotion is the behavior that are performed in conjunction with an emotion. These behaviors are constructed by the striated muscular system, which has two general types called gross behaviors of the body effected by the skeletal muscles and the so-called emotion expressions.

Source text

Another obvious descriptive component of emotion is the set of behaviors that may be performed and observed in conjunction with an emotion. These behaviors are produced by the striated muscular system and are of two general types: gross behaviors of the body effected by the skeletal muscles and the so-called emotion expressions.

Unattributed close paraphrasing

• National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research edited by CivCodex (talk · contribs)

The article text has several pages of text lifted from source e.g. this.

Massive copyright violation

• Vision edited by Crosscountry1 (talk · contribs)

Article text

Disadvantages of Visual Impairment: * Visual impairment may significantly impact an individual’s ability to participate in occupations of choice. * Common problems for children suffering with visual impairment may impact a child’s ability to meet developmental milestones, interact with their peers,learn, and play. * For an adult, visual impairment may interfere with obtaining meaningful employment, learning skills, and engaging in leisure activities. * For the older elderly, visual impairment may impede social participation, reduce the ability to remain independent with activities of daily living, and engage in activities of choice.

Source text

Visual impairment may signi?cantly impact an individual’s ability to participate in occupations of choice. Visual impairment may impact a child’s ability to meet developmental milestones, interact with their peers, learn, and play. For an adult, visual impairment may interfere with obtaining meaningful employment, learning skills, and engaging in leisure activities. For the older adult, visual impairment may impede social participation, reduce the ability to remain independent with activities of daily living, and engage in activities of choice

Unattributed close paraphrasing verging on pure copy/paste.

Students to assess

For the analysis, I'm looking at each edit and judging its qualities. Does the sentence make sense? Does it fit in this location in the article or even in the article? How good is the citation? Is the text a copy vio (copy paste portions (clauses) into Google is the easiest way to spot this, particularly if the prose is well written) -- Google will find journal text even if behind a paywall. Then look at the article history since and see if the edit was retained. If not, who removed it and why? Diffs help for the add/remove but aren't required.

This list is fairly stable and other volunteers could assess these students one at a time. Put your name against a bunch of students to indicate you are going to review them.

NOTE: If the "Plagiarism/Copyvio found" column is empty, that means the reviewer didn't check or didn't have access to the source.

User	Comment	# Edits	Duration	Reviewer	Plagiarism/Copyvio found?	Useful material added?
116ebestbus (talk · contribs)	No concerns	2	1 minute	Doc James
Ab 1234 (talk · contribs)	Doc James: First edit [1] content already present. Primary research study. Reverted by next editor. Second edit is good.[2] Colin: Second edit is too close to source. Article: Dietary restrictions are not recommended for young children; instead children should be encouraged to engage in high energy activity, minimize low energy activity and develop healthy eating habits. Source: Diet restriction is not recommended in very young children...Encourage overweight children to expand high energy activity, minimize low energy activity (screen watching), and develop healthful eating habits.	3	19 minutes	Doc James	YES
Adhiyaak (talk · contribs)	First edit adds content in the wrong spot [3] Second edits ref is to the inside net [4]	2	13 minutes	Doc James
Abraham.lee3 (talk · contribs)	First edit okay-ish [5] Ref poorly formatted. Second edit not to bad. Paraphrasing is a little difficult to figure out. [6]	4 (2)	1 day 2 hours (6 1/2 hours)	Doc James
Ageofagua8 (talk · contribs)	Edits appears okay [7]	7 (6)	1 hours 5 minutes (41 minutes)	Doc James
Aldecoar (talk · contribs)	Doc James: Okay Colin Copy/paste Article: Nevertheless, adolescence period is one of multiple transitions, involving education, training, employment and unemployment, as well as transitions from one living circumstance to another. Source: Today, however, writers are more likely to describe [adolescence] as one of multiple transitions, involving education, training, employment and unemployment, as well as transitions from one living circumstance to another.	1	0 minutes	Doc James	YES
Ap0305 (talk · contribs)	Doc James: Looks okay Colin: Key phrases copied, rewording changes meaning (e.g. the "probably" is dropped). Article: Another developmental factor for childhood/infant obesity may be due to maternal hyperglycemia, which can lead to increased glucose transport across the placenta. The increased glucose transport will cause an increased insulin secretion by the fetal pancreas which in turn will result in an increase in both the number and content of fat cells. Source: The second proposed developmental pathway to [childhood] obesity...Maternal hyperglycemia leads to increased glucose transport across the placenta and in turn to increased insulin secretion by the fetal pancreas. Insulin is adipogenic in late fetal and infant life and probably increases both fat cell number and content.	7	1 day 23 minutes	Doc James	YES
Ashleebireley (talk · contribs)	(Not sure about this one} Ref and wording inappropriate [8]	6	1 hour 41 minutes	Doc James
Anuj Kapahi (talk · contribs)	Ref to text but no page number [9] Same issue with second edit however the wording is also barely intelligible [10] Reverted	2	10 minutes	Doc James
Babbarsu (talk · contribs)	Inappropriate wording for an encyclopedia [11] and Marie Claire is not a suitable ref. Content is wrong. Second edit is unreffed [12]	2	17 minutes	Doc James
Bandit3 (talk · contribs)	User adding content to disambig [13] Wording is poor. Second edit uses a blog as a ref and of course humans are animals [14]	7	21 minutes	Doc James
Batman766 (talk · contribs)	Doc James: No ref in the edits [15] [16] Colin: Likely plagiarism. The five factors added to Decision making are listed here. Really should be attributed in-text.	2	7 minutes	Doc James	LIKELY
Buttburh (talk · contribs)	Ref to inside net [17]	2	17 minutes	Doc James
B zara (talk · contribs)	Doc James: May be okay [18] Colin: Plagiarism Article: Near the end of his life, he attended Association for Humanistic Psychology’s founding meeting in 1963 where he declined nomination as its president, arguing that the new organization should develop an intellectual movement without a leader which resulted in useful useful strategy during the field’s early years. Source: Maslow was at the Association for Humanistic Psychology's founding meeting in 1963. He declined nomination as its president, arguing that the new organisation should develop an intellectual movement without a leader. This formed a useful strategy during the field's early years"	1	0 minutes	Doc James	YES
Butterfly4444 (talk · contribs)	First edit [19] what was added is not really what the source says. Next two edits reverted as vague / meaningless [20]	4	20 hours	Doc James
BWikiUser (talk · contribs)	Edit very hard to understand and ref to inside net [21] Next statement is a little strange and to the inside net but some extra details so could probably make it out [22]	2	39 minutes	Doc James
Caitlin7211 (talk · contribs)	A strange statement [23]	1 (2)	0 minutes (1 hour 16 minutes)	Doc James
Changlo2 (talk · contribs)	No sure how this relates to prognosis [24] Second edit not to bad [25]	4	6 hours 20 minutes	Doc James
Chrikatu 20 (talk · contribs)	Doc James: Edits okay [26] Colin: Good attempt to summaries a page of information into a few sentences. Makes one possible mistake in that severity of traumatic experience isn't related to duration of amnesia but to incidences, according to the source. This would have been caught if the edit was reviewed when marked.	2	17 hours	Doc James	NO
Doctorkazooka (talk · contribs)	Doc James: Edits okay Colin: The addition uses in-text attribution for close-paraphrased text. However, the reader doesn't know who "Ghafoor" is and has no reason to care. There is no excuse for us not putting this into our own words.	3 (2)	18 minutes (47 minutes)	Doc James	NO
Djp1717 (talk · contribs)	Okay	5 (2)	9 minutes (24 minutes)	Doc James
Egglayingmonkey (talk · contribs)	A 1935 book as ref? [27] No ref in second [28]	2	1 day 6 hours 10 minutes	Doc James
Forozan n (talk · contribs)	Students first edit is PLAGIARISM [29] of [30] Reverted as such. Prolonged QT is NOT a cause of anorexia [31]	2 (5)	9 minutes (26 minutes)	Doc James	YES
Habibyum (talk · contribs)	First edit is about mice and ref is to a newpaper [32] Other edits could use better refs.	3 (3)	16 hours	Doc James
Hamhamchan (talk · contribs)	Editor reverted own edit	2	1 minute	Doc James
Hhhdltnqls (talk · contribs)	Source is primary rather than secondary [33] Okay-ish. Second edit ref is poor [34]	2	24 minutes	Doc James
Hologgraz (talk · contribs)	Primary source as ref [35] [36]	2	1 hours 38 minutes	Doc James
IanSu (talk · contribs)	Repeated addition of unsourced content [37] reverted. Other is minor wording [38]	9	1 day 23 hours	Doc James
Ijoyfulness (talk · contribs)	Changed understandable to not understandable text [39]. Changed correct numbers to incorrect numbers [40] Ie VANDALISM	2	8 minutes	Doc James
Jasvinei (talk · contribs)	Ref good. Wording a little hard to understand [41]	1	0 minutes	Doc James
Jathiban (talk · contribs)	Okay minor edits	3	11 minutes	Doc James
Jayykub13 (talk · contribs)	First edit unreffed [42] second edit broke formatting and ref to inside net [43] To top it off it is PLAGIARISM from [44]	2	10 minutes	Doc James	YES
Jenneilson (talk · contribs)	In this edit [45] they state 5 year olds when paper is about grade 5 students. Study mentions "overweight" however student confused with "obesity". Also primary source Crevix removed	5	13 minutes	Doc James
Jessy3149 (talk · contribs)	Reworded a correlation as a cause [46] Otherwise appears okay. Used a review article.	7	26 minutes	Doc James
JCLU8694 (talk · contribs)	Added content to wrong spot in this edit [47] Appears to be from here [48]	3 (5)	3 hours (2 1/2)
Jhwithsh (talk · contribs)	(1) Added useful link to "See also" section. (2) Added duplicate link to "See also" section. Deleted by Flyer22.	2	6 minutes	Anthonyhcole		(1) Yes (2) No
Jp271 (talk · contribs)	(1) Added duplicate information using slang ("puke") and non-MEDRS source. Reverted by Arctic Kangaroo. (2) Added wrong information ("Childhood obesity is the cause of not getting enough physical activity...") and duplicate information. Reverted by Cresix.	2	1 hour 33 minutes	Anthonyhcole		No
J.hermans9 (talk · contribs)	(1) Added mostly duplicate information, citing intranet link. Anthonyhcole deleted 29 words, retained one. (2) Added good content, 1952 source. Persists. (3) Added good content with poor (intranet) citation. Persists.	3 (3)	13 minutes (36 minutes)	Anthonyhcole		Yes
Karandeep39 (talk · contribs)	(1) Added good, relevant unsourced copy-paste plagiarism from anxietycentre.com (2) Added serious misinterpretation of the findings of a single double blind trial. Reverted by Icarus of old.	3	4 hours 20 minutes	Anthonyhcole	Yes	No
Kangaroo91 (talk · contribs)	[49] Unfathomable meaning. Citing 1939 book. Adding article content to a disambiguation page. Reverted by User:Johnmperry after 34 hours. Added unfathomable text to Attribution (psychology). Reverted by Colin. Added more unthathomable text to Motivated forgetting. Reverted by Anthonyhcole.	4	6 days	Anthonyhcole/Colin		No
Killinan (talk · contribs)	(1) Added 2 sentences about a small (classic) 34 year-old prospective study. Good paraphrasing, good expression, relevant. (I checked against current sources that the info' is still current.) Persists. (2) Added irrelevant non sequitur to lede. Deleted by Looie496	3	42 minutes	Anthonyhcole	No	(1) Yes (2) No
Kookiemonstur (talk · contribs)	Added useful content with a well-formatted (classic, seminal 1967) citation. Expression needs clean-up. Reverted by Icarus of old.	1	0 minutes	Anthonyhcole		Yes
Lanchenshenghui (talk · contribs)	Added valueless verbiage to lede citing 1954 book, no page number. Rejected by Jeremy.Hebert.	1	0 minutes	Anthonyhcole		No
Leshawnantoine (talk · contribs)	Added redundant definition of the topic. Deleted by Anthonyhcole Added irrelevant factoid to a disambiguation page. Deleted by Johnmperry	2	35 minutes	Anthonyhcole		No
LulzGoat (talk · contribs)	Looks fine to me.(T) Me too. (A) Added two apposite facts with good sources and good cites.	2	19 minutes	Tryptofish Anthonyhcole	No	Yes
Marsh180 (talk · contribs)	Added a section to Ablative brain surgery on epilepsy. This had synthesis of sources, plagiarism and incorrect facts. Removed by Colin. Added a source to Bulimia nervosa but it wasn't a neutral source and was removed by Dawnseeker2000.	3	1 day 5 hours	Colin	YES
Mistry123 (talk · contribs)	(1) Added irrelevant content to a disambiguation page. Deleted by Wtmitchell (2) Added meaningless verbiage, citing 800 page textbook with no page number.	2	26 minutes	Anthonyhcole		No
Mr.wonderful234 (talk · contribs)	Added content addressing "men and women" to article about adolescents with useless citations. Persists.	1	0 minutes	Anthonyhcole		No
MustafaKanchwala (talk · contribs)	Added a fact on epilepsy to the epileptic seizure article. Sourced to intranet so useless cite. Added a section "Predicting Epileptic Seizures". The short paragraph is, apart from the first few words, a direct copy-paste of the abstract of PMID 12849542, though again the source give is an intranet address. Removed by Fvasconcellos as a copyvio. Added a fact to Childhood obesity that is in the wrong place (not a long-term health effect) and already covered in the right place. Removed by LovaFalk.	2	24 minutes	Colin	YES
MSvarichKnights (talk · contribs)	First edit not sure if should be here [50] Not sure what this really means [51]	2 (3)	17 minutes (1 hour 9 minutes)	Doc James
Nataliexhochoy (talk · contribs)	First edits I am having difficulty with [52] Second edit adds errors [53]	4	2 hours 15 minutes	Doc James
NatashaSav (talk · contribs)	Minor edits [54] [55]	3	19 minutes	Doc James
Nicsch8 (talk · contribs)	First edit [56] poorly worded. Second edit unreffed [57]	5 (2)	23 minutes (45 minutes)	Doc James
N.bakr (talk · contribs)	Editor put content in the wrong spot [58] It was also poorly referenced. Reverted by Cresix. Second edit [59] involves some close paraphrasing of the source [60] and the ref is poorly formatted.	3	4 hours 55 minutes	Doc James	YES
Parisbesosxo (talk · contribs)	Users first edit [61] based on a primary study of 36 people [62] and put in the wrong part of the article. Second addition also poorly sourced [63]	4	22 minutes	Doc James
Pinemelon (talk · contribs)	First edit ref to inside net [64] Second edit no ref [65]	3	22 minutes	Doc James
Prabanan (talk · contribs)	First edit to a disambig page [66] with no ref and reverted by CluBot (good bot). User readded [67], was reverted and readded a third time with a ref. Next edit [68] uses page number 13.7 and writing style is strange. Ref does not function. No one fixes.	4 (4)	15 minutes (27 minutes)	Doc James
Psy02-2013 (talk · contribs)	First edit COPY AND PASTE [69] ref poor quality and reverted. Second edit same [70] but not reverted.	2	22 minutes	Doc James	YES
PSYCHOLOGYA0ONE (talk · contribs)	Added a cohort study [71] edit removed. Second edit [72] non encyclopedic tone. Ref is to the companies website.	3	17 minutes
Pwellpeng (talk · contribs)	First edit okay [73] Second edit minor formatting issues [74]	4	41 minutes	Doc James
Ramen-18 (talk · contribs)	First edit [75] minor formatting issues. Second edit same	2	1 hour 25 minutes	Doc James
Rongyiji (talk · contribs)	User placed content on a disambig page [76] No ref provided. User tried second time. Edits reverted.	4	2 hours 44 minutes	Doc James
Rosita3310 (talk · contribs)	Student reverted own first edit. Second edit appears okay [77]	3	43 minutes	Doc James
Roseahmed (talk · contribs)	First edit does not really make sense [78] link to inside net but could probably figure it out. Next edit [79] is PLAGIARISM from the source in question [80] Still in article. Third edit [81] does not make much sense and removed in next edit.	5 (6)	21 minutes (8 days)	Doc James	YES
Rosesandchocolate (talk · contribs)	First edit [82] ref to inside next. Second edit contains link to inside net [83]	2	52 minutes	Doc James
SaganaJ88 (talk · contribs)	Edit adds content already in the article and poorly formatted breaking the page in question [84]. Reverted in next edit by Flyer22	1	0 minutes	Doc James
Smelendez93 (talk · contribs)Thekratoskilla	Two edits okay [85] [86]. Both use popular press and add details about people.	2 (3)	3 hours 23 minutes (5 hours 57 minutes)	Doc James	NO	YES
Snowyfebsak (talk · contribs)	First edit [87] links to inside net but enough info to figure it out. Second edit ref to inside net [88] but enough data. User tried again with better results [89]	3 (2)	33 minutes	Doc James
Swayne pencil (talk · contribs)	First edit repeats the same thing twice. Is already stated in the article and uses a newpaper as a ref.[90]. Reverted in next edit. Second edit person added content in a middle of a reference [91] and sentence is difficult to understand. I reverted	5	28 minutes	Doc James
Slimfaiz (talk · contribs)	First edit links to inside net and content in the wrong spot.[92] Second ref to inside net [93]	2	29 minutes	Doc James
Student944 (talk · contribs)	First edit okay [94]. Second edit contanis a properly formatted reference [95]	2	1 day 8 hours	Doc James
S.digiallo (talk · contribs)	Ref is good but does not appear to support the content added [96]. Was removed in next edit as placed in an inappropriate spot. Second edit is unclear [97]	4	14 minutes	Doc James
TessXu (talk · contribs)	In first edit user COPY AND PASTED from [98] but did not change the ref to the new source [99] First edit is PLAGARISM even if source is public domain. Second edit is PLAGIARISM [100] with content copied from [101]	6	3 hours	Doc James/Colin	YES
Tonykaka (talk · contribs)	First edit not to bad [102]. It is primary research though and poorly formatted. Second edit was a COPY AND PASTE [103] from [104] Ref given but poorly formatted.	3	55 minutes	Doc James	YES
Twtpoppy (talk · contribs)	Added a sentence to Epileptic seizure that was impenetrable nonsense. The citation was good. Removed by Colin. Added a sentence to Self-control theory of crime. The sentence repeats some of what is already covered. Was lifted copy-paste from the source. Removed by Colin.	2	91 minutes	Colin	YES
Unigirl02 (talk · contribs)	First edits [105] link to inside net. Removed in next edit. Second edit [106] uses primary research to support poor written content. As article was getting such a high number of poor quality edits from different editors related to this class it was semi protected by User:Nikkimaria	6	43 minutes	Doc James
Vaal77 (talk · contribs)	Added content that was already in the article with a link to the U of T inside net [107] Edit reject by User:Icarus of old. Second edit may be [108] Still linked to inside net and ref not properly formatted. Ref may be the wrong paper.	4	9 hours	Doc James
Vivian155 (talk · contribs)	This edit [109] rejected as a random comment. The next edit [110] doesn't really say much.	2	13 minutes	Doc James
Wiki753 (talk · contribs)	This edit [111] more or less adds duplication of the sentence above it. Reverted by next editor. Second edit appears okay [112]. Not sure if already covered.	2 (3)	11 minutes (15 minutes)	Doc James
Xxamyvvu (talk · contribs)	First edit very poorly formatted [113] and removed. Second was also very poorly formatted and was placed in the middle of another sentence which two other editors fixed.[114]	3	18 minutes	Doc James
Yekaiut (talk · contribs)	First edit placed content in wrong spot at end of article [115]. Some links to inside net used. Missing page numbers for books. Removed in next edit as duplicated what the article already said. Second edit also placed at end of article. Written in inappropriate tone. [116] PLAGIARIZED from here [117] Removed in next edit.	2	31 minutes	Doc James	YES
YWikiUser (talk · contribs)	First edit uses link to U of T inside net [118] As did the second edit [119]	2	32 minutes	Doc James
ZahedahS (talk · contribs)	Added another cause of seizures (cancer patients). Sourced to intranet with useless cite. Language is childish. Fact already present in the article. Removed by Fvasconcellos. Added a fact to Coping (psychology) that reads like the blurb off a self-help book and inappropriate for a serious psychology article. Removed by Colin.	2 (3)	16 minutes (61 minutes)	Colin

Students being assessed by Mike Christie

I've separated these out so my assessments don't edit conflict with other edits; I suggest other editors consider doing the same. I'll move these back up when done. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

User	Comment	# Edits	Duration	Reviewer	Plagiarism or copyvio or close paraphrase found?	Useful material added?
Petersie879 (talk · contribs)	Added a sentence to aphasia taken directly from "February 20, 1992. Damasio A.R. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:531-539"; I removed it as copyvio. Also made a harmless minor edit to the same article. Added but then immediately removed a sentence from cognitive dissonance; then made a harmless minor edit. Made a minor edit to the dab page for commitment -- could have reverted per WP:DABNOT but decided it was harmless. Added a sentence to childhood, no ref given in the text but the edit summary gave the ref as "Psychology (2nd edn) textbook", which is useless; from other students' work it appears this is "Schacter, Daniel L., Daniel Todd. Gilbert, and Daniel M. Wegner. Psychology. New York, NY: Worth, 2011." Checked in Google Books and the edit is an acceptable rephrase.	7	1 hour 19 minutes	Mike Christie	Yes	Yes
Shivarni93 (talk · contribs)	Added a paragraph on morphemes and phonemes to the lead. Sourced correctly, and the material was acceptably paraphrased though a little too close to the original for my taste; still, the student had clearly worked to re-present the material. I removed it as inappropriate detail for the lead; note posted to the talk page to suggest that this or similar material might be usable lower down the article. Added material on Broca's aphasia and Wernicke's aphasia to aphasia; some attempt made to paraphrase the source, but I removed it as close paraphrase.	2 (3)	19 minutes (12 minutes)	Mike Christie	Yes	No
UTSCJonii (talk · contribs)	Fixed a minor layout error in alcohol abuse. Added a couple of words to aphasia; unsourced but probably OK, though incorrectly capitalized.	2	6 minutes	Mike Christie	No	Yes
HassiniUofT (talk · contribs)	Added material from "February 20, 1992. Damasio A.R. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:531-539"; can't see enough of the article to tell if it's plagiarized or not. The additions were removed by Lova Falk as redundant. Added a couple of sentences to stress (psychological) from "Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D, Miller GE. 2007. Psychological stress and disease. JAMA. 298(14):1685-1687"; new text partly removed by Lova Falk, but one sentence that looks useful and properly cited remains.	3	10 minutes	Mike Christie	Can't tell	Yes
Meowpsych (talk · contribs)	Added a phrase to a sentence that was already cited, making it appear that the new material came from that source; also added a paragraph cited to "Contemporary Linguistic Analysis" with no further citation data, containing material that mostly repeated information already in the article. Both removed by Lova Falk.	1	0 minutes	Mike Christie	Can't tell	No
Luluchan04 (talk · contribs)	Added a useful sentence to aphasia with a citation to a U of T URL. Added poorly written sentence cited to U of T URL; subsequently rewritten by Lova Falk.	2	6 days	Mike Christie	Can't tell	Yes
Fatbatpsya02 (talk · contribs)	Added a sentence to axon cited to a U of T URL. Removed by Looie496. Added a sentence to behavioural confirmation cited to a U of T URL but also giving the journal: "Gruman, Jamie A. and Ariganello, Mellisa (2002). Behavioural Confirmation of the Loneliness Steretype. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(2)."	3	1 hour 4 minutes	Mike Christie	Can't tell	Yes
Jht94 (talk · contribs)	Added a sentence to axon cited to a U of T URL but also to "Waxman, S.G., J.D. Kocsis, and P.K. Stys. "The Axon : structure, function, and pathophysiology." Oxford University Press. 15. (1995): 692. Web. 22 Mar. 2013." Page 692 not visible in Google Books preview; poorly worded so probably not straight copy/paste. Addition reverted soon afterwards as a poor quality edit. Added a marginally useful sentence to motor skill from "Eran, D, and G.C. Leonardo. "Neuroplasticity Subserving Motor Skill Learning." Elsevier Inc.. (2011): 443-454."; can't check the source.	2 (4)	5 hours 40 minutes (3 hours 20 minutes)	Mike Christie	Can't tell	Yes
10kimbeu (talk · contribs)	Added material from an unreliable source to sex differences in humans; rephrased so badly that it became meaningless. I removed it. Added three sentences to B.F. Skinner; inappropriate content, including copy/paste from source (which was incompletely cited just as "Psychology. ; Second Edition. (2010)"Chapter 9: Language and Thought" Worth Publishers, Incorporated"). I removed it.	3	40 minutes	Mike Christie	Yes	No
Sidra.s91 (talk · contribs)	Added a couple of sentences to Belmont report. In wrong place and can't check the source; moved the material to a slightly better location in case someone else can find a use for it. Added material to Black Intelligence Test of Cultural Homogeneity; unable to check source.	4	1 hour 34 minutes	Mike Christie	Can't tell	Yes
Congee1 (talk · contribs)	Copyedited Black Intelligence Test of Cultural Homogeneity; no access to source. Added several sentences to kinetic depth effect cited to "Wallach, H., & O'Connell, D. N. (1953). The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45(4), 205-217. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0056880"; no access to source.	2 (4)	1 hour (2 days)	Mike Christie	Can't tell	Yes
Lenaathi (talk · contribs)	Added a sentence to self-actualization cited to "Smith, M. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 1990. Santa Cruz: Sage Publications, 1990"; can't check the source. Added material to mnemonic cited to ""Long-term effects of mnemonic training in community-dwelling older adults"]"Journal of Psychiatric Research", October 2007" via a U of T URL; can't check the source.	4	46 minutes	Mike Christie	Can't tell	Yes
Leungw24 (talk · contribs)	Added a sentence cited to "Smith, W. 2001. Revisiting the Belmont Report. The Hastings Center Report, Vol 31 (2) 5"; I found a very similar sentence in "Respect for the Elderly: Implications for Human Service Providers edited by Kyu-tak Sŏng and Bum Kim" on Google Books, so it may be mis-cited -- I can't check the cited source. I think I know what the student intended to say, but the partial rephrase made the meaning so vague that I removed the sentence. Added a sentence taken almost verbatim from this web page; reverted as poor quality edit by Lova Falk.	2	18 minutes	Mike Christie	Yes	No
Psyyea (talk · contribs)	Added a sentence to Belmont Report cited to Vollmer/Howard, Sara/George (December 2010). "Statistical power, the Belmont report, and the ethics of clinical trials". Science and Engineering Ethics. 16 (4): 681.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link); can't check source. Added a sentence to countercontrol cited to Carey/Bourbon, Timothy A/W Thomas (September 2006). "Is Countercontrol the Key to Understanding Chronic Behavior Problems?". Intervention in School and Clinic. 42 (1): 5–13. doi:10.1177/10534512060420010201.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link); can't check source. Colin: Note the Belmont Report sentence says "According to Vollmer and Howard, the Belmont Report ..." so has in-text attribution. But this is utterly inappropriate style for the article (especially the lead). The reader will rightly ask "who on earth are Vollmer and Howard and why should I care what they say?". This is academic writing style.	5 (6)	42 minutes (3 hours)	Mike Christie	Can't tell	Yes
Hereforpsych (talk · contribs)		2	12 minutes	Mike Christie
5MLH5 (talk · contribs)	5 (1)	11 hours
Being Time (talk · contribs)	6 (2)	6 hours (13 minutes)
Triplusfineliner (talk · contribs)	3	23 minutes
Faiza93 (talk · contribs)	8	4 days
Aliyass3 (talk · contribs)	2	7 minutes
Noor.leghari (talk · contribs)	2 (4)	57 minutes (17 hours)

More students to assess

User	# Edits	Duration	Comment	Reviewer
Walshale (talk · contribs)	3	22 hours 30 minutes	Edit refs are primary sources [120] [121]	Doc James
Smartieslol123 (talk · contribs)	2	1 hour	Edits looks good [122]	Doc James
Bramsubick (talk · contribs)	2	2 days	material directly copied from this source; I have reverted as blatant plagiarism	Go Phightins!
Veelieu (talk · contribs)	3	3 hours	edits look OK	Go Phightins!
Steefy2794 (talk · contribs)	6	14 days	edits look fine	Go Phightins!
Punish3r227 (talk · contribs)	7	58 minutes	Though the edits were rather quote heavy, they were cited, so I will say that they are probably OK	Go Phightins!
Carlos.nag (talk · contribs)	1	0 minutes	Good	Go Phightins!
Thatscrazyish (talk · contribs)	2	22 minutes	edits have been cleaned up by other editors, but not because of plagiarism or anything of the like	Go Phightins!
GawtamT (talk · contribs)	2	3 minutes	edits look good	Go Phightins!
YeungD (talk · contribs)	4	12 days	edit to Logopenic progressive aphasia appears to be copied from a letter in this article; have reverted second edit is extremely close paraphrasing...that one I have cleaned up third edit was simply adding a source, fourth edit is copied, and I have reverted	Go Phightins!
Alikhaider (talk · contribs)	2	54 minutes
Apkn (talk · contribs)	3 (2)	6 days (1 day)
Rkrmq719 (talk · contribs)	1	0 minutes
Deer101 (talk · contribs)	2	10 hours
Tumblinggirl (talk · contribs)	4 (2)	21 minutes (20 minutes)
Galgegod (talk · contribs)	4	39 minutes
Afewum (talk · contribs)	9	20 hours
Hahatheirony (talk · contribs)	4	17 days
Jerald1994 (talk · contribs)	2	6 minutes
Shambika (talk · contribs)	2	27 minutes
SSM17 (talk · contribs)	4	21 hours
ArtemisDSII (talk · contribs)	2	59 minutes
Kalerina (talk · contribs)	4	4 minutes
Rochelleerika (talk · contribs)	4 (13)	4 hours 10 minutes (1 hour 17 minutes)
Yelenaaa (talk · contribs)	1	0 minutes
Nadesal6 (talk · contribs)	2	9 minutes
Leader180 (talk · contribs)	3	20 minutes
Youn94 (talk · contribs)	2	0 minutes
Yiris (talk · contribs)	1	0 minutes
Letseducateourselves (talk · contribs)	3	27 minutes
Muchogarrett7 (talk · contribs)	4 (2)	24 minutes (15 minutes)
Maurae7 (talk · contribs)	2	56 minutes
Scizor 99 (talk · contribs)	6 (1)	5 hours 10 minutes (0 minutes)
Haykuhi8 (talk · contribs)	3	7 minutes
Jorthi (talk · contribs)	2 (2)	34 minutes (12 minutes)

Yet More Students

270 more students

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Learning&diff=546053536&oldid=545892478 142.1.81.79 (talk · contribs) (University of Toronto IP) "Learning will increase brain knowledge" -- added to the lead paragraph of Learning citing the student textbook. Was reverted in less than a minute. 十六夜咲夜 (talk · contribs) 123editwikiacc (talk · contribs) 3rd-bonus (talk · contribs) AakritiKapoor (talk · contribs) AarthigaS (talk · contribs) Abiramy1 (talk · contribs) Adamskh1 (talk · contribs) Adsza (talk · contribs) Ahmednawabi (talk · contribs) ajevan (talk · contribs) Alberto198 (talk · contribs) "Without memory, people will forget many things" -- added to the lead of Memory citing Sperling, G (1963). "A Model for Visual Memory Tasks". This lasted 2 minutes before being reverted. Alegesam (talk · contribs) AliceYangSun (talk · contribs) Allaroundtheworld123 (talk · contribs) Alukane (talk · contribs) Amalmehad (talk · contribs) Amyna123 (talk · contribs) Anetta773 (talk · contribs) Anita zh (talk · contribs) Anna Zoe (talk · contribs) Anna9348 (talk · contribs) Anum27 (talk · contribs) Areihof (talk · contribs) ArgieG (talk · contribs) ARScience4 (talk · contribs) Asalmahmoudian (talk · contribs) Asdf89108 (talk · contribs) Austlove58 (talk · contribs) B.emmanuel (talk · contribs) Balasu40 (talk · contribs) Barrie99 (talk · contribs) Bigbangvip (talk · contribs) ButterflyEffect101 (talk · contribs) C7H5N3O6 TQ (talk · contribs) Caterpillar10 (talk · contribs) Cct881 (talk · contribs) Chansant (talk · contribs) Chaoichen (talk · contribs) Chengnuoli (talk · contribs) Cheriechoi (talk · contribs) Christmas 12 (talk · contribs) Chuntingchan (talk · contribs) Chunyanweng (talk · contribs) CivCodex (talk · contribs) Clahoonya (talk · contribs) Crella09 (talk · contribs) Crosscountry1 (talk · contribs) CrunchyCandy (talk · contribs) Cxhelali (talk · contribs) DanielMark23 (talk · contribs) Daniielle.Hiiggs (talk · contribs) Darreniaf (talk · contribs) Deedeerocks123 (talk · contribs) Deeders123 (talk · contribs) DianeDD (talk · contribs) Dineshhi (talk · contribs) Dlcd3250 (talk · contribs) Dongshil (talk · contribs) Doy2325 (talk · contribs) Ealphonse (talk · contribs) Emma610 (talk · contribs) Enocheng (talk · contribs) Erindal (talk · contribs) EunGi (talk · contribs) Fahim.nehan (talk · contribs) Faith766 (talk · contribs) Feras1994 (talk · contribs) Freshrice424 (talk · contribs) Gaurang2904 (talk · contribs) Gavinyuen (talk · contribs) Gfredalldayeveryday (talk · contribs) Gyuwiki (talk · contribs) Haha654321 (talk · contribs) Hakimashari (talk · contribs) Hannanin (talk · contribs) Happyieyangyiwen (talk · contribs) Hellodur (talk · contribs) Hira.abbasi (talk · contribs) Hira2024 (talk · contribs) Honeybooboooo (talk · contribs) HShafs (talk · contribs) Hussain5654 (talk · contribs) HY1416 (talk · contribs) IceCappp (talk · contribs) Icecream01 (talk · contribs) Imanlegro (talk · contribs) Intehan (talk · contribs) Ishwarsinghmann (talk · contribs) Islahay (talk · contribs) Jaane123 (talk · contribs) Jamary (talk · contribs) Jasmera (talk · contribs) Jasmine523 (talk · contribs) Jem-24 (talk · contribs) Jenniwey (talk · contribs) Jennnytruongg (talk · contribs) JHewitt88 (talk · contribs) Jimmysnack (talk · contribs) Joey6000 (talk · contribs) Joymariesyw (talk · contribs) Jsandov16 (talk · contribs) Jsjs0437 (talk · contribs) Jsw6408 (talk · contribs) Junzisaac (talk · contribs) Kalatha4 (talk · contribs) KAYLOVEDIL (talk · contribs) Kcheung92 (talk · contribs) Kevinlai318 (talk · contribs) Kjnn321 (talk · contribs) Kkyf (talk · contribs) Knowll (talk · contribs) Kogakoga11 (talk · contribs) Koolaidrain12 (talk · contribs) Lasimon1 (talk · contribs) Laurayuer (talk · contribs) Leivicto (talk · contribs) Leo Ted (talk · contribs) Leungk48 (talk · contribs) Lilkid3194 (talk · contribs) Littlexbird (talk · contribs) Lovelove555 (talk · contribs) Luan2012 (talk · contribs) Luluzou (talk · contribs) Ma2013 (talk · contribs) MaieshaR (talk · contribs) Majsupreme (talk · contribs) Mak68 (talk · contribs) Mariakhandaker (talk · contribs) Mashaovsy (talk · contribs) MattsGoleafsGo (talk · contribs) Maybellline18 (talk · contribs) Mazlinak (talk · contribs) Md324 (talk · contribs) Mehakrs (talk · contribs) Mickjon (talk · contribs) Mmzzhh (talk · contribs) Momtha25 (talk · contribs) Msandford (talk · contribs) MsTumnus101 (talk · contribs) MusicisBodyMind&Soul (talk · contribs) Nabz phoenix (talk · contribs) NashrahHH (talk · contribs) NatTactikz (talk · contribs) NewBeginning111 (talk · contribs) Ngalexan (talk · contribs) Nguye770 (talk · contribs) Nguye823 (talk · contribs) Nighteleven (talk · contribs) Nonakhakimova (talk · contribs) Nottellin1234 (talk · contribs) Nss09 (talk · contribs) Ntsang18 (talk · contribs) Nukelz13 (talk · contribs) Omar.nawabi (talk · contribs) Optimisticprime (talk · contribs) Ost789 (talk · contribs) Party Vario (talk · contribs) Patelr26 (talk · contribs) Persytps (talk · contribs) Pirandella (talk · contribs) Pirapakris (talk · contribs) Pmistry6 (talk · contribs) Pmit09 (talk · contribs) Pochi93 (talk · contribs) Poodlelover18 (talk · contribs) Prajapatiparth23 (talk · contribs) Psy.S.S (talk · contribs) Psya01h3sarsar (talk · contribs) Psya01kwong (talk · contribs) Psych.student44 (talk · contribs) PsychoART20 (talk · contribs) Psychology1994 (talk · contribs) Psychologyisthebest (talk · contribs) Psychologystudent04 (talk · contribs) Psychstudent11 (talk · contribs) Psychwiki13 (talk · contribs) Psyedit13 (talk · contribs) PsyGirl29 (talk · contribs) Psyreadings (talk · contribs) PsyStdy (talk · contribs) PuppyLover16 (talk · contribs) Pure cloud (talk · contribs) Purplefanta1109 (talk · contribs) Quixoticalee (talk · contribs) Rajbhagat2 (talk · contribs) Rajkum30 (talk · contribs) Raluca27 (talk · contribs) Raptorsfanutsc (talk · contribs) Raspberrycream (talk · contribs) Raymattwiki (talk · contribs) Razahabi (talk · contribs) Redskill13 (talk · contribs) Rheadsouza (talk · contribs) Rimapaul ls (talk · contribs) Rita0215 (talk · contribs) S.amari94 (talk · contribs) Sabzii (talk · contribs) Safdarma (talk · contribs) SailorMoonLover4Life (talk · contribs) Sajjadjaffery (talk · contribs) Samahkhan (talk · contribs) Samuel1928 (talk · contribs) Sanafatani (talk · contribs) Sanaiq (talk · contribs) Shabojano (talk · contribs) Shadow1008 (talk · contribs) Shajevan (talk · contribs) Shalinisood (talk · contribs) ShanieRam (talk · contribs) Sharmini9 (talk · contribs) Sidrooj (talk · contribs) Sij321 (talk · contribs) Silkroses123 (talk · contribs) Simplesp (talk · contribs) Sisicatherine (talk · contribs) Sivana246 (talk · contribs) Sj lee613 (talk · contribs) Sjstud (talk · contribs) Skrshnn (talk · contribs) SMA2012 (talk · contribs) Snakewolf (talk · contribs) Snorkelling (talk · contribs) Soccer1818 (talk · contribs) Soniafungg (talk · contribs) Spidegrant (talk · contribs) Sports33 (talk · contribs) Stacy.samuel22 (talk · contribs) Studentjessica (talk · contribs) Sunshine0001 (talk · contribs) Superman540 (talk · contribs) Surajena (talk · contribs) Suyixuan (talk · contribs) Tangy28 (talk · contribs) TasneemMaster (talk · contribs) Tellthemwhoiwillbe (talk · contribs) Thambiap (talk · contribs) Thanusharamya16 (talk · contribs) Thatscherry (talk · contribs) Thekratoskilla (talk · contribs) Thirumaran13 (talk · contribs) Trending12 (talk · contribs) Trixsz459 (talk · contribs) Uoft201 (talk · contribs) Utsc45012pr (talk · contribs) Utsc93 (talk · contribs) Utsc94 (talk · contribs) Utscecc (talk · contribs) UTSCholar (talk · contribs) Vafaeva (talk · contribs) Victoria2013 (talk · contribs) Violet202 (talk · contribs) Vythili2 (talk · contribs) W852 (talk · contribs) Waleedmaraj (talk · contribs) Wft09830210 (talk · contribs) Wikiwikiyan (talk · contribs) Wxndxty (talk · contribs) Wyan1990 (talk · contribs) Wyh0930 (talk · contribs) Xgy94 (talk · contribs) Xowe (talk · contribs) Xultimatepro (talk · contribs) Yoonchae (talk · contribs) Yossofz (talk · contribs) YoungWarlock (talk · contribs) Yunus siddiqui4 (talk · contribs) Yyz2del (talk · contribs) Zhangz72 (talk · contribs) Zoethekitten (talk · contribs) Zoyaburey (talk · contribs)