Template:Did you know nominations/Domestic violence in China
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Overall: 
I did some copyediting and added links to most of the journal articles that didn't have them. I don't have access behind the paywalls that block most of them, but the abstracts support the claims made in this article (and one or two can be read in full for free). I approve the submission with the ALT1 hook. (This is my first review, so if I've missed something, I'd welcome input from someone more experienced!) -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 18:41, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 04:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Domestic violence in China
... that, according to a 2005 survey, 1 out of 5 women had suffered from domestic violence in China within the previous year?
- Comment: Source of the hook can be found in the introduction paragraph.
5x expanded by Patriqueliu (talk). Self-nominated at 20:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC).
- Comment: I bolded the title. Howkafkaesque (talk) 18:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Patriqueliu I don't think the current hook wording is correct, as it reads it suggests that 1 out of 5 of ALL women had been subject to domestic violence in China, I assume it is supposed to refer to 1 in 5 Chinese women - Basement12 (T.C) 14:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that, according to a 2005 survey, 1 out of 5 women in China had suffered from domestic violence within the previous year? SSTflyer 03:13, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Full review needed now that hook is set. (Struck original hook per above.) BlueMoonset (talk) 14:48, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Review:
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: None required. |
I did some copyediting and added links to most of the journal articles that didn't have them. I don't have access behind the paywalls that block most of them, but the abstracts support the claims made in this article (and one or two can be read in full for free). I approve the submission with the ALT1 hook. (This is my first review, so if I've missed something, I'd welcome input from someone more experienced!) -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 18:41, 1 June 2016 (UTC)