Talk:Zoetis

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:Tsaag_Valren's edits

User:Tsaag_Valren added the following section: "Business with bloodfarms" and wrote "Zoetis has been supplying equine chorionic gonadotropin (ECG) hormones to Syntex, in South America, since 2015[1] : Syntex is accused for animal cruelty[2][3]."

Note that he cites only personal blogs (milkpoint.com.br), and animal rights activist websites, instead of credible, mainstream, media outlets. He has reverted my excision of this material once, so this should be monitored. Obviously if the claims can be corroborated from something other than random blogs and activist sites, they should be included. If they can't, they shouldn't. Inoculatedcities (talk) 16:37, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only one source was a blog. The 2 others ones are very reliables :
Activist websites are *not* credible sources. If this is so widely recognized, it should be trivial to find a mainstream news source reporting the same claims.Inoculatedcities (talk) 16:46, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

November 2013

The item on Zoetis contains a hyperlink to Microtek, one of the companies bought by Zoetis in 2010. The hyperlink takes the reader to the wrong Microtek. The hyperlink should be removed.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zoetis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sections

XyZAn I would like to start a discussion about your revert of my edits to the article. You cited "Restore IPO content" but if you actually look at the article, it was not removed. I wrote the IPO section in the first place when I created the article. However, overtime the sections had become improperly laid out as described in WP:MOS. For example there shouldn't be a new subsection for every year when all that's included is a single sentence. I re-ordered and consolidated the layout while still including the IPO section and removed WP:PRIMARY sources. Press releases from the company should be avoided especially when there are WP:ADVERT problems with the article. Mkdwtalk 17:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]